STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term clinical and radiographic complications between iliac screw (IS) and S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation techniques in the adult and pediatric populations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic fixation with lumbosacral implants is in widespread practice with numerous indications. Several techniques for spinopelvic fixation have been described in the literature. Although the iliac screw technique is widely practiced, it presents several challenges, including the use of connectors, more lateral surgical dissection, and some complaints of pain over the posterior pelvis. The S2AI method has recently been proposed as an alternative technique that minimizes these complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 65 adult patients (43 IS, 22 S2AI) and 55 pediatric patients (40 IS/unit rod, 15 S2AI) in a consecutive series who underwent spinopelvic fixation. Acute, spinopelvic implant-related, and delayed complications, including persistent pain over the gluteal region occurring longer than 3 months postoperatively, were recorded from both clinical and radiographic encounters. Statistical analyses were performed among the adult and pediatric group, respectively, as well as a pooled cohort. RESULTS: The adult cohort found an 18.6% absolute risk reduction (ARR) in implant loosening (P=0.029) and a 21.1% ARR (P=0.05) in late pain with the S2AI method. In the pediatric population, the S2AI method demonstrated a 22.2% ARR (P=0.049) in both occurrence of revision surgery secondary to spinopelvic implant failure and late pain. In the pooled cohort, the S2AI method had a 13% ARR (P=0.033) in acute infections, 18.1% ARR (P=0.003) in implant loosening, 14.5% ARR (P=0.009) in revision surgery, 18.7% ARR (P=0.015) in late pain, and a 10.8% ARR (P=0.031) in delayed wound issues. CONCLUSIONS: The S2AI technique is associated with significantly less clinical and radiographic complications in both the pediatric and adult populations when compared with the iliac screws technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. OBJECTIVE: To compare short-term clinical and radiographic complications between iliac screw (IS) and S2 alar-iliac (S2AI) screw fixation techniques in the adult and pediatric populations. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Pelvic fixation with lumbosacral implants is in widespread practice with numerous indications. Several techniques for spinopelvic fixation have been described in the literature. Although the iliac screw technique is widely practiced, it presents several challenges, including the use of connectors, more lateral surgical dissection, and some complaints of pain over the posterior pelvis. The S2AI method has recently been proposed as an alternative technique that minimizes these complications. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the charts of 65 adult patients (43 IS, 22 S2AI) and 55 pediatric patients (40 IS/unit rod, 15 S2AI) in a consecutive series who underwent spinopelvic fixation. Acute, spinopelvic implant-related, and delayed complications, including persistent pain over the gluteal region occurring longer than 3 months postoperatively, were recorded from both clinical and radiographic encounters. Statistical analyses were performed among the adult and pediatric group, respectively, as well as a pooled cohort. RESULTS: The adult cohort found an 18.6% absolute risk reduction (ARR) in implant loosening (P=0.029) and a 21.1% ARR (P=0.05) in late pain with the S2AI method. In the pediatric population, the S2AI method demonstrated a 22.2% ARR (P=0.049) in both occurrence of revision surgery secondary to spinopelvic implant failure and late pain. In the pooled cohort, the S2AI method had a 13% ARR (P=0.033) in acute infections, 18.1% ARR (P=0.003) in implant loosening, 14.5% ARR (P=0.009) in revision surgery, 18.7% ARR (P=0.015) in late pain, and a 10.8% ARR (P=0.031) in delayed wound issues. CONCLUSIONS: The S2AI technique is associated with significantly less clinical and radiographic complications in both the pediatric and adult populations when compared with the iliac screws technique. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
Authors: Tarik Alp Sargut; Nils Hecht; Ran Xu; Georg Bohner; Marcus Czabanka; Julia Stein; Marcus Richter; Simon Bayerl; Johannes Woitzik; Peter Vajkoczy Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2022-06-30 Impact factor: 2.721
Authors: Matteo Panico; Ruchi D Chande; Derek P Lindsey; Ali Mesiwala; Tomaso Maria Tobia Villa; Scott A Yerby; Enrico Gallazzi; Marco Brayda-Bruno; Fabio Galbusera Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2021-09-25 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Parth Kothari; Sulaiman Somani; Nathan J Lee; Javier Z Guzman; Dante M Leven; Branko Skovrlj; Jeremy Steinberger; Jun Kim; Samuel K Cho Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-02-01
Authors: Zachary T Sharfman; Yaroslav Gelfand; Priyam Shah; Ari J Holtzman; Joseph R Mendelis; Neel Shah; Jonathan Krystal; Reza Yassari; David C Kramer Journal: Spine Surg Relat Res Date: 2020-03-31
Authors: Wataru Ishida; Benjamin D Elder; Christina Holmes; Sheng-Fu L Lo; C Rory Goodwin; Thomas A Kosztowski; Ali Bydon; Ziya L Gokaslan; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Daniel M Sciubba; Timothy F Witham Journal: Global Spine J Date: 2017-08-30