| Literature DB >> 34940171 |
Weixiang Lv1,2, Xingfu Jiang1, Xiujie Chen1, Yunxia Cheng1, Jixing Xia1, Lei Zhang1.
Abstract
Understanding how species that follow different life-history strategies respond to stressful temperature can be essential for efficient treatments of agricultural pests. Here, we focused on how the development, reproduction, flight, and reproductive consequences of migration of Cnaphalocrocis medinalis were influenced by exposure to different rearing temperatures in the immature stage. We found that the immature rice leaf roller that were reared at low temperatures (18 and 22 °C) developed more slowly than the normal temperature 26 °C, while those reared at high temperatures (34 °C) grew faster. Female adults from low immature stage rearing temperatures showed stronger reproductive ability than those at 26 and 34 °C, such as the preoviposition period (POP) significantly decreased, while the total lifetime fecundity obviously increased. However, 34 °C did not significantly reduce the reproductive performances of females compared to 26 °C. On the contrary, one relative decreased tendency of flight capacity was found in the lower immature temperature treatments. Furthermore, flight is a costly strategy for reproduction output to compete for limited internal resources. In the lower temperature treatments, after d1-tethered flight treatment, negative reproductive consequences were found that flight significantly decreased the lifetime fecundity and mating frequency of females from low rearing temperatures in the immature stage compared to the controls (no tethered-flight). However, in the 26 and 34 °C treatments, the same flight treatment induced a positive influence on reproduction, which significantly reduced the POP and period of first oviposition (PFO). The results suggest that the experience of relative high temperatures in the immature stage is more likely to trigger the onset of migration, but lower temperatures in the immature stage may induce adults to have a greater resident propensity with stronger reproductive ability.Entities:
Keywords: development; flight capacity; migration; rearing temperature; reproduction
Year: 2021 PMID: 34940171 PMCID: PMC8706861 DOI: 10.3390/insects12121083
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Insects ISSN: 2075-4450 Impact factor: 2.769
Larval development of C. medinalis under different rearing temperatures.
| Development Parameters | Rearing Temperatures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 °C | 22 °C | 26 °C | 34 °C | |
| Egg-larval period (d) | 53.80 ± 0.39 a | 30.59 ± 0.23 b | 23.76 ± 0.08 c | 23.25 ± 0.14 c |
| Pupal period (d) | 17.83 ± 0.31 a | 8.87 ± 0.19 b | 5.78 ± 0.09 c | 4.99 ± 0.10 d |
| Larval mortality rate (%) | 74.00 ± 10.51 a | 49.35 ± 12.52 a | 46.00 ± 25.14 a | 53.05 ± 18.49 a |
| Pupal mortality rate (%) | 36.45 ± 23.86 a | 25.62 ± 8.71 a | 18.85 ± 3.45 a | 27.70 ± 5.04 a |
| Pupation rate (%) | 35.14 ± 25.47 a | 50.65 ±12.52 a | 54.00 ± 25.14 a | 46.95 ± 18.49 a |
| Eclosion rate (%) | 71.34 ± 8.15 a | 59.94 ± 23.97 a | 76.64 ± 3.98 a | 68.61 ± 6.28 a |
| Period of synchronized eclosion (d) | 9.40 ± 0.48 a | 5.66 ± 0.24 b | 4.08 ± 0.13 c | 4.61 ± 0.17 c |
| Sex ratio (female/total progeny) | 0.55 ± 0.02 a | 0.56 ± 0.06 a | 0.57 ± 0.04 a | 0.52 ± 0.08 a |
Means with the different letters in the same row represent significant differences at the 5% level by Tukey’s HSD test. Sample sizes of 18, 22, 26, and 34 °C treatments are 153, 356, 443, and 318, respectively.
