| Literature DB >> 34946727 |
Maksim Kukushkin1,2, Vladimir Novotortsev1, Vadim Filatov1, Yan Ivanenkov3, Dmitry Skvortsov1, Mark Veselov3, Radik Shafikov1, Anna Moiseeva1, Nikolay Zyk1, Alexander Majouga1,4, Elena Beloglazkina1.
Abstract
A series of novel S-, O- and Se-containing dispirooxindole derivatives has been synthesized using 1,3-dipolar cycloaddition reaction of azomethine ylide generated from isatines and sarcosine at the double C=C bond of 5-indolidene-2-chalcogen-imidazolones (chalcogen was oxygen, sulfur or selenium). The cytotoxicity of these dispiro derivatives was evaluated in vitro using different tumor cell lines. Several molecules have demonstrated a considerable cytotoxicity against the panel and showed good selectivity towards colorectal carcinoma HCT116 p53+/+ over HCT116 p53-/- cells. In particular, good results have been obtained for LNCaP prostate cell line. The performed in silico study has revealed MDM2/p53 interaction as one of the possible targets for the synthesized molecules. However, in contrast to selectivity revealed during the cell-based evaluation and the results obtained in computational study, no significant p53 activation using a reporter construction in p53wt A549 cell line was observed in a relevant concentration range.Entities:
Keywords: 3D molecular docking; anticancer activity; cytotoxicity; dispirooxindoles; p53/MDM2 interaction
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946727 PMCID: PMC8703884 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26247645
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Molecules ISSN: 1420-3049 Impact factor: 4.411
Figure 1Compounds synthesized earlier and in this work.
Scheme 1Synthesis of the compounds 1a–k, 2.
Scheme 2Synthesis of 3-(5-oxo-2-thioxoimidazolidin-4-ylidene)indolin-2-ones 3a–x and dispiroindolinines 4a–x.
Figure 2Molecular structure of compound 4s (as a salt with HCl).
Scheme 3Synthesis of Se-containing analogue of the compounds 4.
Scheme 4Synthesis of O-containing analogue of the compounds 4.
Cytotoxicity of dispiro-oxindoles 4, 6, 9 against different cell lines (MTT test).
| Compound | Cell Lines | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A549 | MCF7 | VA13 | Hek293T | HCT+/+ | HCT−/− | LNCaP | PC3 | |
| CC50, μM | ||||||||
|
| 20.3 ± 3.7 | 31.3 ± 6.7 | 16.1 ± 2.5 | 9.8 ± 1.6 | 66.2 ± 11.74 | 40.11 ± 19.11 | 12.5 ± 2.1 | 30.1 ± 9.1 |
|
| 9.1 ± 2.2 | 24.3 ± 2.3 | 21.4 ± 1.9 | 9.5 ± 1.7 | 60.73 ± 13.75 | 30.01 ± 15.21 | 10.3 ± 1.1 | 49.0 ± 12.7 |
|
| 45.9 ± 13.4 | na | na | 41.8 ± 12.4 | na | 14.33 ± 6.65 | 9.8 ± 3.3 | 53.1 ± 15.8 |
|
| 32.1 ± 6.7 | 68.4 ± 8.8 | 30.8 ± 4.5 | 11.5 ± 3 | 57.73 ± 18.41 | 40.11 ± 5.23 | 20.0 ± 3.6 | 50.0 ± 9.1 |
|
