Dong-Qiong Wang1,2, Chang-Lin Zhao1,2,3,4. 1. Key Laboratory for Forest Resources Conservation and Utilization in the Southwest Mountains of China, Ministry of Education, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China. 2. College of Biodiversity Conservation, Southwest Forestry University, Kunming 650224, China. 3. Yunnan Key Laboratory for Fungal Diversity and Green Development, Kunming Institute of Botany, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Kunming 650201, China. 4. School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.
Abstract
Two new corticioid fungal species, Phanerochaete pruinosa and P. rhizomorpha spp. nov. are proposed based on a combination of morphological features and molecular evidence. Phanerochaete pruinosa is characterized by the resupinate basidiomata with the pruinose hymenial surface, a monomitic hyphal system with simple-septate generative hyphae and subcylindrical basidiospores measuring as 3.5-6.7 × 1.5-2.7 µm. Phanerochaete rhizomorpha is characterized by having a smooth hymenophore covered by orange hymenial surface, the presence of rhizomorphs, subulate cystidia, and narrower ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores. Sequences of ITS+nLSU nrRNA gene regions of the studied specimens were generated and phylogenetic analyses were performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and Bayesian inference methods. These phylogenetic analyses showed that two new species clustered into genus Phanerochaete, in which P. pruinosa was sister to P. yunnanensis with high supports (100% BS, 100% BT, 1.00 BPP); morphologically differing by a pale orange to greyish orange and densely cracked hymenial surface. Another species P. rhizomorpha was closely grouped with P. citrinosanguinea with lower supports; morphologically having yellow to reddish yellow hymenial surface, and smaller cystidia measuring as 31-48 × 2.3-4.8 µm.
Two new corticioid fungal species, Phanerochaete pruinosa and P. rhizomorpha spp. nov. are proposed based on a combination of morphological features and molecular evidence. Phanerochaete pruinosa is characterized by the resupinate basidiomata with the pruinose hymenial surface, a monomitic hyphal system with simple-septate generative hyphae and subcylindrical basidiospores measuring as 3.5-6.7 × 1.5-2.7 µm. Phanerochaete rhizomorpha is characterized by having a smooth hymenophore covered by orange hymenial surface, the presence of rhizomorphs, subulate cystidia, and narrower ellipsoid to ellipsoid basidiospores. Sequences of ITS+nLSU nrRNA gene regions of the studied specimens were generated and phylogenetic analyses were performed with maximum likelihood, maximum parsimony, and Bayesian inference methods. These phylogenetic analyses showed that two new species clustered into genus Phanerochaete, in which P. pruinosa was sister to P. yunnanensis with high supports (100% BS, 100% BT, 1.00 BPP); morphologically differing by a pale orange to greyish orange and densely cracked hymenial surface. Another species P. rhizomorpha was closely grouped with P. citrinosanguinea with lower supports; morphologically having yellow to reddish yellow hymenial surface, and smaller cystidia measuring as 31-48 × 2.3-4.8 µm.
Corticioid fungi is a large group of Basidiomycota with simpler basidiomata with the diverse morphological features when compared with polypores, but the phylogenetic diversity of this group is less intensively studied [1,2]. In the subtropical–tropical areas, many corticioid taxa have not been discovered and described worldwide. The genus Phanerochaete P. Karst. is a member of the corticioid fungi, which is typified by P. alnea (Fr.) P. Karst. [3], and the genus is characterized by the resupinate, membranaceous basidiomata with or without rhizomorphs, a monomitic hyphal system with primarily simple-septate generative hyphae, clavate basidia with four sterigmata, and smooth, thin-walled, inamyloid basidiospores [1,4,5]. Index Fungorum (http://www.indexfungorum.org; accessed on 9 December 2021) registers 187 specific and infraspecific names in Phanerochaete. The diversity and taxonomy of Phanerochaete s.l. in China have been studied for the last 30 years [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19].Molecular studies involving Phanerochaete based on the ribosomal DNA (rDNA) sequences, revealed the phylogenetic distribution of resupinate forms across the major clades of mushroom-forming fungi, in which P. chrysosporium Burds. nested into phlebioid clade in Polyporales [20]. Revisiting the taxonomy of Phanerochaete (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) using a four gene dataset and extensive ITS sampling indicated that Phanerochaete sensu lato was polyphyletic and distributed across nine lineages in the phlebioid clade, in which six lineages were associated to described genera [21]. Miettinen et al. [22]. explored the DNA-phylogeny-based and morphology-based to reconcile the polypores and genus concepts in the family Phanerochaetaceae, which the macromorphology of fruiting bodies and hymenophore construction did not reflect monophyletic groups, and Ceriporia inflata B.S. Jia and B.K. Cui was combined into Phanerochaete. Amplifying nrLSU, nrITS, and rpb1 genes across the Polyporales revealed that eleven genera clustered into family Phanerochaetaceae, and two families Hapalopilaceae and Bjerkanderaceae were placed as synonyms of Phanerochaetaceae [23]. Recently, the research supported by morphological studies and the phylogenetic analyses, showed that many new taxa of Phanerochaete s.s. were found and displayed the taxonomic status for the new taxa within genus Phanerochaete [14,19].In 2018–2019, we collected the material supposedly belonging to the two undescribed species of corticioid fungi from Yunnan Province, China. We present the morphological and molecular phylogenetic evidence that support the recognition of two new species within the Phanerochaete s.s., based on the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) and regions nLSU sequences.
