| Literature DB >> 34960693 |
Willian P Paim1,2, Mayara F Maggioli1, Shollie M Falkenberg3, Akhilesh Ramachandran4, Matheus N Weber5, Cláudio W Canal2, Fernando V Bauermann1.
Abstract
Bovine serum has been widely used as a universal supplement in culture media and other applications, including the manufacture of biological products and the production of synthetic meat. Currently, commercial bovine serum is tested for possible viral contaminants following regional guidelines. Regulatory agencies' established tests focused on detecting selected animal origin viruses and are based on virus isolation, immunofluorescence, and hemadsorption assays. However, these tests may fail to detect new or emerging viruses in biological products. High-throughput sequencing is a powerful option since no prior knowledge of the viral targets is required. In the present study, we evaluate the virome of seven commercial batches of bovine serum from Mexico (one batch), New Zealand (two batches), and the United States (four batches) using a specific preparation and enrichment method for pooled samples and sequencing using an Illumina platform. A variety of circular replicase-encoding single-stranded (CRESS) DNA families (Genomoviridae, Circoviridae, and Smacoviridae) was identified. Additionally, CrAssphage, a recently discovered group of bacteriophage correlated with fecal contamination, was identified in 85% of the tested batches. Furthermore, sequences representing viral families with single-stranded DNA (Parvoviridae), double-stranded DNA (Polyomaviridae and Adenoviridae), single-stranded RNA (Flaviviridae, Picornaviridae, and Retroviridae), and double-stranded RNA (Reoviridae) were identified. These results support that high-throughput sequencing associated with viral enrichment is a robust tool and should be considered an additional layer of safety when testing pooled biologicals to detect viral contaminants overlooked by the current testing protocols.Entities:
Keywords: bovine serum; diagnostic; surveillance; viral metagenomics
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34960693 PMCID: PMC8705701 DOI: 10.3390/v13122425
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Viruses ISSN: 1999-4915 Impact factor: 5.048
Summary of sequences retrieved in the commercial batches of bovine serum that matched with eukaryotic viruses.
| Sample Type a | No. of Raw Reads | % of Viral/Non-Viral Reads | Best BLASTN Hit b | Non-Assembled Reads c | Assembled Reads | Contig Length Range (nt) | Contig Identity d | Genome Coverage e |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBS1 MEX | 772,754 | 0.004/99.996 | Bovine parvovirus 3 | 18 | 4 | 181–311 | 93.7% | 28.2% |
| Bovine polyomavirus 1 | 2 | 1 | 205 | 99.0% | 4.7% | |||
| Moloney murine leukemia virus | 12 | 1 | 206 | 99.5% | 3.3% | |||
| FBS2 USA | 1,538,378 | 0.117/99.882 | Bovine parvovirus 2 | 1138 | 43 | 107–1904 | 97.7% | 100% |
| Bovine parvovirus 3 | 3 | 1 | 219 | 89.0% | 8.6% | |||
| Bovine polyomavirus 1 | 660 | 21 | 106–2250 | 100% | 99.4% | |||
| Bovine viral diarrhea virus 1 | 5 | 2 | 129–180 | 93.0% | 2.5% | |||
| Bovine viral diarrhea virus 2 | 6 | 2 | 151–224 | 94.7% | 2.4% | |||
| NCS1 USA | 3,157,462 | 0.453/99.546 | Bovine bocaparvovirus 2 | 878 | 16 | 122–3110 | 100% | 88.2% |
| Bosavirus | 1806 | 34 | 101–3021 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine hokovirus 1 | 41 | 4 | 120–2179 | 5.0% | 46.9% | |||
| Bovine hokovirus 2 | 39 | 1 | 395 | 98.1% | 45.6% | |||
| Bovine kobuvirus | 4 | 2 | 151–207 | 95.4% | 4.4% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 1 | 8 | 1 | 420 | 96.0% | 12.8% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 2 | 11,470 | 297 | 101–2552 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 3 | 67 | 13 | 113–623 | 97.7% | 59.2% | |||
| Cyclovirus Equ1 | 4 | 2 | 103–209 | 100% | 17.5% | |||
