Literature DB >> 27321014

Sensitivity of plain radiography for pediatric cervical spine injury.

Li W Cui1, Marc A Probst2, Jerome R Hoffman3, William R Mower4.   

Abstract

Pediatric patients with suspected cervical spine injuries (CSI) often receive a computed tomography (CT) scan as an initial diagnostic imaging test. While sensitive, CT of the cervical spine carries significant radiation and risk of lethal malignant transformation later in life. Plain radiographs carry significantly less radiation and could serve as the preferred screening tool, provided they have a high functional sensitivity in detecting pediatric patients with CSI. We hypothesize that plain cervical spine radiographs can reliably detect pediatric patients with CSI and seek to quantify the functional sensitivity of plain radiography as compared to CT. We analyzed data from the NEXUS cervical spine study to assess the sensitivity of plain radiographs in the evaluation of CSI. We identified all pediatric patients who underwent plain radiographic imaging, and all pediatric patients found to have CSI. We then determined the sensitivity of plain radiographs in detecting pediatric patients with CSI. We identified 44 pediatric patients with CSI in the dataset with age ranging from 2 to 18 years old. Thirty-two of the 44 pediatric patients received cervical spine plain films as a part of their workup. Plain films were able to identify all 32 pediatric patients with CSI to yield a sensitivity of 100 % in detecting injury victims (95 % confidence interval 89.1-100.0 %). Plain radiography was highly sensitive for the identification of CSI in our cohort of pediatric patients and is useful as a screening tool in the evaluation of pediatric CSI.

Entities:  

Keywords:  CSI; Cervical spine injury; Pediatric; Plain films; Plain radiography; X-ray

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 27321014     DOI: 10.1007/s10140-016-1417-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Radiol        ISSN: 1070-3004


  20 in total

Review 1.  Exposing the thyroid to radiation: a review of its current extent, risks, and implications.

Authors:  Bridget Sinnott; Elaine Ron; Arthur B Schneider
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  2010-07-21       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  An evidenced-based approach to radiographic assessment of cervical spine injuries in the emergency department.

Authors:  Jason Greenbaum; Nathan Walters; Phillip D Levy
Journal:  J Emerg Med       Date:  2008-09-10       Impact factor: 1.484

3.  Selective cervical spine radiography in blunt trauma: methodology of the National Emergency X-Radiography Utilization Study (NEXUS).

Authors:  J R Hoffman; A B Wolfson; K Todd; W R Mower
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.721

Review 4.  Imaging, clearance, and controversies in pediatric cervical spine trauma.

Authors:  Sonny T Tat; Michelle J Mejia; Robert J Freishtat
Journal:  Pediatr Emerg Care       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 1.454

5.  Estimated risks of radiation-induced fatal cancer from pediatric CT.

Authors:  D Brenner; C Elliston; E Hall; W Berdon
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Pediatric cervical spine injury evaluation after blunt trauma: a clinical decision analysis.

Authors:  Megan Hannon; Rebekah Mannix; Kate Dorney; David Mooney; Kara Hennelly
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 5.721

7.  Use of plain radiography to screen for cervical spine injuries.

Authors:  W R Mower; J R Hoffman; C V Pollack; M I Zucker; B J Browne; A B Wolfson
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.721

8.  Cervical spine computed tomography utilization in pediatric trauma patients.

Authors:  Kathleen M Adelgais; Lorin Browne; Maija Holsti; Ryan R Metzger; Shannon Cox Murphy; Nanette Dudley
Journal:  J Pediatr Surg       Date:  2013-10-17       Impact factor: 2.545

9.  Developing a clinical algorithm for early management of cervical spine injury in child trauma victims.

Authors:  D M Jaffe; H Binns; M A Radkowski; M J Barthel; H H Engelhard
Journal:  Ann Emerg Med       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 5.721

10.  The role and limitations of computed tomographic scanning in the evaluation of cervical trauma.

Authors:  J H Woodring; C Lee
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1992-11
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.