2. Materials and Methods
2.1. Morphology
The fruiting bodies were observed growing on the ground of broad-leaved treemixed forest. The fruiting bodies were dried in an electric food dehydrator at 40 °C, then sealed and stored in an envelope bag. They were then transported to Kunming where microscopic morphology and phylogeny to be studied at the mycology laboratory of Southwest Forestry University, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. The for-study specimens were deposited at the herbarium of Southwest Forestry University (SWFC), Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. Macromorphological descriptions were based on field notes and photos captured in the field and lab. Color terminology follow Petersen [24]. Micromorphological data were obtained from the dried specimens, and observed under a light microscope following Dai [25]. The following abbreviations were used: KOH = 5% potassium hydroxide water solution, CB = Cotton Blue, CB– = acyanophilous, IKI = Melzer’s reagent, IKI– = both inamyloid and indextrinoid, L = mean spore length (arithmetic average for all spores), W = mean spore width (arithmetic average for all spores), Q = variation in the L/W ratios between the specimens studied, n = a/b (number of spores (a) measured from given number of specimens (b)).
2.2. Molecular Phylogeny
CTAB rapid plant genome extraction kit-DN14 (Aidlab Biotechnologies Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) was used to obtain genomic DNA from dried specimens, according to the manufacturer’s instructions followed previous study [26]. ITS region was amplified with primer pair ITS5 and ITS4 [27]. nLSU region was amplified with primer pair LR0R and LR7 (http://lutzonilab.org/nuclear-ribosomal-dna/; accessed on 28 September 2021). The PCR procedure for ITS was as follows: initial denaturation at 95 °C for 3 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 40 s, 58 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 1 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR procedure for nLSU was as follows: initial denaturation at 94 °C for 1 min, followed by 35 cycles at 94 °C for 30 s, 48 °C for 1 min and 72 °C for 1.5 min, and a final extension of 72 °C for 10 min. The PCR products were purified and directly sequenced at Kunming Tsingke Biological Technology Limited Company, Kunming, Yunnan Province, China. All newly generated sequences were deposited in NCBI GenBank (Table 1).
Table 1
List of species, specimens, and GenBank accession numbers of sequences used in this study.
Species Name
Specimen No.
GenBank Accession No.
