| Literature DB >> 34964273 |
Shuhei Takizawa1,2, Ryoki Asano3, Yasuhiro Fukuda1, Yasunori Baba4, Chika Tada1, Yutaka Nakai3.
Abstract
Treatment with rumen fluid improves methane production from non-degradable lignocellulosic biomass during subsequent methane fermentation; however, the kinetics of xylanases during treatment with rumen fluid remain unclear. This study aimed to identify key xylanases contributing to xylan degradation and their individual activities during xylan treatment with bovine rumen microorganisms. Xylan was treated with bovine rumen fluid at 37°C for 48 h under anaerobic conditions. Total solids were degraded into volatile fatty acids and gases during the first 24 h. Zymography showed that xylanases of 24, 34, 85, 180, and 200 kDa were highly active during the first 24 h. Therefore, these xylanases are considered to be crucial for xylan degradation during treatment with rumen fluid. Metagenomic analysis revealed that the rumen microbial community's structure and metabolic function temporally shifted during xylan biodegradation. Although statistical analyses did not reveal significantly positive correlations between xylanase activities and known xylanolytic bacterial genera, they positively correlated with protozoal (e.g., Entodinium, Diploplastron, and Eudiplodinium) and fungal (e.g., Neocallimastix, Orpinomyces, and Olpidium) genera and unclassified bacteria. Our findings suggest that rumen protozoa, fungi, and unclassified bacteria are associated with key xylanase activities, accelerating xylan biodegradation into volatile fatty acids and gases, during treatment of lignocellulosic biomass with rumen fluid.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34964273 PMCID: PMC9151333 DOI: 10.1111/1751-7915.13988
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microb Biotechnol ISSN: 1751-7915 Impact factor: 6.575
Fig. 1Chemical characteristics of xylan degradation during treatment with the rumen fluid.
A. Total solids (TS) content.
B. TS degradation rate.
C. Reducing sugars.
D. VFAs.
E. pH.
F. Carbon dioxide and methane gas production. Multiple comparisons were conducted using the Tukey–Kramer method. Different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).
Fig. 2Principal coordinate analysis of genus‐level microbial communities (A) and COG involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism (B) based on Bray–Curtis dissimilarities. Values in parentheses represent the amount of variation explained by each coordinate.
Genus‐level microbial community during treatment of xylan with the rumen fluid.
| Relative abundance (% of total abundances at each time point) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 h | 6 h | 12 h | 24 h | 48 h | |
|
| |||||
|
| 26.05 ± 3.05cd | 42.76 ± 0.74a | 18.66 ± 0.48d | 30.12 ± 0.54bc | 35.57 ± 1.86ab |
|
| 0.83 ± 0.05c | 1.25 ± 0.02c | 13.15 ± 0.42a | 10.24 ± 0.54a | 6.94 ± 1.06b |
|
| 0.52 ± 0.01b | 0.51 ± 0.02b | 0.34 ± 0.05b | 8.27 ± 3.89ab | 17.12 ± 2.30a |
|
| 3.11 ± 1.05a | 3.50 ± 0.49a | 2.40 ± 0.61a | 4.14 ± 1.33a | 5.05 ± 1.20a |
|
| 3.83 ± 0.12ab | 3.73 ± 0.25b | 5.61 ± 0.61a | 1.56 ± 0.18c | 1.55 ± 0.18c |
|
| 3.99 ± 0.10a | 2.49 ± 0.10ab | 3.10 ± 0.32ab | 1.30 ± 0.52b | 3.10 ± 0.40ab |
|
| 1.65 ± 0.01b | 1.90 ± 0.16b | 7.16 ± 0.35a | 1.19 ± 0.20bc | 0.48 ± 0.02c |
|
| 1.43 ± 0.06ab | 3.34 ± 0.53a | 1.72 ± 0.45ab | 2.08 ± 0.25ab | 1.37 ± 0.15b |
|
| 1.36 ± 0.16b | 1.75 ± 0.29ab | 1.64 ± 0.27ab | 2.76 ± 0.12a | 1.70 ± 0.24ab |
|
| 0.02 ± 0.01b | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.13 ± 0.08b | 3.90 ± 1.02a | 1.84 ± 0.25ab |
|
| 1.33 ± 0.02b | 1.08 ± 0.01b | 1.73 ± 0.04a | 0.68 ± 0.11c | 0.53 ± 0.05c |
|
| 0.21 ± 0.01a | 0.29 ± 0.06a | 0.66 ± 0.08a | 3.08 ± 1.16a | 0.33 ± 0.06a |
|
| 0.48 ± 0.01a | 1.03 ± 0.01a | 0.70 ± 0.00a | 0.68 ± 0.17a | 0.82 ± 0.15a |
|
| 0.44 ± 0.09b | 0.65 ± 0.17b | 0.64 ± 0.00b | 1.33 ± 0.01a | 0.64 ± 0.08b |
|
| 0.11 ± 0.01b | 0.35 ± 0.08b | 3.03 ± 0.74a | 0.08 ± 0.01b | 0.05 ± 0.02b |
|
| 0.70 ± 0.13ab | 0.65 ± 0.05b | 1.33 ± 0.06a | 0.31 ± 0.06b | 0.55 ± 0.21b |
|
| 0.69 ± 0.12ab | 0.66 ± 0.11ab | 1.18 ± 0.04a | 0.46 ± 0.20b | 0.34 ± 0.07b |
|
| 0.38 ± 0.02b | 0.53 ± 0.04b | 0.39 ± 0.07b | 0.86 ± 0.03a | 0.44 ± 0.03b |
|
| 0.52 ± 0.00a | 0.49 ± 0.01a | 0.59 ± 0.02a | 0.31 ± 0.03b | 0.64 ± 0.05a |
|
| 0.38 ± 0.02a | 0.45 ± 0.09a | 0.50 ± 0.04a | 0.65 ± 0.15a | 0.54 ± 0.01a |
|
| |||||
|
| 13.67 ± 2.12a | 4.25 ± 0.69b | 1.16 ± 0.06b | 0.91 ± 0.72b | 0.21 ± 0.02b |
|
| 4.92 ± 2.13a | 2.30 ± 1.68a | 0.19 ± 0.10a | 0.13 ± 0.06a | 0.01 ± 0.00a |
|
| 4.11 ± 0.90a | 0.92 ± 0.31b | 0.83 ± 0.03b | 0.10 ± 0.05b | 0.02 ± 0.01b |
|
