| Literature DB >> 34947021 |
Nadia Mohamed El-Shafey1, Marym A Marzouk1, Manal M Yasser1, Salwa A Shaban1, Gerrit T S Beemster2, Hamada AbdElgawad1.
Abstract
Heavy metal contamination in soil is increasing rapidly due to increasing anthropogenic activities. Despite the importance of rose-scented geranium as a medicinal plant, little attention was paid to enhancing its productivity in heavy metal-polluted soil. In this regard, endophytes improve plant resistance to heavy metal toxicity and enhance its tissue quality. Here, the impact of the three endophytic fungi Talaromyces versatilis (E6651), Emericella nidulans (E6658), and Aspergillus niger (E6657) on geranium growth, tolerance, and tissue quality under cadmium (Cd) stress was investigated. In contrast to E. nidulans, T. versatilis and A. niger enhanced geranium growth and the stimulatory effect was more pronounced under Cd-stress. The three endophytes significantly alleviated Cd accumulation and increased mineral content in geranium leaves. In addition, endophytic fungi successfully alleviated Cd-induced membrane damage and reinforced the antioxidant defenses in geranium leaves. Inoculation with endophytes stimulated all the antioxidant enzymes under Cd-stress, and the response was more obvious in the case of T. versatilis and A. niger. To reduce the toxicity of tissue-Cd levels, T. versatilis and A. niger upregulated the detoxification mechanisms; glutathione-S-transferase, phytochelatin, and metallothionein levels. Moreover, endophytic fungi improved the medicinal value and quality of geranium by increasing total antioxidant capacity (TAC), phenolic compound biosynthesis (phenylalanine ammonia-lyase), and vitamin content as well as the quantity and quality of essential oil, particularly under Cd-stress conditions. The variation in the mechanisms modulated by the different endophytic fungi was supported by Principal Component Analysis (PCA). Overall, this study provided fundamental insights into endophytes' impact as a feasible strategy to mitigate the phytotoxicity hazards of Cd-stress in geranium and enhance its quality, based on the growth and biochemical investigations.Entities:
Keywords: Cd-stress; Pelargonium graveolens; detoxification; endophytic fungi; essential oil; redox status; tissue quality
Year: 2021 PMID: 34947021 PMCID: PMC8705862 DOI: 10.3390/jof7121039
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Fungi (Basel) ISSN: 2309-608X
Figure 1(a) Total leaves fresh weight, (b) content of H2O2 and (c) lipid peroxidation (MDA) of geranium non-inoculated (NI) or inoculated with different endophytic fungi; T. versatilis (E6651), E. nidulans (E6658) and A. niger (E6657) under normal conditions and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress. Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 5–8) for (a) and (n = 3) for (b,c). For comparison among different treatments within and between levels of both normal conditions and cadmium stress, values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different according to One-way ANOVA with Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Mineral content in leaves of geranium non-inoculated (NI) or inoculated with different endophytic fungi under normal conditions and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress.
| Minerals | Normal Conditions | Cadmium Stress | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NI | NI | |||||||
| Cd | 0.000 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 0.00 ± 0.00 a | 8.351 ± 0.51 c | 8.187 ± 0.62 c | 6.586 ± 0.64 b | 6.352 ± 0.84 b |
| K | 1.440 ± 0.09 bc | 1.36 ± 0.24 bc | 1.14 ± 0.20 ab | 1.94 ± 0.19 d | 0.780 ± 0.05 a | 1.85 ± 0.12 cd | 2.070 ± 0.19 d | 2.270 ± 0.10 d |
| Ca | 0.028 ± 0.00 b | 0.035 ± 0.01 bc | 0.03 ± 0.00 bc | 0.04 ± 0.00 cd | 0.017 ± 0.00 a | 0.04 ± 0.00 cd | 0.047 ± 0.00 d | 0.051 ± 0.00 d |
| Mg | 0.410 ± 0.02 ab | 0.61 ± 0.11 cd | 0.54 ± 0.06 bc | 0.62 ± 0.05 cd | 0.252 ± 0.03 a | 0.53 ± 0.05 bc | 0.850 ± 0.04 e | 0.768 ± 0.09 de |