References
ITS
nLSU
Bjerkandera adusta
FP-101236
KP134982
[21]
B. adusta
HHB-12826
KP134983
KP135198
[21]
B. fumosa
Dai 12674B
MW507112
MW520213
[28]
B. fumosa
Dai 21087
MW507110
[28]
Byssomerulius corium
FP-102382
KP135007
KP135230
[21]
B. corium
FP-107055
KP135008
[21]
Ceraceomyces serpens
HHB-15692-Sp
KP135031
KP135200
[21]
C. serpens
L-11105
KP135032
[21]
Ceriporia purpurea
KKN-223-Sp
KP135044
KP135203
[21]
C. purpurea
HHB-3964
KP135042
[21]
C. reticulata
RLG-11354
KP135041
KP135204
[21]
C. reticulata
L-7837
KP135040
[21]
Efibula gracilis
FD-455
KP135027
MZ637116
[21]
E. gracilis
FP-102052
KP135028
[21]
E. tropica
Wu 0809-8
MZ636968
MZ637130
unpublished
E. tropica
WEI 18-149
MZ636967
MZ637129
unpublished
Gloeoporus dichrous
FP-151129
KP135058
KP135213
[21]
G. pannocinctus
L-15726-Sp
KP135060
KP135214
[21]
Hyphodermella poroides
Dai 12045
KX008367
KX011852
[29]
H. poroides
Dai 10848
KX008368
KX011853
[29]
H. rosae
FP-150552
KP134978
KP135223
[21]
H. rosae
MA-Fungi
FN600389
JN939588
[30]
Irpex lacteus
FD-9
KP135026
KP135224
[21]
I. lacteus
FD-93
KP135025
[21]
Meruliopsis albostramineus
HHB-10729
KP135051
KP135229
[21]
M. albostramineus
L-9778
KP135052
[21]
M. taxicola
CBS 45548
MH856432
MH867978
[31]
M. taxicola
Kuljok 00/75 (GB)
EU118648
[32]
Phaeophlebiopsis caribbeana
HHB-6990
KP135415
KP135243
[21]
P. caribbeana
FD-442 (TYPE)
KP135416
[21]
P. ignerii
FD-425
KP135418
[21]
P. peiophoroides
FP-150577
KP135417
KP135273
[21]
Phanerochaete. albida
FD-31
KP135308
KP135210
[19]
P. alnea
OM 8110
KP135171
[21]
P. alnea
KHL 12054
EU118653
EU118653
[32]
P. argillacea
Wu 9712-18
GQ470656
[13]
P. arizonica
RLG-10248-sp
KP135170
KP135239
[21]
P. australis
He 6013
MT235656
MT248136
[19]
P. australis
HHB-7105-sp
KP135081
KP135240
[21]
P. australosanguinea
20098 Tell
MH233928
[33]
P. australosanguinea
20102 Tell
MH233929
[33]
P. bambucicola
He 3606
MT235657
MT248137
[19]
P. bambucicola
Wu 0707-2
MF399404
MF399395
[15]
P. brunnea
He 4192
MT235658
MT248138
[19]
P. brunnea
He 1873
KX212220
KX212224
[17]
P. burdsallii
He 2066
MT235690
MT248177
[19]
P. burdsallii
CFMR: RF9JR
KU668973
unpublished
P. burtii
HHB-4618-sp
KP135117
KP135241
[21]
P. burtii
FD-171
KP135116
[21]
P. calotricha
Vanhanen-382
KP135107
[21]
P. canobrunnea
He 5726
MT235659
MT248139
[19]
P. canobrunnea
CHWC 1506-66
LC412095
LC412104
[14]
P. canolutea
Wu 9211-105
GQ470641
[13]
P. carnosa
He 5172
MT235660
MT248140
[19]
P. carnosa
HHB-9195
KP135129
KP135242
[21]
P. chrysosporium
HHB-6251
KP135094
KP135246
[21]
P. chrysosporium
He 5778
MT235661
MT248141
[19]
P. cinerea
He 6003
MT248172
[19]
P. citrinosanguinea
He 4298
MT235691
MT248178
[19]
P. citrinosanguinea
FP-105385-sp
KP135100
KP135234
[21]
P. concrescens
He 4657
MT235662
MT248142
[19]
P. concrescens
Spirin 7322
KP994380
KP994382
[34]
P. cumulodentata
He 2995
MT235664
MT248144
[19]
P. cumulodentata
LE 298935
KP994359
KP994386
[34]
P. cystidiata
He 4224
MT235665
MT248145
[19]
P. cystidiata
Wu 1708-326
LC412097
LC412100
[14]
P. deflectens
FCUG 2777
GQ470644
[13]
P. ericina
He 4285
MT235666
MT248146
[19]
P. ericina
HHB-2288
KP135167
KP135247
[21]
P. exilis
HHB-6988
KP135001
KP135236
[21]
P. fusca
Wu 1409-163
LC412099
LC412106
[14]
P. hymenochaetoides
He 5988
MT248173
[19]
P. incarnata
He 20120728-1
MT235669
MT248149
[19]
P. incarnata
WEI 16-075
MF399406
MF399397
[15]
P. inflata
Dai 10376
JX623929
JX644062
[35]
P. inflata
Cui 7712
JX623930
JX644063
[35]
P. krikophora
HHB-5796
KP135164
KP135268
[21]