| 18.9 ± 3.1 | 22.8 ± 5.6 | 13.2 ± 2.3 | 6.5 ± 0.9 | 27.9 ± 6.94 | 36.0 ± 12.55 | 3.45 ± 0.45 | na |
|
| 2.8 ± 0.4 | 2.3 ± 0.5 | 2.3 ± 0.4 | 1.1 ± 0.1 | 1.95 ± 0.43 | 2.35 ± 0.95 | 4.5 ± 0.32 | 12.6 ± 2.3 |
|
| 15.8 ± 1.5 | 20.4 ± 3.6 | 12.5 ± 1.5 | 14 ± 1.5 | – | – |
|
|
|
| 38.2 ± 11.5 | 75.2 ± 29.3 | 73.6 ± 23.4 | 30.2 ± 8.2 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 6.2 ± 2.1 | 8.5 ± 1.2 | 6.3 ± 1.1 | 6.7 ± 0.9 | na | na | na | na |
|
| na | 88.2 ± 32.2 | na | na | na | na | na | na |
|
| 62 ± 8.3 | 13.7 ± 2.1 | 27.2 ± 5.3 | 17.4 ± 2 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 67.5 ± 6.9 | 27.9 ± 6.9 | 59.1 ± 7.6 | 69 ± 3.7 | 52.7 ± 11.4 | 40.9 ± 20.5 | 5.2 ± 0.91 | 7.8 ± 1.4 |
|
| 37 ± 6.5 | 19.1 ± 4.1 | 30.4 ± 3 | 34 ± 3.4 | 42.5 ± 9.1 | 57.11 ± 5.76 | 4.4 ± 0.67 | 2.2 ± 0.7 |
|
| na | 105.9 ± 43.1 | 171.0 ± 15.8 | na | 23.3 ± 3.3 | 42.4 ± 4.7 | 3.4 ± 0.7 | 1.93 ± 0.91 |
|
| na | – | – | 53.0± 9.5 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 53.4 ± 11.2 | 23.2 ± 3.6 | 36.3 ± 3.2 | 48 ± 5.3 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 11.3 ± 2.4 | 6.6 ± 1 | 12.3 ± 1.6 | 18.4 ± 1.7 | 34.2 ± 5.7 | na | 4.1 ± 0.1 | 2.2 ± 1.4 |
|
| na | 62.2 ± 27.7 | 57.9 ± 18.3 | 69.1 ± 21 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 14.1 ± 1.8 | 14.1 ± 1.2 | 13.9 ± 1.5 | 11.1 ± 1.3 | na | na | na | na |
|
| 26.5 ± 5.4 | – | – | 11.9 ± 0.9 | – | – | 11.8 ± 1.5 | >50 |
|
| 35.3 ± 17.7 | – | – | 15.1 ± 1.2 | – | – | 19.6 ± 1.8 | >50 |
|
| na | na | na | na | na | na | na | na |
|
| na | na | na | na | na | na | na | na |
|
| na | na | na | na | 20.8 ± 4.8 | na | 3.4 ± 0.6 | 53.6 ± 17.3 |
|
| na | – | – | 103.2 ± 27.7 | na | na | na | na |
|
| na | 57.9 ± 17.1 | 94.1 ± 19.7 | 75.1 ± 8.6 | 54.7 ± 9.5 | na | 9.8 ± 1.8 | 52.2 ± 11.6 |
|
| na | – | – | na | na | na | na | na |
| Etoposide | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 2.6 ± 0.9 | 1.1 ± 0.2 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 0.43 ± 0.12 | 0.85 ± 0.22 | – | – |
| Nutlin–3 | – | – | – | – | 3.3 ± 0.13 | 35.12 ± 2.65 | – | – |
na—not active (CC50>100 μM); “–“—not tested. Etoposide [39] as a topoisomerase poison, and nutlin-3 [19] as P53/MDM2 interaction inhibitor, were also tested on some cell lines as positive control.
Figure 3Examples of small-molecule MDM2 inhibitors with spiro-oxindole fragments in the molecules [40,41,42,43,44].
Figure 4The results of moleculardocking study: (A) MDM2 inhibitor V (see Figure 3) bound in the target pocket (4JVR)—RSA data (orange), the predicted active conformation (yellow, Eb = −88 kcal/mol), RMSD = 0.23; (B) compound 4u (orange, Eb = −53 kcal/mol) and the reference compound V (yellow) docked into the same binding site (the best conformations are shown).