Literature DB >> 34946136

Vegetables and Fruit as a Reservoir of β-Lactam and Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria: A Review.

Widad Chelaghma1, Lotfi Loucif2, Mourad Bendahou1, Jean-Marc Rolain3,4.   

Abstract

Antibacterial resistance is one of the 2019 World Health Organization's top ten threats to public health worldwide. Hence, the emergence of β-lactam and colistin resistance among Gram-negative bacteria has become a serious concern. The reservoirs for such bacteria are increasing not only in hospital settings but in several other sources, including vegetables and fruit. In recent years, fresh produce gained important attention due to its consumption in healthy diets combined with a low energy density. However, since fresh produce is often consumed raw, it may also be a source of foodborne disease and a reservoir for antibiotic resistant Gram-negative bacteria including those producing extended-spectrum β-lactamase, cephalosporinase and carbapenemase enzymes, as well as those harboring the plasmid-mediated colistin resistance (mcr) gene. This review aims to provide an overview of the currently available scientific literature on the presence of extended-spectrum β-lactamases, cephalosporinase, carbapenemase and mcr genes in Gram-negative bacteria in vegetables and fruit with a focus on the possible contamination pathways in fresh produce.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Gram-negative bacteria; fruit; mobile colistin resistance; vegetables; β-lactamases

Year:  2021        PMID: 34946136      PMCID: PMC8708060          DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9122534

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Microorganisms        ISSN: 2076-2607


1. Introduction

Fresh produce is considered a good source of minerals, vitamins, phytonutrients and dietary fiber. Accordingly, there is a consensus that a diet rich in vegetables and fruit may decrease the risk of heart diseases and protect against some types of cancer [1]. In 2003, the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the United Nations and the World Health Organization (WHO) started an initiative worldwide to promote fruit and vegetable intake for health, with a recommended minimum consumption of 400 g of vegetables and fruit per day [2]. Following this recommendation, the intake of fresh produce as ingredients in healthy diets has been increasing and has gained popularity globally [3]. Consequently, the consumption of contaminated fresh produce, such as vegetables and fruit eaten raw, has been associated with an increasing number of outbreaks of foodborne disease [1]. In addition, fresh produce represents a route of human exposure to antibiotic-resistant bacteria and has often served as a reservoir of antibiotic resistance genes, representing a major public health threat [3,4]. In this context, one of the main public health preoccupations worldwide is the emergence of Gram-negative bacteria displaying resistance to oxyimino-cephalosporins (3GCs), carbapenem and colistin [3]. β-lactams, essentially extended-spectrum cephalosporins and carbapenems, are the main therapeutic choices to treat infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria [5,6,7]. However, resistance to these antibiotic drugs has been increasing in recent years mostly through β-lactamase production. Various β-lactamases have been identified worldwide, including penicillinases, extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs), cephalosporinases (AmpC), and carbapenemases [7]. Given these circumstances, the approved alternative is colistin, but its re-use in clinical practice has led to the appearance of colistin-resistant bacteria, particularly through horizontal transfer (mcr) [8]. The transfer of these multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria to fresh produce may occur during production via animal manure, through the use of contaminated irrigation water, or be linked to humans during the post-harvest stage, as well as during transport, conservation and processing by handlers [9]. The ingestion of antibiotic-resistant bacteria poses a potential public health concern since they are able to colonize the gut and exchange resistance genes with intestinal bacteria during their passage through the intestines which facilitates their further dissemination in the environment [3]. Extended-spectrum β-lactamase, cephalosporinase and carbapenemase producers as well as mcr gene-producing Gram-negative bacteria isolated from fresh vegetables and fruit have been reported in several countries around the world [3,4,10,11]. Thus, the aim of this review is to highlight the current situation of the worldwide dissemination of ESBL, cephalosporinase, carbapenemase and mcr gene-producing Gram-negative bacteria from fresh vegetables and fruit, their genetic characteristics, and possible contamination pathways.

2. β-Lactam Resistance and Gram-Negative Bacteria

β-lactam resistance in Gram-negative bacteria can be attributed to two main mechanisms, these include the acquisition of β-lactamase genes, as well as the modification of the target (penicillin-binding proteins) [12]. β-lactamase enzymes have played an important clinical role and have served as the principal resistance mechanism detected for β-lactam drugs [13,14]. The first enzyme detected presenting β-lactamase activity originated from Bacillus coli in 1940, currently supposed to be the class C, AmpC chromosomal cephalosporinase from Escherichia coli [14]. Given this, various extended-spectrum cephalosporins were introduced in the 1980s, which were stable against penicillinase hydrolysis, such as TEM-1 (TEMoniera) and SHV-1 (sulfhydryl variable). A few years later, Enterobacteriaceae species developed several derivatives of TEM-1, TEM-2 and SHV-1; these variants extended their hydrolysis spectrum to include oxyimino-cephalosporins, hence the term ‘extended-spectrum’ β-lactamases (ESBL) [14,15]. Afterwards, a novel variant of the ESBL family named Cefotaximase-Munchen (CTX-M) was described, which became the predominant ESBL in enterobacterial species worldwide [14], as well as the family of Guyana extended-spectrum β-lactamases (GES) reported as ESBL variants in 2000 [16]. The β-lactamases belonging to Ambler class C, called cephalosporinases, are derived from the ampC gene in the chromosome of various Enterobacteriaceae species [17,18]. In the early 1990s, plasmid-encoded AmpC cephalosporinases were described in species lacking an inducible AmpC enzyme. Afterwards, plasmid-mediated AmpC, such as Dharhan hospital (DHA), cephamycinase (CMY), cefoxitinase (FOX), moxalactamase (MOX) and Ambler Class C (ACC), were reported worldwide [19]. In this worrisome situation, carbapenems were introduced to clinics in the late 1980s and showed significant activity in the treatment of infections caused by AmpC and ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria [16,20]. The first carbapenemase reported in Enterobacteriaceae was the Serratia marcescens enzyme (SME-1) in London in 1982. Since then, various carbapenemase enzymes belonging to the Ambler class A β-lactamases have been reported, including imipenemase (IMI-1) and non-metallocarbapanemase class A (NmcA); however, the K. pneumoniae-carbapenemase (KPC) type was the most commonly found [5,16,21]. On the other hand, the first MBL variant was discovered in Bacillus cereus in 1966 and was called the BCII enzyme. Until 1989, only four MBL enzymes had been identified and were all chromosomally encoded, therefore they were deemed clinically negligible. Afterwards, various plasmid-encoding class B carbapenemases were described, such as Imipenem-resistant Pseudomonas-type carbapenemases (IMP),Verona integron-encoded MBL (VIM),and recently, New Delhi MBL (NDM) [22,23].In class D β-lactamases, several variants with relatively weak carbapenemase activity have also been reported as carbapenemase enzymes, including OXA-48, OXA-58, OXA-24/40 and OXA-23 [22]. In Enterobacteriaceae, class D carbapenemases are mainly represented by the OXA-48-like enzymes [24].