P. laevis
He 20120917-8
MT235670
MT248150
[19]
P. laevis
HHB-15519
KP135149
KP135249
[21]
P. leptocystidiata
He 5853
MT235685
MT248168
[19]
P. leptocystidiata
Dai 10468
MT235684
MT248167
[19]
P. livescens
He 5010
MT235671
MT248151
[19]
P. livescens
FD-106
KP135070
KP135253
[21]
P. magnoliae
He 3321
MT235672
MT248152
[19]
P. magnoliae
HHB-9829-sp
KP135089
KP135237
[21]
P. metuloidea
He 2565
MT248163
[19]
P. metuloidea
He 2766
MT235682
MT248164
[19]
P. minor
He 3988
MT235686
MT248170
[19]
P. minor
He 3977
MT248169
[19]
P. parmastoi
He 4570
MT235673
MT248153
[19]
P. parmastoi
Wu 880313-6
GQ470654
[13]
P. porostereoides
He 1902
KX212217
KX212221
[17]
P. pruinosa
CLZhao 7712
MZ435346
MZ435350
Present study
P. pruinosa
CLZhao 7713
MZ435347
MZ435351
Present study
P. pseudomagnoliae
PP-25
KP135091
KP135250
[21]
P. pseudosanguinea
FD-244
KP135098
KP135251
[21]
P. queletii
HHB-11463
KP134994
KP135235
[21]
P. queletii
FP-102166
KP134995
[21]
P. rhizomorpha
CLZhao 10470
MZ435348
MZ435352
Present study
P. rhizomorpha
CLZhao 10477
MZ435349
MZ435353
Present study
P. rhodella
FD-18
KP135187
KP135258
[21]
P. robusta
Wu 1109-69
MF399409
MF399400
[15]
P. robusta
Ghobad 2288
KP127068
KP127069
[16]
P. sanguinea
HHB-7524
KP135101
KP135244
[21]
P. sanguineocarnosa
FD-359
KP135122
KP135245
[21]
P. sinensis
He 4660
MT235688
MT248175
[19]
P. sinensis
GC 1809-56
MT235689
MT248176
[19]
P. sordida
He 5400
MT235676
MT248157
[19]
P. sordida
FD-241
KP135136
KP135252
[21]
P. stereoides
He 5824
MT235677
MT248158
[19]
P. subceracea
FP-105974-R
KP135162
KP135255
[21]
P. subrosea
He 2421
MT235687
MT248174
[19]
P. taiwaniana
He 5269
MT235680
MT248161
[19]
P. taiwaniana
Wu 0112-13
MF399412
MF399403
[15]
P. thailandica
2015_07
MF467737
[36]
P. velutina
He 3079
MT235681
MT248162
[19]
P. velutina
Kotiranta 25567
KP994354
KP994387
[34]
P. xerophila
HHB-8509-Sp
KP134996
KP135259
[21]
P. xerophila
KKN-172
KP134997
[21]
P. yunnanensis
He 2719
MT235683
MT248166
[19]
P. yunnanensis
He 2697
MT248165
[19]
Phlebiopsis flavidoalba
FD-263
KP135402
KP135271
[21]
P. flavidoalba
FD-374
KP135403
[21]
P. gigantea
FP-70857-sp
KP135390
KP135272
[21]
P. gigantea
FP-101815
KP135389
[21]
Pirex concentricus
OSC-41587
KP134984
KP135275
[21]
P. concentricus
Kropp160Bup6-R
KP134985
[21]
Rhizochaete filamentosa
HHB-3169
KP135410
KP135278
[21]
R. filamentosa
FP-105240
KP135411
[21]
R.radicata
FD-123
KP135407
KP135279
[21]
Terana caerulea
FP-104073
KP134980
KP135276
[21]
T. caerulea
T-616
KP134981
[21]
Trametopsis aborigena
Robledo 1238
KY655337
[37]
T. aborigena
Robledo 1236
KY655336
[37]
T. cervina
AJ-185
JN165020
JN164839
[21]
T. cervina
AJ-189
JN165021
[21]
New sequences are shown in bold.
Sequences were aligned in MAFFT 7 (https://mafft.cbrc.jp/alignment/server/; accessed on 28 September 2021) using G-INS-i strategy for ITS+nLSU combined dataset, and manually adjusted in BioEdit [38]. Aligned dataset was deposited in TreeBase (submission ID 28442). Phlebiopsis gigantea Fr. and Rhizochaete radicata (Henn.) Gresl., Nakasone and Rajchenb were selected as an outgroup for phylogenetic analyses of combined dataset following a previous study [19]. The taxon sampling strategy for the selection of sequences for phylogenetic trees was to choose (1) in a larger scale, focusing on the related genera in the families Phanerochaetaceae and Irpicaceae in Figure 1; (2) the related taxa based on BLAST search in GenBank within Phanerochaete s.l.; and (3) all species of Phanerochaete s.s.