| P | 2.840 ± 0.23 b | 4.12 ± 0.59 cd | 3.71 ± 0.31 bc | 4.09 ± 0.34 cd | 1.550 ± 0.11 a | 3.58 ± 0.26 bc | 5.370 ± 0.35 d | 4.950 ± 0.54 de |
| Na | 0.378 ± 0.01 a | 0.73 ± 0.14 bc | 0.71 ± 0.08 bc | 0.68 ± 0.05 bc | 0.261 ± 0.03 a | 0.606 ± 0.07 b | 0.75 ± 0.06 bc | 0.876 ± 0.09 c |
| Fe | 0.060 ± 0.01 ab | 0.08 ± 0.0 bcd | 0.08 ± 0.0 bcd | 0.07 ± 0.01 bc | 0.039 ± 0.00 a | 0.067 ± 0.01 b | 0.103 ± 0.01 d | 0.098 ± 0.01 cd |
| Cu | 0.010 ± 0.00 ab | 0.02 ± 0.0 bcd | 0.02 ± 0.0 bcd | 0.016 ± 0.0 bc | 0.008 ± 0.00 a | 0.014 ± 0.0 bc | 0.022 ± 0.00 d | 0.019 ± 0.00 cd |
| Mn | 0.034 ± 0.00 b | 0.06 ± 0.01 cd | 0.053 ± 0.0 cd | 0.052 ± 0.00 c | 0.016 ± 0.00 a | 0.05 ± 0.01 bc | 0.069 ± 0.00 d | 0.046 ± 0.00 bc |
| Zn | 0.060 ± 0.01 b | 0.09 ± 0.02 c | 0.090 ± 0.01 c | 0.089 ± 0.01 c | 0.030 ± 0.00 a | 0.08 ± 0.01 bc | 0.120 ± 0.01 d | 0.095 ± 0.00 cd |
Values are expressed as means ±SE (n = 4). Values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different for each element (for each row) according to One-way ANOVA with the Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05). The elements’ concentration was expressed as mg g−1 FW, except Cd, Cu, Mn, and Zn were expressed as µg g−1 FW.
Figure 2(a) Superoxide dismutase (SOD, USOD mg−1 (protein) min−1), (b) catalase (CAT, µmol H2O2 mg−1 (protein) min−1), (c) peroxidase (POX, µmol oxidized pyrogallol mg−1(protein) min−1), (d) ascorbate peroxidase (APX, µmol AsA mg−1(protein) min−1), (e) monodehydroascorbate reductase (MDHAR, µmol NADH mg−1(protein) min−1), (f) dehydroascorbate reductase (DHAR, µmol AsA mg−1 (protein) min−1), (g) glutathione reductase (GR, µmol NADPH mg−1 (protein) min−1) and (h) glutathione peroxidase (GPX, µmol NADPH mg−1 (protein) min−1) activities in leaves of geranium non-inoculated (NI) or inoculated with different endophytic fungi; T. versatilis (E6651), E. nidulans (E6658) and A. niger (E6657) under normal condition and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress. Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 4). For comparison among different treatments within and between levels of both normal conditions and cadmium stress, values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different according to One-way ANOVA with Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 3(a) Activity of glutathione S-transferase (GST, µmol GSH-CDNB conj. mg−1 (protein) min−1), (b) reduced glutathione (GSH), (c) phytochelatins (PCs) and (d) metallothioneins (MTs) in leaves of geranium non-inoculated (NI) or inoculated with different endophytic fungi; T. versatilis (E6651), E. nidulans (E6658) and A. niger (E6657) under normal conditions and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress. Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 3–4). For comparison among different treatments within and between levels of both normal conditions and cadmium stress, values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different according to One-way ANOVA with Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Figure 4(a) The scavenging activity of the free radical 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH scavenging, %), (b) ferric ion reducing antioxidant power (FRAP, µmol g−1 FW), (c) phenylalanine ammonia-lyase (PAL, µmol trans-cinnamic acid g−1 FW h−1) activity and (d) flavonoids (mg quercetin g−1 dry wt) content of leaves of geranium non-inoculated (NI) or inoculated with different endophytic fungi; T. versatilis (E6651), E. nidulans (E6658) and A. niger (E6657) under normal conditions and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress. Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 3–4). For comparison among different treatments within and between levels of both normal conditions and cadmium stress, values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different according to One-way ANOVA with Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05).