3. Colistin Resistance in Gram-Negative Bacteria

Colistin is a cationic polypeptide antibiotic belonging to the polymyxin family [25]. It was described initially in 1947 in Paenibacillus polymyxa, and it is commonly used in human and veterinary medicines, plant cultivation and animal husbandry [25,26,27]. Although in the 1970s its use was discontinued due to its neuro- and renal toxicity, it was reintroduced in the mid-2000s as a last line therapeutic option for the treatment of extensively drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative infections, such as those caused by carbapenem-resistant GNB [26,28]. The initial target site of colistin is lipopolysaccharide (LPS), more exactly lipid A, located in the outer membrane, which plays a major role in cell permeability. The electrostatic interaction between the cationic region of colistin, which is from the diamino-butyric acid (Dab) residues, and the negatively charged phosphate groups of lipid A, replace the magnesium and calcium ions previously united with the phosphate group. This destabilizes the lipid A and increases the permeability of the outer membrane, leading to the entry of colistin by a self-promoted uptake mechanism and eventual bacterial death [26,29]. Another antibacterial mechanism is the inhibition of a crucial respiratory enzyme, the type II NADH-quinone oxidoreductase (NDH-2) in the bacterial cell membrane [29]. The increased use of colistin has led to the emergence of colistin-resistant strains worldwide [25]. Colistin resistance is mainly achieved by modification of LPS, and consequently the reduced or absent affinity for colistin. This mechanism, although universal in Gram-negative bacteria, may differ between species. The lipid A of LPS undergoes changes, essentially due to the addition of positively charged residues such as phosphoethanolamine (PEtn) and/or 4-amino-4-deoxy-L-arabinose (L-Ara4N). These molecules decrease the overall negative charge of LPS, leading to a smaller electrostatic interaction with the positive charges of colistin that inhibits cell lysis [26,30]. Previously, the genes responsible for most of these additions were thought to be due to chromosomal mutations in genes of a two-component regulatory system, such as pmrAB, PhoPQ, and mgrB, which are not transferable [30]. In late 2015, Liu et al. described the mobilized colistin resistance (mcr-1) gene in an E. coli isolate recovered from livestock in China [8,31]. MCR-1 confers resistance by modifying the colistin target through the action of phosphoethanolamine transferase, which ensures the transfer of phosphoethanolamine (PEA) onto the glucosamine saccharide of lipid A, contributing as in chromosomal resistance to reduce the net negative charge of lipid A and consequently, colistin binding [32]. After the discovery of the mcr-1 gene, nine other mcr gene types (mcr-2 to mcr-10) were identified. The second mobile colistin resistance gene, mcr-2, was found initially in E. coli strains isolated from pigs and calves in Belgium [33]. The gene mcr-3 was identified in E. coli from pigs in China [34], and mcr-4 was reported in Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strains isolated from pigs in Italy [35]. In 2017, anovel transposon-associated phosphoethanolamine transferase gene (mcr-5) was described in d-tartrate-fermenting Salmonella enterica subsp. enterica serovar paratyphi B in Germany [36]. In 2018, further variants were described; mcr-6 was identified in Moraxella spp. isolated from pigs in Great Britain [37], while mcr-7 and mcr-8 were described in K. pneumoniae strains isolated from animals (chickens and pigs) in China [38,39]. In 2019, a novel variant mcr-9 was reported in a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium strain isolated from a human in Washington State in 2010 [40] and more recently, Wang et al. reported the detection of an mcr-10 variant in an Enterobacter roggenkampii clinical strain in China [41].

4. Literature Search Strategy and Data Collection

The dissemination of extended-spectrum β-lactamase, cephalosporinase, carbapenemase and MCR-producing Gram-negative bacteria in fresh produce is a major public health threat, since they are a very suitable pathway for the spread of antibiotic-resistant bacteria from farm to fork. Until June 2021, thirty-three molecular studies have revealed the isolation of Gram-negative bacteria producing β-lactamase and mcr genes on fresh vegetables and fruit. They have been used and are accessible through the PubMed database using the following keywords: ‘‘ESBL’’, ‘‘AmpC’’, ‘‘KPC’’, ‘‘VIM’’, ‘‘NDM’’, ‘‘IMP’’, ‘‘OXA-48”, ‘‘mcr’’, ‘‘carbapenem resistance’’, ‘‘fresh vegetables’’, ‘‘vegetables’’ and ‘‘fruit’’.

5. Vegetable and Fruit Isolates with ESBL and Cephalosporinase Genes

A total of nineteen molecular studies reporting the isolation of ESBL-producing Gram-negative bacteria and AmpC genes from vegetables and fruit have been described (Figure 1, Table 1). The first report of ESBL-producing GNB isolates from vegetables and fruit was reported in 2014 in The Netherlands. These bacteria were reported on six vegetable types that are consumed raw (bunched carrots, blanched celery, endive, chicory, iceberg lettuce and radish), and from iceberg lettuce farms. In that study, the blaFONA-5 gene was detected among Serratia fonticola isolates on iceberg lettuce from a farm. In addition, 35 Rahnella aquatilis strains harboring the blaRAHN gene were identified. Of the 35 isolates, 34 strains were producing the blaRAHN-1, and only one R. aquatilis strain carried the blaRAHN-2 gene [42]. After this publication, this level of resistance has been reported in Europe, Africa, Asia and America. Like isolates from humans, animals and the environment, the CTX-M family is the most prevalent type of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae found in vegetables. Similarly, in an Italian study carried out on fresh vegetables, the authors refer to the detection of different ESBL enzymes, including CTX-M-15, CTX-M-1, SHV-12 and RAHN-1 in twenty isolates (the blaCTX-M-15 gene in C. freundii, E. coli and Pantoea agglomerans, the blaCTX-M-1 gene in Enterobacter cloacae, the blaSHV-12 in E. coli and blaRAHN-1 in R. aquatilis). Whereas only four isolates displayed AmpC production, among the four strains obtained, two Hafnia alvei isolates carried a blaACC gene and two E. cloacae harbored a blaDHA-1 gene [43]. A study in The Netherlands investigated the prevalence of third-generation cephalosporin (3GC) resistant Gram-negative bacteria on fresh vegetables. A total of 27 Serratia spp. isolates with an ESBL phenotype harboring a blaFONA variant were obtained, including blaFONA-1 (18.5%), blaFONA-2 (37.0%), blaFONA-3 (7.4%), blaFONA-4 (7.4%), blaFONA-5 (18.5%) and blaFONA-6 (11.1%). The blaSHV-12 gene was detected in one E. coli and two Enterobacter spp. strains; however, one R. aquatilis strain harbored the blaRAHN-1 gene [3]. In Switzerland, two studies reported the detection of blaESBL genes on vegetable samples. In the first study, the authors evaluated the presence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae in 68 vegetables imported from the Dominican Republic, India, Thailand and Vietnam via the national airport in Zürich, and 101 samples were purchased in the city of Zürich. In total, 60 ESBL producers were retrieved, including blaCTX-M- and blaSHV-producing E. coli (blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-55, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-65, blaCTX-M-1 and blaSHV-12) and K. pneumoniae strains (blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-3, blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-63, blaSHV-2, blaSHV-2a, and blaSHV-12). Moreover, blaCTX-M-15 and blaSHV-2 genes were identified in E. cloacae, E. aerogenes and C. sakazakii, respectively [10]. The second study reported the detection of CTX-M group 2, CTX-M-15 and FONA-2 in Kluyvera ascorbata, E. cloacae and S. fonticola isolates from diced tomato, chopped chives and spinach, respectively [44]. A study from Germany described the isolation of seven ESBL-producing E. coli isolates collected by food safety inspectors during 2011–2013 from markets, producers and supermarkets. Of the seven isolates, two strains were positive for blaCTX-M-14 and two other isolates harbored blaCTX-M-15 genes. However, three remaining strains were positive for blaCTX-M-65, blaCTX-M-125 and blaCTX-M-2 genes, respectively [45]. In addition, the blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCTX-M and blaDHA genes were also reported in Romania in different Enterobacteriaceae species (S. marcescens, E. cloacae, E. coli, Klebsiella oxytoca and Proteus vulgaris) [46].
Figure 1

Worldwide distribution of extended-spectrum β-lactamase, cephalosporinase, carbapenemase and mcr-producing GNB on fresh vegetables and fruit.

Table 1

ESBL and cephalosporinase genes reported in Gram-negative bacteria isolates from vegetables and fruit worldwide.