Figure 1
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of two new species and related genera in Phanerochaetaceae and Irpicaceae based on ITS+nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values >70%, parsimony bootstrap values >70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.95, respectively.
Maximum parsimony analysis was applied to the combined (ITS+nLSU) dataset. Its approaches followed Zhao and Wu [26], and the tree construction procedure was performed in PAUP* version 4.0b10 [39]. All characters were equally weighted and gaps were treated as missing data. Trees were inferred using the heuristic search option with TBR branch swapping and 1000 random sequence additions. Max-trees were set to 5000, branches of zero length were collapsed and all parsimonious trees were saved. Clade robustness was assessed using bootstrap (BT) analysis with 1000 replicates [40]. Descriptive tree statistics: tree length (TL), consistency index (CI), retention index (RI), rescaled consistency index (RC), and homoplasy index (HI) were calculated for each Maximum Parsimonious Tree generated. Datamatrix was also analyzed using Maximum Likelihood (ML) approach with RAxML-HPC2 through the CIPRES Science Gateway (www.phylo.org; accessed on 28 September 2021) [41]. Branch support (BS) for ML analysis was determined by 1000 bootstrap replicates.MrModeltest 2.3 [42] was used to determine the best-fit evolution model for the dataset for Bayesian inference (BI). BI was calculated with MrBayes 3.1.7a [43]. Four Markov chains were run for 2 runs from random starting trees for 10 million generations for ITS+nLSU (Figure 2). The first one-fourth of all generations was discarded as burn-in. The majority rule consensus tree of all remaining trees was calculated. Branches were considered as significantly supported if they received maximum likelihood bootstrap value (BS) >70%, maximum parsimony bootstrap value (BT) >70%, or Bayesian posterior probabilities (BPP) >0.95.
Figure 2
Maximum Parsimony strict consensus tree illustrating the phylogeny of two new species and related species in Phanerochaete based on ITS+nLSU sequences. Branches are labeled with maximum likelihood bootstrap values >70%, parsimony bootstrap values >70% and Bayesian posterior probabilities >0.95, respectively. The yellow backgrounds indicate new species.
3. Results
3.1. Molecular Phylogeny
The ITS+nLSU dataset (Figure 1) included sequences from 86 fungal specimens representing 50 species. The dataset had an aligned length of 2368 characters, of which 1170 characters are constant, 598 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 600 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded one equally parsimonious tree (TL = 3476, CI = 0.3631, HI = 0.6369, RI = 0.7539, RC = 0.3512). Best model for the ITS+nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis was GTR+I+G (lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1)). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology to MP analysis with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.038487 (BI), and the effective sample size (ESS) across the two runs is the double of the average ESS (avg ESS) = 303.The phylogeny (Figure 1) based on the combined ITS+nLSU sequences indicated that both species Phanerochaete pruinose and P. rhizomorpha clustered into Phanerochaete s.s and then P. pruinose grouped with P. subceracea (Burt) Burds.; P. rhizomorpha was sister to P. citrinosanguinea Floudas and Hibbett.The ITS+nLSU dataset (Figure 2) included sequences from 83 fungal specimens representing 53 taxa. The dataset had an aligned length of 2017 characters, of which 1548 characters are constant, 164 are variable and parsimony-uninformative, and 395 are parsimony-informative. Maximum parsimony analysis yielded 35 equally parsimonious trees (TL = 1900, CI = 0.4095, HI = 0.5905, RI = 0.6456, RC = 0.2644). Best model for the ITS+nLSU dataset estimated and applied in the Bayesian analysis was GTR+I+G (lset nst = 6, rates = invgamma; prset statefreqpr = dirichlet (1,1,1,1)). Bayesian analysis and ML analysis resulted in a similar topology to MP analysis with an average standard deviation of split frequencies = 0.004260 (BI), and the effective sample size (ESS) across the two runs is the double of the average ESS (avg ESS) = 309.The phylogram inferred from ITS+nLSU sequences (Figure 2) revealed that two new species were clustered into genus Phanerochaete s.s.; P. pruinosa sp. nova. was sister to P. yunnanensis Y.L. Xu and S.H. He with high supports (100% BS, 100% BT, 1.00 BPP), and then grouped with P. robusta Parmasto without supported data. Another species P. rhizomorpha sp. nova. was closely grouped with P. citrinosanguinea with lower supports, and then grouped with P. pseudosanguinea Floudas and Hibbett (–BS, 98% BP and 1.00 BPP) and P. sanguinea (Fr.) Pouzar (96% BS, 91% BP and 1.00 BPP).
