| Literature DB >> 34945424 |
Junyang Li1,2,3, Lei Fan1,3, Yanfang Li1, Tanyong Wei1, Cheng Wang4, Feng Li4, Hua Tian4, Dong Sun1,2,3.
Abstract
Cell-carrying magnet-driven microrobots are easily affected by blood flow or body fluids during transportation in the body, and thus cells often fall off from the microrobots. To reduce the loss of loaded cells, we developed a microrobot with a bioactive nanostructured titanate surface (NTS), which enhances cell adhesion. The microrobot was fabricated using 3D laser lithography and coated with nickel for magnetic actuation. Then, the microrobot was coated with titanium for the external generation of an NTS through reactions in NaOH solution. Enhanced cell adhesion may be attributed to the changes in the surface wettability of the microrobot and in the morphology of the loaded cells. An experiment was performed on a microfluidic chip for the simulation of blood flow environment, and result revealed that the cells adhered closely to the microrobot with NTS and were not obviously affected by flow. The cell viability and protein absorption test and alkaline phosphatase activity assay indicated that NTS can provide a regulatory means for improving cell proliferation and early osteogenic differentiation. This research provided a novel microrobotic platform that can positively influence the behaviour of cells loaded on microrobots through surface nanotopography, thereby opening up a new route for microrobot cell delivery.Entities:
Keywords: cell carrying; enhanced cell adhesion; magnetic microrobots; nanostructured titanate surface
Year: 2021 PMID: 34945424 PMCID: PMC8707319 DOI: 10.3390/mi12121572
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Micromachines (Basel) ISSN: 2072-666X Impact factor: 2.891
Figure 1Preparation of magnetic microrobots with NTS: (a) Fabrication procedures of the microrobots with NTS including writing, Ni/Ti deposition, chemical reaction in NaOH solution and cell culture process; (b) SEM images of the microrobots with NTS: (i) Microrobot deposited with Ni for 150 nm and Ti for 50 nm (without NTS); (ii) Microrobot with NTS modified with 5 mol/L NaOH for 6 h; (iii,iv) High-magnification SEM pictures of NTS outside the microrobot; (c) EDS spectrum of NTS sample. (d) XRD pattern of NTS sample.
Figure 2Surface wettability of the Ni/Ti samples: (a) WCA and SEM images of control sample; (b) WCA and SEM images of NTS modified with 1 mol/L of NaOH for 1, 6 and 12 h; (c) WCA and SEM images of NTS modified with 3 mol/L of NaOH for 1, 6 and 12 h; (d) WCA and SEM images of NTS modified with 5 mol/L NaOH for 1, 6 and 12 h; (e) Mean WCA vs. reaction time with various NaOH concentrations (n = 3); (f) Mean ferret diameter vs. reaction time with various NaOH concentrations (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD.
Figure 3Cell morphology on NTS: (a) SEM image of MSCs on glass substrate without NTS after 1 day of incubation; (b) SEM image of MSCs on NTS sample after1 day of incubation; (c) SEM image of single MSC with protrusive pseudopodia on NTS sample; (d) High-magnification SEM image of interplay between the MSC and the NTS; (e) SEM image of HEK-293T cells on microrobot with NTS after 1 day of incubation; (f) SEM image of HEK-293T cells on microrobot without NTS; (g) High-magnification SEM image of HEK-293T cells on microrobot with NTS; (h) High-magnification SEM image of single HEK-293T cell with protrusive pseudopodia on microrobot with NTS; (i) Histogram representing the average elongation of MSCs on glass substrate with and without NTS cultured for 1, 3, and 5 days (n = 100); (j) Histogram representing the average elongation of HEK-293T cells on microrobot with and without NTS cultured for 1 day (n = 100). Error bars indicate SD.
Figure 4Cell biological evaluation on NTS: (a) SEM images of MSCs on glass substrate with NTS with days 1, 3 and 5 of culture; (b) Cell viability of MSCs on different substrates with days 1, 3 and 5 of culture (n = 3); (c) Bright field and fluorescence images of the FITC-albumin absorption on microrobot with and without NTS after 30, 60 and 120 min of incubation (n = 3); (d) Fluorescence intensity of microrobots with and without NTS vs. incubation time in FITC-albumin solution (n = 3); (e) Adsorption of protein onto glass substrate with and without NTS vs. incubation time in FITC-albumin solution (n = 3); (f) ALP staining images of MSCs grown on different substrates with days 3 and 7 of culture; (g) Percentages of ALP-positive cells on different substrates on days 3 and 7 of culture; (h) ALP activity of MSCs cultured on different substrates after osteogenic induction for 3 and 7 days (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD.
Figure 5Verification of cell adhesion ability in microfluidic chip: (a) HEK-293T cells shed from the microrobot without NTS by passing through different flow rate; (b) HEK-293T cells adhered closely to the microrobot with NTS by passing through same volume flow rate; (c) The histogram of fluorescent area for microrobot without NTS by passing through different volume flow rate of 50 µL/min, 150 µL/min and 250 µL/min in one minute (n = 3); (d) The histogram of fluorescent area for microrobot with NTS by passing through different volume flow rate of 50 µL/min, 150 µL/min and 250 µL/min in one minute (n = 3). Error bars indicate SD.