| Feces associated gemycircularvirus 14 | 2 | 1 | 192 | 97.4% | 9.4% | |||
| Gopherus associated genomovirus 1 | 2 | 1 | 181 | 82.3% | 10.1% | |||
| Mongoose feces-associated gemycircularvirus b | 2 | 1 | 181 | 86.2% | 8.2% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus 21 | 2 | 1 | 246 | 93.3% | 6.2% | |||
| Porcine associated porprismacovirus 10 | 2 | 1 | 151 | 88.7% | 5.7% | |||
| NCS2 NZ | 2,806,994 | 35.240/64.759 | Bosavirus | 18 | 4 | 157–411 | 100% | 26.7% |
| Bovine parvovirus 2 | 44 | 11 | 281–1951 | 86.0% | 25.3% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 3 | 989,123 | 7700 | 100–2471 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine rotavirus A | 5 | 2 | 113–157 | 97.3% | 7.7% | |||
| Starling circovirus | 2 | 1 | 188 | 95.2% | 9.1% | |||
| NCS3 NZ | 1,082,206 | 2.081/97.918 | Bovine bocaparvovirus 2 | 4 | 1 | 245 | 100% | 5.0% |
| Bosavirus | 20,458 | 365 | 100–2050 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine adenovirus 4 | 4 | 2 | 103–147 | 99.3% | 0.8% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 2 | 2002 | 232 | 101–1370 | 96.6% | 100% | |||
| Bovine polyomavirus 1 | 10 | 2 | 141–221 | 100% | 8.6% | |||
| Bovine rotavirus A | 4 | 1 | 298 | 95.3% | 9.0% | |||
| Feces associated gemycircularvirus 14 | 10 | 3 | 190–238 | 99.6% | 37.7% | |||
| Feces associated gemycircularvirus 16 | 2 | 1 | 140 | 92.1% | 6.3% | |||
| Gopherus associated genomovirus 1 | 2 | 1 | 200 | 79.0% | 9.2% | |||
| Human rotavirus A | 4 | 1 | 103 | 96.1% | 4.0% | |||
| Mongoose feces-associated gemycircularvirus a | 2 | 1 | 176 | 80.7% | 8.4% | |||
| Mongoose feces-associated gemycircularvirus b | 22 | 4 | 387–571 | 99.2% | 88.2% | |||
| Sewage-associated gemycircularvirus 3 | 2 | 1 | 162 | 98.8% | 7.6% | |||
| NCS4 USA | 1,099,344 | 0.021/99.978 | Bovine hokovirus 1 | 2 | 1 | 233 | 88.6% | 4.6% |
| Bovine kobuvirus | 2 | 1 | 203 | 94.1% | 2.5% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 2 | 217 | 26 | 149–1679 | 98.4% | 100% | |||
| Bovine polyomavirus | 6 | 2 | 115–233 | 97.6% | 13.0% | |||
| Bovine serum-associated circular virus | 4 | 1 | 370 | 92.0% | 73.0% | |||
| Genomoviridae sp. ctca367 | 2 | 1 | 119 | 96.6% | 5.4% | |||
| BCS1 USA | 1,035,018 | 41.878/58.121 | Bovine adenovirus 6 | 6 | 2 | 280–282 | 98.9% | 2.9% |
| Bovine hokovirus 1 | 34 | 7 | 107–184 | 100% | 15.3% | |||
| Bovine hokovirus 2 | 15,009 | 93 | 105–1418 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 2 | 149,979 | 3733 | 100–2888 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bovine parvovirus 3 | 268,265 | 3569 | 100–2574 | 100% | 100% | |||
| Bo-Circo-like virus CH | 6 | 1 | 149 | 100% | 3.8% | |||
| Circovirus sp. PoCirV VIRES YN02 C2 | 3 | 1 | 334 | 91.3% | 31.1% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus 21 | 12 | 3 | 132–252 | 95.5% | 14.4% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus 22 | 13 | 1 | 192 | 88.5% | 4.9% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus 41 | 3 | 1 | 191 | 93.6% | 6.5% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus S20 | 7 | 1 | 262 | 96.5% | 38.9% | |||
| Po-Circo-like virus GX19 | 11 | 1 | 480 | 90.2% | 12.2% |
a Sample type: fetal bovine serum (FBS), newborn calf serum (NCS), and bovine calf serum (BCS). Serum origin: Mexico (Mex), New Zealand (NZ), and the United States of America (USA). b Analysis performed in BLASTN (E-value < 1 × 10−5). c Number of read sequences obtained by mapping to the virus RefSeq database (NCBI Reference Sequence Database). d Highest percentage of nucleotide identity based on the reference strain available in the virus RefSeq database (NCBI Reference Sequence Database). e Coverage of the genome based on the length of the reference strain included on the virus RefSeq database (NCBI Reference Sequence Database). The analyses included contig and reads.
