| Literature DB >> 33193243 |
Hongjin Liu1,2, Linyong Hu1,2, Xueping Han1,2,3, Na Zhao1,2, Tianwei Xu1,2, Li Ma1,2,3, Xungang Wang1,2,3, Xiaoling Zhang1,2,3, Shengping Kang1,2,3, Xinquan Zhao1,2, Shixiao Xu1,2.
Abstract
The rumen microbiota is strongly associated with host health, nutrient absorption, and adaptability. However, the composition, functioning and adaptability of rumen microbiota in Tibetan sheep (TS) across different phenological periods are unclear. In this study we used sequencing of the V4-V5 region of 16S rRNA, qPCR technology and metagenomics to investigate the adaption of rumen microbiota to forage in different stages of phenology. In a grassy period, due to the high nutritional quality of the forage, TS can produce high concentrations of NH3-N and short fatty acids by increasing the content of key bacteria in the rumen, such as Bacteroidetes, Prevotella, Succiniclasticum, Treponema, Butyrivibrio fibrisolvens, Fibrobacter succinogenes, Prevotella ruminicola, Ruminococcus albus, and Ruminococcus flavefaciens to aid in growth. In the withering period, there was a positive correlation between microorganisms which indicated the closely cooperation between microorganisms, and metagenomic analysis showed that the high genes (GHs and CBMs) and subtribe (GH8, GH12, GH45, GH6, GH9, GH5, GH10, GH3, GH52, GH11, GH57, CBM1, CBM4, CBM6, CBM16, CBM37, CBM13, CBM35, CBM42, CBM32, and CBM62) that encode cellulolytic enzymes were significantly increased when the host faced low quantity and quality of forage. Genes involved in metabolic pathways, fatty acid biosynthesis and biosynthesis of antibiotics were significantly enriched, which indicated that rumen microbiota could improve plant biomass deconstruction and energy maintenance in the face of nutritional deficiencies. In the regreen period, both the composition and function of rumen microbiota had obvious disadvantages, therefore, to improve the competitiveness of microorganisms, we suggest TS should be supplemented with high-protein feed. This study is of great significance for exploring the high altitude adaptability of TS.Entities:
Keywords: Tibetan sheep; adaptability; phenological periods; rumen microbiota diversity; rumen microbiota function
Year: 2020 PMID: 33193243 PMCID: PMC7649133 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.587558
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Primers sequences and parametersa.
| Target | Primer sequence (5′–3′) | Size (bp) | T (°C) | References |
| 5′ GTTCGGAATTACT GGGCGTAAA 3′ CGCCTGCCCCTGA ACTATC | 121 | 60.0 | ||
| 5′ CCCTAAAAGCAGTC TTAGTTCG 3′ CCTCCTTGCGGTT AGAACA | 176 | 55.0 | ||
| 5′ CGAACGGAGATAAT TTGAGTTTACTTAGG 3′ CGGTCTCTGTATGTT ATGAGGTATTACC | 132 | 60.0 | ||
| 5′ TCTGGAAACGGA TGGTA CCTTTAAGACAGGAG TTTACAA | 295 | 55.0 | ||
| 5′ CAACCAGTCGCAT TCAGA 3′ CACTACTCATG GCAACAT | 642 | 57.0 | ||
| 5′ GGTTATCTTGAG TGAGTT 3′ CTGATGGCAACT AAAGAA | 485 | 53.0 | ||
| 5′ GCTTTCGWTGGTA GTGTATT 3′ CTTGCCCTCYAAT CGTWCT | 223 | 55.0 |
The common forage nutrition composition in different phonological periods (air-dry basis).
| Nutrition contents | Phenological periods | |||
| Regreen stage | Grassy stage | Withering stage | ||
| DMa | 94.240.33b | 94.600.30ab | 95.200.25a | <0.05 |
| CP | 6.320.50b | 10.130.36a | 5.180.14c | <0.05 |
| EE | 0.910.03bc | 1.840.14a | 0.510.14c | <0.05 |
| ADF | 29.820.92b | 24.520.73c | 30.210.65a | <0.05 |
| NDF | 48.311.49b | 53.011.24ab | 57.131.68a | <0.05 |
The rumen fermentation parameters in the rumen of Tibetan sheep.
