| Literature DB >> 34959734 |
Karolina Jakubczyk1, Agnieszka Łukomska1, Sylwester Czaplicki2, Anna Wajs-Bonikowska3, Izabela Gutowska4, Norbert Czapla5, Małgorzata Tańska2, Katarzyna Janda-Milczarek1.
Abstract
Aegopodium podagraria L. (goutweed), a member of the Apiaceae family, is a common perennial plant found all around the world that has been used in folk medicine since antiquity. Goutweed leaves contain polyacetylenes, essential oils, mono- and sesquiterpenes, vitamins, macro- and microelements, and phenolic compounds. In spite of its many health-promoting properties, including antioxidant effects, the plant has not been thoroughly studied. The aim of this study was to investigate the antioxidant properties of different goutweed leaf extracts and their effects on the THP-1 cell line, and also to describe the chemical characteristics of goutweed. Falcarinol and falcarindiol and essential oil were determined by gas chromatography coupled with mass spectrometry. Spectrophotometry was used to measure the total content of polyphenols and antioxidant activity-by DPPH and FRAP methods. Oxidative stress in THP-1 cells was induced via sodium fluoride. Then, goutweed leaf extracts were added to evaluate their influence on antioxidant potential (ABTS) and the activity of antioxidant enzymes. Confocal microscopy was used to visualise the production of cytoplasmic and mitochondrial reactive oxygen species (ROS) and for in vitro imaging of apoptosis. The ethanol extracts have a high total content of polyphenols, polyacetylenes, and essential oil, as well as high antioxidant potential. The main volatiles represented diverse chemical groups, which are both oxygenated derivatives of sesquiterpenes and monoterpenes. We also demonstrated positive effects of the high antioxidant potential and increased activity of antioxidant enzymes on cell cultures under severe fluoride-induced oxidative stress. Extraction at 80 ℃ and the use of ethanol as a solvent increased the antioxidant capacity of the extract. The leaves of Aegopodium podagraria may serve as a valuable source of antioxidants in the daily diet and assist in the prevention and treatment of oxidative stress-mediated conditions, e.g., inflammatory conditions, cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, and even obesity.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant; fluoride; goutweed; natural compounds; oxidative stress; polyphenols
Year: 2021 PMID: 34959734 PMCID: PMC8704125 DOI: 10.3390/ph14121334
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Pharmaceuticals (Basel) ISSN: 1424-8247
Figure 1Chemical structures of the polyacetylenes falcarinol [(3R)-heptadeca-1,9(Z)-diene-4,6-diyne-3-ol] and falcarindiol [(3R,8S)-heptadeca-1,9(Z)-diene-4,6-diyne-3,8-diol]. Created with BioRender.com.
Antioxidant potential (DPPH, FRAP); total polyphenol content (TPC) in Aegopodium podagraria leaf extracts (100 mg/L).
| Extraction | Solvent | DPPH | FRAP | TPC | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [%] | [uM Fe(II)/L] | [mg/L] Gallic Acid (GAE)/[g/100 g DW] | ||||||||
| water 25 °Cz | water | 9.65 | ± | 1.29 *y,x,v,f,h | 177.79 | ± | 32.31 *y,x,w | 5.66 | ± | 0.45 *y,x,w,v,f,h |
| water 90 °Cy | water | 6.54 | ± | 0.96 * z,x,w,v,u,h,f | 331.03 | ± | 46.45 *z | 12.85 | ± | 0.22 *z,w,u |
| ethanol 25 °Cx | ethanol | 13.92 | ± | 1.07 *z,y,w,u,f | 333.55 | ± | 123.55 *z | 13.73 | ± | 0.38 *z,u |
| ethanol 80 °Cw | ethanol | 10.83 | ± | 1.40 *y,x,v,f,h | 416.42 | ± | 36.85 *z,v,u,f,h | 17.79 | ± | 1.02 *z,y,u,h |
| water 25 °Cv | DMSO | 9.71 | ± | 0.36 *z,y,w,u | 151.98 | ± | 14.50 *w | 4.98 | ± | 0.46 *z,u |
| water 90 °Cu | DMSO | 15.11 | ± | 0.46 *y,w,v,f,h | 259.68 | ± | 14.22 *w | 11.03 | ± | 0.49 *y,x,w,u,f,h |
| ethanol 25 °Cf | DMSO | 14.42 | ± | 2.10 *z,y,x,w,u | 293.91 | ± | 96.06 *w | 13.83 | ± | 3.81 *z,u |
| ethanol 80 °Ch | DMSO | 15.65 | ± | 0.55 *z,y,w,u | 302.86 | ± | 44.66 *w | 13.96 | ± | 0.23 *z,w,u |
* FDR p ≤ 0.05 between type of extract, p ≤ 0.05 between type of extract: z–water 25 °C, solvent–water; y–water 90 °C, solvent–water; x–ethanol 25 °C, solvent–water; w–ethanol 80 °C, solvent–water; v–water 25 °C, solvent–DMSO; u–water 90 °C, solvent–DMSO; f–ethanol 25 °C, solvent–DMSO; h–ethanol 80 °C, solvent–DMSO; DW–dry weight.
