| Literature DB >> 34944301 |
Weibing Lv1, Xiu Liu1, Yuzhu Sha1, Hao Shi1, Hong Wei1, Yuzhu Luo1, Jiqing Wang1, Shaobin Li1, Jiang Hu1, Xinyu Guo1, Xiaoning Pu1.
Abstract
As an important ruminant on the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, Tibetan sheep can maintain their population reproduction rate in the harsh high-altitude environment of low temperature and low oxygen, which relies on their special plateau adaptations mechanism that they have formed for a long time. Microbiomes (known as "second genomes") are closely related to the nutrient absorption, adaptability, and health of the host. In this study, rumen fermentation characteristics, the microbiota, and rumen epithelial gene expression of Tibetan sheep in various months were analyzed. The results show that the rumen fermentation characteristics of Tibetan sheep differed in different months. The total SCFAs (short-chain fatty acids), acetate, propionate, and butyrate concentrations were highest in October and lowest in June. The CL (cellulase) activity was highest in February, while the ACX (acid xylanase) activity was highest in April. In addition, the diversity and abundance of rumen microbes differed in different months. Bacteroidetes (53.4%) and Firmicutes (27.4%) were the dominant phyla. Prevotella_1 and Rikenellaceae_RC9_gut_group were the dominant genera. The abundance of Prevotella_1 was highest in June (27.8%) and lowest in December (17.8%). In addition, the expression of CLAUDIN4 (Claudin-4) and ZO1 (Zonula occludens 1) was significantly higher in April than in August and December, while the expression of SGLT1 (Sodium glucose linked transporter 1) was highest in August. Correlation analysis showed that there were interactions among rumen fermentation characteristics, the microbiota, and host gene expression, mainly by adjusting the amino acid metabolism pathway and energy metabolism pathway to improve energy utilization. At the same time, we adjusted the balance of the rumen "core microbiota" to promote the development of rumen and maintain the homeostasis of rumen environment, which makes Tibetan sheep better able to adapt to the harsh environment in different periods of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau.Entities:
Keywords: 16S rRNA; Tibetan sheep; gene expression; microbiota; rumen fermentation
Year: 2021 PMID: 34944301 PMCID: PMC8697948 DOI: 10.3390/ani11123529
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Animals (Basel) ISSN: 2076-2615 Impact factor: 2.752
Primer information.
| Gene | Primer (5′-3′) | Length | Annealing Temperature | Login ID |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| F:AGCCTTCCTTCCTGGGCATGGA | 113 bp | 60 °C | NM_001009784.3 |
| R:GGACAGCACCGTGTTGGCGTAGA | ||||
|
| F:GTGCAGTCAGCACAAAGTGG | 198 bp | 60 °C | NM_001009404.1 |
| R:CCCGGTTCCATAGGCAAACT | ||||
|
| F:AAGGTGTACGACTCGCTGCT | 237 bp | 60 °C | NM_001185017.2 |
| R:GACGTTGTTAGCCGTCCAG | ||||
|
| F:CGACCAGATCCTCAGGGTAA | 161 bp | 60 °C | XM_015101953.2 |
| R:AATCACCCACATCGGATTCT |
Results of determination of rumen fermentation parameters in different periods.
