| Literature DB >> 34947059 |
Xin Guo1, Zhen Wang2, Jing Zhang1, Ping Wang3, Yaoming Li1, Baoming Ji1.
Abstract
Arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), which form symbioses with most land plants, could benefit their hosts and potentially play important roles in revegetation of degraded lands. However, their application in revegetation of desert grasslands still faces challenges and uncertainties due to the unclear specificity of AMF-plant interactions. Here, Caragana korshinskii and Caragana microphylla were inoculated with either conspecific (home) or heterospecific (away) AM fungal communities from the rhizosphere of three common plant species (C. korshinskii, C. microphylla and Hedysarum laeve) in Kubuqi Desert, China. AMF communities of the inocula and their home and away effects on growth and nutrition status of two Caragana species were examined. Results showed that AMF communities of the three inocula from C. korshinskii, H. laeve and C. microphylla were significantly different, and were characterized by high abundance of Diversispora, Archaeospora, and Glomus, respectively. The shoot biomass, photosynthetic rate, foliar N and P contents of C. korshinskii only significantly increased under home AMF inoculation by 167.10%, 73.55%, 9.24%, and 23.87%, respectively. However, no significant effects of AMF on C. microphylla growth were found, regardless of home or away AMF. Positive correlations between C. korshinskii biomass and the abundance of AMF genus Diversispora were found. Our study showed strong home advantage of using native AMF community to enhance C. korshinskii growth in the desert and presented a potentially efficient way to use native AMF in restoration practices.Entities:
Keywords: Caragana; arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi; desert grassland; home advantage; inoculum source
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947059 PMCID: PMC8708327 DOI: 10.3390/jof7121077
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1Relative abundance of AM fungal genus in original inocula (A: C. korshinskii, B: H. leave, C: C. microphylla, and CK: sterilized inocula) and plant roots after one year of growth (a), and non-metric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) ordination plot illustrating differences in AMF OTU composition among the original inocula and plant roots (b).
Results of three-way analysis of variances showing the effects of host plant species, AMF inoculation, year and their interactions on plant performance.
| Height | Canopy | Photosynthetic | Transpiration | Vapor Pressure | Stomatal | Colonization | Shoot | Foliar N | Foliar P | Foliar N:P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Host | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.2394 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.003 | 0.011 |
| Inoculation | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.001 | 0.189 | 0.000 | 0.002 | 0.0241 | <0.001 | 0.102 | 0.163 | 0.076 |
| Year | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | |||||
| Host:Inoculation | <0.001 | 0.001 | 0.029 | 0.026 | 0.501 | 0.015 | 0.0646 | 0.0119 | 0.0406 | 0.0130 | 0.5085 |
| Host:Year | <0.001 | 0.012 | <0.001 | <0.001 | <0.001 | 0.002 | |||||
| Inoculation:Year | 0.026 | 0.001 | 0.584 | 0.435 | 0.307 | 0.213 | |||||
| Host:Inoculation:Year | 0.769 | 0.341 | 0.035 | 0.151 | 0.033 | 0.109 |
Figure 2Shoot biomass (a,b) and photosynthetic rate (c–f) of C. korshinskii and C. microphylla plants in 3 years. Inoculation treatments including inocula originating from rhizosphere of C. korshinskii (A), H. leave (B), C. microphylla (C) and sterilized control (CK). Bars indicate means with standard error (n = 7 for shoot biomass and n = 14 for photosynthetic rate). Different letters above bars indicated significant differences at p < 0.05 level according to Tukey’s test. Grey bars indicated home AMF and plant combinations.
Results of orthogonal contrasts for photosynthetic rate, biomass, and nutrient content of Caragana species among inoculated or un-inoculated and inoculated with home AMF (home) or other inocula (away). ‘+/−’ means a positive/negative effect of AMF inoculation or home advantage of conspecific inocula. Statistically significant effects (P) were shown behind.
|
|
| |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inoculated vs. Un-Inoculated | Home vs. Away | Inoculated vs. Un-Inoculated | Home vs. Away | |||||
| Shoot biomass | + | 0.144 | + | <0.001 | + | 0.977 | − | 0.38 |
| Photosynthetic rate (2017) | + | 0.132 | + | <0.001 | + | 0.376 | + | <0.001 |
| Photosynthetic rate (2018) | + | 0.017 | + | 0.102 | − | 0.426 | − | 0.144 |
| Foliar N | + | 0.854 | + | 0.002 | − | 0.002 | + | 0.089 |
| Foliar P | + | 0.244 | + | 0.009 | − | 0.008 | − | 0.444 |
| Foliar N:P | − | 0.397 | − | 0.365 | + | 0.383 | + | 0.003 |
Figure 3Correlations between shoot biomass of C. korshinskii ((a), n = 19) and C. microphylla ((b), n = 20) and the corresponding relative abundance of AMF Diversispora. Both plant biomass and AMF abundance were log transformed. Statistically significant effects (p) and the coefficient of determination (R2) were presented.
Figure 4Structural equation model (SEM) showed home AMF inoculation effects on C. korshinskii plant performance. Solid and dashed lines indicated significant (p < 0.05), and non-significant pathways (p > 0.05). The double headed arrow indicated correlations. Numbers above the arrows showed the standardized path coefficients. Arrow width is proportional to the strength of different pathways. Green and red lines indicated positive and negative pathways. R2 below each dependent variable represented the proportion of variance explained.