| Literature DB >> 28887008 |
Citlalli Harris-Valle1, Martín Esqueda2, Aldo Gutiérrez1, Alejandro E Castellanos3, Alfonso A Gardea1, Ricardo Berbara4.
Abstract
Plants response to symbiosis with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) under water stress is important to agriculture. Under abiotic stress conditions native fungi are more effective than exotics in improving plant growth and water status. Mycorrhization efficiency is related to soil fungi development and energy cost-benefit ratio. In this study, we assessed the effect on growth, water status and energy metabolism of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo when inoculated with native AMF from the Sonoran desert Mexico (mixed isolate and field consortium), and compared with an exotic species from a temperate region, under drought, low and high salinity conditions. Dry weights, leaf water content, water and osmotic potentials, construction costs, photochemistry and mycorrhization features were quantified. Under drought and low salinity conditions, the mixed isolate increased plant growth and leaf water content. Leaf water potential was increased only by the field consortium under drought conditions (0.5-0.9MPa). Under high salinity, the field consortium increased aerial dry weight (more than 1g) and osmotic potential (0.54MPa), as compared to non-mycorrhized controls. Plants inoculated with native AMF, which supposedly diminish the effects of stress, exhibited low construction costs, increased photochemical capacity, and grew larger external mycelia in comparison to the exotic inoculum.Entities:
Keywords: Construction cost; Glomus; Pacispora; Photosynthesis; Water status
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28887008 PMCID: PMC5790584 DOI: 10.1016/j.bjm.2017.04.005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Effects of the mycorrhizal inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo irrigated (I) and stressed with drought (D). The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), foliar water content (water), osmotic potential (Ψs), water potential (Ψw), and construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight).
| ADW (g) | RDW (g) | A:R | Water (%) | CC (g G/D) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | MI | 6.5 ± 0.10 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 42.0 ± 3.5 | 90.0 ± 0.4 | −1.1 ± 0.07 | −1.2 ± 0.01 | 151.1 ± 1.86 |
| FC | 6.9 ± 0.12 | 0.14 ± 0.01 | 49.9 ± 4.0 | 88.9 ± 0.6 | −1.1 ± 0.04 | −1.6 ± 0.05 | 162.8 ± 0.93 | |
| EI | 6.7 ± 0.14 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 40.6 ± 2.5 | 89.4 ± 0.6 | −1.6 ± 0.14 | −1.6 ± 0.07 | 173.8 ± 0.92 | |
| C | 6.6 ± 0.08 | 0.15 ± 0.01 | 45.9 ± 3.8 | 88.2 ± 0.5 | −1.1 ± 0.04 | −1.3 ± 0.03 | 155.8 ± 0.99 | |
| D | MI | 4.9 ± 0.08 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 21.2 ± 1.7 | 90.7 ± 0.2 | −1.3 ± 0.03 | −1.0 ± 0.03 | 186.1 ± 1.26 |
| FC | 4.6 ± 0.23 | 0.22 ± 0.02 | 22.8 ± 2.7 | 89.5 ± 0.7 | −1.1 ± 0.07 | −1.0 ± 0.02 | 184.7 ± 1.74 | |
| EI | 4.2 ± 0.08 | 0.14 ± 0.00 | 30.5 ± 1.6 | 87.4 ± 0.6 | −1.3 ± 0.13 | −0.9 ± 0.01 | 187.9 ± 0.48 | |
| C | 3.9 ± 0.15 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 25.5 ± 1.6 | 85.9 ± 1.3 | −1.2 ± 0.04 | −1.4 ± 0.01 | 180.1 ± 1.00 | |
| Significance | ||||||||
| S | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.16 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| M | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.39 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | |
| S × M | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.04a | 0.07 | 0.01a | 0.00a | 0.00a | |
These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (S) and mycorrhization (M).
Effects of the mycorrhizal inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo normal salinity (NS) and stressed with low salinity (LS). The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), foliar water content (water), osmotic potential (Ψs), water potential (Ψw), and construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight).
| ADW (g) | RDW (g) | A:R | Water (%) | CC (g G/D) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NS | MI | 5.7 ± 0.35 | 0.28 ± 0.03 | 20.9 ± 1.9 | 86.8 ± 0.9 | −1.2 ± 0.08 | −2.8 ± 0.31 | 151.8 ± 0.6 |
| FC | 5.8 ± 0.52 | 0.30 ± 0.03 | 19.8 ± 2.2 | 87.3 ± 0.4 | −1.2 ± 0.03 | −3.5 ± 0.27 | 166.0 ± 1.0 | |
| EI | 4.5 ± 0.40 | 0.29 ± 0.01 | 16.0 ± 1.7 | 86.5 ± 0.5 | −1.1 ± 0.05 | −3.6 ± 0.19 | 172.0 ± 0.5 | |
| C | 4.9 ± 0.16 | 0.28 ± 0.01 | 17.5 ± 1.2 | 86.1 ± 0.7 | −1.2 ± 0.04 | −3.7 ± 0.15 | 165.9 ± 0.6 | |
| LS | MI | 7.7 ± 0.78 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 40.9 ± 1.8 | 82.2 ± 0.5 | −1.8 ± 0.06 | −2.4 ± 0.42 | 145.7 ± 0.6 |
| FC | 7.0 ± 0.52 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 36.4 ± 1.8 | 83.8 ± 0.6 | −1.6 ± 0.01 | −2.4 ± 0.36 | 155.5 ± 1.0 | |
| EI | 4.8 ± 0.34 | 0.21 ± 0.01 | 23.0 ± 2.4 | 79.7 ± 0.7 | −1.5 ± 0.12 | −3.5 ± 0.42 | 164.1 ± 0.3 | |
| C | 4.5 ± 0.42 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 25.6 ± 2.2 | 78.1 ± 1.0 | −1.9 ± 0.10 | −3.3 ± 0.28 | 145.3 ± 0.8 | |
| Significance | ||||||||
| S | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.04 | 0.00 | |
| M | 0.00 | 0.65 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| S × M | 0.04a | 0.81 | 0.00a | 0.01a | 0.38 | 0.44 | 0.00a | |
These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (S) and mycorrhization (M).