| Items | Phenological periods | |||
| Regreen stage | Grassy stage | Withering stage | ||
| pH | 6.550.09 | 6.490.04 | 6.580.05 | 0.519 |
| ammonium nitrogen (NH3-N) (mg/dL) | 6.820.51b | 10.900.75a | 4.150.51c | |
| Total short volatile fatty acids (mmol/L) | 40.574.14b | 57.143.47a | 50.214.14b | 0.023 |
| Acetate (%) | 75.040.29b | 73.580.01c | 77.140.32a | |
| Propionate percentage (%) | 15.180.27a | 15.130.01a | 14.490.21b | |
| Isobutyric acid percentage (%) | 1.360.03b | 1.780.01a | 0.840.04c | |
| Butyric acid percentage (%) | 7.710.32b | 8.640.57a | 7.020.26b | |
| Valeric acid percentage (%) | 0.710.03b | 0.860.05a | 0.520.01c | |
| Acetic acid/Propionic acid (A:P) | 4.950.10b | 4.540.09c | 5.340.09a | |
FIGURE 1Differences in bacterial diversity and richness under different phenological periods. (A) Rarefaction analysis among the 30 different samples at the OTU level. (B) Principle coordinate analysis (PCoA) profile of rumen bacteria diversity (C) Evenness (Shannon’s diversity index values) at the 3% dissimilarity level. (D) Richness (number of observed species) at the 3% dissimilarity level. **P < 0.01 by Tukey test. The groups are regreen stage (I), grassy stage (II), and withering stage (III).
FIGURE 2Shared and unique OTUs found in the rumen samples during the different phenological periods. The parenthetical numbers indicate total OTUs proportion in each group, whereas numbers in Venn diagram indicate unique (non-overlapping panels) and shared OTUs (overlapping panels). A total of 11,711 OTUs were detected. (A) unique OTUs annotated to the phylum level in the regreen stage, (B) unique OTUs annotated to the phylum level in grassy stage, (C) unique OTUs annotated to the phylum level in the withering stage. (D) The shared OTUs annotated to the phylum level among the three phenological periods.
FIGURE 3Distribution and significance analysis of rumen bacterial through the 30 samples. Heatmap showing the bacterial relative abundance at phylum (A) and genus (B) level. The significance analysis of rumen bacteria at phylum (C) and genus (D) level. The groups are regreen stage (I-1, 2 …10), grassy stage (II-1, 2 …10) and withering stage (III-1, 2 …10). Only the dominant phyla and genus with relative abundance more than 0.5% in one group were listed. Different letters denote statistically significant differences at P < 0.01. ∗∗P < 0.01 and ∗∗∗P < 0.001 by Tukey test.
FIGURE 4Mantel test revealed the correlation between forage nutrition (A), ADF (B), NDF (C), CP (D) and rumen microbiota (OTU level).
FIGURE 5Statistic analysis of the relationship between rumen bacteria community and fermentation parameters. (A) Mantel test analysis between bacteria communities (OTU level) and rumen fermentation parameters. (B) Redundancy analysis (RDA) of the top 10 phyla in association with rumen fermentation parameters. (C) The correlation heatmap using spearman analysis between the top 17 rumen bacteria communities and rumen fermentation parameters. (D) Variation partition analysis (VPA) of different factors to the variation of bacteria community structure in rumen samples. The relative abundance of top 17 genera whose relative abundance >0.5% in at least one group are used for spearman analysis and the relative abundance of the genera are used as input for VPA analysis.
FIGURE 6Comparison of rumen bacteria networks during the regreen (A), grassy (B), and withering periods (C). A highly positive correlation is described by pink color, whereas highly negative correlation by green color. Higher average degree (avg k) and density (D) mean a more complex network. A lower average clustering coefficient (avgCC) indicate that bacterial network is mainly composed of relatively isolated nodes. A low level centralization betweenness (CB) signifies a similar bacteria status and more community stability of rumen bacteria. The serial number indicates the number of modules in each group.
The relative quantification of ruminal microbes in Tibetan sheep under different phenological periods.
| Items | Phenological periods | |||
| Regreen stage | Grassy stage | Withering stage | ||
| 0.00580.0015b | 0.04650.0102a | 0.00280.0005b | 0.000 | |
| 0.00430.0008b | 0.01150.0019a | 0.00650.0006b | 0.001 | |
| 0.00520.001b | 0.01110.0047ab | 0.0160.002a | 0.044 | |
| 0.00130.0005b | 0.01050.0039a | 0.00230.0008b | 0.016 | |
| 0.00020.0001 | 0.00030.0001 | 0.00050.0002 | 0.208 | |
| 0.00080.0002b | 0.00360.0006a | 0.0010.0001b | 0.000 | |
FIGURE 7The genes encoding glycoside hydrolases (GH) and the families to which they belong. Different letters denote statistically significant difference at P < 0.05.
FIGURE 8Comparison of CBMs linkd to various cellulose and hemicellulose in rumen metagenome samples during different phenological periods. Heatmap list the abundance of different CBMs. * meat there were significantly difference among groups (P < 0.05) and ** meant P < 0.01.
FIGURE 9Analysis of metabolic pathways in which genes involved. (A) Heatmap showing the significantly different metabolic pathways. (B) Gene’s enrichment analysis in the grassy period when compared with the regreen period. (C) Gene’s enrichment analysis in the withering period when compared with the regreen period. (D) Gene’s enrichment analysis in the withering period when compared with the grassy period. The q-value represent the P-value corrected by FDR.