| Literature DB >> 34941702 |
Chenlin Hu1,2,3, Yanxia Zuo1,2, Liang Peng1,2,4, Nanqin Gan1, Lirong Song1.
Abstract
Microbial degradation is an important route for removing environmental microcystins (MCs). Here, we investigated the ecological distribution of microcystin degraders (mlr-genotype), and the relationship between the substrate specificity of the microcystin degrader and the profile of microcystin congener production in the habitat. We showed that microcystin degraders were widely distributed and closely associated with Microcystis abundance in Lake Taihu, China. We characterized an indigenous degrader, Sphingopyxis N5 in the northern Lake Taihu, and it metabolized six microcystin congeners in increasing order (RR > LR > YR > LA > LF and LW). Such a substrate-specificity pattern was congruent to the order of the dominance levels of these congeners in northern Lake Taihu. Furthermore, a meta-analysis on global microcystin degraders revealed that the substrate-specificity patterns varied geographically, but generally matched the profiles of microcystin congener production in the degrader habitats, and the indigenous degrader typically metabolized well the dominant MC congeners, but not the rare congeners in the habitat. This highlighted the phenotypic congruence between microcystin production and degradation in natural environments. We theorize that such congruence resulted from the metabolic adaptation of the indigenous degrader to the local microcystin congeners. Under the nutrient microcystin selection, the degraders might have evolved to better exploit the locally dominant congeners. This study provided the novel insight into the ecological distribution and adaptive degradation of microcystin degraders.Entities:
Keywords: Microcystis; adaptation; biodegradation; distribution; microcystin; mlrA
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34941702 PMCID: PMC8705652 DOI: 10.3390/toxins13120864
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Figure 1This is a (A) Large-scale spatial distribution of mlr-genotype (measured by the frequency of positive PCR-mlrA detection) in Lake Taihu from November 2008 to March 2009. (B–F) Notched box plots showing the difference in the five parameters (temperature, pH, dissolved O2, extracellular microcystin, and Microcystis abundance) between negative PCR-mlrA (PCR-mlr-) and positive PCR-mlrA (PCR-mlrA+) group (Two-sample t-test, n.s., not significant, p > 0.05).
Figure 2(A)16S rRNA-based phylogenetic analysis of the newly isolated indigenous MC degrader Sphingopyxis N5 (in bold) in northern Lake Taihu against 25 MC-degrading sphingomonad strains previously identified, Rhodospirillum rubrum ATCC 11170 was chosen as the outgroup. Local bootstrap probabilities were indicated at nodes. The access number for each strain’s 16S RNA was shown in brackets. The color-coding mark beside each bracket was used to indicate each strain’s origin. (B) The origin of the 26 microcystin-degrading sphingomonad strains. (C) The bar chart summarizing the number of the identified MC-degrading sphingomonad isolates in each country (China, Japan, Thailand, Spain, Poland, Canada, Argentina, Australia, New Zealand) across the Asia, Europe, North America, South America, and Oceania.
Analysis of the relationship between substrate specificity patterns of the microcystin (MC) degraders (n = 29) and the MC production profiles in the degrader habitats.
