| Literature DB >> 30999628 |
Małgorzata Szczuko1, Marta Zapalowska-Chwyć2, Radosław Drozd3.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: According to a review of the literature, there is a lack of data on the mechanisms that participate in the suppression of inflammation that accompanies polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Additionally, the changes in oxidative status resulting from a low-calorie diet have not been studied in a group of women with PCOS, and the oxidation and reduction processes associated with PCOS have not been explained.Entities:
Keywords: FRAP; GPx3; antioxidant status; diet; polycystic ovary syndrome; uric acid
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2019 PMID: 30999628 PMCID: PMC6514917 DOI: 10.3390/molecules24081508
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Changes in concentrations of antioxidants (uric acid, FRAP, GPx3) in the plasma of women with PCOS before and after following a low GI, low-calorie diet.
| Parameter | Average Values in Groups | Significance of Differences | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCO I | PCO II | CG | I vs. II | I vs. CG | II vs. CG | |
| Uric acid mg/dL | 4.58 ± 1.65 | 7.40 ± 1.61 | 4.91 ± 2.72 | 0.000 | 0.542 | 0.001 |
| FRAP umol/L | 1093.1 ± 327.1 | 1041.0 ± 221.5 | 818.7 ± 263.4 | 0.541 | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| GPx3 mU/mL | 555.3 ± 220.4 | 858.2 ± 326.7 | 871.4 ± 360.3 | 0.000 | 0.000 | 0.902 |
PCO I: women with PCOS before the low-calorie diet; PCO II: women with PCOS after the low-calorie diet; CG: control group.
Figure 1Comparison of FRAP (a), uric acid levels (b), and GPx3 (c) activity in the plasma of women with PCOS before dietary intervention (PCO I), women with PCOS after dietary intervention (PCO II), and women not diagnosed with PCOS (control). The means were compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test.
Correlation matrix between anthropometric and biochemical parameters and antioxidants (uric acid, FRAP, GPx3) in women with PCOS.
| Correlation Matrix | Uric Acid | FRAP | GPx3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Height | 0.039 | 0.004 | −0.326 |
| BM–no clothes | −0.245 | −0.138 | −0.202 |
| BMR | −0.161 | −0.211 | −0.003 |
| BMI | −0.273 | −0.153 | −0.098 |
| DHEA-SO4 | −0.197 | 0.009 | −0.213 |
| Androstenedione | 0.240 | −0.415 | 0.458 |
| TSH | 0.238 | −0.014 | −0.155 |
| LH | 0.290 | 0.036 | 0.033 |
| FSH | −0.072 | 0.203 | 0.374 |
| Oestradiol | 0.090 | −0.188 | 0.225 |
| SHBG | 0.349 | 0.127 | 0.116 |
| Testosterone | 0.432 | −0.101 | 0.097 |
| Prolactin | −0.417 | 0.021 |
|
| Insulin 0 | −0.002 | −0.017 |
|
| Insulin after 2 h | −0.200 | −0.048 | −0.210 |
| Glucose | −0.460 | −0.116 | −0.059 |
| Glucose after 2 h | −0.520 | −0.360 | 0.163 |
| Cholesterol | −0.265 | 0.008 | −0.419 |
| LDL | −0.061 | −0.039 | −0.163 |
| TG | −0.444 | −0.011 |
|
| HDL | 0.271 | 0.092 | 0.314 |
Values in red indicate a statistically significant correlation p ≤ 0.05.
Correlation matrix between anthropometric and biochemical parameters and antioxidants (uric acid, FRAP, GPx3) in women with PCOS after dietary intervention.
| Parameters | Uric Acid | FRAP | GPx3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Body mass |
|
|
|
| Body mass reduction |
| −0.587 | 0.308 |
| BMR | −0.540 | −0.151 | 0.345 |
| CPM | −0.540 | −0.151 | 0.345 |
| Na/K | 0.142 | −0.424 | −0.243 |
| TBW % | 0.154 | 0.172 | −0.496 |
| TBW IN % | −0.024 | 0.543 | 0.040 |
| TBW EX % | 0.024 | −0.543 | −0.040 |
| TBW litre |
|
| 0.444 |
| TBW IN litre | −0.561 | −0.189 | 0.368 |
| TBW EX litre | −0.363 |
| 0.251 |
| Phase angle PA | −0.075 | 0.482 | 0.072 |
| fat mass % | −0.159 | −0.183 | 0.503 |
| fat mass kg | −0.606 |
|
|
| BCM kg | −0.542 | −0.151 | 0.346 |
| BCM % | −0.036 | 0.531 | 0.052 |
| Muscle mass kg | 0.285 |
|
|
| Muscle mass % | 0.566 |
|
|
| Waist circumference | −0.447 | −0.411 |
|
| Hip circumference | −0.583 |
|
|
| Arm circumference |
|
| 0.626 |
| Skinfold–shoulder-blade |
|
| 0.388 |
| Skinfold–hip |
| −0.506 |
|
| Skinfold–arm | −0.314 | −0.500 |
|
| BMI |
| −0.385 |
|
| WHR | 0.251 | 0.613 | 0.075 |
| DHEA-SO4 | 0.296 |
|
|
| Androstenedione | 0.297 | 0.228 | 0.407 |
| LH | 0.194 | −0.164 | 0.580 |
| FSH | −0.443 | 0.062 | 0.540 |
| Oestradiol | 0.520 | −0.102 | −0.382 |
| SHBG | 0.128 | −0.257 | −0.486 |
| Testosterone | 0.334 | −0.372 | −0.056 |
| Prolactin |
| 0.203 | −0.197 |
| Insulin sample 0 | 0.337 | −0.138 | 0.545 |
| Insulin after 2 h | −0.600 | −0.334 | 0.057 |
| Glucose |
|
| −0.468 |
| Glucose after 2 h | −0.146 | 0.466 | −0.392 |
| Cholesterol | −0.223 | 0.163 | 0.455 |
| LDL | −0.337 | 0.242 | 0.292 |
| TG | 0.247 | 0.158 | 0.544 |
| HDL | 0.285 | 0.0156 | −0.396 |
Values in red indicate a statistically significant correlation p ≤ 0.05.
Figure 2PRL and insulin impact on the development of inflammation involving ROS in PCOS.
Test details of women with PCOS before dietary intervention.
| Parameter | Avg | SD |
|---|---|---|
|
| 1.67 | 0.06 |
|
| 82.97 | 17.32 |
|
| 1508.66 | 146.15 |
|
| 29.68 | 6.48 |
|
| 243.29 | 91.44 |
|
| 3.64 | 1.67 |
|
| 1.70 | 0.77 |
|
| 7.71 | 3.62 |
|
| 5.03 | 0.95 |
|
| 45.19 | 24.68 |
|
| 35.05 | 16.39 |
|
| 0.73 | 0.96 |
|
| 17.63 | 7.25 |
|
| 13.98 | 10.88 |
|
| 79.80 | 47.97 |
|
| 91.82 | 10.87 |
|
| 114.53 | 24.45 |
|
| 179.21 | 30.72 |
|
| 111.82 | 31.42 |
|
| 102.53 | 52.41 |
|
| 55.89 | 18.86 |