Vitamin content, essential oil chemical constituents (%), oil content (%), and oil yield (mL Plant−1) of geranium leaves in response to inoculation with endophytic fungi under normal conditions and Cd-stress; after 17 days of applying stress.
| Normal Conditions | Cadmium Stress | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NI | NI | |||||||
|
| ||||||||
| β-Cryptoxanthin (Vit. A) | 1.27 ± 0.07 bc | 1.27 ± 0.09 bc | 0.73 ± 0.06 a | 1.48 ± 0.09 cd | 1.05 ± 0.09 b | 1.61 ± 0.14 d | 1.56 ± 0.09 cd | 1.94 ± 0.11 e |
| α-Carotene (Vit A) | 0.79 ± 0.05 bc | 0.89 ± 0.07 cd | 0.54 ± 0.03 a | 0.99 ± 0.05 de | 0.68 ± 0.05 ab | 1.03 ± 0.05 e | 1.06 ± 0.04 de | 1.26 ± 0.06 f |
| β-Carotene (Vit. A) | 0.54 ± 0.01 b | 0.67 ± 0.01 c | 0.43 ± 0.01 a | 0.71 ± 0.01 cd | 0.48 ± 0.00 ab | 0.72 ± 0.01 cd | 0.78 ± 0.01 d | 0.90 ± 0.01 e |
| Thiamine (Vit B) | 1.10 ± 0.06 bc | 1.11 ± 0.08 bc | 0.64 ± 0.05 a | 1.29 ± 0.07 cd | 0.91 ± 0.07 b | 1.39 ± 0.11 d | 1.36 ± 0.07 d | 1.68 ± 0.09 e |
| Ascorbic acid (Vit. C) | 0.18 ± 0.07 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.27 ± 0.03 c | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.19 ± 0.00 a | 0.17 ± 0.01 a | 0.21 ± 0.00 ab | 0.25 ± 0.01 bc |
| Tocopherols (Vit. E) | 31.9 ± 0.89 a | 58.1 ± 11.1 ab | 48.3 ± 8.3 ab | 63.7 ± 12.2 b | 56.4 ± 1.3 ab | 66.1 ± 11.7 b | 48.6 ± 4.2 ab | 77.4 ± 14.1 b |
| Phylloquinone (Vit. K) | 0.92 ± 0.05 bc | 0.95 ± 0.07 bc | 0.56 ± 0.04 a | 1.09 ± 0.06 cd | 0.77 ± 0.06 b | 1.17 ± 0.09 d | 1.16 ± 0.06 d | 1.42 ± 0.07 e |
|
| ||||||||
| Citronellol ( | 17.4 ± 1.0 abc | 16.5 ± 3.0 ab | 13.7 ± 2.0 a | 23.5 ± 2.0 cd | 14.8 ± 1.00 a | 22.0 ± 2 bcd | 25.3 ± 2.0 d | 27.6 ± 1.0 d |
| Trans-geraniol ( | 2.60 ± 0.2 ab | 2.4 ± 0.4 a | 2.20 ± 0.3 a | 3.40 ± 0.3 bc | 2.10 ± 0.10 a | 3.60 ± 0.2 c | 3.50 ± 0.2 c | 3.90 ± 0.5 c |
| Isomenthone ( | 1.30 ± 0.2 a | 2.4 ± 0.6 bcd | 2.3 ± 0.3 abcd | 2.40 ± 0.2 bcd | 1.60 ± 0.2 ab | 2.10 ± 0.3 abc | 3.00 ± 0.2 cd | 3.20 ± 0.3 d |
| Linalool ( | 0.96 ± 0.1 ab | 0.91 ± 0.1 ab | 0.70 ± 0.04 ab | 1.00 ± 0.1 b | 0.60 ± 0.04 a | 0.90 ± 0.1 ab | 1.70 ± 0.2 c | 1.10 ± 0.2 b |
| Geranyl acetate ( | 1.00 ± 0.04 a | 2.0 ± 0.4 bc | 1.90 ± 0.2 bc | 1.90 ± 0.2 bc | 1.00 ± 0.10 a | 1.60 ± 0.2 ab | 2.00 ± 0.2 bc | 2.30 ± 0.2 c |
| γ-cadinene ( | 0.04 ± 0.01 a | 0.08 ± 0.02 bc | 0.07 ± 0.01 bc | 0.08 ± 0.01 bc | 0.05 ± 0.01 ab | 0.06 ± 0.01 ab | 0.1 ± 0.01 c | 0.10 ± 0.01 c |
| Geranyl butyrate ( | 0.69 ± 0.10 a | 0.92 ± 0.2 abc | 0.91 ± 0.07 abc | 0.86 ± 0.07 ab | 0.70 ± 0.06 a | 0.77 ± 0.07 a | 1.20 ± 0.07 c | 1.10 ± 0.2 bc |
| Geranyl tiglate ( | 0.10 ± 0.006 ab | 0.18 ± 0.04 cd | 0.17 ± 0.02 cd | 0.17 ± 0.01 cd | 0.07 ± 0.005 a | 0.15 ± 0.02 bc | 0.21 ± 0.02 d | 0.13 ± 0.02 bc |
