Literature DB >> 3495145

High-resolution CT scanning in the evaluation of cervical spine fractures: comparison with plain film examinations.

M B Acheson, R R Livingston, M L Richardson, G K Stimac.   

Abstract

Forty-nine patients with cervical spine fractures were identified among 160 patients who underwent CT of the cervical spine for blunt trauma. Although there was a high index of suspicion on the plain film interpretation, as well as a large percentage of false positives, many fractures were found on CT that were not suggested, even in retrospect, on the plain radiographs. Of the 136 fractures ultimately identified in these patients, CT detected 135 (99%) while only 64 (47%) were seen or suspected on the initial screening radiographs. At first glance, this might appear to discredit the plain films as a screening device. However, most of these "occult" fractures occurred in vertebrae that had been identified as probably fractured in other parts, for example, pedicle fractures found in vertebrae initially suspected of harboring only a vertebral body fracture. Most of the remainder of the uncovered fractures were in vertebrae immediately adjacent to ones that were initially identified as fractured. Indeed, of the 49 patients with fractures, only one had an adequately exposed and positioned plain film that was completely normal. The ability of CT to determine quickly and confidently the presence or absence of cervical fractures and to define the position of fragments in relation to the spinal canal is of considerable value in the medical and nursing management of the seriously traumatized patient. For example, when a fracture is seen or suspected on conventional films, a limited CT examination of the area is recommended. Plain films should be used to guide the CT examination so that an intact vertebra above and below the lesion is included. If an adequately exposed and positioned plain film series of the cervical spine is normal, it is unlikely that CT will reveal a fracture. While conventional radiographs fail to detect a surprising number of fractures, they retain their value as a screening tool and as a guide to selective CT imaging.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3495145     DOI: 10.2214/ajr.148.6.1179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  9 in total

1.  Sensitivity of plain radiography for pediatric cervical spine injury.

Authors:  Li W Cui; Marc A Probst; Jerome R Hoffman; William R Mower
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2016-06-20

2.  CT of dens axis fractures.

Authors:  J Nepper-Rasmussen
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.804

3.  Systematic Radiation Dose Reduction in Cervical Spine CT of Human Cadaveric Specimens: How Low Can We Go?

Authors:  M Tozakidou; C Reisinger; D Harder; J Lieb; Z Szucs-Farkas; M Müller-Gerbl; U Studler; S Schindera; A Hirschmann
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2017-12-21       Impact factor: 3.825

4.  The role of computed tomography and Glasgow Coma Scale in detecting spinal injury associated with traumatic brain injuries.

Authors:  Fadia Abdul-Ameer Merza; Ghazwan Alwan Lafta
Journal:  Med Pharm Rep       Date:  2022-04-28

5.  Efficacy of limited CT for nonvisualized lower cervical spine in patients with blunt trauma.

Authors:  J Tehranzadeh; R T Bonk; A Ansari; M Mesgarzadeh
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 2.199

Review 6.  Traumatic injuries to the craniovertebral junction: a review of rare events.

Authors:  Alberto Debernardi; Giuseppe D'Aliberti; Giuseppe Talamonti; Fabio Villa; Maurizio Piparo; Gianfranco Ligarotti; Marco Cenzato
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2013-08-09       Impact factor: 3.042

7.  Efficacy of orthotic immobilization of the unstable subaxial cervical spine of the elderly patient: investigation in a cadaver model.

Authors:  Drew A Bednar
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 2.089

8.  Does Every Patient Require Imaging after Cervical Spine Trauma? A Knowledge Translation Project to Support Evidence-Informed Practice for Physiotherapists.

Authors:  Marj Belot; Alison M Hoens; Carol Kennedy; Linda C Li
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 9.  Clinical Neurorestorative Therapeutic Guidelines for Spinal Cord Injury (IANR/CANR version 2019).

Authors:  Hongyun Huang; Wise Young; Stephen Skaper; Lin Chen; Gustavo Moviglia; Hooshang Saberi; Ziad Al-Zoubi; Hari Shanker Sharma; Dafin Muresanu; Alok Sharma; Wagih El Masry; Shiqing Feng
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2019-11-11       Impact factor: 5.191

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.