BACKGROUND: Various mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been demonstrated experimentally. Invasive methods to study these mechanisms in humans have limitations, precluding continuous mapping of both atria with sufficient resolution. In this article, we present continuous biatrial epicardial activation sequences of AF in humans using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the testing phase, ECGI accuracy was evaluated by comparing ECGI with co-registered CARTO images during atrial pacing in 6 patients. Additionally, correlative observations from catheter mapping and ablation were compared with ECGI in 3 patients. In the study phase, ECGI maps during AF in 26 patients were analyzed for mechanisms and complexity. ECGI noninvasively imaged the low-amplitude signals of AF in a wide range of patients (97 procedural success). Spatial accuracy for determining initiation sites from pacing was 6 mm. Locations critical to maintenance of AF identified during catheter ablation were identified by ECGI; ablation near these sites restored sinus rhythm. In the study phase, the most common patterns of AF were multiple wavelets (92), with pulmonary vein (69) and non-pulmonary vein (62) focal sites. Rotor activity was seen rarely (15). AF complexity increased with longer clinical history of AF, although the degree of complexity of nonparoxysmal AF varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: ECGI offers a noninvasive way to map epicardial activation patterns of AF in a patient-specific manner. The results highlight the coexistence of a variety of mechanisms and variable complexity among patients. Overall, complexity generally increased with duration of AF.
BACKGROUND: Various mechanisms of atrial fibrillation (AF) have been demonstrated experimentally. Invasive methods to study these mechanisms in humans have limitations, precluding continuous mapping of both atria with sufficient resolution. In this article, we present continuous biatrial epicardial activation sequences of AF in humans using noninvasive electrocardiographic imaging (ECGI). METHODS AND RESULTS: In the testing phase, ECGI accuracy was evaluated by comparing ECGI with co-registered CARTO images during atrial pacing in 6 patients. Additionally, correlative observations from catheter mapping and ablation were compared with ECGI in 3 patients. In the study phase, ECGI maps during AF in 26 patients were analyzed for mechanisms and complexity. ECGI noninvasively imaged the low-amplitude signals of AF in a wide range of patients (97 procedural success). Spatial accuracy for determining initiation sites from pacing was 6 mm. Locations critical to maintenance of AF identified during catheter ablation were identified by ECGI; ablation near these sites restored sinus rhythm. In the study phase, the most common patterns of AF were multiple wavelets (92), with pulmonary vein (69) and non-pulmonary vein (62) focal sites. Rotor activity was seen rarely (15). AF complexity increased with longer clinical history of AF, although the degree of complexity of nonparoxysmal AF varied widely. CONCLUSIONS: ECGI offers a noninvasive way to map epicardial activation patterns of AF in a patient-specific manner. The results highlight the coexistence of a variety of mechanisms and variable complexity among patients. Overall, complexity generally increased with duration of AF.
Authors: Valentin Fuster; Lars E Rydén; David S Cannom; Harry J Crijns; Anne B Curtis; Kenneth A Ellenbogen; Jonathan L Halperin; Jean-Yves Le Heuzey; G Neal Kay; James E Lowe; S Bertil Olsson; Eric N Prystowsky; Juan Luis Tamargo; Samuel Wann; Sidney C Smith; Alice K Jacobs; Cynthia D Adams; Jeffery L Anderson; Elliott M Antman; Jonathan L Halperin; Sharon Ann Hunt; Rick Nishimura; Joseph P Ornato; Richard L Page; Barbara Riegel; Silvia G Priori; Jean-Jacques Blanc; Andrzej Budaj; A John Camm; Veronica Dean; Jaap W Deckers; Catherine Despres; Kenneth Dickstein; John Lekakis; Keith McGregor; Marco Metra; Joao Morais; Ady Osterspey; Juan Luis Tamargo; José Luis Zamorano Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-08-15 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Hugh Calkins; Josep Brugada; Douglas L Packer; Riccardo Cappato; Shih-Ann Chen; Harry J G Crijns; Ralph J Damiano; D Wyn Davies; David E Haines; Michel Haissaguerre; Yoshito Iesaka; Warren Jackman; Pierre Jais; Hans Kottkamp; Karl Heinz Kuck; Bruce D Lindsay; Francis E Marchlinski; Patrick M McCarthy; J Lluis Mont; Fred Morady; Koonlawee Nademanee; Andrea Natale; Carlo Pappone; Eric Prystowsky; Antonio Raviele; Jeremy N Ruskin; Richard J Shemin Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2007-04-30 Impact factor: 6.343
Authors: Yinglong Hou; Benjamin J Scherlag; Jiaxiong Lin; Ying Zhang; Zhibing Lu; Kim Truong; Eugene Patterson; Ralph Lazzara; Warren M Jackman; Sunny S Po Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2007-06-18 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Anna Degiovanni; Miriam Bortnik; Gabriele Dell'Era; Virginia Bolzani; Eraldo Occhetta; Giorgio Bellomo; Paolo Marino Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2012-04-29 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Olaf Dössel; Martin W Krueger; Frank M Weber; Mathias Wilhelms; Gunnar Seemann Journal: Med Biol Eng Comput Date: 2012-06-21 Impact factor: 2.602
Authors: Lindsey L Saint; Marci S Bailey; Sunil Prasad; Tracey J Guthrie; Jennifer Bell; Marc R Moon; Jennifer S Lawton; Nabil A Munfakh; Richard B Schuessler; Ralph J Damiano; Hersh S Maniar Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2012-02-02 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Tina Baykaner; Paul Clopton; Gautam G Lalani; Amir A Schricker; David E Krummen; Sanjiv M Narayan Journal: Can J Cardiol Date: 2013-08-30 Impact factor: 5.223
Authors: Miguel Rodrigo; Andreu M Climent; Alejandro Liberos; Francisco Fernández-Avilés; Omer Berenfeld; Felipe Atienza; Maria S Guillem Journal: Heart Rhythm Date: 2017-04-10 Impact factor: 6.343