| Fermentation Parameters | February | April | June | August | October | December |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acetate (mmol/L) | 23.56 ± 0.33 d | 26.08 ± 0.81 c | 19.53 ± 1.94 e | 36.63 ± 0.33 b | 40.36 ± 0.88 a | 40.01 ± 2.01 a |
| Propionate (mmol/L) | 12.72 ± 0.61 c | 13.55 ± 1.02 bc | 10.33 ± 0.30 d | 14.37 ± 0.37 b | 15.96 ± 0.49 a | 13.86 ± 0.31 bc |
| Butyrate (mmol/L) | 6.85 ± 0.39 c | 7.48 ± 0.45 b | 5.71 ± 0.20 d | 8.11 ± 0.10 a | 8.14 ± 0.49 a | 6.05 ± 0.19 d |
| Isobutyrate (mmol/L) | 1.18 ± 0.11 a | 1.27 ± 0.09 a | 0.97 ± 0.02 b | 1.00 ± 0.01 b | 0.93 ± 0.05 bc | 0.82 ± 0.01 c |
| Isovalerate (mmol/L) | 2.53 ± 0.11 b | 2.77 ± 0.26 a | 1.85 ± 0.03 c | 1.87 ± 0.01 c | 1.69 ± 0.12 c | 1.44 ± 0.01 d |
| Valerate (mmol/L) | 5.05 ± 0.35 a | 4.61 ± 0.21 b | 4.26 ± 0.12 c | 4.13 ± 0.13 cd | 3.80 ± 0.06 d | 3.08 ± 0.15 e |
| A:P | 1.85 ± 0.06 c | 1.93 ± 0.08 c | 1.89 ± 0.13 c | 2.55 ± 0.04 b | 2.53 ± 0.02 b | 2.88 ± 0.08 a |
| Total SCFAs (mmol/L) | 51.88 ± 1.91 d | 55.77 ± 2.43 c | 42.65 ± 2.62 e | 66.11 ± 0.94 b | 70.91 ± 1.64 a | 65.27 ± 2.37 b |
| NH3-N (mg/dL) | 2.38 ± 0.03 e | 5.82 ± 0.08 c | 9.54 ± 0.26 a | 8.10 ± 0.02 b | 5.98 ± 0.03 c | 3.37 ± 0.03 d |
| CL activities (μg/min/mL) | 122.78 ± 17.25 a | 110.82 ± 15.58 ab | 110.13 ± 6.50 ab | 96.23 ± 2.01 b | 99.21 ± 4.85 b | 109.52 ± 5.58 ab |
| ACX activities (nmol/min/mL) | 144.61 ± 27.04 c | 293.32 ± 20.78 a | 257.4 ± 23.88 a | 107.64 ± 18.64 d | 162.19 ± 14.37 bc | 194.42 ± 13.55 b |
Note: In the same row, with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05), the same lowercase letters or no letters indicate that the difference is not significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 1(A) Distribution map of microbial OTU; (B) dilution curve; (C) PCoA analysis; (D) Anosim analysis box plot.
Alpha index diversity.
| Alpha Index | Shannon | Simpson | ACE | Chao1 | OTU | Coverage (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| February | 5.24 ± 0.12 c | 0.020 ± 0.004 | 940.54 ± 13.38 c | 953.76 ± 14.19 d | 882 c | 99.60 |
| April | 5.58 ± 0.05 ab | 0.010 ± 0.001 | 1000.69 ± 24.72 b | 1015.56 ± 24.39 c | 952 b | 99.60 |
| June | 5.24 ± 0.12 c | 0.019 ± 0.007 | 891.69 ± 17.80 d | 909.56 ± 18.81 d | 819 d | 99.60 |
| August | 5.67 ± 0.08 a | 0.011 ± 0.001 | 1067.62 ± 16.55 a | 1076.28 ± 15.89 ab | 1027 a | 99.70 |
| October | 5.67 ± 0.07 a | 0.011 ± 0.002 | 1073.34 ± 14.22 a | 1092.61 ± 13.21 a | 1030 a | 99.70 |
| December | 5.35 ± 0.03 bc | 0.018 ± 0.002 | 1010.09 ± 11.01 b | 1031.25 ± 12.09 bc | 948 b | 99.60 |
Note: In the same column, with different small letter superscripts mean significant difference (p < 0.05), the same lowercase letters or no letters indicate that the difference is not significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 2(A) Phylum species composition histogram; (B) phylum rank sum test analysis histogram; (C) genus species composition histogram; (D) genus rank sum test analysis histogram. Note: * p < 0.05.
Figure 3Random forest analysis of microorganisms at the genus level in different periods. Note: Mean Decrease Gini: Calculate the impact of each variable on the heterogeneity of the observations at each node of the classification tree, thereby comparing the importance of the variables. The larger the value, the greater the importance of the variable.
Figure 4LEfSe analysis evolutionary branch diagram.
Figure 5Expression of SGLT1, CLAUDIN4, and ZO1 genes in rumen epithelial tissue. Note: Different lowercase letters represent significant differences in the relative expression of the same gene at different periods (p < 0.05). The same lowercase letter means that the difference is not significant (p > 0.05).
Figure 6Rumen fermentation-microbe-host gene expression correlation heat map. Note: * p < 0.05, ** p < 0.01, *** p < 0.001.