Literature DB >> 28368161

Attention mediates the flexible allocation of visual working memory resources.

Stephen M Emrich1, Holly A Lockhart1, Naseem Al-Aidroos2.   

Abstract

Though it is clear that it is impossible to store an unlimited amount of information in visual working memory (VWM), the limiting mechanisms remain elusive. While several models of VWM limitations exist, these typically characterize changes in performance as a function of the number of to-be-remembered items. Here, we examine whether changes in spatial attention could better account for VWM performance, independent of load. Across 2 experiments, performance was better predicted by the prioritization of memory items (i.e., attention) than by the number of items to be remembered (i.e., memory load). This relationship followed a power law, and held regardless of whether performance was assessed based on overall precision or any of 3 measures in a mixture model. Moreover, at large set sizes, even minimally attended items could receive a small proportion of resources, without any evidence for a discrete-capacity on the number of items that could be maintained in VWM. Finally, the observed data were best fit by a variable-precision model in which response error was related to the proportion of resources allocated to each item, consistent with a model of VWM in which performance is determined by the continuous allocation of attentional resources during encoding. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2017 APA, all rights reserved).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28368161     DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000398

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform        ISSN: 0096-1523            Impact factor:   3.332


  18 in total

1.  What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?

Authors:  Gi-Yeul Bae; Steven J Luck
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2018-08-01

2.  A daytime nap enhances visual working memory performance and alters event-related delay activity.

Authors:  Kevin J MacDonald; Holly A Lockhart; Alex C Storace; Stephen M Emrich; Kimberly A Cote
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-12       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Perceptual distraction causes visual memory encoding intrusions.

Authors:  Blaire Dube; Julie D Golomb
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-05-23

4.  Behavioral Prioritization Enhances Working Memory Precision and Neural Population Gain.

Authors:  Aspen H Yoo; Alfredo Bolaños; Grace E Hallenbeck; Masih Rahmati; Thomas C Sprague; Clayton E Curtis
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2022-01-05       Impact factor: 3.420

5.  Internal but not external noise frees working memory resources.

Authors:  Ivan Tomić; Paul M Bays
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2018-10-15       Impact factor: 4.475

6.  Reassessing the Evidence for Capacity Limits in Neural Signals Related to Working Memory.

Authors:  Paul M Bays
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 5.357

7.  How do we measure attention? Using factor analysis to establish construct validity of neuropsychological tests.

Authors:  Melissa Treviño; Xiaoshu Zhu; Yi Yi Lu; Luke S Scheuer; Eliza Passell; Grace C Huang; Laura T Germine; Todd S Horowitz
Journal:  Cogn Res Princ Implic       Date:  2021-07-22

8.  Encoding differences affect the number and precision of own-race versus other-race faces stored in visual working memory.

Authors:  Xiaomei Zhou; Catherine J Mondloch; Stephen M Emrich
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2018-04       Impact factor: 2.199

9.  A resource-rational theory of set size effects in human visual working memory.

Authors:  Ronald van den Berg; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Strategic allocation of working memory resource.

Authors:  Aspen H Yoo; Zuzanna Klyszejko; Clayton E Curtis; Wei Ji Ma
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-11-01       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.