| Literature DB >> 34946095 |
Baoyu Xiang1, Liping Zhao1, Menghui Zhang1.
Abstract
Gut-microbiota-targeted nutrition intervention has achieved success in the management of obesity, but its underlying mechanism still needs extended exploration. An obese Prader-Willi syndrome boy lost 25.8 kg after receiving a high-fiber dietary intervention for 105 days. The fecal microbiome sequencing data taken from the boy on intervention days 0, 15, 30, 45, 60, 75, and 105, along with clinical indexes, were used to construct a metagenome-scale metabolic network. Firstly, the abundances of the microbial strains were obtained by mapping the sequencing reads onto the assembly of gut organisms through use of reconstruction and analysis (AGORA) genomes. The nutritional components of the diet were obtained through the Virtual Metabolic Human database. Then, a community model was simulated using the Microbiome Modeling Toolbox. Finally, the significant Spearman correlations among the metabolites and the clinical indexes were screened and the strains that were producing these metabolites were identified. The high-fiber diet reduced the overall amount of metabolite secretions, but the secretions of folic acid derivatives by Bifidobacterium longum strains were increased and were significantly relevant to the observed weight loss. Reduced metabolites might also have directly contributed to the weight loss or indirectly contribute by enhancing leptin and decreasing adiponectin. Metagenome-scale metabolic network technology provides a cost-efficient solution for screening the functional microbial strains and metabolic pathways that are responding to nutrition therapy.Entities:
Keywords: folate; gut microbiota; high-fiber diet; metagenome-scale metabolic network; obesity
Year: 2021 PMID: 34946095 PMCID: PMC8705902 DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms9122493
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Microorganisms ISSN: 2076-2607
Food intakes on different sampling days (g/day).
| Food Name | Day 0, 15, 30 | Day 45, 60 | Day 75, 105 |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||
| Adlay | 222 | 128 | 123 |
| Hyacinth beans | 111 | 64.3 | 61.8 |
| Buckwheat | 111 | 64.3 | 61.8 |
| Oats | 166 | 96.5 | 92.7 |
| Yam | 111 | 64.3 | 61.8 |
| Soybean | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Red bean | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Peanut | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Goji berries | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Yellow corn | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Lotus seed | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Big jujube | 55.6 | 32.2 | 30.9 |
| Olive oil | 16.2 | 14.8 | 14.6 |
|
| |||
| Bitter gourd | 36.6 | 43.1 | 43.1 |
| Fibersol-2 | 2.44 | 2.87 | 2.87 |
| Oligosaccharides | 0.61 | 0.72 | 0.72 |
| Isomaltose | 1.02 | 1.20 | 1.20 |
|
| |||
| Fibersol-2 | 16.1 | 16.1 | 53.6 |
| Oligosaccharides | 4.02 | 4.02 | 13.4 |
| Isomaltose | 6.70 | 6.70 | 22.3 |
Figure 1Results of metagenome-scale metabolic network simulation. (A) The relative abundance of gut strains at different dietary intervention timepoints. Data were obtained by mapping high-quality reads to the AGORA reference genomes. For the mapped strains, only the most abundant 19 strains are shown and the remaining strains are summed and labeled as “others”. The unmapped reads are assigned as “unmapped”. (B) The summed abundances (mmol/day) of potential metabolite secretion in metabolism subsystems at different dietary intervention timepoints. (C) Correlations among host clinical parameters and the simulated metabolites of gut microbiota. Each row represents a metabolite and each column represents a clinical parameter. Correlations were calculated with Spearman correlation and post-adjusted with FDR. ‘*’: R > 0.7, p-value < 0.1, ‘**’: R > 0.7, p-value < 0.05. color of each rectangle in each cell represents p-value while size represent R. (D) Network diagram among the key metabolites and their contributing strains related to the obese child’s BMI, leptin, and adiponectin. The BMI, leptin and adiponectin are expressed in red triangles, the correlated metabolites are expressed in ellipses and the strains are expressed in diamonds. Different metabolisms are distinguished with colors. Only correlations with R > 0.7 and p-value < 0.1 are shown. Red lines indicate positive correlation while blue lines represent negative correlation. Metabolites and their producing strains are linked with black lines. FPG: Fasting Glycaemia, OGTT: oral glucose tolerance test, abbreviation for metabolites is from VMH database, 3mop: 3-methyl-2-oxopentanoate, 5mthf: 5-Methyltetrahydrofolate, adn: Adenosine, ca2: calcium, cl: Chloride, cobalt2: Co2+, cu2: Cu2+, fe2: Fe2+, fe3: Fe3+, fol: folate, k: potassium, Lcystin: L-cystine, met_L: L-methionine, mg2: magnesium, mn2: Mn2+, nac: nicotinate, ocdca: octadecenoate, so4: sulfate, thf: 5,6,7,8-Tetrahydrofolate, thr_L: L-threonine, urea: Urea, zn2: Zinc.
Figure 2The contribution of strains to metabolites (A) fol (B) thf (C) 5mthf (D) 3mop (E) adn, and (F) Lcystin at different dietary intervention timepoints. Each circle represents a metabolite with its top 10 contributing strains (left part of the circle). The right part of each circle represents the 7 different timepoints.