Literature DB >> 34942647

Behavioral Prioritization Enhances Working Memory Precision and Neural Population Gain.

Aspen H Yoo1, Alfredo Bolaños1, Grace E Hallenbeck1, Masih Rahmati1, Thomas C Sprague2, Clayton E Curtis1.   

Abstract

Humans allocate visual working memory (WM) resource according to behavioral relevance, resulting in more precise memories for more important items. Theoretically, items may be maintained by feature-tuned neural populations, where the relative gain of the populations encoding each item determines precision. To test this hypothesis, we compared the amplitudes of delay period activity in the different parts of retinotopic maps representing each of several WM items, predicting the amplitudes would track behavioral priority. Using fMRI, we scanned participants while they remembered the location of multiple items over a WM delay and then reported the location of one probed item using a memory-guided saccade. Importantly, items were not equally probable to be probed (0.6, 0.3, 0.1, 0.0), which was indicated with a precue. We analyzed fMRI activity in 10 visual field maps in occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex known to be important for visual WM. In early visual cortex, but not association cortex, the amplitude of BOLD activation within voxels corresponding to the retinotopic location of visual WM items increased with the priority of the item. Interestingly, these results were contrasted with a common finding that higher-level brain regions had greater delay period activity, demonstrating a dissociation between the absolute amount of activity in a brain area and the activity of different spatially selective populations within it. These results suggest that the distribution of WM resources according to priority sculpts the relative gains of neural populations that encode items, offering a neural mechanism for how prioritization impacts memory precision.
© 2021 Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 34942647      PMCID: PMC9017245          DOI: 10.1162/jocn_a_01804

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci        ISSN: 0898-929X            Impact factor:   3.420


  88 in total

1.  Sustained activity in topographic areas of human posterior parietal cortex during memory-guided saccades.

Authors:  Denis Schluppeck; Clayton E Curtis; Paul W Glimcher; David J Heeger
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-05-10       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Parietal and early visual cortices encode working memory content across mental transformations.

Authors:  Thomas B Christophel; Radoslaw M Cichy; Martin N Hebart; John-Dylan Haynes
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2014-11-14       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.

Authors:  Stephen M Emrich; Holly A Lockhart; Naseem Al-Aidroos
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2017-04-03       Impact factor: 3.332

4.  Compressive spatial summation in human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kendrick N Kay; Jonathan Winawer; Aviv Mezer; Brian A Wandell
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-04-24       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Reconstructions of information in visual spatial working memory degrade with memory load.

Authors:  Thomas C Sprague; Edward F Ester; John T Serences
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2014-09-04       Impact factor: 10.834

6.  Functional magnetic resonance imaging of human prefrontal cortex activation during a spatial working memory task.

Authors:  G McCarthy; A M Blamire; A Puce; A C Nobre; G Bloch; F Hyder; P Goldman-Rakic; R G Shulman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-08-30       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Sensory uncertainty decoded from visual cortex predicts behavior.

Authors:  Ruben S van Bergen; Wei Ji Ma; Michael S Pratte; Janneke F M Jehee
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Population coding of visual space: modeling.

Authors:  Sidney R Lehky; Anne B Sereno
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 2.380

9.  Multiplexed echo planar imaging for sub-second whole brain FMRI and fast diffusion imaging.

Authors:  David A Feinberg; Steen Moeller; Stephen M Smith; Edward Auerbach; Sudhir Ramanna; Matthias Gunther; Matt F Glasser; Karla L Miller; Kamil Ugurbil; Essa Yacoub
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Joint representation of working memory and uncertainty in human cortex.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Li; Thomas C Sprague; Aspen H Yoo; Wei Ji Ma; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 17.173

View more
  2 in total

1.  Common Neural Mechanisms Control Attention and Working Memory.

Authors:  Ying Zhou; Clayton E Curtis; Kartik K Sreenivasan; Daryl Fougnie
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2022-08-04       Impact factor: 6.709

2.  Unveiling the abstract format of mnemonic representations.

Authors:  Yuna Kwak; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 18.688

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.