3.2. Taxonomy
C.L. Zhao and D.Q. Wang, sp. nov. Figure 3 and Figure 4.
Figure 3
Basidiomata of Phanerochaete pruinosa (holotype) Bars: (A) = 2 cm and (B) = 1 mm.
Figure 4
Microscopic structures of Phanerochaete pruinosa (holotype): basidiospores (A), basidia and basidioles (B), A section of hymenium (C). Bars: (A) = 5 µm, (B,C) = 10 µm.
MycoBank no.: MB 841271.Diagnosis: It differs from P. yunnanensis by its pruinose hymenophore with the white to slightly cream hymenial surface and lightly darkening in KOH.Holotype—China, Yunnan Province, Chuxiong, Zixishan National Forestry Park, on the bark of fallen angiosperms, 101.4° E, 25.1° N, 1 July 2018, CLZhao 7113 (SWFC).Etymology— (Lat.): from Latin, referring to the white powder on hymenial surface of basidiomata.Fruiting body—Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adnate, undetachable from substrate, membranaceous to coriaceous, without odor and taste when fresh, up to 15 cm long, 3 cm wide, 50–100 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth to have small verrucous process, pruinose, white when fresh, white to slightly cream on drying; lightly darkening in KOH. Margin sterile, narrow, white, attached.Hyphal system—Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae simple-septa, colorless, thick-walled, unbranched, interwoven, 3–4.5 µm in diameter, subhymenial hyphae densely covered by larger crystals, basal hyphae regular; IKI–, CB–; tissues unchanged in KOH.Hymenium—Hymenial cystidia and cystidoles absent; basidia clavate to subcylindrical, with four sterigmata and a simple-septum, 13–24 µm × 3.5–4.5 µm.Spores—Basidiospores cylindrical, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, IKI–, CB–, (3.3–) 3.5–6.7(–7) µm × 1.5–2.7(–2.9) µm, L = 4.42 µm, W = 1.94 µm, Q = 2.21–2.35 (n = 60/2).Additional specimen examined—China, Yunnan Province, Zixishan National Forestry Park, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 101.4° E, 25.1° N, 1 July 2018, C.L. Zhao 7112 (SWFC).Habitat and ecology—Climate of the sample collection site is monsoon humid, and the forest type is evergreen broad-leaved forest, and the samples were collected on an angiosperm branch.C.L. Zhao and D.Q. Wang sp. nov. Figure 5 and Figure 6.
Figure 5
Basidiomata of Phanerochaete rhizomorpha (holotype) Bars: (A) = 2 cm and (B) = 1 mm.
Figure 6
Microscopic structures of Phanerochaete rhizomorpha (holotype): basidiospores (A), basidia and basidioles (B), cystidia (C). A section of hymenium (D). Bars: (A) = 5 µm, (B–D) = 10 µm.
MycoBank no.: MB 841272.Diagnosis: It differs from P. citrinosanguinea by its orange hymenial surface and larger cystidia 48.5–71.5 µm × 3–6.5 µm)Holotype—China, Yunnan Province, Dali, Nanjian Country, Lingbaoshan National Forestry Park, on the fallen branch of angiosperm, 24.7° N, 100.6° E, 10 January 2019, C.L. Zhao 10,477 (SWFC).Etymology— (Lat.): from Latin, referring to the rhizomorphic basidiomata of the specimens.Fruiting body—Basidiomata annual, resupinate, adnate, easily detachable from substrate, membranaceous, up to 5 cm long, 3 cm wide, 200–300 µm thick. Hymenial surface smooth, slightly orange when fresh, orange upon drying; lightly darkening in KOH. Margin sterile, buff to slightly orange, up to 1 mm wide, rhizomorphic.Hyphal system—Hyphal system monomitic, generative hyphae simple-septa, colorless, thick-walled, frequently branched, interwoven, 3–6.5 µm in diameter, basal hyphae regular, numerous crystals present among the abhymenium hyphae, IKI–, CB–; tissues unchanged in KOH.Hymenium—Hymenium cystidia subulate or tapering, colorless, thick-walled, with 2–4 septa, 48.5–71.5 µm × 3–6.5 µm; basidia subcylindrical, with 4 sterigmata, 18.5–35.5 µm × 3.5–5.5 µm.Spores—Basidiospores narrower ellipsoid to ellipsoid, colorless, thin-walled, smooth, with oil 1–2 drops inside, IKI–, CB–, 4.5–5.8(–6) µm × 2.7–3.6(–3.8) µm, L = 5.07 µm, W = 3.19 µm, Q = 1.58–1.60 (n = 62/2).Additional specimen examined—China, Yunnan Province, Nanjian Country, Lingbaoshan National Forestry Park, on fallen branch of angiosperm, 24.7° N, 100.6° E, 10 January 2019, C.L. Zhao 10,470 (SWFC).Habitat and ecology—Climate of the sample collection site is a transition between tropical and subtropical climate, and the forest type is the tropical monsoon evergreen broad-leaved forest, and the samples were collected on an angiosperm trunk.