| Strain | Location | MC Production in Degrader Habitat | MC Degradation of Indigenous Degrader | b Congruence | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Profile | Reference | Substrate Specificity | a Degradation Rate (mg/(L·h)) | Initial MC Concentration (mg/L) | Reference | |||
| Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR > LR > YR > LA > LF, LW | RR (0.58), LR (0.34), YR (0.18), LA (0.14) | Each MC (5) | This study | Yes | |
| Algal sludge from Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR > LR | RR (>0.24), LR (<0.24) | RR (~4.3), LR (~3.5) | [ | Yes | |
| Algal sludge from Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR < LR | LR (0.31), RR (0.17) | RR (5), LR (11) | [ | No | |
| Algal sludge from Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR > LR | RR (0.07), LR (0.03) | RR (1.7), LR (0.7) | [ | Yes | |
| Algal sludge from Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR > LR | RR (0.23), LR (0.125) | LR (21.2), LR (39.2) | [ | Yes | |
| Algal heap from Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR > LR | RR (0.125), LR (0.09) | RR (2.99), LR (2.15) | [ | Yes | |
| Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR = LR | RR (0.008), LR (0.008) | Each (0.1) | [ | No | |
| Northern Lake Taihu, China | RR > LR > YR > LA | This study | RR = LR | RR (0.005), LR (0.005) | Each (0.1) | [ | No | |
| Lake Dianchi, China | RR > LR | [ | LR, RR, YR | LR (1.2), RR (0.7), YR (1.48, by enzyme) in different conditions | RR (50.2), LR (28.8),YR (14.8) | [ | - | |
| Lake Hongfeng, China | RR > LR | [ | LR, RR | LR (0.33), RR (e n.a) | LR (1), RR (e n.a.) | [ | - | |
| Lake Suwa, Japan | LR, RR > YR | [ | YR > RR > LR | YR (2.5), RR (0.54), LR (0.23) | YR (22), RR (18), LR (18) | [ | No | |
| Lake Suwa, Japan | LR, RR > YR | [ | LR > LF = LW = LY | LR (t1/2, ~2.4d), LF, LW, LY (t1/2, ~3.3d) | Each (6) | [ | Yes | |
| Lake Tsukui, Japan | LR, RR, YR | [ | LR = RR > LF | LR, RR (0.08), LF (undegraded by cell extract) | LR (2), RR (2), LF (91) | [ | Yes | |
| Lake Kasumigaura, Japan | LR, YR, RR | [ | YR > RR > LR | YR (t1/2, 1.9 h−1), RR (1.25 h−1), LR (0.66 h−1) | Each (1) | [ | - | |
| River Carron, Scotland | no MCs | [ | LY > LW > LF > LR > RR | LY (t1/2, 5d), LW (t1/2, 6d), LF (t1/2, 8d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2, 10d) | Each (10) | [ | - | |
| River Carron, Scotland | no MCs | [ | LY > LF = LW > LR > RR | LY (t1/2, 5d), LW (t1/2, 8d), LF (t1/2, 8d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2, >10d) | Each (10) | [ | - | |
| Forfar Loch, Scotland | no MCs | [ | LY > LF > LR = LW > RR | LY (t1/2, 6d), LF (t1/2, 7d), LW (t1/2, 9d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2, >10d) | Each (10) | [ | - | |
| Forfar Loch, Scotland | no MCs | [ | LY = LF > LW > LR > RR | LY (t1/2, 6d), LF (t1/2, 6d), LW (t1/2, 7d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2,>10d) | Each (10) | [ | - | |
| Loch Rescobie, UK | MCs (unknown) | [ | LW > LY = LF > LR > RR | LW (t1/2, 6d), LY (t1/2, 7d), LF (t1/2, 7d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2, >10d) | Each (10) | [ | - | |
| Lake Tuusulanjarvi, Finland | c DmRR, RR etc. | [ | LY = LF > LW > LR > RR | LY (t1/2, 6d), LF (t1/2, 6d), LW (t1/2, 7d), LR (t1/2, 9d), RR (t1/2, >10d) | Each (10) | [ | No | |
| San Juan Dam, Spain | LR > RR > YR | [ | e RR, LR | RR (t1/2, < 2 h), LR (t1/2, > 2 h) | LR (0.92), RR (0.04), YR (0.04) | [ | - | |
| Sphingopyxis IM-2 | San Juan Dam, Spain | LR > RR> YR | [ | e RR, LR | LR, RR (t1/2, ~110 h) | LR (0.92), RR (0.04), YR (0.04) | [ | - |
| San Juan Dam, Spain | LR> RR> YR | [ | e RR, LR | RR (t1/2, ~20 h), LR (t1/2, ~30 h) | LR (0.92), RR (0.04), YR (0.04) | [ | - | |
| San Juan Dam, Spain | LR> RR> YR | [ | e RR, LR | LR, RR (t1/2, ~35 h) | LR (0.92), RR (0.04), YR (0.04) | [ | - | |
| Missisquoi Bay, Canada | LR, YR, LY, LW, LF | [ | LR = YR = LY = LW = LF | LR, YR, LY, LW, LF (6.25 × 10−4) | Each (0.01) | [ | - | |
| Sand filter, Australia | d n.a. | - | LR = LA | LR, LA (1 × 10−4) | Each (0.01) | [ | - | |
