| Literature DB >> 28611799 |
Saqib Bilal1, Abdul L Khan2, Raheem Shahzad1, Sajjad Asaf1, Sang-Mo Kang1, In-Jung Lee1.
Abstract
This study investigated the Ni-removal efficiency of phytohormone-producing endophytic fungi Penicillium janthinellum, Paecilomyces formosus, Exophiala sp., and Preussia sp. Among four different endophytes, P. formosus LHL10 was able to tolerate up to 1 mM Ni in contaminated media as compared to copper and cadmium. P. formosus LHL10 was further assessed for its potential to enhance the phytoremediation of Glycine max (soybean) in response to dose-dependent increases in soil Ni (0.5, 1.0, and 5.0 mM). Inoculation with P. formosus LHL10 significantly increased plant biomass and growth attributes as compared to non-inoculated control plants with or without Ni contamination. LHL10 enhanced the translocation of Ni from the root to the shoot as compared to the control. In addition, P. formosus LHL10 modulated the physio-chemical apparatus of soybean plants during Ni-contamination by reducing lipid peroxidation and the accumulation of linolenic acid, glutathione, peroxidase, polyphenol oxidase, catalase, and superoxide dismutase. Stress-responsive phytohormones such as abscisic acid and jasmonic acid were significantly down-regulated in fungal-inoculated soybean plants under Ni stress. LHL10 Ni-remediation potential can be attributed to its phytohormonal synthesis related genetic makeup. RT-PCR analysis showed the expression of indole-3-acetamide hydrolase, aldehyde dehydrogenase for indole-acetic acid and geranylgeranyl-diphosphate synthase, ent-kaurene oxidase (P450-4), C13-oxidase (P450-3) for gibberellins synthesis. In conclusion, the inoculation of P. formosus can significantly improve plant growth in Ni-polluted soils, and assist in improving the phytoremediation abilities of economically important crops.Entities:
Keywords: antioxidant enzymes; endophytic fungi; fatty acids; nickel stress; phytohormones; soybean
Year: 2017 PMID: 28611799 PMCID: PMC5447229 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2017.00870
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Plant Sci ISSN: 1664-462X Impact factor: 5.753
List of endophytic fungi with their traits used for initial screening of assessing their metal metals tolerance.
| Endophytic fungi | Isolated host | Bioactive metabolites | Accession no. | Effect on plant growth under abiotic stress | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tomato | Gibberellins | JX111908 | Growth promoting | ||
| Cucumber | Auxin and gibberellins | HQ444388 | Growth promoting | ||
| Cucumber | Gibberellins | HM017066 | Growth promoting | ||
| Frankincense | Auxin and extracellular enzymes (gibberellins not published) | KR231682 | Growth promoting | ||
Growth promoting effect of Paecilomyces formosus LHL10 in soybean under various nickel stress.
| Treatment | SL (cm) | RL (cm) | SFW (g) | SDW (g) | RFW (g) | RDW (g) | CC (SPAD) | TF | TI% |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 24.46 ± 0.38b | 13.27 ± 0.58b | 14.71 ± 0.61b | 5.47 ± 0.62b | 6.19 ± 0.52b | 2.16 ± 0.22b | 31.74 ± 1.52b | – | – |
| Fungus | 26.59 ± 0.86a | 16.63 ± 0.46a | 16.74 ± 0.73a | 6.22 ± 0.49a | 7.25 ± 0.61a | 2.87 ± 0.35a | 34.91 ± 1.12a | – | 108.67 |
| 0.5 mM Ni | 20.44 ± 0.25b | 12.77 ± 0.63b | 12.99 ± 0.65b | 3.97 ± 0.38b | 5.25 ± 0.68b | 1.71 ± 0.27b | 24.37 ± 1.14b | 0.58 | 83.55 |
| Fungus + 0.5 mM Ni | 23.13 ± 0.53a | 14.81 ± 0.61a | 17.18 ± 0.78a | 4.82 ± 0.51a | 8.92 ± 0.45a | 2.69 ± 0.41a | 29.77 ± 1.35a | 0.62 | 94.56 |
| 1 mM Ni | 19.43 ± 0.84b | 9.15 ± 0.89b | 11.42 ± 0.47b | 3.55 ± 0.32b | 4.75 ± 0.56b | 1.57 ± 0.43b | 20.54 ± 1.39b | 0.61 | 79.41 |
| Fungus + 1 mM Ni | 22.01 ± 0.81a | 13.17 ± 0.63a | 15.46 ± 0.01a | 4.50 ± 0.62a | 8.74 ± 0.46a | 2.54 ± 0.49a | 27.12 ± 0.76a | 0.52 | 89.98 |
| 5 mM Ni | 16.4 ± 0.89b | 6.21 ± 0.81b | 10.51 ± 0.76b | 2.98 ± 0.43b | 3.88 ± 0.52b | 1.15 ± 0.37b | 12.52 ± 0.79b | 0.56 | 67.02 |
| Fungus + 5 mM Ni | 19.04 ± 0.74a | 11.85 ± 1.32a | 14.25 ± 0.98a | 3.94 ± 0.49a | 6.98 ± 0.60a | 2.07 ± 0.15a | 22.56 ± 1.14a | 0.53 | 77.84 |
Two-way ANOVA table of the biochemical analysis performed for inoculated and non-inoculated soybean under different concentration of Ni toxicity.