Figure 1Genetic characterization of members of the Parvoviridae family was detected in the present study. Representative genomes belonging to the Parvoviridae family were selected from GenBank at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI). The nucleotide phylogenetic tree was constructed using the Neighbor-Joining (NJ) method based on a p-distance model using the full coding genome. Analyses were conducted with 1000 bootstrap replicates. Complete coding genomes obtained are indicated by the black dots and the sequences were deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers MZ502227, MZ502228, MZ502229, MZ502230, MZ502231, MZ502232, MZ502233, MZ502234, MZ502235, and MZ502236.
Figure 2Phylogenetic tree based on the coding sequence of the polyomavirus large tumor antigen gene. The MEGA6 app suite was used for the phylogeny inference using the Maximum-Likelihood (ML) method based on General Time Reversible (GTR) model. Analyses were conducted with 1000 bootstrap replicates. The polyomavirus reference sequences described in the International Committee on Taxonomy of Viruses were retrieved from the GenBank database. The retrieved bovine polyomavirus 1 (BPyV-1) sequence is represented by the black dot and it was deposited in GenBank under the accession number MZ520135.
Figure 3Taxonomic classification of bacteriophage reads. Bar chart representation of the reads based on BLASTN, E-value < 1 × 10−5 against the GenBank non-redundant database. Sample type: fetal bovine serum (FBS), newborn calf serum (NCS), and bovine calf serum (BCS). Serum origin: Mexico (Mex), New Zealand (NZ), and the United States of America (USA).
Characterization of retrieved CrAssphage contig sequences.
| Sample Type a | Number of Contigs | Contig Length Range | Best BLASTN Hit ID of the Longest Contig b/Sample Type/Species | Contig Identity c |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FBS1 Mex | 0 | Not apply | Not apply | Not apply |
| FBS2 USA | 1 | 80 | Uncultured crAssphage -NC_024711/Fecal/human | 86.08% |
| NCS1 USA | 69 | 76-625 | CrAssphage FA1-2_000172F-MK415404/Gut/human | 99.20% |
| NCS2 NZ | 56 | 108–409 | CrAssphage YS1-2_2437-MK415410/Gut/human | 98.78% |
| NCS3 NZ | 107 | 64–721 | CrAssphage LMMB-MT006214/Fecal/human | 94.59% |
| NCS4 USA | 8 | 100–241 | CrAssphage sp. C0531BW4-MW067003/Fecal/human | 97.93% |
| BCS1 USA | 1 | 74 | CrAssphage YS1-2_2437-MK415410/Gut/human | 82.43% |
a Sample type: fetal bovine serum (FBS), newborn calf serum (NCS), and bovine calf serum (BCS). Serum origin: Mexico (Mex), New Zealand (NZ), and the United States of America (USA). b Analysis performed in BLASTN (E-value < 1 × 10−5). c Nucleotide identity based on the reference strain available in the virus RefSeq database (NCBI Reference Sequence Database).