| Literature DB >> 34952916 |
Wolfgang J Mayer1, Andreas Ohlmann2, Anna Schuh2, Siegfried Priglinger2, Thomas Kohnen3, Mehdi Shajari2,3.
Abstract
Studying anterior lens capsule cutting edge profiles from femtosecond laser-assisted capsulotomy procedures performed before and after lens fragmentation. Twenty eyes (10 patients) with age-related cataract underwent femtosecond laser-assisted surgery (FLACS) using the Ziemer Z8 platform. First step of laser surgery was either capsulotomy (group first) or fragmentation (group second). One eye of each patient was assigned randomly, the second eye treated with the different sequence of procedures. After anterior capsule removal, tissue was fixed in cacodylate-buffered solution and cutting-edge profiles were analysed using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). All cases had cataract grade 2 and 3 based on LOCS III grading. SEM analysis showed more smooth edges in the first group, especially in cases with pseudoexfoliation (P = 0.037); more tags and bridges and a significant number of staggered cutting patterns (7 out of 10 cases) in the second group. All cases evolved the same microgroves with "valleys and mountains " as signs of the photodisruption process. Femtosecond laser capsulotomy should be performed before lens fragmentation minimizing the rate of cutting errors. Especially in eyes with advanced cataract, as intracapsular pressure may increase due to lens fragmentation without anterior capsular opening.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34952916 PMCID: PMC8709839 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-04054-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Figure 1(A) and (B): SEM sample of a capsulotomy before fragmentation procedure sequence. Smooth cutting edge (black arrow) with only few bridges and grooves (white arrow). Magnification bar for A: 50 µm and B: 25 µm.
Figure 2(A) and (B): SEM sample of a fragmentation before capsulotomy procedure sequence showing a high amount of tissue cutting grooves and bridges (white arrow). The offset laser spot cutting pattern is conspicuous. Magnification bar for A: 100 µm and B: 25 µm.
Figure 3(A) and (B): SEM samples of a capsulotomy before fragmentation (3a) and vice versa (3b) procedure sequence in pseudoexfoliation cases showing more grooves and bridges in all samples and more sawtooth characteristics in group 2 (3b) (white arrow). Magnification bar for A and B: 10 µm.