| Literature DB >> 27827872 |
María Ángeles Lezcano1, Jesús Morón-López2, Ramsy Agha3, Isabel López-Heras4, Leonor Nozal5, Antonio Quesada6, Rehab El-Shehawy7.
Abstract
The microcystin biodegradation potential of a natural bacterial community coexisting with a toxic cyanobacterial bloom was investigated in a water reservoir from central Spain. The biodegradation capacity was confirmed in all samples during the bloom and an increase of mlrA gene copies was found with increasing microcystin concentrations. Among the 24 microcystin degrading strains isolated from the bacterial community, only 28% showed presence of mlrA gene, strongly supporting the existence and abundance of alternative microcystin degradation pathways in nature. In vitro degradation assays with both mlr⁺ and mlr- bacterial genotypes (with presence and absence of the complete mlr gene cluster, respectively) were performed with four isolated strains (Sphingopyxis sp. IM-1, IM-2 and IM-3; Paucibacter toxinivorans IM-4) and two bacterial degraders from the culture collection (Sphingosinicella microcystinivorans Y2; Paucibacter toxinivorans 2C20). Differences in microcystin degradation efficiencies between genotypes were found under different total organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations. While mlr⁺ strains significantly improved microcystin degradation rates when exposed to other carbon and nitrogen sources, mlr- strains showed lower degradation efficiencies. This suggests that the presence of alternative carbon and nitrogen sources possibly competes with microcystins and impairs putative non-mlr microcystin degradation pathways. Considering the abundance of the mlr- bacterial population and the increasing frequency of eutrophic conditions in aquatic systems, further research on the diversity of this population and the characterization and conditions affecting non-mlr degradation pathways deserves special attention.Entities:
Keywords: Paucibacter sp.; Sphingopyxis sp.; biodegradation; cyanobacteria; genotype; microcystin
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2016 PMID: 27827872 PMCID: PMC5127115 DOI: 10.3390/toxins8110318
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Toxins (Basel) ISSN: 2072-6651 Impact factor: 4.546
Sestonic microcystin concentrations during cyanobacterial bloom. (+) refer to the presence of mcyE gene. Errors represent standard error of two replicates.
| Date | Sestonic MCs (µg·L−1) | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MC-LR | MC-RR | MC-YR | Total MCs | ||
| 7 August 2012 | 0.31 ± 0.20 | 0.16 ± 0.02 | 0.07 ± 0.00 | 0.54 ± 0.22 | + |
| 4 September 2012 | 10.17 ± 1.59 | 3.14 ± 0.18 | 0.99 ± 0.07 | 14.31 ±1.84 | + |
| 24 September 2012 | 25.75 ± 6.10 | 16.82 ± 3.82 | 6.95 ± 1.45 | 49.52 ± 11.37 | + |
| 8 October 2012 | 13.64 ± 1.43 | 5.89 ± 0.74 | 2.42 ± 0.26 | 21.95 ± 0.43 | + |
| 29 October 2012 | 0.85 ± 0.26 | 0.52 ± 0.14 | 0.23 ± 0.06 | 1.60 ± 0.06 | + |
Total microcystin concentrations in the water from different sampling dates enriched with 1.2 mg equivalent MC-LR·L−1 of crude MC extract before and after 15 days of incubation. Controls represent autoclaved water. Errors represent standard errors of two replicates. “n.d.” means “not detected”.
| Date | Control (µg·L−1) | Reservoir Water (µg·L−1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 0 | Day 15 | Day 0 | Day 15 | |
| 7 August 2012 | 1315 ± 32 | 1239 ± 26 | 1196 ± 80 | n.d. |
| 4 September 2012 | 1238 ± 35 | 1219 ± 95 | 1206 ± 22 | n.d. |
| 24 September 2012 | 1303 ± 15 | 1321 ± 52 | 1200 ± 30 | n.d. |
| 8 October 2012 | 1145 ± 69 | 1179 ± 125 | 1173 ± 65 | n.d. |
| 29 October 2012 | 1183 ± 45 | 1284 ± 22 | 1211 ± 44 | n.d. |
Figure 1Proportion of the different cultivable MCs-degrading bacterial phenotypes found in the water samples. Classification was performed according to MCs degradation efficiencies. Type A represents bacteria with a MCs degradation efficiency between 80% and 100%, type B between 60% and 79% and type C between 40% and 59%. Non-MCs-degrading bacteria are represented in type D. Proportion of the most efficient MCs-degrading bacteria (phenotypes A and B) with presence and absence of mlrA gene are also represented.
Figure 2Abundance of mlrA gene copies L−1 in reservoir water samples and 15 days after MCs enrichment. Line represents total sestonic MCs and the small inserted plot represents the correlation between mlrA gene copies L−1 and total sestonic MCs. Asterisk indicates data below quantification limit and error bars represent standard errors of two replicates.
Figure 3Maximum likelihood tree based on the 16S rRNA gene (1344–1420 bp) showing, in bold, the position of the sequences obtained in the present study. The numbers near nodes indicate bootstrap values greater than or equal to 95, as a percentage of 1000 replicates resulting from the analysis. Underlined sequences indicate already known MCs-degrading bacteria. Bar, 0.05 substitutions per nucleotide position. Cluster I represents Sphingopyxis sp. and cluster II, Paucibacter toxinivorans.
Figure 4Biodegradation of total MCs by bacterial genotypes mlr+ (strains Y2, IM-1, IM2 and IM-3) and mlr− (strains 2C20 and IM-4) incubated in: (a) MSM; (b) ¼ R2A medium; and (c) reservoir water for 120 h. Upper plots represent bacteria from culture collection and bottom plots represent new isolated strains. A negative control without bacteria was included. Error bars represent standard errors of two technical replicates.
Microcystin degradation rates under different media with variable total organic carbon and total nitrogen concentrations. Ratios correspond to assay period until 90% of total MCs degradation was achieved. (+) and (−) mean presence and absence of mlr genes, respectively. Errors represent standard errors of two replicates.
| Bacterial Strains | Degradation Rates (µg MC L−1 h−1) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| MSM | ¼ R2A Medium | Reservoir Water | ||
| Y2 | + | 73.24 ± 6.09 | 113.36 ± 22.33 | 48.2 ± 16.80 |
| 2C20 | − | 12.75 ± 2.93 | 8.04 ± 4.94 | 20.62 ± 4.00 |
| IM-1 | + | 171.15 ± 15.34 | 146.92 ± 23.79 | 144.9 ± 54.02 |
| IM-2 | + | 25.35 ± 6.04 | 97.03 ± 40.47 | 11.39 ± 5.28 |
| IM-3 | + | 37.10 ± 7.20 | 112.14 ± 21.36 | 16.30 ± 0.71 |
| IM-4 | − | 19.42 ± 1.12 | 4.12 ± 1.37 | 21.26 ± 3.36 |