| River Murrumbidgee, Australia | LR (major) | [ | LR > RR, LA | LR (1.6) and RR (1.5) by cell free extract | Each (10) | [ | Yes | |
| LA (5 × 10−5) by bacteria in reservoir water | LA (0.01) | [ | ||||||
| Reservoir Myponga, Australia | e n.a. | - | LR = RR = YR = LA | LR, RR, YR, LA (2 × 10−4) | Each (0.01) | [ | - | |
| Lake Rotoiti, New Zealand | LR, RR. etc. | [ | LR, [Dha7] LR | Mixture of LR and Dha7 LR (0.35) | Mixture (25) | [ | - | |
a Instead of the degradation rate (mg/(L·h)), the half-life (t1/2, d) was provided to compare the degradation rates of microcystin congeners for the strains (C1, C6, F3, F7, R4, dsmz-16998, IM-1, IM-2, IM-3, IM-4, and 7CY), and the specific degradation constant (h−1) was provided for strain Novosphingobium MD-1. b Congruence is qualified by comparing the matching level between substrate specificity and the microcystin production profile in the degrader habitat. c DmRR, demethylated MC-RR, d n.a. not available. e The substrate-specificity patterns of the Spanish degraders (IM-1, IM-2, IM-3) for RR and LR were not compared because of the remarked difference (>20 folds) in the initial concentration of substrate (LR and RR) in the degradation assays.
Figure 3Characterization of microcystin-degrading capability and specificity of indigenous degrader Sphingopyxis sp. N5. (A) Degradation of four microcystin congeners (LR, RR, YR, and LA; 5 mg/L of each) by the degrader N5 in modified M9 broth at 28 °C, with microcystin as the sole carbon source. (B) Pseudo-first-order curve of microcystin degradation kinetics for LR, RR, YR, and LA. C0 denotes the initial concentration of microcystin; and C and t1/2 denote the residual microcystin concentration at sampling time (t) and the degradation half-life of each variant, respectively. (C) The structure of micocystins. (D) The molecular weight (MW, g/mol), polarity-related parameters (topological polar surface area (TPSA), and miLogP) of six microcystin congeners (LR, RR, YR, LA, LF, and LW), and their degradation rates by degrader N5. a MW (molecular weight); b miLogP is a lipophilicity parameter; c TPSA is the topological polar surface area that is a polarity-related parameter; d Rate is the degradation rate of Sphingopyxis N5 for each microcystin congener.
Figure 4Meta-analysis of the composition pattern of microcystin congeners (LR, RR, YR, and LA) in northern Lake Taihu. (A) Box plot of the proportion values (%) of four microcystin variants (LR, RR, YR, and LA) in northern Lake Taihu according to the meta-analysis. (B) Temporal variation in the proportions of LR, RR, YR, and LA in northern Lake Taihu over 11 years (2004–2014), according to the meta-analysis. (C) Temporal variation in the proportions of LR, RR, YR, and LA in northern Lake Taihu over 12 months.
Figure 5(A) (Left) Phylogenetic analysis of the translated amino acid sequences in the partial microcystinase MlrA (Position: 56–285) of 11 characterized microcystin degraders; the accession number of the corresponding mlrA sequences was shown in brackets, the mlrA sequence of Bordetella MC-LTH1 was retrieved from the reference [66]. (Middle) The middle column describes the origin of these 11 microcystin degraders. (Right) The right column described the consensus pattern of substrate specificity of the degraders. (B) Multiple-sequence alignment of the partial microcystinase MlrA homologs (Position: 56–285) in 11 microcystin degraders (the genus names were omitted). The amino acid residue at each position that shows dissimilarity with those in other strains was highlighted in various colors. Four motifs (Motif 1, EEXXXR; Motif 2, WXXXH, Motif 3, TXXXV; Motif 4, HXXHXE), which were previously assigned [71], were completely conserved through all the degraders and were marked under the line.
Figure 6(A) The mlr-mediated pathway for degrading the MC congeners, which was illustrated based on the findings of previous studies [11,12,16]. (B) The conceptual model for the microbial adaption of MC degraders living within the mucilage of toxic Microcystis colony to the dominant MC congeners produced.