| Literature DB >> 34956575 |
Yabin Liu1, Yimin Wang1, Ya Shu1, Jing Zhu1.
Abstract
This work aimed to explore the application value of deep learning-based magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images in the identification of tuberculosis and pneumonia, in order to provide a certain reference basis for clinical identification. In this study, 30 pulmonary tuberculosis patients and 27 pneumonia patients who were hospitalized were selected as the research objects, and they were divided into a pulmonary tuberculosis group and a pneumonia group. MRI examination based on noise reduction algorithms was used to observe and compare the signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and carrier-to-noise ratio (CNR) of the images. In addition, the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) value for the diagnosis efficiency of lung parenchymal lesions was analyzed, and the best b value was selected. The results showed that the MRI image after denoising by the deep convolutional neural network (DCNN) algorithm was clearer, the edges of the lung tissue were regular, the inflammation signal was higher, and the SNR and CNR were better than before, which were 119.79 versus 83.43 and 12.59 versus 7.21, respectively. The accuracy of MRI based on a deep learning algorithm in the diagnosis of pulmonary tuberculosis and pneumonia was significantly improved (96.67% vs. 70%, 100% vs. 62.96%) (P < 0.05). With the increase in b value, the CNR and SNR of MRI images all showed a downward trend (P < 0.05). Therefore, it was found that the shadow of tuberculosis lesions under a specific sequence was higher than that of pneumonia in the process of identifying tuberculosis and pneumonia, which reflected the importance of deep learning MRI images in the differential diagnosis of tuberculosis and pneumonia, thereby providing reference basis for clinical follow-up diagnosis and treatment.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34956575 PMCID: PMC8695032 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6772624
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Figure 1Schematic diagram of DCNN structure.
Figure 2MRI imaging results based on the deep learning algorithm. (a) Before. (b) After.
Figure 3Evaluation of noise reduction effect. Note. ∗ suggests the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 4Noise reduction processing results.
Comparison of the baseline data of patients from the two groups.
| Group | Tuberculosis group ( | Pneumonia group ( |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age (years old) | 39.21 ± 1.12 | 39.06 ± 2.02 | 0.351 | >0.05 |
| Male (case (%)) | 8 (26.67) | 9 (33.33) | 0.302 | >0.05 |
| Female (case (%)) | 22 (73.33) | 18 (66.67) | — | >0.05 |
| Fever (case (%)) | 7 (23.33) | 8 (29.63) | 0.032 | >0.05 |
| Cough and expectoration (case (%)) | 5 (16.67) | 4 (14.81) | 0.000 | >0.05 |
| Hemoptysis (case (%)) | 8 (26.67) | 6 (22.22) | 0.002 | >0.05 |
Figure 5MRI results of tuberculosis.
Figure 6MRI results of pneumonia.
MRI diagnosis accuracy rate based on the deep learning algorithm.
| Number of cases | MRI | MRI after optimization | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tuberculosis group | 30 | 21 (70%) | 29 (96.67%) |
| Pneumonia group | 27 | 17 (62.96%) | 27 (100%) |
Note: The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05).
Figure 7The comparison results of SNR and CNR of MRI images with different b values. Note: ∗ and #suggest that the change on CNR and SNR was statistically obvious with increase in b value, respectively (P < 0.05).