| 1.08 ± 0.37a | 0.83 ± 0.06a | 3.13 ± 2.23a | 0.09 ± 0.06a | 0.07 ± 0.02a |
|
| 2.41 ± 1.40a | 0.08 ± 0.00a | 0.24 ± 0.06a | 0.09 ± 0.08a | 0.02 ± 0.02a |
|
| 0.61 ± 0.11a | 0.74 ± 0.57a | 0.70 ± 0.55a | 0.18 ± 0.17a | 0.12 ± 0.00a |
|
| 0.49 ± 0.48a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
|
| 0.17 ± 0.02a | 0.13 ± 0.03a | 0.16 ± 0.07a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
|
| 0.01 ± 0.00a | 0.25 ± 0.25a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
|
| 0.07 ± 0.01a | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.00 ± 0.00b |
|
| |||||
|
| 0.26 ± 0.00a | 0.09 ± 0.00b | 0.04 ± 0.00c | 0.01 ± 0.00d | 0.00 ± 0.00d |
|
| 0.11 ± 0.05a | 0.04 ± 0.01a | 0.05 ± 0.04a | 0.00 ± 0.00a | 0.00 ± 0.00a |
|
| 0.06 ± 0.00a | 0.02 ± 0.01ab | 0.00 ± 0.00b | 0.01 ± 0.01b | 0.00 ± 0.00b |
Top 20 bacterial genera, top 10 protozoal genera, and top 3 fungal genera are shown. All data represent the mean ± standard error. Multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey–Kramer method, and different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).
Fig. 3Shifts in functional COG involved in carbohydrate transport and metabolism during xylan treatment with the rumen fluid. Top 20 COG are shown, and other COG are included in the category “other.” All values represent the mean of two reactors.
Fig. 4Change in functional COG related to xylan degradation during treatment with the rumen fluid.
A. Beta‐1,4‐xylanase (EC: 3.2.1.8).
B. Predicted xylanase.
C. Beta‐xylosidase (EC: 3.2.1.37). Multiple comparisons were performed using the Tukey–Kramer method, and different letters indicate a statistically significant difference (P < 0.05).
Fig. 5Xylanase activity of rumen microbial community during xylan degradation. The pH during zymography of xylan treatment at 0, 6, 12, 24, and 48 h was 7.3, 5.7, 5.2, 4.6, and 4.6 respectively (see Fig. 1). Twenty microliters of protein extract were loaded on an 8% polyacrylamide gel containing 1.0% (w/v) xylan from beechwood, and incubations for xylanase zymography were performed at 37°C for 6 h. Gel images were cropped from different parts of the same gel.
Fig. 6Correlations of xylanase activities with relative abundances of ruminal microorganisms. Square color and size represent the correlation coefficient; blue shading represents a positive correlation, red shading represents a negative correlation, and a larger square represents a stronger correlation, whereas a smaller square represents a weaker correlation. *P < 0.05. Top 15 bacterial genera, top 10 protozoal genera, and top 3 fungal genera are shown.
Correlation of dominant microorganisms in this study and their function.
| Genus | This study | Previous study | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Positive correlation | Reported xylanolytic function | Reference | |
|
| |||
|
| Not significant | Production of wide range of xylanases | Matsui |
|
| Negative | Transcription of hemicellulases | Dai |
|
| Not significant | Transcription of hemicellulases | Dai |
|
| Negative | Production of several xylanases | Saluzzi |
|
| Negative | Presence of xylanase activity | Sawanon |
|
| Not significant | Predominant xylan degrader | Palevich |
|
| Not significant | Encode of xylanases | Palevich |
|
| Negative | Production of beta‐ | Lasrado and Gudipati ( |
|
| Not significant | Utilization of xylosaccharides | Okazaki |
|
| Not significant | Fermantation of xylose | Copeland |
|
| Not significant | Production of several xylanases | Béra‐Maillet |
|
| |||
|
| Total, 34, 85 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| 200 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| Total, 34, 180 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| 200 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| Total, 24, 34, 85 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| 24 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| 24 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| |||
|
| 24 kDa | Presence of xylanase activity | Takenaka |
|
| 24, 85 kDa | Presence of xylanase activity | Wereszka |
|
| 24 kDa | Xylanases of 26, 32, 38, and 52 kDa | Devillard |
|
| 180 kDa | No gas production from xylan | Takenaka |
|
| Total, 34, 180 kDa | Xylanases of 26, 42, and 54 kDa | Béra‐Maillet |
|
| Total, 85, 180 kDa | Presence of xylanase activity | Takenaka |
|
| 200 kDa | Presence of xylanase activity | Takenaka |
|
| 24 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
|
| |||
|
| 24, 85 kDa | Production of xylanases | Krause |
|
| 24, 85 kDa | Production of xylanases | Krause |
|
| 24 kDa | Xylanolytic activity has been unclear. | – |
Fig. 7Summary of xylanase degradation suggested in this study.