| Gemacrene D ( | 0.08 ± 0.01 ab | 0.129 ± 0.02 c | 0.125 ± 0.01 c | 0.12 ± 0.01 c | 0.07 ± 0.00 a | 0.11 ± 0.01 bc | 0.17 ± 0.01 d | 0.132 ± 0.01 cd |
| Caryophyllene oxide ( | 1.80 ± 0.06 a | 1.60 ± 0.3 a | 2.20 ± 0.3 ab | 2.90 ± 0.1 bc | 1.70 ± 0.2 a | 2.80 ± 0.2 bc | 2.70 ± 0.3 bc | 3.30 ± 0.4 c |
| Geraniol ( | 11.4 ± 1.1 a | 11.4 ± 1.8 a | 13.0 ± 1.7 ab | 17.1 ± 0.6 c | 9.20 ± 1.0 a | 16.6 ± 1.0 bc | 18.9 ± 1.1 c | 23.1 ± 1.2 d |
| C/G | 1.53 ± 0.1 bc | 1.43 ± 0.1 bc | 1.04 ± 0.1 a | 1.37 ± 0.9 abc | 1.66 ± 0.2 c | 1.36 ± 0.2 abc | 1.33 ± 0.1 abc | 1.20 ± 0.1 ab |
| Oil content (%) | 0.31 ± 0.02 a | 0.39 ± 0.03 ab | 0.34 ± 0.05 a | 0.49 ± 0.03 bc | 0.39 ± 0.03 ab | 0.53 ± 0.02 cd | 0.62 ± 0.03 de | 0.73 ± 0.07 e |
| Oil yield (mL Plant−1) | 27.3 ± 2.2 b | 59.5 ± 4.8 d | 12.1 ± 1.7 a | 48.9 ± 2.8 c | 20.3 ± 1.6 ab | 84.9 ± 3.2 e | 28.5 ± 1.4 b | 67.7 ± 6.1 d |
The bracketed italicized values indicate the retention index (RI). Values are expressed as means ± SE (n = 4). Values with at least one similar letter are non significantly different for each parameter (for each row) according to One-way ANOVA with the Post Hoc-Tukey HSD test (p ≤ 0.05). NI; non-inoculated, C/G; citronellol:geraniol ratio.
Figure 5Principle component analysis (PCA) of growth and biochemical parameters of geranium leaves as affected by the inoculation with different endophytic fungi; T. versatilis (E6651), E. nidulans (E6658), and A. niger (E6657) under normal conditions and Cd-stress. C; non-inoculated geranium under normal conditions, C-Talaromyces, C-Emericella and C-Aspergillus; geranium inoculated with different endophytic fungi under normal conditions, Cd; non-inoculated geranium under Cd-stress, Cd-Talaromyces, Cd-Emericella and Cd-Aspergillus; geranium inoculated with different endophytic fungi under Cd-stress, FW; leaves fresh weight, H perox; hydrogen peroxide, MDA; lipid peroxidation, SOD; superoxide dismutase, CAT; catalase, POX; peroxidase, APX; ascorbate peroxidase, MDHAR; monodehydroascorbate reductase, DHAR; dehydroascorbate reductase, GR; glutathione reductase, GPX, glutathione peroxidase, DPPH; 1,1-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl, FRAP; ferric ion reducing antioxidant power, PAL; phenylalanine ammonia-lyase, Flav; flavonoids, GST; glutathione S-transferase, GSH; glutathione, PCs; phytochelatins, MTs, metallothioneins, VitA; β-cryptoxanthin, alpha-Car; α-carotene, beta-Car; β-carotene, B1; thiamine, PhQ; phylloquinone, ASC; ascorbic acid, TCP; tocopherols, CT; citronellol, T.GE; trans-geraniol, Isomen; isomenthone, Lool; linalool, GA; geranylacetate, Cad; cadinene, GB; geranyl butyrate, GT; geranyl tiglate, gemD; gemacreneD, CPO; caryophyllene oxide, GE; geraniol, C.G; citronellol/geraniol ratio, OY, oil yield.