Vegetable TypeESBL/AmpC GeneIsolation PeriodSpecies Isolates Number CountryOther Antibiotic Resistance GenesSequence TypeReferences
Lettuce bla FONA-5 2011 Serratia fonticola 1The NetherlandsNDND[42]
bla RAHN-2 Rahnella aquatilis 1
bla CTX-M-15 2013–2014 Klebsiella pneumoniae 1Algeriaaph(3′)-Ia, aadA2, strB, strA, qnrS1, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, mph(A), catA2, sul1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA12ST219[48]
bla DHA-1 bla SHV-101 K. pneumoniae 1blaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aph(3′)-Ia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB4, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, mph(A) catB3, ARR-3, sul1ST882
blaSHV-28, blaCTX-M-15, K. pneumoniae 1blaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-Iia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, dfrA14.ST14
bla CTX-M-15 2015 Escherichia coli 1EcuadordfrA1, aadA5ST44[54]
bla CTX-M-15 1NoneST44
bla CTX-M-14 2017–2018 S. fonticola 1South AfricaNDND[9]
bla SHV-154 S. marcescens 1NDND
bla CTX-M-15 2018 E. coli 1South KoreaNDST2509[51]
blaSHV, blaTEM2019 Proteus vulgaris 1RomaniaNDND[46]
bla CTX-M-15 ND K. pneumoniae 1Brazil blaOXA-1, blaSHV-110, aac(3)IIa, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, opxAB, drfA14, catA1, tet(A), fosA, opxBST198[56]
Butterhead lettuceblaFONA-1 (1–6)2012–2013 S. fonticola NDThe NetherlandsNDND[3]
Iceberg lettuce bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis NDThe NetherlandsND [42]
blaSHV,blaTEM2011–2012 K. pneumoniae 2United StatesNDND[52]
bla CTX-M-1 S. marcescens 1NDND
blaFONA-1 (1–6)2012–2013 S. fonticola NDThe NetherlandsNDND[3]
TomatoblaCTX-M, blaSHV, blaTEM2011–2014 E. coli 1ChinaNDND[7]
blaSHV-28, blaCTX-M-152013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1Algeriaaac(3)-Iia, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosAST14[48]
blaSHV-28, blaCTX-M-15, 1blaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-Iia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, dfrA14ST14
bla CMY-2 2017–2018 Citrobacter freundii 1South AfricaNDND[9]
bla CTX-M-14 1NDND
bla CTX-M-55 E. coli 1NDND
bla CTX-M-14 1NDND
bla CTX-M-14 1blaSHV-1, blaTEM-215ND
bla SHV-18 E. asburiae 1NDND
bla MIR-14 1 bla SHV-26 ND
bla ACT-29 1NDND
blaCTX-M-27, blaCTX-M-15 E. cloacae 1 bla SHV-26 ND
bla MIR-20 1NDND
blaTEM-3, blaACT-2, blaSHV-181blaTEM-1, blaSHV-11ND
blaSHV-18, blaTEM-3 E. cowanii 1NDND
bla CTX-M-15 K. pneumoniae 1NDND
bla ACT-10 K. oxytoca 1NDND
bla CTX-M-55 Proteus mirabilis 1 bla TEM-215 ND
blaACT-10, blaDHA-18, blaCMY-49 Pseudomonas penneri 1NDND
bla SHV-18 R. aquatilis 1 bla TEM-215 ND
bla MIR-16 R. aquatilis 1NDND
blaSHV-18, blaMIR-162017–2018 E. asburiae 1South AfricablaTEM-1, blaOXA-1ND[9]
Diced tomato bla CTX-MGroup2 2014 Kluyvera ascorbata 1SwitzerlandNDND[44]
Spinach bla FONA-2 2014 S. fonticola 1SwitzerlandNDND[44]
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM2017 E. asburiae 1South AfricaNDND[47]
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA E. coli 2NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA K. pneumoniae 3NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM E. asburiae 1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA E. coli 2NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA K. pneumoniae 3NDND
bla CTX-M-group1 R. aquatilis 1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA R. aquatilis 1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV R. aquatilis 2NDND
bla CIT S. fonticola 3NDND
blaTEM, blaSHV1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA2NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA, blaCIT1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaSHV1NDND
blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaCIT2NDND
bla CTX-M-27 2017–2018 E. coli 2South AfricaNDND[9]
bla MIR-20 1NDND
blaSHV-18, blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-31NDND
blaCTX-M-14, blaTEM-31NDND
bla CTX-M-14 1NDND
bla CTX-M-15 1ND
bla CTX-M-55 1NDND
blaCTX-M-14, blaACT-581NDND
bla CTX-M-14 2NDND
bla CTX-M-14 2 bla TEM-215 ND
bla ACT-58 E. asburiae 1 bla TEM-215 ND
bla CMY-87 E. ludwigii 1NDND
blaCTX-M-27, blaEC-30 R. aquatilis 1NDND
bla CTX-M-15 1 bla SHV-11 ND
blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV-28 S. fonticola 1NDND
blaCTX-M-14, blaSHV-281NDND
bla MIR-16 1blaTEM-1, blaOXA-1ND
bla CTXM-15 1 bla TEM-215 ND
blaSHV, blaTEM2019 S. marcescens 1RomaniaNDND[46]
bla CTXM E. cloacae 1NDND
bla CTXM-15 ND E. cloacae 1BrazilblaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B, blaACT-7, aac(3)-IIa, aac(6′)Ib-cr, ant(3′’)Ia, strA, strB, qnrB, sul2, tet(A), fosA.ST927[56]
bla CTXM-15 ND E. coli 1blaTEM-1B, aac(3)IId, aadA5, strA, strB, tet(A)ST14012
Chopped SpinachblaCTXM14, blaSHV-1422017 K. pneumoniae 1CanadaNDST261[55]
bla CTXM-27 E. cloacae 1qnrB2, qnrS1, aac(6′)Ib crND
bla CTXM-27 E. aerogenes 1aac(6′) Ib crND
Ceylon spinach bla CTXM-14 2014 K. pneumoniae 1SwitzerlandNDST37[10]
Water spinach bla CTXM-15 K. pneumoniae 1NDST16
CucumberblaCTX-M, blaSHV2011–2014 E. coli 2ChinaNDND[7]
bla CTXM-15 2014 E. cloacae 1SwitzerlandNDND[10]
bla CTXM-15 E. coli 1NDST410
bla TEM-116 2015–2016 P. mosselii 1JapanNDND[49]
bla MIR-20 2017–2018 E. cloacae 1South AfricaNDND[9]
bla SHV-18 R. aquatilis 1 bla OXA-1 ND
blaCTXM, blaTEM2019 E. coli 1RomaniaNDND[46]
blaDHA E. cloacae 1ND
Bitter cucumber bla CTXM-15 2014 E. coli 1SwitzerlandNDST131[10]
Coriander bla CTXM-55 2011–2014 E. coli 2ChinaNDST48, ST4680[7]
blaCTX-M, blaOXA Citrobacter freundii 1NDND
bla CTX-M-55 2018 E. coli 1MalaysiablaTEM-1B, aph(3 0)-Ia, aph(300)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, mdf(A), floR, ARR-2, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14 ST155[50]
bla CTX-M-65 E. coli 1aac(3)-IV, aadA5, aph(4)-Ia, oqxA, oqxB, mdf(A), floR, sul1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA17ST479
ParsleyblaSHV-28, blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-12013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1Algeriaaac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-Iia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, dfrA14ST14[48]
blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-11aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-IIa, strB, strA, aac(6′)Ib-cr,oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14ST45
bla SHV 2019 K. oxytoca 1RomaniaNDND[46]
Water parsley bla CTX-M-55 2018 E. coli 1South KoreaNDND[51]
blaCTX-M-15, blaTEM-11NDST101
blaCTX-M-14, blaTEM-11NDST354
bla CTX-M-14 1NDST38
Parsley/cilantro bla CTX-M-15 2015 E. coli 1EcuadorNoneST410[54]
1dfrA1, aadA5ST44
Soy sprouts bla CTX-M-65 2011–2013 E. coli 1GermanyfloR, aac(6′)-Ib3, sul2, tet(A), fosA3ST10[45]
bla CTX-M-125 1aph(3′)-II, tet(A), fosA3ST542
bla CTX-M-14 1catA1, floR, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aph(3′)-Ia, aadA5, sul1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA17, fosA3ST527
bla CTXM-14 2014 K. pneumoniae 1SwitzerlandNDST208[10]
Sprouts-mixture bla CTX-M-15 2011–2013 E. coli 1GermanyblaTEM-1, qnrS1, strA, strB, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14ST847[45]
Alfalfa bla CTX-M-15 2015 E. coli 1EcuadordfrA1, aadA5ST410[54]
bla CTX-M-15 1NoneST44
bla CTX-M-15 1NoneST44
Alfalfa sprouts bla CTX-M-15 2011–2013 E. coli 1GermanyblaTEM-1, qnrS1, strA, strB, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14ST410[45]
Greenbeans bla CTX-M-14 2017–2018 E. coli 2South AfricaNDND[9]
blaCTX-M-14, blaCMY-2 S. fonticola 1 bla TEM-215 ND
blaCTX-M-14, blaCMY-1612017–2018 S. fonticola 1 bla TEM-215 ND
Curry leaves bla CTXM-15 2014 K. pneumoniae 1SwitzerlandNDST307[10]
bla CTXM-14 E. coli 1NDST38
bla CTXM-15 K. pneumoniae 1NDST1742
bla SHV-12 E. coli 1NDST1656
bla CTXM-15 K. pneumoniae 4NDST1739, ST1741, ST1881, ST1740
bla CTXM-1 E. coli 1NDST1555
bla CTXM-15 1NDST4681, ST152
bla CTXM-14 1NDST4679
bla CTXM-55 1NDST10
MintblaCTX-M-15, blaSHV-282013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1AlgeriablaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-Iia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, dfrA14ST14[48]
blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV-281blaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-Iia, aac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, dfrA14ST14
Chili bla CTXM-15 2014 E. coli 1SwitzerlandNDST405[10]
Green chili bla CTXM-15 E. cloacae 1NDND[10]
bla CTXM-15 K. pneumoniae 2NDST1740, ST37
bla CTXM-27 1NDST458
Small chili bla CTXM-65 E. coli 1NDST167
Chili pepperblaCTX-M-15, blaSHV-282018 K. pneumoniae 1MalaysiablaTEM-1B, blaOXA-1, aac(3)-IIa, aac(6 0)-Ib-cr, aph(300)-Ib, aph(6)-Id, aac(6 0)-Ib-cr, oqxA, oqxB, qnrB1, fosA, catB3, sul2, tet(A), dfrA14ST307[50]
blaDHA-1, blaSHV-28 K. pneumoniae 1oqxA, oqxB, qnrS1, fosA, sul1, tet(A), dfrA1ST101
Hyacinth bean seeds bla CTXM-15 2017 E. coli 1CanadaNDST189[55]
1 bla TEM-1 ST226
Ginseng bla TEM-116 2015–2016 Pseudomonas paralactis 1JapanNDND[49]
bla TEM-116 1NDND
bla TEM-116 P. arsenicoxydans 1NDND
Beets bla CTX-M-15 2013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1Algeriaaph(3′)-Ia, aadA2, strB, strA, nrS1, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, mph(A), catA2, sul1, sul2, tet(A), dfrA12ST219[48]
CarrotblaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-12013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1blaTEM-1B, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aac(3)-IIa, strB, strA, ac(6′)Ib-cr, qnrB66, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, catB3, sul2, dfrA14.ST45[48]
bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis NDThe NetherlandsNDND[42]
Bunched carrotblaFONA(1–6)2012–2013 S. fonticola NDThe NetherlandsNDND[3]
Arugula bla RAHN-1 2015–2016 R. aquatilis 4ItalyNDND[43]
bla CTX-M-15 C. freundii 4NDND
bla ACC Hafnia alvei 2NDND
bla CTXM-15 bla SHV-106 ND K. pneumoniae 1BrazilblaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B, aac(6)Ib-cr, strA, strB, qnrB1, opxAB, gyrA, parC, tet(A), fosA.ST2739[56]
Egg plant bla CTXM-15 2014 K. pneumoniae 1SwitzerlandNDST45[10]
bla CTXM-15 1NDST307
bla CTXM-15 E. cloacae 1NDND
Chinese chive bla SHV-12 2015–2016 P. parafulva 1JapanNDND[49]
Chopped chives bla CTX-M-15 2014 E. cloacae 1SwitzerlandNDND[44]
OnionblaFONA-1 (1–6)2012–2013 S. fonticola NDThe NetherlandsNDND[3]
bla TEM-116 2015–2016 Pseudomonas beteli 1JapanNDND[49]
Broccoli bla TEM-116 2015–2016 P. hunanensis 1JapanNDND[49]
Cabbage bla TEM-116 2015–2016 P. hunanensis 1JapanNDND[49]
blaCTX-M, blaSHV2019 E. cloacae 1RomaniaNDND[46]
bla CTXM-65 2018 E. coli 1South KoreaND2847[51]
bla CTXM-15 ND E. coli 1Brazil blaOXA-1, blaTEM-1B, aac(3)IIa, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aadA5, gyrA, parC, sul1.ST648[56]
bla CTXM-15 ND E. coli 1blaOXA-1, aac(6′)Ib-cr, aadA5, aac(6′)Ib-cr, sul1, drfA17, tet(B), mph(A)ST38
Cut cabbage bla SHV-12 2015–2016 P. hunanensis 1JapanNDND[49]
Bean sprout bla SHV-12 P. putida 1NDND
Yard long beans bla CTXM-55 2015–2016 E. cloacae 1JapanNDND[49]
bla SHV-12 2014 Cronobacter sakazakii 1SwitzerlandNDST3696[10]
bla CTXM-14 E. coli 1NDND
Holy Basil bla CTXM-15 2014 K. pneumoniae 1SwitzerlandNDST36
bla CTXM-65 E. coli 1NDST58
Okra (marrow) bla CTXM-14 E. coli 1NDST38
bla CTXM-15 E. coli 2NDST155, ST443
Okra bla CTXM-15 K. pneumoniae 2NDST997, ST244
bla CTXM-15 E. aerogenes 1NDND
bla CTXM-15 E. cloacae 2NDND
bla CTXM-15 E. coli 2NDST4682, ST4684
Parwal beans bla CTXM-15 E. coli 1NDST641
Peppermint bla CTXM-3 K. pneumoniae 1NDST15
Cha-om (acacia) bla SHV-12 K. pneumoniae 1NDND
bla CTXM-55 E. coli 2NDST167, ST393
bla CTXM-14 E. coli 1NDST58
Garlic chives bla CTXM-63 K. pneumoniae 1NDST1743
bla CTXM-55 E. coli 1NDST226
Lemongrass bla CTXM-14 K. pneumoniae 1NDST1530
Sweet basil bla SHV-2a K. pneumoniae 1NDST76
Basil leaves bla CTXM-65 E. coli 1NDST4683
Celery bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis 34The NetherlandsNDND[42]
blaSHV-60, blaDHA-12013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1AlgeriablaTEM-1D, aadA1, strB, strA, qnrB4, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, sul1,tet(A), dfrA1ST236[48]