| Analysis | Non-inoculated and LHL 10 | Ni stress | Interaction | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MS | variance % | MS | variance % | MS | variance % | ||||
| ABA shoots | 3520 | 0.0001 | 8.62 | 115500 | 0.0001 | 84.83 | 8750 | 0.0001 | 6.43 |
| ABA Roots | 58130 | 0.0001 | 9.28 | 171900 | 0.0001 | 82.34 | 17310 | 0.0001 | 8.29 |
| JA Roots | 30110 | 0.0001 | 12.62 | 45150 | 0.0001 | 56.78 | 24030 | 0.0001 | 30.23 |
| JA Shoots | 32510 | 0.0001 | 18.90 | 38950 | 0.0001 | 67.93 | 7449 | 0.0001 | 12.99 |
| Root Ni uptake | 120600 | 0.0001 | 8.33 | 427900 | 0.0001 | 88.71 | 14030 | 0.0001 | 2.91 |
| Shoot Ni uptake | 58130 | 0.0001 | 11.37 | 135700 | 0.0001 | 84.56 | 6284 | 0.0001 | 3.92 |
| LPO | 6.848 | 0.0001 | 24.78 | 5.516 | 0.0001 | 59.87 | 0.5414 | 0.0472 | 5.88 |
| GSH | 4.815 | 0.0001 | 45.81 | 1.149 | 0.0001 | 32.80 | 0.6473 | 0.0001 | 18.48 |
| POD | 7083 | 0.0001 | 17.11 | 9973 | 0.0001 | 72.26 | 1399 | 0.0001 | 10.14 |
| PPO | 41.11 | 0.0001 | 80.41 | 0.05457 | 0.8841 | 0.32 | 1.934 | 0.0022 | 11.32 |
Regulation of fatty acids by Paecilomyces formosus LHL10 in soybean under Ni- stress.
| Treatment | Palmitic | Stearic | Oleic | Linolenic |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 15.74 ± 0.29b | 10.76 ± 0.21b | 40.5 ± 1.91a | 33.0 ± 2.13a |
| LHL10 | 17.26 ± 0.35a | 11.96 ± 0.36a | 36.02 ± 1.85b | 34.7 ± 2.536a |
| 0.5 mM Ni | 20.64 ± 0.58a | 15.02 ± 1.35a | 43.41 ± 1.57a | 20.93 ± 1.83c |
| LHL10 + 0.5 mM Ni | 18.67 ± 0.34b | 13.4 ± 1.72a | 31.7 ± 1.79c | 36.23 ± 2.46a |
| 1 mM Ni | 24.07 ± 0.53a | 14.9 ± 0.56a | 43.02 ± 1.58a | 18.01 ± 2.17c |
| LHL10 + 1 mM Ni | 21.34 ± 0.72b | 13.54 ± 1.67a | 33.02 ± 1.43c | 32.1 ± 2.23a |
| 5 mM Ni | 25.68 ± 0.61a | 17.95 ± 1.04a | 47.36 ± 2.05a | 9.01 ± 1.41c |
| LHL10 + 5 mM Ni | 22.87 ± 0.58b | 15.38 ± 1.32a | 35.15 ± 2.35b | 26.6 ± 2.45a |