Ramya Vijayakumar1, Sunil K Vasireddi1, Phillip S Cuculich1, Mitchell N Faddis1, Yoram Rudy2. 1. From the Cardiac Bioelectricity and Arrhythmia Center (R.V., S.K.V., P.S.C., M.N.F., Y.R.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (R.V., Y.R.), Washington University in St. Louis, MO; Division of Medicine, Metro Health Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (S.K.V.); and Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO (P.S.C., M.N.F., Y.R.). 2. From the Cardiac Bioelectricity and Arrhythmia Center (R.V., S.K.V., P.S.C., M.N.F., Y.R.) and Department of Biomedical Engineering (R.V., Y.R.), Washington University in St. Louis, MO; Division of Medicine, Metro Health Medical Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH (S.K.V.); and Department of Medicine (Cardiology), Washington University School of Medicine/Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO (P.S.C., M.N.F., Y.R.). rudy@wustl.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Phase analysis of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, has gained interest because of the ability to detect organized stable drivers (rotors) and target them for therapy. However, the lack of methodology details in publications on the topic has resulted in ongoing debate over the phase mapping technique. By comparing phase maps and activation maps, we examined advantages and limitations of phase mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven subjects were enrolled. We generated phase maps and activation maps from electrocardiographic imaging-reconstructed epicardial unipolar electrograms. For ventricular signals, phase was computed with (1) pseudoempirical mode decomposition detrending and (2) a novel Moving Average (MVG) detrending approach. For atrial fibrillation signals, MVG was modified to incorporate dynamic cycle length (DCL) changes (MVG-DCL). Phase maps were visually analyzed to study phase singularity points and rotors. Results show that phase is sensitive to cycle length choice, a limitation that was addressed by the MVG-DCL algorithm. MVG-DCL was optimal for atrial fibrillation analysis. Phase maps helped to highlight high-curvature wavefronts and rotors. However, for some activation patterns, phase generated nonrotational singularity points and false rotors. CONCLUSIONS: Phase mapping computes singularity points and visually highlights rotors. As such, it can help to provide a clearer picture of the spatiotemporal activation characteristics during atrial fibrillation. However, it is advisable to incorporate electrogram characteristics and the time-domain activation sequence in the analysis, to prevent misinterpretation and false rotor detection. Therefore, for mapping complex arrhythmias, a combined time-domain activation and phase mapping with variable cycle length seems to be the most reliable method.
BACKGROUND: Phase analysis of cardiac arrhythmias, particularly atrial fibrillation, has gained interest because of the ability to detect organized stable drivers (rotors) and target them for therapy. However, the lack of methodology details in publications on the topic has resulted in ongoing debate over the phase mapping technique. By comparing phase maps and activation maps, we examined advantages and limitations of phase mapping. METHODS AND RESULTS: Seven subjects were enrolled. We generated phase maps and activation maps from electrocardiographic imaging-reconstructed epicardial unipolar electrograms. For ventricular signals, phase was computed with (1) pseudoempirical mode decomposition detrending and (2) a novel Moving Average (MVG) detrending approach. For atrial fibrillation signals, MVG was modified to incorporate dynamic cycle length (DCL) changes (MVG-DCL). Phase maps were visually analyzed to study phase singularity points and rotors. Results show that phase is sensitive to cycle length choice, a limitation that was addressed by the MVG-DCL algorithm. MVG-DCL was optimal for atrial fibrillation analysis. Phase maps helped to highlight high-curvature wavefronts and rotors. However, for some activation patterns, phase generated nonrotational singularity points and false rotors. CONCLUSIONS: Phase mapping computes singularity points and visually highlights rotors. As such, it can help to provide a clearer picture of the spatiotemporal activation characteristics during atrial fibrillation. However, it is advisable to incorporate electrogram characteristics and the time-domain activation sequence in the analysis, to prevent misinterpretation and false rotor detection. Therefore, for mapping complex arrhythmias, a combined time-domain activation and phase mapping with variable cycle length seems to be the most reliable method.