Lollo rosso leaves bla CTX-M-14 2011–2013 E. coli 1GermanystrA, strB, sul1, dfrA1ST973[45]
Lollo rosso and Lollo bionda leaves bla CTX-M-2 E. coli 1blaTEM-1, strA, strB, aadA5ST120
Blanched celery bla SHV-12 2012–2013 E. coli 1The NetherlandsNDND[3]
bla FONA-1 S. fonticola NDNDND
Radish bla RAHN-1 2012–2013 R. aquatilis 1The NetherlandsNDND[3]
blaFONA(1–6) S. fonticola NDNDND
bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis NDNDND[42]
Chicory bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis NDThe NetherlandsNDND[42]
Endive bla RAHN-1 2011 R. aquatilis NDNDND
blaFONA-1 (1–6)2012–2013 S. fonticola NDThe NetherlandsNDND[3]
Iceberg lettuce + arugula bla SHV-12 2015–2016 E. coli 3Italy NDND[43]
bla CTX-M-15 E. coli 1NDND
Mixed green vegetables bla CTXM-15 2017 E. cloacae 1CanadablaTEM-1, qnrB1, aac(6′) Ib crND[55]
Sambhar vegetablesblaCTXM15, blaSHV-106 K. pneumoniae 1NDST101
Aster scaberblaCTX-14, blaTEM-12018 E. coli 1South KoreaNDST69[51]
Perilla leafblaCTX-M-27, blaTEM-11NDST349
Sweet potato stalk bla CTX-M-15 1NDST224
Pepper leafblaCTX-M-55, blaTEM-11NDND
Mapleleaf ainsliaea bla CTX-M-27 1NDST10
Leafy greens bla CTX-M 2015–2016 Enterobacterale 1United StatesNDND[53]
bla CMY Enterobacterale 6NDND
Frisee saladblaCTX-M-1, blaDHA-12015–2016 E. cloacae 2ItalyNDND[43]
Frisee salad + carrot bla CTX-M-15 Pantoea agglomerans 6NDND
Peach bla CTX-M-15 2013–2014 K. pneumoniae 1AlgeriaaadA2, strB, strA, qnrS1, oqxB, oqxA, fosA, mph(A), catA2, sul1, sul2, dfrA12ST219[48]
In Africa, the first recorded ESBL and/or cephalosporinase-positive GNB was observed in 2019 in South Africa. In this report, 545 vegetable samples including spinach, cucumbers, tomatoes, green beans and lettuce, were collected from street-trading greengrocers, mobile trolley vendors, formal retailers and vendors at two farmers markets from September 2017 to May 2018. ESBL genes were detected in 39 strains, while AmpC production was observed in 20 strains belonging to 10 genera of Enterobacteriaceae including S. fonticola, Serratia marcescens, E. coli, E. cloacae, Enterobacter asburiae, Enterobacter cowanii, Enterobacter ludwigii, R. aquatilis, K. pneumoniae, Klebsiella oxytoca, Citrobacter freundii, Proteus mirabilis and Proteus penneri. Different blaCTX-M genes were obtained, including blaCTX-M-14 (n = 15), blaCTX-M-15 (n = 6), blaCTX-M-27 (n = 4) and blaCTX-M-55 (n = 3). In addition, the blaTEM-3 gene (n = 3), as well as blaSHV genes encoding blaSHV-18 (n = 6), blaSHV-28 (n = 1), and blaSHV-154 (n = 1) were detected. Three isolates carried more than one ESBL gene; two strains (E. cowanii and E. coli) harbored the blaTEM-3 gene in association with blaSHV-18 and blaCTX-M-14 genes, respectively, while one E. coli isolate carried blaCTX-M-14, blaSHV-18 and blaTEM-3 genes. AmpC genetic determinants were observed in 18 of 58 (31%) isolates, 17 strains carried only one pAmpC gene, including blaMIR-20 (n = 4), blaMIR-16 (n = 3), and blaACT-58 (n = 2), and one isolate each harbored blaMIR-14, blaCMY-2, blaACT-2, blaACT-10, blaACT-29, blaEC-30, blaCMY-161 or blaCMY-87, respectively. As well, one P. penneri isolate harbored three AmpC genetic determinants (blaDHA-18, blaCMY-49 and blaACT-10). Among these 17 isolates, five strains (Enterobacter spp. (n = 2), R. aquatilis (n = 1), E. coli (n = 1) and S. fonticola (n = 1)) also carried ESBL genes [9]. Another report from South Africa described the detection of twenty enterobacterial isolates, identified as E. asburiae, E. coli, K. pneumoniae, R. aquatliis and S. fonticola, harboring different ESBL and AmpC genes, including blaCTX-M-group1, blaTEM, blaSHV, blaOXA and blaCIT genes [47]. In Algeria, Mesbah Zekar et al. reported the identification of multi-drug resistant K. pneumoniae isolates in fresh fruit and vegetables purchased in Bejaia city. In this study, eleven K. pneumoniae isolates harbored multiple ESBL genes, and blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaSHV-101 and blaSHV-28 were described. In addition, two K. pneumoniae strains coharbored blaDHA-1 with ESBL genes [48]. In Asia, Usui et al. analyzed 130 samples of fresh vegetables collected from seven supermarkets in Japan, 10 out of the 130 samples contained ESBL-producing Pseudomonas spp. including; P. hunanensis, P. putida, P. parafulva, P. beteli, P. mosselii, P. paralactis and P. arsenicoxydans. These isolates harbored the blaSHV-12 or blaTEM-116 ESBL gene [49]. In China, a nationwide survey investigated the prevalence of ESBL-producing Enterobacteriaceae from retail food, where four isolates were obtained. Three were identified as E. coli and one as C. freundii isolated from retail vegetables, including tomatoes, cucumber and coriander. The C. freundii isolate carried blaCTX-M and blaOXA genes, while two E. coli isolates harbored blaCTX-M and blaSHV genes and one other E. coli strain carried blaCTX-M, blaSHV and blaTEM genes [7]. In Malaysia, ESBL or AmpC genes were detected in two E. coli (blaCTX-M-55 and blaCTX-M-65) and two K. pneumoniae isolates (blaCTX-M-15, blaSHV-28 and blaDHA-1) from coriander and chili pepper respectively [50]. In addition, different CTX-M variants were described from E. coli isolates in South Korea including CTX-M-14, CTX-M-15, CTX-M-27, CTX-M-55 and the CTX-M-65 variant [51]. On the American continent, different Enterobacteriaceae isolates harbored blaSHV, blaTEM and blaCTX-M-1 as well as blaCTX-M and blaCMY genes and were detected from iceberg lettuce and leafy greens, respectively in the United States [52,53]. Moreover, seven E. coli isolates carrying the blaCTX-M-15 gene were reported from leaf lettuce, alfalfa and parsley/cilantro in Ecuador [54], while blaCTX-M-14, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-27, blaSHV-106 and blaSHV-142-positive Enterobacteriaceae were reported in Canada from imported vegetable samples [55], and the blaCTX-M-15 gene in Brazil [56]. ESBL and cephalosporinase genes reported in Gram-negative bacteria isolates from vegetables and fruit worldwide.