Polyacetylene content in Aegopodium podagraria leaf extracts (100 mg/L).
| Extract | Falcarinol mg/100g | Falcarindiol mg/100g |
|---|---|---|
| ethanol 25 °C f | nd | 185.81 ± 19.21 *h |
| ethanol 80 °C h | 46.91 ± 3.47 *f | 474.51 ± 75.74 *f |
* FDR p ≤ 0.05 between type of extract: f–ethanol 25 °C; h–ethanol 80 °C.
Composition of the essential oil of freeze-dried leaves of Aegopodium podagraria.
| Compound | Amount [%] | RI exp. * |
|---|---|---|
| 0.4 | 772 | |
| 1.1 | 876 | |
| Benzaldehyde + | 0.4 | 927 |
| Octane-2,3-dione | 0.1 | 959 |
| 6-Methylhept-5-ene-2-one | 0.8 | 961 |
|
| 967 | |
| 2-Pentylfuran | 0.5 | 976 |
|
| 980 | |
| 2-Phenylethanal | 0.2 | 1006 |
|
| 1010 | |
| Limonene | 0.4 | 1019 |
| ( | 0.1 | 1025 |
| ( | 0.2 | 1031 |
| 3-Ethyl-2-methylhexa-1,3-diene | 0.1 | 1043 |
| 0.4 | 1048 | |
| 0.2 | 1057 | |
| ( | 0.3 | 1065 |
| Nonan-2-one | 1.1 | 1070 |
| 0.1 | 1075 | |
| ( | 0.1 | 1078 |
| 0.8 | 1082 | |
| Linalool |
| 1085 |
| Nopinone | 0.4 | 1106 |
| Non-3-en-2-one | 0.1 | 1116 |
| 0.9 | 1123 | |
| ( | 0.1 | 1126 |
| 0.3 | 1128 | |
| ( | 0.5 | 1135 |
| α-Pinocarvone | 0.3 | 1138 |
| 0.1 | 1146 | |
| 0.2 | 1149 | |
| 0.3 | 1160 | |
| Terpinen-4-ol | 0.8 | 1162 |
| Myrtenal | 0.3 | 1169 |
| 0.4 | 1172 | |
| Myrtenol | 0.8 | 1179 |
| Caprylicacid | 1.2 | 1184 |
| 2,6,6-Trimethylcyclohex-1-ene-1-carbaldehyde | 0.1 | 1194 |
| 0.1 | 1196 | |
| Thymol methylether | 0.1 | 1209 |
| 0.1 | 1211 | |
| ( | 0.1 | 1218 |
| Geraniol | 0.2 | 1236 |
| ( | 1.0 | 1238 |
| 0.1 | 1249 | |
| Pelargonic acid | 0.9 | 1268 |
| Carvacrol | 0.5 | 1277 |
| Dihydroedulan I | 1.3 | 1282 |
| Dihydroedulan II | 1.2 | 1286 |
| ( | 0.1 | 1289 |
| Tridecane | 0.7 | 1300 |
| 0.1 | 1349 | |
| Non-2-enoic acid | 0.6 | 1353 |
| Capric acid | 0.5 | 1365 |
| 0.2 | 1373 | |
| 0.2 | 1377 | |
|
| 1389 | |
| ( | 0.3 | 1397 |
| ( | 0.1 | 1407 |
| ( | 0.7 | 1419 |
| β-copaene | 0.3 | 1429 |
| 0.4 | 1434 | |
| ( | 0.3 | 1437 |
| ( | 0.4 | 1447 |
| α-Himachalene | 0.2 | 1450 |
| α-Humulene | 0.4 | 1453 |
| 5,6-Epoxy-β-ionone | 0.7 | 1463 |
| β-Ionone | 1.0 | 1466 |
| α-Curcumene + γ-Muurolene | 0.5 | 1472 |
| Germacrene D | 1.0 | 1479 |
| (3 | 0.3 | 1482 |
| 0.3 | 1484 | |
| 0.2 | 1490 | |
| 2,4-Ditert-butylphenol | 1.3 | 1493 |
|
| 1503 | |
| 0.2 | 1508 | |
| 0.7 | 1516 | |
| 0.4 | 1531 | |
| Isoaromadendreneepoxide | 1.1 | 1545 |
| 0.2 | 1553 | |
| 1,5-Epoxysalvial-4(14)-ene | 0.4 | 1559 |
| Spathulenol |
| 1576 |
|
| 1578 | |
| Salvial-4(14)-en-1-one |
| 1585 |
| Humuleneepoxide II |
| 1601 |
| Aristoleneepoxide | 0.4 | 1604 |
| Isopropyllaurate | 0.3 | 1614 |
| 7-Hydroxyfarnesen | 0.8 | 1616 |
| Widdrol | 0.7 | 1630 |
| 0.5 | 1640 | |
| α-Cadinol | 0.4 | 1643 |
| Ledeneoxide II |
| 1659 |
| Khusinol |
| 1673 |
| 2-Ethylhexyl benzoate | 0.4 | 1768 |
| Myristoleic acid | 0.2 | 1797 |
| diIisobutylphtalate (artifact) | 0.1 | 1827 |
| Heptadecan-2-one |
| 1832 |
| Decan-2-yl benzoate | 0.2 | 1834 |
| Methylpalmitate | 0.5 | 1908 |
| di-Butyl phthalate (artifact) | 0.2 | 1918 |
| Palmitic acid |
| 1960 |
| Phytol | 1.1 | 2101 |
| Tricosane | 0.2 | 2298 |
| Pentacosane | 0.1 | 2499 |
| Sum of identified |
|
* RI exp–experimental retention index calculated on non-polar column; artifacts originate from plastic packaging.