Mycorrhization characteristics and effects of the inoculation of Cucurbita pepo var. pepo with high salinity. The assessed variables were: aerial dry weight (ADW), radicular dry weight (DRW), aerial: radicular dry weight ratio (A:R), osmotic potential (Ψs), construction costs (CC, g G/D: grams of glucose per dry weight), external mycelium (EM), mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and total number of spores (TNS).
| ADW (g) | RDW (g) | A:R | CC (g G/D) | EM (mg/g of soil) | MC (%) | TNS (spores/10 g of soil) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MI | 5.6a | 0.09a | 63.70a | −2.71a | 176.49a | 53.3a | 15.4a | 231.6ab |
| FC | 5.3a | 0.06b | 88.48b | −1.95a | 161.57b | 61.5a | 20.1a | 169.6b |
| EI | 5.4a | 0.10a | 52.85a | −2.45a | 164.33ab | 42.8a | 22.3a | 366.3a |
| C | 4.4b | 0.09a | 52.22a | −2.16a | 174.97a | 0 | 0 | 0 |
These values correspond to the mean of the results for the mixed inoculums (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inoculums (EI) and control (C). Means with different letters in a column are different (Tukey-Kramer p ≤ 0.05).
Mycorrhization characteristics in Cucurbita pepo var. pepo under conditions of stress by drought, low salinity and non-stressed. The assessed variables were external mycelium (EM), mycorrhizal colonization (MC), and total number of spores (TNS).
| EM | MC | TSN | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-stressed | Stressed | Non-stressed | Stressed | Non-stressed | Stressed | ||
| Drought | MI | 33.3 ± 1.6 | 42.1 ± 2.6 | 12.3 ± 1.1 | 10.4 ± 0.5 | 160.1 ± 8 | 163.9 ± 11 |
| FC | 43.0 ± 4.5 | 35.8 ± 3.4 | 11.5 ± 0.9 | 9.2 ± 0.9 | 202.9 ± 29 | 110.3 ± 17 | |
| EI | 42.6 ± 4.4 | 25.0 ± 1.5 | 17.9 ± 0.2 | 7.2 ± 0.4 | 249.4 ± 20 | 97.9 ± 08 | |
| C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Low salinity | MI | 35.5 ± 1.3 | 51.6 ± 1.7 | 24.2 ± 4.1 | 36.1 ± 4.1 | 93.6 ± 13 | 138.6 ± 22 |
| FC | 39.5 ± 1.4 | 51.7 ± 1.2 | 29.9 ± 3.0 | 26.0 ± 0.4 | 152.0 ± 22 | 91.8 ± 15 | |
| EI | 49.8 ± 2.5 | 32.8 ± 1.2 | 22.1 ± 2.2 | 70.3 ± 4.0 | 96.5 ± 4 | 65.2 ± 12 | |
| C | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| Significance | |||||||
| Drought | 0.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 | ||||
| Mycorrhization (M) | 0.22 | 0.14 | 0.65 | ||||
| Drought × M | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | ||||
| Low salinity | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.21 | ||||
| Mycorrhization (M) | 0.10 | 0.00 | 0.02 | ||||
| Low salinity × M | 0.00a | 0.00a | 0.00a | ||||
These values correspond to the mean ± standard error of the results for the mixed inocula (MI), field consortium (FC), exotic inocula (EI) and control (C). Factorial analysis asignificance p ≤ 0.05 among the stress treatment (drought or low salinity) and mycorrhization (M).
Fig. 1Performance index (PI) assessed at 21, 27, 38 and 45 d in culture and calculated through readings of chlorophyll fluorescence in Cucurbita pepo var. pepo under conditions of drought (A), irrigated (B), low salinity (C), normal salinity (D), and high salinity (E). These values are the arithmetic mean for three replicates, vertical lines represent standard deviation. Treatment C (), treatment EI (- - -), treatment FC (—), treatment MI (). Symbols for each inoculation treatment are the same as in Table 1.
Native AMF morphospecies composition inoculated onto Cucurbita pepo var. pepo following exposure to different drought and salinity stresses.
| Morphospecies | Spore content (%) | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Drought | Salinity | |||||||||
| Non-stressed | Stressed | Non-stressed | Low | High | ||||||
| MI | FC | MI | FC | MI | FC | MI | FC | MI | FC | |
| 23.1 | 2.7 | 21.5 | 28.0 | 14.1 | ||||||
| 5.5 | 0.4 | |||||||||
| 87.0 | 54.5 | 89.0 | 78.2 | 81.9 | 60.5 | 80.2 | 47.1 | 82.1 | 56.2 | |
| 1.2 | ||||||||||
| 2.2 | 2.7 | 18.5 | 4.8 | |||||||
| 13.0 | 10.4 | 11.0 | 14.3 | 18.1 | 5.6 | 19.8 | 3.2 | 17.9 | 14.5 | |
| 0.9 | 4.8 | 3.3 | 3.2 | 1.4 | ||||||
| 2.2 | 6.0 | 9.0 | ||||||||
Spore content (%) was calculated based on the sum of spores (total and per species) of six replicates. Captions for each inoculation treatment are as in Table 1.