6. Vegetables and Fruit Isolates with Carbapenemase Genes

Only eight reports have revealed the isolation of Gram-negative bacteria producing carbapenemase genes from vegetables and fruit (Figure 1, Table 2). The first study describing carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria from fresh vegetable samples was published in 2015. Samples were purchased from different retail shops specializing in Asian food from three different cities in Switzerland, imported from Vietnam, Thailand, and India. In this study, only one Klebsiella variicola strain carrying the blaOXA-181 gene was isolated from a coriander sample from Thailand/Vietnam, and the obtained isolate coharbored a quinolone resistant gene (qnrS1). These data suggest that the international production of imported fresh vegetables constitutes a possible reservoir for the spread of carbapenemase-producing Gram-negative bacteria, especially Enterobacteriaceae [57].
Table 2

Carbapenemases and mcr genes reported in Gram-negative bacteria isolates from vegetables and fruit worldwide.

Vegetables TypeCarbapenemase/mcr GeneIsolation PeriodSpecies Isolates NumberCountryOther Antibiotic Resistance GenesSequence TypePlasmid TypeReference
Coriander bla OXA-181 2015 Klebsiella variicola 1SwitzerlandqnrS1NDIncX3[57]
LettuceblaKPC-2 and blaNDM-12015 Escherichia coli 1ChinablaDHA-1, fosA3, floR aacA4, tet(D), sul1, armA, mph(E), msr(E), erm(B), strA, strBST877IncA/C (blaNDM-1), Untypable (blaKPC-2)[60]
bla OXA-48 2016 K. pneumoniae 1Algeria bla TEM-1 ST391ND[11]
bla NDM-5 2017 E. coli 1ChinablaCTX−M−1G, fosA3, floRST4762X3[61]
1blaCTX−M−1G, fosA3, floR, oqxAB.ST4762X3
bla NDM-1 C. freundii 1fosA3, floR, qnrBNDND
Parsley bla NDM-1 2015 K. pneumoniae 1JapanblaSHV-28, blaSHV-1, blaTEM-1A, blaCTX-M-15, blaCTX-M-14b, blaTEM-1A, blaOXA-9, fosA, oqxAB, tet(D), aac(69)-Ib, aadA1, aph(39)-VI, aph(6)-Id, aph(39)-VIb, aph(39’)-Ib, aac(69)-Ib-cr, qnrS1ST15 ND[59]
bla OXA-48 2016 K. pneumoniae 1AlgeriaNoneNDND[11]
bla OXA-48 2019 E. cloacae 1RomaniaNDNDND[46]
bla KPC K. oxytoca 1NDNDND
Baby leaf mix bla NDM-1 2015 K. pneumoniae 1JapanblaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-9, blaTEM-1A, blaSHV-28, blaCTX-M-14b, fosA, oqxAB, aac(69)-Ib, aadA1, aph(39)-VI, aac(69)-Ib-cr, qnrS1, aph(6)-Id, aph(39)-VIb, aph(39’)-Ib.ST15ND[59]
blaOXA-66, blaOXA-72 A. baumannii 1blaADC-25, blaOXA-66, blaOXA-72, sul2, tet(B), aac(3)-Ia aac(69)-Ip, aph(39’)-Ib, aph(6)-IdST2GR2 (blaOXA-72)
Cucumber bla KPC-2 2017 K. pneumoniae 1ChinaqnrB, oqxABST23F35:A-:B1[61]
1blaCTX−M−1G, qnrB, oqxABST23F35:A-:B1
bla NDM-5 E. coli 1fosA3, floR, qnrBUTND
1blaCTX−M−1G, fosA3, floR,.ST4762ND
blaNDM-5 and blaKPC-2 E. coli 1None NDND
Curly endive bla NDM-5 2017 E. coli 1ChinablaCTX−M−1G, fosA3, floR, rmtBST167ND[61]
bla NDM-1 C. freundii 1fosA3, floR, qnrBNDND
1fosA3, floR, oqxAB, qnrB, rmtBNDND
1fosA3, floR, qnrBNDX3
Tomato bla OXA-48 2016 K. pneumoniae 1AlgeriaNoneST1877ND[11]
bla NDM-1 2017 C. freundii 1ChinablaCTX−M−1G, fosA3, floR, qnrBNDX3[61]
Leaf rape bla NDM-5 2017–2018 E. coli 1Chinamcr-1, fosA3ST156X3[4]
Spinach bla NDM-9 1mcr-1, fosA3ST2847Untypable
bla KPC 2019 Morganella morganii 1RomaniaNDNDND[46]
Vegetables (ND) bla OXA-72 ND Acinetobacter calcoaceticus 2LebanonNDNDND[58]
Lettucemcr-12013 E. coli 1PortugalblaTEM-1, aadA1y, aph(4)-Ia, estX-12, floR, sat2, strA, strB, sul2, tetAST1716ND[62]
2013–2014 E. coli 1blaTEM-1, aac(3)-Iv, aadA1, aph(4)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, mdf(A)-type, tetA, sul2, floRST1716ND[63]
2016 E. coli 1ChinablaCTX-M-14, floR, fosA3, oqxABST795IncHI2[64]
1blaCTX-M-55, floRST2505ncI2
2015 E. coli 1blaCTX-M-55, rmtB, floR, fosA3.ST156IncI2
2016 E. coli 1floRST48IncX4
2015 Raoultella ornithinolytica 2blaCTX-M-14, floR, fosA3, oqxABNAIncHI2
mcr-12018 E. coli 1South KoreablaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M-55ST10ND[65]
mcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1ChinaNDST10X4[66]
1NDST2705HI2
Tomatomcr-12016 E. coli 1ChinablaCTX-M-14, floR, fosA3, oqxABST69IncHI2[64]
2015 E. coli 2floRST206chromosome
mcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1ChinaNDST713X4[66]
1ChinaNDUTI2
Leaf rapemcr-12017–2018 K. pneumoniae 1ChinablaNDM-5, fosA3ST156X4[4]
E. coli 1ChinaNDST744X4[66]
Green Peppermcr-12017–2018 E. cloacae 1ChinaNDNDND[66]
mcr-1 E. coli 1NDST5873X4
Spinachmcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1ChinablaNDM-9, fosA3ST2847I2[4]
mcr-11NDST2253I2[66]
Cha-ommcr-12014 E. coli 1Switzerland bla CTX-M-55 ST167ND[67]
Basil leavesmcr-12014 E. coli 1 bla CTX-M-65 ST4683ND
Cucumbermcr-12017–2018 E. coli 2ChinaNDST744 X4 [66]
2NDST1115I2
Carrotmcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1NDST5539X4
E. coli 1NDST13I2
Curly endivemcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1NDST13X4
Pak choimcr-12017–2018 E. coli 1NDST648I2
Applemcr-12016 E. coli 1ChinaaadA2, aadA1,floR, cmlA1, sul2, sul3, tetA, tetM, dfrA12,mdfAST189IncFIA[68]
Orangemcr-1 K. pneumoniae 1blaSHV-110, qnrS1, oqxA, oqxB, fosA6, sul1, tetA, dfrA1ST442IncHI1
Since its first report, carbapenemase genes have been identified in bacteria from different vegetable samples in only five countries across the Asian, African and European continents. Indeed, OXA-72-producing Acinetobacter calcoaceticus strains have been found in two vegetable samples purchased from the same market in Beirut, Lebanon [58]. In Japan, two K. pneumoniae and one Acinetobacter baumannii isolate were collected from vegetable samples in the city of Higashi-Hiroshima. Both K. pneumoniae isolates carried blaNDM-1 with other genes conferring resistance to β-lactams (blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-9, and blaTEM-1A), aminoglycosides (aac(6’)-Ib, aadA1, and aph(3’)-VI), quinolones (qnrS1) and fluoroquinolones (aac(6’)-Ib-cr). While the obtained A. baumannii isolate coharbored blaOXA-66, blaOXA-72 and genes conferring resistance to sulfonamides (sul2), tetracycline (tet(B)), and streptomycin (strAB) [59]. In China, Wang et al., identified an Escherichia coli strain coproducing blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-1 genes in fresh lettuce from a market in Guangzhou. In addition, this multidrug resistant E. coli strain coharbored fosfomycin resistance genes (fosA3 and floR). This study represents the first report of either blaKPC or blaNDM genes in bacteria obtained from vegetables [60]. Additionally, two other studies from China reported the detection of carbapenemase-positive enterobacterial isolates. The first reported the isolation of twelve carbapenem-resistant isolates obtained from vegetable samples, where the highest detection rate was found in curly endive samples. The authors identified two K. pneumoniae isolates carrying the blaKPC-2 gene, while five of each E. coli and C. freundii strains harbored the blaNDM gene, including four E. coli with the blaNDM-5 gene and five C. freundii with blaNDM-1. Notably, one E. coli strain from a cucumber sample harbored blaNDM-5 and blaKPC-2 genes simultaneously. All C. freundii and E. coli isolates carried fosfomycin resistance genes (fosA3and floR), and all K. pneumoniae and C. freundii isolates harbored the floR gene. However, one strain of E. coli and C. freundii harbored the aminoglycoside resistance gene (rmtB). Quinolone resistance genes including oqxAB and qnrB, were found in four and eight isolates, respectively [61]. The second report signaled the detection of two E. coli isolates carrying blaNDM genes in leaf rape and spinach recovered from two supermarkets in Shandong province; one isolate concomitantly harbored blaNDM-9, mcr-1 and fosA3, while the second isolate carried blaNDM-5, mcr-1 and fosA3 genes [4]. From the African continent only one study from Algeria has been reported. The authors identified three K. pneumoniae isolates harboring the blaOXA-48 gene from lettuce, tomatoes and parsley in Béjaïa city [11]. In Europe and more precisely from Romania, the blaOXA-48 and blaKPC genes were detected in E. cloacae and K. oxytoca isolates from parsley samples [46]. Carbapenemases and mcr genes reported in Gram-negative bacteria isolates from vegetables and fruit worldwide.

