OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe mitral regurgitation commonly develop atrial fibrillation. The precise mechanisms of this relationship remain unknown. The objective of this study was to apply noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of the atria during sinus rhythm to identify changes in atrial electrophysiology that may contribute to development of atrial fibrillation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation referred for mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Twenty subjects (9 atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation, 11 mitral regurgitation alone) underwent electrocardiographic imaging. Biatrial electrophysiology was imaged with activation maps in sinus rhythm. The reconstructed unipolar electrograms were analyzed for voltage amplitude, number of deflections and conduction heterogeneity. In subjects with mitral regurgitation, left atrial biopsies were obtained at the time of surgery. Results: Subjects with history of atrial fibrillation demonstrated prolonged left atrial conduction times (110±25 ms vs. mitral regurgitation alone (85±21), p=0.025); right atrial conduction times were unaffected. Variable patterns of conduction slowing were imaged in the left atria of most subjects, but those with prior history of atrial fibrillation had more complex patterns of conduction slowing or unidirectional block. The presence of atrial fibrillation was not associated with the extent of fibrosis in atrial biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed changes in sinus rhythm atrial electrophysiology can be imaged noninvasively and can be used to assess the impact and evolution of atrial fibrillation on atrial conduction properties in patients with mitral regurgitation. If replicated in larger studies, electrocardiographic imaging may identify patients with mitral regurgitation at risk for atrial fibrillation and could be used to guide treatment strategies.
OBJECTIVE: Patients with severe mitral regurgitation commonly develop atrial fibrillation. The precise mechanisms of this relationship remain unknown. The objective of this study was to apply noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging of the atria during sinus rhythm to identify changes in atrial electrophysiology that may contribute to development of atrial fibrillation in patients with severe mitral regurgitation referred for mitral valve surgery. METHODS: Twenty subjects (9 atrial fibrillation and mitral regurgitation, 11 mitral regurgitation alone) underwent electrocardiographic imaging. Biatrial electrophysiology was imaged with activation maps in sinus rhythm. The reconstructed unipolar electrograms were analyzed for voltage amplitude, number of deflections and conduction heterogeneity. In subjects with mitral regurgitation, left atrial biopsies were obtained at the time of surgery. Results: Subjects with history of atrial fibrillation demonstrated prolonged left atrial conduction times (110±25 ms vs. mitral regurgitation alone (85±21), p=0.025); right atrial conduction times were unaffected. Variable patterns of conduction slowing were imaged in the left atria of most subjects, but those with prior history of atrial fibrillation had more complex patterns of conduction slowing or unidirectional block. The presence of atrial fibrillation was not associated with the extent of fibrosis in atrial biopsies. CONCLUSIONS: Detailed changes in sinus rhythm atrial electrophysiology can be imaged noninvasively and can be used to assess the impact and evolution of atrial fibrillation on atrial conduction properties in patients with mitral regurgitation. If replicated in larger studies, electrocardiographic imaging may identify patients with mitral regurgitation at risk for atrial fibrillation and could be used to guide treatment strategies.
Authors: Rick A Nishimura; Catherine M Otto; Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; John P Erwin; Lee A Fleisher; Hani Jneid; Michael J Mack; Christopher J McLeod; Patrick T O'Gara; Vera H Rigolin; Thoralf M Sundt; Annemarie Thompson Journal: Circulation Date: 2017-03-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Vuyisile T Nkomo; Julius M Gardin; Thomas N Skelton; John S Gottdiener; Christopher G Scott; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano Journal: Lancet Date: 2006-09-16 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: J L Cox; R B Schuessler; H J D'Agostino; C M Stone; B C Chang; M E Cain; P B Corr; J P Boineau Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 1991-04 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Phillip S Cuculich; Yong Wang; Bruce D Lindsay; Mitchell N Faddis; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano; Li Li; Yoram Rudy Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Kurt C Roberts-Thomson; Irene Stevenson; Peter M Kistler; Haris M Haqqani; Steven J Spence; John C Goldblatt; Prashanthan Sanders; Jonathan M Kalman Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2009-04-10 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Rochus K Voeller; Marci S Bailey; Andreas Zierer; Shelly C Lall; Shun-ichiro Sakamoto; Kristen Aubuchon; Jennifer S Lawton; Nader Moazami; Charles B Huddleston; Nabil A Munfakh; Marc R Moon; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2008-03-18 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Farah N Musharbash; Matthew R Schill; Laurie A Sinn; Richard B Schuessler; Hersh S Maniar; Marc R Moon; Spencer J Melby; Ralph J Damiano Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2017-09-27 Impact factor: 5.209