4. Discussion
In the present study, two new species, Phanerochaete pruinosa C.L. Zhao and D.Q. Wang and P. rhizomorpha C.L. Zhao and D.Q. Wang spp. nov., are described based on phylogenetic analyses and morphological characters. The nucleotide differences of phylogenetically similar species to Phanerochaete pruinosa and P. rhizomorpha.Phylogenetically, Xu et al. [19] revealed the taxonomy and phylogeny of Phanerochaete sensu stricto (Polyporales, Basidiomycota) with emphasis on Chinese collections, which showed that twenty-eight species of Phanerochaete s.s. from China are confirmed by morphology and DNA sequence data. In the present study (Figure 2), two new taxa clustered into Phanerochaete s.s., in which P. pruinosa was sister to P. yunnanensis, and then grouped with P. robusta. Another species P. rhizomorpha was closely grouped with P. citrinosanguinea with lower supports, and then grouped with P. pseudosanguinea and P. sanguinea. However, morphologically, P. yunnanensis is separated from P. pruinosa by having a pale orange to greyish orange and densely cracked hymenial surface [19]; P. robusta differs in its yellow basidiomata and two kinds of cystidia without encrustation, larger basidiospores (5.5–7 μm × 2.4–2.9 μm) and a boreal distribution [34]. Phanerochaete citrinosanguinea differs from P. rhizomorpha by having yellow to reddish yellow hymenial surface, and smaller cystidia (31–48 μm × 2.3–4.8 µm) [21]; P. pseudosanguinea differs P. rhizomorpha in its light red or dark red hymenial surface, and narrower basidiospores (4–5.5 µm × 2–2.5 µm) [21]; P.
sanguinea is separated from P. rhizomorpha by having the thin-walled cystidia and the larger basidia (25–45 μm × 4–6 μm) [1]; in addition, there is some coloration of wood as in P. sanguinea.Morphologically, Phanerochaete pruinosa is similar to P. concrescens Spirin and Volobuev and P. sordida (P. Karst.) J. Erikss. and Ryvarden, based on presence of white or cream hymenial surface. However, P. concrescens differs from P. pruinosa by having the large basidia (27–39 μm × 4–5 µm) [34]; P. sordida is separated from P. pruinosa by presence of cystidia and wider basidiospores (5–7 μm × 2.5–3.5 μm) [1].Phanerochaete rhizomorpha reminds four taxa of Phanerochaete based on the character by having the rhizomorph, P. burdsallii Y.L. Xu, Nakasone and S.H. He, P. leptocystidiata Y.L. Xu and S.H. He, P. sinensis Y.L. Xu, C.C. Chen and S.H. He and P. subrosea Y.L. Xu and S.H. He. However, P. burdsallii differs from P.
rhizomorpha by having the cystidia encrusted with small crystals [19]; P.