7. Vegetables and Fruit Isolates with the mcr Gene

To date, eight studies have reported mcr-producing Gram-negative bacteria, especially isolates of Enterobacteriaceae species, from fresh produce that mostly originated from China (Figure 1, Table 2). The mcr-1 gene was first reported in 2016 in Switzerland in two out of sixty isolates. The two E. coli isolates carried the mcr-1 gene and coharbored blaCTX-M-55 and blaCTX-M-65 genes, respectively [67]. After this first description in fresh produce, mcr-1-producing GNB isolates on fresh produce were reported in China, where seven E. coli and two Raoultella ornithinolytica isolates were recovered from tomato and lettuce samples between May 2015 and August 2016 in Guangzhou. All the obtained mcr-1-positive strains harbored the florfenicol resistance gene (floR). Of the nine isolates, six strains carried the blaCTX-M gene (four blaCTX-M-14 and two blaCTX-M-55), with five and four strains harboring the fosA3 and oqxAB efflux pump gene, respectively [64]. Moreover, the mcr-1 gene was described in China from a total of 528 fresh vegetable samples, including 18 different types purchased from 53 supermarkets and farmers markets from 23 districts or cities in nine provinces between May 2017 and April 2018. Of the 528 samples analyzed, only 19 samples harbored one or more mcr-positive isolates, and the three highest detection rates were noted in carrots (14.3%), pakchoi (13.3%) and green pepper (7.7%), followed by leaf lettuce (5.6%), leaf rape (4.9%), romaine lettuce (4.3%), tomato (3.5%), spinach (3.2%), cucumber (3.1%), and curly endive (2.4%). In the above study, twenty-four mcr-1-positive isolates were obtained; twenty-three strains were identified as E. coli and one as E. cloacae. Fourteen mcr-1-positive strains coproduced the blaCTX-M gene, nine strains harbored the blaCTX-M-9G gene and three strains carried blaCTX-M-1G. However, the remaining two strains harbored both blaCTX-M-9G and blaCTX-M-1G genes. In addition, eight and two isolates harbored fosA3 and rmtB genes, respectively. Plasmid-mediated resistance to quinolones (PMQR), including oqxAB, qnrS and qnrB genes, were also detected in this study [66]. Additionally, in the same country, two E. coli isolates carrying the mcr-1 gene were isolated from leaf rape and spinach in Shandong province. These isolates coharbored metallo-β-lactamase and fosA3 genes; the first carried blaNDM-5, while the second harbored the blaNDM-9 gene [4]. In 2018, one E. coli isolate carrying the mcr-1 gene recovered from lettuce was reported in South Korea. The obtained isolate coharbored blaTEM-1 and blaCTX-M-55 genes [65]. In Portugal, the mcr-1 gene was reported by Manageiro et al. in 2020, and they documented the presence of this gene in an E. coli strain isolated from a lettuce sample. In silico analysis showed the presence of additional antibiotic resistance genes including blaTEM-1, aac(3)-Iv, aadA1, aph(4)-Ia, aph(6)-Id, mdf(A)-type, tetA, sul2 and floR-type [63]. Another report from Portugal revealed the detection of the mcr-1 gene in an E. coli strain from conventionally produced lettuce. The isolate co-carried blaTEM-1, aph(4)-Ia, floR, sat2, strA, strB, sul2 and tetA genes, while no conventional and organic fruit were positive for the mcr-1 gene [62]. On fruit samples, the mcr-1 gene was detected in E. coli and K. pneumoniae isolates from apple and orange samples recovered in China [68].

8. Contamination Pathways and Genetic Characteristics of β-Lactamases and mcr-Producing Gram-Negative Bacteria

The high diversity of global clones illustrates the extensive spread of ESBL-producing K. pneumoniae and E. coli isolates on vegetables around the world (ST45, ST219, ST15 and ST147 found in K. pneumoniae isolates, and ST410-A, ST44, ST405, ST131 and ST38 in E. coli isolates). In Algeria, sequence type 14, ST45, ST219, ST236, and ST882 have been identified among K. pneumoniae strains recovered on fresh fruit and vegetables carrying ESBL or cephalosporinase genes, including blaCTX-M-15, blaOXA-1, blaSHV-101, blaSHV-28 and blaDHA-1 genes that were mostly (11 of 13) located on the IncFII plasmid, while the IncR plasmid replicon was identified in only one isolate [48]. In Switzerland, twenty-two different sequence types identified in E. coli-positive ESBL have been described on imported vegetables, including ST4684 and ST4683, four of them belonging to the epidemiologically important sequence types ST405 (n = 1), ST131 (n = 2) and ST38 (n = 2) [10]. Similarly, the ST131 E. coli clone is known for its role in the global spread of ESBLs, especially CTX-M-15, and this clone has had an inevitable clinical impact on antibiotic resistance and pathogenicity [69]. In the same study conducted in Switzerland, high clonal diversity was observed among K. pneumoniae strains, with two isolates belonging to the epidemic clones ST15 and ST147 [10]. In Quito, Ecuador, the hyper epidemic clones ST410 and ST44 harboring the blaCTX-M-15 gene have been identified in E. coli isolates from leaf lettuce, alfalfa and parsley/cilantro, and three of them were found on the same integron 1 variable region (dfrA1 and addA5). The five remaining isolates presented blaCTX-M-15 downstream of an insertion sequence element p1 (ISEcp1) [54]. In a survey in Germany, a high diversity of global clones was identified in ESBL-producing E. coli isolates from different vegetable samples. These ESBL determinants were detected on different plasmids as follows: IncHI2 and IncK (blaCTX-M-14, ST527, ST973), IncN (blaCTX-M-65, ST10), IncFIB (blaCTX-M-15, ST410), IncHI2 (blaCTX-M-125, ST542) and IncFIA-FIB (blaCTX-M-2, ST120) [45]. The IncFIB and IncFIC plasmid replicons were found in Pseudomonas hunanensis, and P. putida carried the blaSHV-12 respectively.The plasmid IncK/B was reported in P. paralactis harboring the blaTEM-16 gene [49]. The dissemination of carbapenemase-producing E. coli is polyclonal, where multiple STs have been reported. The sequence type 877 was reported in an E. coli strain coproducing blaKPC-2 and blaNDM-1 genes isolated from fresh lettuce. These genes were located on 64 and 118 kb plasmids, designated as plasmids pHNTS79-KPC and pHNTS79-NDM, respectively [60]. Furthermore, ST1877 and ST391 have been detected in OXA-48-positive K. pneumoniae isolates from lettuce, tomatoes and parsley in Algeria, where the ST391 clone is considered as an emergent carbapenemase-producing lineage of clinical importance [11]. The blaOXA-181 detected in a Klebsiella variicola isolate from a coriander sample was mediated by the IncX3-type plasmid of 51-kb [57]. Indeed, in Japan the epidemic clones ST15 and ST2 were reported among K. pneumoniae that carried the blaNDM-1 gene and the A. baumannii strain coharbored blaOXA-66, and blaOXA-72 genes, respectively [59]. ST15 is a relatively common NDM-positive K. pneumoniae lineage, and it has been found in various countries across different continents, almost all of which were isolated from humans [70]. IncX3 plasmids carrying the blaNDM gene have been identified in E. coli and C. freundii strains isolated from cucumbers, and the identified IncX3 plasmid was identical or highly similar (99%) to the IncX3 plasmids identified from patients in other countries. In addition, similar F35:A-:B1 plasmids were described in two blaKPC-2-producing-K. pneumoniae isolates belonging to ST23 obtained from different cities. Two E. coli isolates carrying the blaNDM-5 gene isolated from cucumber and romaine lettuce samples in different cities in China shared an identical PFGE pattern and sequence type (ST4762); however, one E. coli strain belonged to ST167 [61]. Among E. coli isolates, the mcr-1 gene was found in multiple STs from different countries, ST10 in South Korea, and ST167 and ST4683 in Switzerland [65,67]. ST156 and ST2847 have been identified in China from leaf rape and spinach samples. In the latter, mcr-1 genes were located on the~60-kb IncI2 plasmid or the ~33-kb IncX4 plasmid; even as blaNDM-5 was on the ~46-kb IncX3 plasmid while blaNDM-9 was on the ~120-kb untypeable plasmid. The detected plasmids were highly similar to those from patients and animals described in different countries [4]. In a Chinese study, six sequence types, including ST795, ST2505, ST69, ST156, ST48 and ST206, were described in seven E. coli isolates recovered from lettuce and tomato samples. For the four E. coli isolates, mcr-1 genes were located on IncHI2, IncI2 or IncX4 plasmids, while for the two Raoultella ornithinolytica isolates, the mcr-1 gene was located on the IncHI2 plasmid [64]. Moreover, in China, sixteen STs along with a new ST type were identified, while the most prevalent STs were ST744 and ST224. In this study, different plasmid replicons were detected, including IncX4, IncI2 and IncHI2; where IncX4 was the most detected and shared highly similar RFLP profiles, although they were from different cities and fresh vegetables. The mcr-1 gene was located on the IncX4 plasmid of ∼33 kb in size [66]. In addition to the above results, the study found that patients and animals shared identical or highly similar plasmids with vegetables [4,61]. Various other studies reported that vegetables may become contaminated with multidrug resistant bacteria from soil, manure fertilization, irrigation water or through direct contamination by humans [2]. In this context, the major way in which antibiotic resistance enters the soil is through the use of animal manure [71]. In Australia, Zhang et al. explored the impact of cattle and poultry manure application on the resistome in lettuce and soil microbiomes, including the rhizosphere, root endosphere, leaf endosphere and phyllosphere. In addition, they identified potential transmission routes of antibiotic resistance genes in the soil–plant system. The authors reported that poultry manure application increased antibiotic resistance genes in the rhizosphere, root endophyte and phyllosphere, while cattle manure use increased the abundance of antibiotic resistance genes only in the root endophyte, suggesting that poultry manure may have a stronger impact on lettuceresistomes. Moreover, the authors also identified an overlap of antibiotic resistance gene (ARG) profiles between lettuce tissues and soil, which indicates that plant and environmental resistomes are interconnected, and confirmed the transmission of antibiotic resistance genes from manured soil to vegetables. Two main transmission pathways were reported: an internal pathway through plant tissues and an external pathway via aerosol from the atmosphere to the plant surface. Thus, in the external pathway, sixty-nine ARGs were shared between poultry manure-amended soil and the phyllosphere of lettuce, while in the internal pathway 47 genes were common between rhizosphere soil and the root endophyte [72]. This finding was consistent with previous studies which reported that the phyllosphere resistome was significantly more abundant and diverse than the endophytic resistome in organic vegetables [73,74]. Another report from China described the impact of the long-term use of inorganic (chemical) and organic (manure) fertilizers on antibiotic resistance genes in greenhouse soils growing vegetables. The results showed that both inorganic and organic use increased the abundance and the diversity of soil ARGs, with a difference in the dominant ARG types. ARG abundance and diversity were both higher in organic fertilizer [75]. These data confirmed those of previous reports indicating that fertilizer application, especially organic fertilizer such as animal manure, raised ARG abundance and diversity in soil compared to soil without fertilization [75,76,77]. Several studies have reported food-borne human outbreaks linked to the consumption of fresh vegetables and fruit irrigated with wastewater and indicated that the type of irrigation practice plays a vital role in the contamination of farm produce [78]. In this context, Araújo et al. characterized the presence of E. coli isolates on vegetables and in irrigation water sampled from 16 household farms in Portugal. In this later study, different commonly acquired genes such as blaTEM, tetA and tetB and plasmids (IncFIC, IncFrep and IncFIB) were detected in isolates in both water and vegetable samples. In addition, rep-PCR typing results detected the same STs and identical clones in vegetables and water, suggesting cross-contamination. These results suggest that irrigation groundwater is a reservoir of antibiotic resistant E. coli and may enter the food chain via vegetable consumption [79]. Makkaew et al. evaluated the contamination of lettuce by E. coli, grown under four diverse methods of wastewater irrigation: open spray, open drip, spray under plastic sheet cover, and drip under plastic sheet cover. E. coli contamination was reported in all lettuce samples in both open and covered spray beds in all types of spray beds. An equal level of microbial quality of spray bed lettuce and submersed lettuce irrigated with wastewater containing 1299.7 E. coli MPN/100 mL was detected, and this result was similar in both laboratory and experimental investigations [80]. In Ghana, Antwi-Agyei et al. reported that irrigation with partially treated and untreated wastewater is a key risk factor for the observed contamination of 80% of produce samples, with a median concentration ranging from 0.64 to 3.84 log E. coli/g produce, while ready-to-eat salad was the most contaminated with 4.23 log E. coli/g [81].

