| Literature DB >> 25815767 |
Lei Zhang1, Pan Pan1, Thomas W Sappington2, Weixiang Lu1, Lizhi Luo1, Xingfu Jiang1.
Abstract
Physiological management of migration-reproduction trade-offs in energy allocation often includes a package of adaptions referred to as the oogenesis-flight syndrome. In some species, this trade-off may be overestimated, because factors like flight behavior and environmental conditions may mitigate it. In this study, we examined the reproductive consequences induced by different flight scenarios in an economically-important Asian migrant insect, Cnaphalocrocis medinalis. We found that the influences of flight on reproduction are not absolutely positive or negative, but instead depend on the age at which the moth begins flight, flight duration, and how many consecutive nights they are flown. Adult flight on the 1st or 2nd night after emergence, flight for 6 h or 12 h nightly, and flight on the first two consecutive nights after emergence significantly accelerated onset of oviposition or enhanced synchrony of egg-laying. The latter can contribute to subsequent larval outbreaks. However, flight after the 3rd night, flight for 18 h at any age, or flight on more than 3 consecutive nights after adult emergence did not promote reproductive development, and in some scenarios even constrained adult reproduction. These results indicate that there is a migration/reproduction trade-off in C.medinalis, but that it is mitigated or eliminated by flight under appropriate conditions. The strategy of advanced and synchronized oviposition triggered by migratory flight of young females may be common in other migratory insect pests.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2015 PMID: 25815767 PMCID: PMC4376675 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121821
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Fig 1Preoviposition period (POP) of adult C. medinalis that experienced (A) a 12-h tethered-flight test at different ages, (B) different flight test durations at 1 day of age, and (C) flight tests of 6-h duration on successive nights beginning at 1 day of age.
Data are presented as mean ± SEM. Bars sharing the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level by Tukey’s HSD test. Sample sizes for each treatment in panel A are 25, 23, 26, 23 and 19; in panel B are 31, 27, 27 and 29; and in panel C are 31, 33, 31, 27 and 30, from left to right, respectively.
Life-time fecundity, ovipositon period (number of days from first oviposition through the last day), mating percentage, and longevity of adult C. medinalis after experiencing a 12-h flight test at different ages of adult life.
| Age (d) at flight | Lifetime fecundity | Oviposition period (d) | Mating frequency | Mating percentage (%) | Female Longevity (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 118.60±32.01 a (25) | 5.52±0.40 a (25) | 0.36±0.10a (25) | 36.00 | 13.76±0.53 a (25) |
| 1 | 89.57±11.35 ab (23) | 4.52±0.24 ab (23) | 0.30±0.10a (23) | 30.43 | 9.57±0.37 b (23) |
| 2 | 92.54±9.76 ab (26) | 4.42±0.19 b (26) | 0.31±0.09a (26) | 30.77 | 9.81±0.36 b (26) |
| 3 | 52.13±5.13 b (23) | 4.00±0.29 b (23) | 0.26±0.09a (23) | 26.09 | 10.22±0.38 b (23) |
| 4 | 34.53±4.49 b (19) | 2.58±0.26 c (19) | 0.16±0.09a (19) | 15.79 | 9.26±0.46 b (19) |
*Data are presented as mean ± SE. Number in parentheses is the corresponding sample size. In each column, data sharing the same letter are not significantly different at the 5% level by Tukey’s HSD test. The mating percentages between each flown group and the unflown control group are not significantly different, as determined by a Chi-square test (χ 2 = 2.37, df = 4, P = 0.67).
Lifetime fecundity, ovipositon period, mating percentage, and longevity of adult C. medinalis after experiencing different flight test durations as 1-d-old adults.
| Flight test duration (h) | Lifetime fecundity | Oviposition period (d) | Mating frequency | Mating percentage (%) | Female longevity (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 124.42±19.23 a (31) | 5.75±0.45a (31) | 0.42±0.09 a (31) | 41.94 a | 12.39±0.61a (31) |
| 6 | 113.89±16.57 a (27) | 5.59±0.42a (27) | 0.44±0.10 a (27) | 44.44 a | 11.11±0.48ab (27) |
| 12 | 82.30±12.44 ab(27) | 5.63±0.35a (27) | 0.22±0.08 ab (27) | 22.22 ab | 10.48±0.36 b (27) |
| 18 | 36.00±7.23 b (29) | 3.83±0.39b (29) | 0.07±0.05 b (29) | 6.90 b | 11.14±0.52ab (29) |
*Data are presented as mean ± SE. Number in the parentheses is the corresponding sample size. Data in a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test. The treatments significantly affected mating percentage, as determined by Chi-square test (χ 2 = 13.39, df = 3, P = 0.0039).
Fecundity, ovipositon period, mating frequency, mating percentage, and longevity of female C. medinalis after experiencing flight tests of 6-h duration on successive nights beginning at 1 day of age.
| Nights flown | Lifetime fecundity | Oviposition period (d) | Mating frequency | Mating percentage (%) | Female longevity (d) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 155.90±24.56 a (29) | 5.89±0.45a (29) | 0.52±0.12a (29) | 44.83 | 11.52±0.52 a (29) |
| 1 | 185.90±30.29 a (31) | 6.51±0.57a (31) | 0.42±0.09ab (31) | 41.93 | 11.13±0.65 a (31) |
| 2 | 132.06±16.86 ab (32) | 6.78±0.49a (32) | 0.31±0.08ab (32) | 31.25 | 12.09±0.55 a (32) |
| 3 | 131.37±25.19 ab (27) | 6.59±0.67a (27) | 0.33±0.09ab (27) | 33.33 | 13.26±0.68 a (27) |
| 4 | 66.34±10.99 b (29) | 6.31±0.59a (29) | 0.14±0.06b (29) | 13.79 | 13.52±0.67 a (29) |
*Data are presented as mean ± SE. Number in parentheses is the corresponding sample size. Data in a column sharing the same letter are not significantly different at 5% level, as determined by Tukey’s HSD test. The mating percentage between the treatments was tested by the Chi-square test showing no signicantly different from each other (χ 2 = 7.03, df = 4, P = 0.13).
Fig 2Period of first oviposition (PFO) of adult C. medinalis that experienced (A) a 12-h tethered-flight test at different ages, (B) different flight test durations at 1 day of age, and (C) flight tests of 6-h duration on successive nights beginning at 1 day of age.
Data are presented (from top to bottom in each of the box-and-whiskers plots) as the maximum (-), upper quartile (—), mean (□), median (---), lower quartile (—), and the minimum (-). Means with the same letters in each panel are not significantly different at 5% level by Tukey’s HSD test. Sample sizes for each treatment in panel A are 25, 23, 26, 23 and 19; in panel B are 31, 27, 27 and 29; and in panel C are 31, 33, 31, 27 and 30, from left to right, respectively.