Antioxidant potential in THP-1 cell cultures with Aegopodium podagraria leaf extracts (ABTS; enzyme activity: SOD—superoxide dismutase, CAT—catalase).
| Sample | ABTS | SOD | CAT | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| [mM] | [U/mL] | [nmol/min/mL/Protein] | |||||||
| Negative control a | 14.7 | ± | 0.2 *b,c,d,f,g,h,i | 31.4 | ± | 6.4 *c,d,e,h,i | 51.3 | ± | 8.1 *b,c,d |
| Water (NaF solvent) b | 36.7 | ± | 7.8 *a,c,f,g,h,i | 30.1 | ± | 3.1 *c,d,e,h,i | 138.7 | ± | 5.0 *a,d,e,f |
| DMSO (extract solvent) c | 67.0 | ± | 6.6 *a,b,d,e,f,g,h | 11.4 | ± | 2.4 *a,b,f,g | 203.5 | ± | 30.2 *a,e,f,g,h,i |
| DMSO + water (extract and NaF solvent) d | 49.7 | ± | 5.0 * a,c,e,f,g,h,i | 12.3 | ± | 1.2 *a,b,f,g | 219.4 | ± | 55.5 *a,b,e,f,g,h,i |
| NaF 10 µM e | 13.8 | ± | 3.2 *b,c,d,f,g,h,i | 8.7 | ± | 1.5 *a,b,f,g | 46.3 | ± | 9.3 *b,c,d |
| ethanol extract 25 °C f | 113.0 | ± | 8.2 *a,b,c,d,e,g,i | 44.7 | ± | 12.4 *c,d,e,h,i | 491.0 | ± | 12.8 *a,b,c,d,e,g,h,i |
| ethanol extract 25 °C + NaF g | 84.4 | ± | 9.5 *a,b,c,d,e,f,h,i | 37.8 | ± | 10.9 *,d,e,h,i | 245.2 | ± | 22.0 *a,b,e,f,h,i |
| ethanol extract 80 °C h | 99.3 | ± | 3.1 *a,b,c,d,e,g,i | 10.0 | ± | 2.6 *f,g | 272.1 | ± | 9.6 *a,b,e,f,g,i |
| ethanol extract 80 °C + NaF i | 69.4 | ± | 5.1 *a,b,d,e,f,g,h | 12.0 | ± | 2.8 *a,b,f,g | 140.1 | ± | 31.9 *a,d,e,f |
* FDR p ≤ 0.05 between type of extract: a—Negative control, b—Water (NaF solvent), c—Water (NaF solvent), d—DMSO (extract solvent), e—DMSO + water (extract and NaF solvent), f—NaF 10 µM, g—ethanol extract 25 °C, h—ethanol extract 80 °C, i—ethanol extract 80 °C + NaF; n = 5.
Figure 2Imaging of apoptosis by confocal microscopy in macrophages cultured with NaF solutions alone or with ethanol extract. THP−1 were cultured with NaF and plant extract for 48 hr as described in Materials and Methods. Cells that are viable are Annexin V-FITC and PI negative; cells that are in early apoptosis are Annexin V-FITC positive and PI negative (green fluorescence); and cells that are in late apoptosis or already dead (necrosis) are both Annexin V-FITC and PI positive (red fluorescence). A dual-pass FITC/rhodamine filter set was applied.
Figure 3Imaging of cytoplasmatic superoxides detection by fluorescence microscopy in macrophages cultured with NaF solutions alone or with ethanol extract.
Figure 4Imaging of mitochondrial superoxides detection by fluorescence microscopy in macrophages cultured with NaF solutions alone or with ethanol extract. THP−1 were cultured with NaF and extract for 48 h as described in the Materials and Methods. Detection of mitochondrial superoxide synthesis in macrophages was performed using MitoSOX Red indicator (incubation 10 min/37 °C). The reagent is oxidised only by superoxide, and the oxidation product becomes highly fluorescent upon binding to nucleic acids (red fluorescence).
Figure 5Methodology used to study Aegopodium podagraria L. extracts. Created with BioRender.com.
Figure 6Cell culture with factors incubated with THP-1 line macrophages. The experiment was repeated 5 times.