9. Conclusions

This review provides a reference for an enhanced understanding of the global risk of fresh vegetables and fruit in the transmission of multidrug resistant Gram-negative bacteria and emphasizes the necessity of paying close attention to these products as a future public health issue. Given that fresh produce is often consumed raw, this allows the transfer of these antibiotic resistance genes to human gut bacteria. It is now even more important that more investigations should be performed in order to survey the emergence and transmission of these genes to humans from farm to fork. In addition, suitable measures, including the improvement of water quality and agricultural practices, need to be considered to ensure consumer safety worldwide.
  80 in total

1.  Emergence of mcr-1 in Raoultella ornithinolytica and Escherichia coli Isolates from Retail Vegetables in China.

Authors:  Juan Luo; Xu Yao; Luchao Lv; Yohei Doi; Xiuyu Huang; Sicheng Huang; Jian-Hua Liu
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-09-22       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Variation of microbial load and biochemical activity of ready-to-eat salads in Cyprus as affected by vegetable type, season, and producer.

Authors:  Panayiota Xylia; George Botsaris; Antonios Chrysargyris; Panagiotis Skandamis; Nikos Tzortzakis
Journal:  Food Microbiol       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 5.516

Review 3.  AmpC β-lactamase-producing Enterobacterales: what a clinician should know.

Authors:  Simone Meini; Carlo Tascini; Marco Cei; Emanuela Sozio; Gian Maria Rossolini
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-03-06       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 4.  Non-phenotypic tests to detect and characterize antibiotic resistance mechanisms in Enterobacteriaceae.

Authors:  Agnese Lupo; Krisztina M Papp-Wallace; Parham Sendi; Robert A Bonomo; Andrea Endimiani
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-10-03       Impact factor: 2.803

5.  Does organically produced lettuce harbor higher abundance of antibiotic resistance genes than conventionally produced?

Authors:  Bokai Zhu; Qinglin Chen; Songcan Chen; Yong-Guan Zhu
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Microbial risk in wastewater irrigated lettuce: comparing Escherichia coli contamination from an experimental site with a laboratory approach.

Authors:  P Makkaew; M Miller; H J Fallowfield; N J Cromar
Journal:  Water Sci Technol       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 1.915

7.  Characteristics of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacteriaceae in Ready-to-Eat Vegetables in China.

Authors:  Bao-Tao Liu; Xiao-Yan Zhang; Shu-Wei Wan; Jun-Jie Hao; Rui-De Jiang; Feng-Jing Song
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 8.  Recent progress on elucidating the molecular mechanism of plasmid-mediated colistin resistance and drug design.

Authors:  Jindan Kai; Sheng Wang
Journal:  Int Microbiol       Date:  2019-12-23       Impact factor: 2.479

Review 9.  Epidemiological Evidence and Health Risks Associated With Agricultural Reuse of Partially Treated and Untreated Wastewater: A Review.

Authors:  Anthony A Adegoke; Isaac D Amoah; Thor A Stenström; Matthew E Verbyla; James R Mihelcic
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2018-12-06

Review 10.  An overview of colistin resistance, mobilized colistin resistance genes dissemination, global responses, and the alternatives to colistin: A review.

Authors:  Mohammad H Gharaibeh; Shoroq Q Shatnawi
Journal:  Vet World       Date:  2019-11-08
View more
  1 in total

1.  Occurrence of Extended Spectrum Cephalosporin-, Carbapenem- and Colistin-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacteria in Fresh Vegetables, an Increasing Human Health Concern in Algeria.

Authors:  Widad Chelaghma; Lotfi Loucif; Esma Bendjama; Zineb Cherak; Mourad Bendahou; Jean-Marc Rolain
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-22
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.