Authors: Sanghamitra Mohanty; Carola Gianni; Prasant Mohanty; Philipp Halbfass; Tamara Metz; Chintan Trivedi; Thomas Deneke; Gery Tomassoni; Rong Bai; Amin Al-Ahmad; Shane Bailey; John David Burkhardt; G Joseph Gallinghouse; Rodney Horton; Patrick M Hranitzky; Javier E Sanchez; Luigi Di Biase; Andrea Natale Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2016-05-06 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Kalyanam Shivkumar; Paul Clopton; Wouter-Jan Rappel; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2012-07-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martyn P Nash; Ayman Mourad; Richard H Clayton; Peter M Sutton; Chris P Bradley; Martin Hayward; David J Paterson; Peter Taggart Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-07-31 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Phillip S Cuculich; Yong Wang; Bruce D Lindsay; Mitchell N Faddis; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano; Li Li; Yoram Rudy Journal: Circulation Date: 2010-09-20 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Seungyup Lee; Jayakumar Sahadevan; Celeen M Khrestian; Ivan Cakulev; Alan Markowitz; Albert L Waldo Journal: Circulation Date: 2015-10-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Arif Elvan; Andre C Linnenbank; Marnix W van Bemmel; Anand R Ramdat Misier; Peter Paul H M Delnoy; Willem P Beukema; Jacques M T de Bakker Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2009-12
Authors: Sanjiv M Narayan; David E Krummen; Paul Clopton; Kalyanam Shivkumar; John M Miller Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-04-03 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Brian J Hansen; Jichao Zhao; Ning Li; Alexander Zolotarev; Stanislav Zakharkin; Yufeng Wang; Josh Atwal; Anuradha Kalyanasundaram; Suhaib H Abudulwahed; Katelynn M Helfrich; Anna Bratasz; Kimerly A Powell; Bryan Whitson; Peter J Mohler; Paul M L Janssen; Orlando P Simonetti; John D Hummel; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: JACC Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2018-11-01
Authors: Christopher A B Kowalewski; Fatemah Shenasa; Miguel Rodrigo; Paul Clopton; Gabriela Meckler; Mahmood I Alhusseini; Mark A Swerdlow; Vijay Joshi; Samir Hossainy; Junaid A B Zaman; Tina Baykaner; Albert J Rogers; Johannes Brachmann; John M Miller; David E Krummen; William H Sauer; Nicholas S Peters; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2018-06
Authors: Miguel Rodrigo; Andreu M Climent; Ismael Hernández-Romero; Alejandro Liberos; Tina Baykaner; Albert J Rogers; Mahmood Alhusseini; Paul J Wang; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Maria S Guillem; Sanjiv M Narayan; Felipe Atienza Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-02-13
Authors: M Swerdlow; M Tamboli; M I Alhusseini; N Moosvi; A J Rogers; G Leef; P J Wang; A Rillig; J Brachmann; W H Sauer; P Ruppersberg; S M Narayan; T Baykaner Journal: Pacing Clin Electrophysiol Date: 2019-03-24 Impact factor: 1.976
Authors: George Leef; Fatemah Shenasa; Neal K Bhatia; Albert J Rogers; William Sauer; John M Miller; Mark Swerdlow; Mallika Tamboli; Mahmood I Alhusseini; Erin Armenia; Tina Baykaner; Johannes Brachmann; Mintu P Turakhia; Felipe Atienza; Wouter-Jan Rappel; Paul J Wang; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2019-07-29
Authors: Edward J Ciaccio; Elaine Y Wan; Deepak S Saluja; U Rajendra Acharya; Nicholas S Peters; Hasan Garan Journal: Comput Methods Programs Biomed Date: 2019-06-15 Impact factor: 5.428
Authors: Alexander M Zolotarev; Brian J Hansen; Ekaterina A Ivanova; Katelynn M Helfrich; Ning Li; Paul M L Janssen; Peter J Mohler; Nahush A Mokadam; Bryan A Whitson; Maxim V Fedorov; John D Hummel; Dmitry V Dylov; Vadim V Fedorov Journal: Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol Date: 2020-09-13