Reproductive performance of C. medinalis adults (the controls) from different rearing temperatures in the immature stage.
| Reproductive Parameters | Rearing Temperatures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 °C | 22 °C | 26 °C | 34 °C | |
| Preoviposition period (d) | 4.91 ± 0.42 b | 5.12 ± 0.26 b | 7.97 ± 0.90 a | 7.38 ± 0.48 a |
| Period of first oviposition (d) | 2.91 ± 0.42 a | 3.12 ± 0.26 a | 3.97 ± 0.90 a | 4.38 ± 0.48 a |
| Lifetime fecundity | 214.23 ± 28.31 a | 181.40 ± 20.13 a | 103.20 ± 17.38 b | 74.62 ± 20.83 b |
| Mating frequency | 1.05 ± 0.20 a | 0.81 ± 0.10 ab | 0.51 ± 0.08 b | 0.42 ± 0.10 b |
| Female longevity (d) | 16.27 ± 0.93 a | 13.74 ± 0.82 a | 15.54 ± 0.68 a | 10.58 ± 0.97 b |
| Oviposition period (d) | 8.05 ± 0.98 a | 7.76 ± 0.72 a | 6.74 ± 0.79 ab | 4.04 ± 0.63 b |
| Mating percentage (%) | 68.18 ± 10.16 a | 66.67 ± 7.36 a | 51.43 ± 8.57 a | 41.67 ± 10.28 a |
Means with the different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at the 5% level. Sample sizes for each temperature treatment are 22, 42, 35, and 24 females, respectively.
Flight performance of C. medinalis males and females from different rearing temperatures in the immature stage.
| Parameters | Sex | Rearing Temperatures | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 18 °C | 22 °C | 26 °C | 34 °C | ||
| Flight duration (h) | Female | 2.34 ± 0.47 a | 3.37 ± 0.36 a | 3.87 ± 0.37 a | 3.25 ± 0.36 a * |
| Male | 3.09 ± 0.55 ab | 3.04 ± 0.34 ab | 3.74 ± 0.34 a | 2.02 ± 0.34 b | |
| Flight distance (km) | Female | 4.42 ± 1.14 a | 7.13 ± 1.09 a | 8.12 ± 1.13 a | 6.30 ± 0.98 a |
| Male | 6.07 ± 1.29 a | 6.34 ± 0.96 a | 7.92 ± 0.97 a | 4.15 ± 0.91 b | |
| Average velocity | Female | 1.54 ± 0.21 a | 2.24 ± 0.1 7 a | 2.24 ± 0.14 a | 2.76 ± 0.18 a |
| (km/h) | Male | 1.75 ± 0.21 a | 1.82 ± 0.15 a | 1.92 ± 0.13 a | 1.67 ± 0.14 a |
Different lowercase letters in the same row indicate significant differences by Tukey’s HSD test at 5% level. “*” represents significant differences in the same column by the t-test (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Sample sizes, from the low to high rearing temperature treatment are 14, 28, 29, and 26 females, and 14, 30, 28, and 29 males, respectively.
Figure 1Preoviposition period (POP) (A), period of first oviposition (PFO) (B), lifetime fecundity (C), and mating frequency (D) of C. medinalis in the flying vs. control groups under different rearing temperatures in the immature stage. Data are presented as mean ± SE. “*”, “**” on bars, indicate significant or highly significant differences in the same bars by the t-test (p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). “ns” above bars indicates no significant difference between the flying and control treatments at the same temperature (t-test, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Sample sizes for each flying treatment are 22, 42, 35, and 24 females, and each control treatment are 24, 25, 23, and 23 females, from low to high temperatures, respectively.
Figure 2Female longevity (A), oviposition period (B), and mating percentage (C) of C. medinalis in the flying vs. control groups under different rearing temperatures in the immature stage. *, ** above bars represent significant or highly significant differences between the flying and control treatments at the same temperature (t-test, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). “ns” above bars indicates no significant difference between the flying and control treatments at the same temperature (t-test, p < 0.05 or p < 0.01). Sample sizes, from low to high temperatures, in flying treatments are 22, 42, 35, and 24 females, and in control treatments are 24, 25, 23, and 23 females, respectively.