| Literature DB >> 31804548 |
Jia-Wen Guo1, Fan Yang1,2, Ping Li1, Xiang-Dong Liu1, Qiu-Lin Wu1,3, Gao Hu4, Bao-Ping Zhai5.
Abstract
Sex ratio bias is common in migratory animals and can affect population structure and reproductive strategies, thereby altering population development. However, little is known about the underlying mechanisms that lead to sex ratio bias in migratory insect populations. In this study, we used Cnaphalocrocis medinalis, a typical migratory pest of rice, to explore this phenomenon. A total of 1,170 moths were collected from searchlight traps during immigration periods in 2015-2018. Females were much more abundant than males each year (total females: total males = 722:448). Sex-based differences in emergence time, take-off behaviour, flight capability and energy reserves were evaluated in a laboratory population. Females emerged 0.78 days earlier than males. In addition, the emigratory propensity and flight capability of female moths were greater than those of male moths, and female moths had more energy reserves than did male moths. These results indicate that female moths migrate earlier and can fly farther than male moths, resulting more female moths in the studied immigratory population.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2019 PMID: 31804548 PMCID: PMC6895038 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54721-x
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Comparison of the numbers of male and female immigrants captured by searchlight traps in Jiangyan from 2015 to 2018. Significant P-values (P < 0.05) are indicated in bold.
| Year | Number of females | Number of males | Sex ratio (F:M) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | 343 | 177 | 1:0.516 | 52.992 | |
| 2016 | 100 | 68 | 1:0.680 | 6.095 | |
| 2017 | 233 | 175 | 1:0.751 | 8.245 | |
| 2018 | 46 | 28 | 1:0.608 | 4.378 | |
| Total | 722 | 448 | 1:0.620 | 64.168 |
Figure 1Proportion of females (lines with black circles) and total number of C. medinalis (bars) captured by searchlight traps from 2015 to 2018 in Jiangyan. The grey dotted line marks the level representing 50% trapped females.
Comparison of the numbers of emerging male and female C. medinalis. Significant P-values (P < 0.05) are indicated in bold. All of the male and female moths were raised from eggs laid on the same day (September 2, 2018).
| Day of emergence (Date) | Number of females | Number of males | Total | Sex ratio (F:M) | χ2 | P |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Day 1 (September 30, 2018) | 58 | 19 | 77 | 1:0.328 | 19.753 | |
| Day 2 (October 1, 2018) | 88 | 52 | 140 | 1:0.591 | 9.257 | |
| Day 3 (October 2, 2018) | 93 | 51 | 144 | 1:0.548 | 12.250 | |
| Day 4 (October 3, 2018) | 69 | 97 | 166 | 1:1.406 | 4.723 | |
| Day 5 (October 4, 2018) | 30 | 58 | 88 | 1:1.933 | 8.909 | |
| Day 6 (October 5, 2018) | 14 | 26 | 40 | 1:1.857 | 3.600 | 0.058 |
| Day 7 (October 6, 2018) | 1 | 3 | 4 | 1:3.000 | 1.000 | 0.317 |
| Total | 353 | 306 | 659 | 1:0.867 | 3.352 | 0.067 |
Take-off percentages of female and male C. medinalis. Numbers in parentheses are sample sizes. In each column, * and ns indicate a significant difference and no significant difference, respectively, between females and males at the P < 0.05 level.
| Adult age | Female take-off percentage | Male take-off percentage | χ2 | df | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| One day old | 20.00 (35) | 22.86 (35) ns | 0.085 | 1 | 0.771 |
| Two days old | 74.00 (50) | 53.33 (45)* | 4.402 | 1 | 0.036 |
| Three days old | 44.00 (50) | 20.00 (55)* | 7.000 | 1 | 0.008 |
Flight capability of female and male C. medinalis. Data are shown as the mean ± SE. Numbers in parentheses indicate sample sizes. In each column, * and ns indicate a significant difference and no significant difference, respectively, between females and males at the P < 0.05 level.
| Adult age | Flight duration (h) | Flight distance (km) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Females | Males | Females | Males | |
| 1 | 3.99 ± 0.44 (28) | 2.55 ± 0.42 (27)* | 5.06 ± 0.65 (28) | 3.27 ± 0.54 (27)* |
| 2 | 3.43 ± 0.68 (24) | 3.06 ± 0.91 (12) ns | 4.12 ± 0.90 (24) | 3.41 ± 1.11 (12) ns |
| 3 | 6.28 ± 0.88 (22) | 3.94 ± 0.66 (30)* | 9.94 ± 1.48(22) | 5.14 ± 1.02 (30)* |
Figure 2Lipid (A) and glycogen (B) contents of female and male C. medinalis. Data are shown as the mean ± SE. *Indicates a significant difference between females and males at the P < 0.05 level.
Figure 3The methods used for extraction and separation of lipids and glycogen[59].