leptocystidiata differs in having a tuberculate hymenial surface and thin-walled cystidia encrusted at apex (24–30 μm × 4–6 µm) [19]; P. sinensis differs in its thin-walled cystidia and the shorter basidia (17–22 μm × 4–5 µm) [19]; P. subrosea is separated from P. rhizomorpha by having the thin-walled and smaller cystidia (33–55 μm × 3–5 µm) [19].Phanerochaete rhizomorpha is similar to P. aurantiobadia Ghob.-Nejh., S.L. Liu, Langer and Y.C. Dai, P. cumulodentata (Nikol.) Parmasto and P. hymenochaetoides Y.L. Xu and S.H. He based on the character by the orange hymenial surface. However, P. aurantiobadia differs from P. rhizomorpha by having the larger basidiospores (5–8.3 μm × 2–3 µm) [16]; P. cumulodentata differs from P. rhizomorpha by a tuberculate hymenophore and shorter basidia (16.7–28.3 μm × 3.7–5.2 µm) [34]; P. hymenochaetoides differs from P. rhizomorpha by having both smaller cystidia (30–45 μm × 3–4 µm) and basidiospores (4–5.2 μm × 2–2.8 µm) [19].In the ecology and biogeography, the taxa of Phanerochaete are a typical example of wood-rotting fungi, which are mainly distributed in Asia, Europe, and America, and the substrata are mostly hardwood [1,25], and this genus is an extensively studied group of Basidiomycota; nonetheless, the wood-rotting fungi diversity is still not well known in the subtropics and tropics [44,45,46,47,48]. The two new species, Phanerochaete pruinosa and P. rhizomorpha spp. nov., were found in subtropics, which enriches the diversity of wood-rotting fungi.
Authors: Saranyaphat Boonmee; Dhanushka N Wanasinghe; Mark S Calabon; Naruemon Huanraluek; Sajini K U Chandrasiri; Gareth E B Jones; Walter Rossi; Marco Leonardi; Sanjay K Singh; Shiwali Rana; Paras N Singh; Deepak K Maurya; Ajay C Lagashetti; Deepika Choudhary; Yu-Cheng Dai; Chang-Lin Zhao; Yan-Hong Mu; Hai-Sheng Yuan; Shuang-Hui He; Rungtiwa Phookamsak; Hong-Bo Jiang; María P Martín; Margarita Dueñas; M Teresa Telleria; Izabela L Kałucka; Andrzej M Jagodziński; Kare Liimatainen; Diana S Pereira; Alan J L Phillips; Nakarin Suwannarach; Jaturong Kumla; Surapong Khuna; Saisamorn Lumyong; Tarynn B Potter; Roger G Shivas; Adam H Sparks; Niloofar Vaghefi; Mohamed A Abdel-Wahab; Faten A Abdel-Aziz; Guo-Jie Li; Wen-Fei Lin; Upendra Singh; Rajendra P Bhatt; Hyang Burm Lee; Thuong T T Nguyen; Paul M Kirk; Arun Kumar Dutta; Krishnendu Acharya; V Venkateswara Sarma; M Niranjan; Kunhiraman C Rajeshkumar; Nikhil Ashtekar; Sneha Lad; Nalin N Wijayawardene; Darbe J Bhat; Rong-Ju Xu; Subodini N Wijesinghe; Hong-Wei Shen; Zong-Long Luo; Jing-Yi Zhang; Phongeun Sysouphanthong; Naritsada Thongklang; Dan-Feng Bao; Janith V S Aluthmuhandiram; Jafar Abdollahzadeh; Alireza Javadi; Francesco Dovana; Muhammad Usman; Abdul Nasir Khalid; Asha J Dissanayake; Anusha Telagathoti; Maraike Probst; Ursula Peintner; Isaac Garrido-Benavent; Lilla Bóna; Zsolt Merényi; Lajos Boros; Bratek Zoltán; J Benjamin Stielow; Ning Jiang; Cheng-Ming Tian; Esmaeil Shams; Farzaneh Dehghanizadeh; Adel Pordel; Mohammad Javan-Nikkhah; Teodor T Denchev; Cvetomir M Denchev; Martin Kemler; Dominik Begerow; Chun-Ying Deng; Emma Harrower; Tohir Bozorov; Tutigul Kholmuradova; Yusufjon Gafforov; Aziz Abdurazakov; Jian-Chu Xu; Peter E Mortimer; Guang-Cong Ren; Rajesh Jeewon; Sajeewa S N Maharachchikumbura; Chayanard Phukhamsakda; Ausana Mapook; Kevin D Hyde Journal: Fungal Divers Date: 2021-12-07 Impact factor: 20.372
Authors: D Vu; M Groenewald; M de Vries; T Gehrmann; B Stielow; U Eberhardt; A Al-Hatmi; J Z Groenewald; G Cardinali; J Houbraken; T Boekhout; P W Crous; V Robert; G J M Verkley Journal: Stud Mycol Date: 2018-05-30 Impact factor: 16.097