| Literature DB >> 34940129 |
Truong Xuan Dai1,2, Hoang Nghia Son1,2, Ho Nguyen Quynh Chi1,2, Hoang Nghia Quang Huy1, Nguyen Thai Minh1, Nguyen Thi Thuy Tram1, Nguyen Thi Thuong Huyen3, To Minh Quan2,4, Doan Chinh Chung1,2, Truong Hai Nhung4, Tran Thi Minh5, Tran Hong Diem6, Nguyen Thi Phuong Mai7, Le Thanh Long1,2.
Abstract
Astronauts are always faced with serious health problems during prolonged spaceflights. Previous studies have shown that weightlessness significantly affects the physiological function of female astronauts, including a change in reproductive hormones and ovarian cells, such as granulosa and theca cells. However, the effects of microgravity on these cells have not been well characterized, especially in granulosa cells. This study aimed to investigate the effects of simulated microgravity (SMG) on the proliferation and morphology of porcine granulosa cells (pGCs). pGC proliferation from the SMG group was inhibited, demonstrated by the reduced O.D. value and cell density in the WST-1 assay and cell number counting. SMG-induced pGCs exhibited an increased ratio of cells in the G0/G1 phase and a decreased ratio of cells in the S and G2/M phase. Western blot analysis indicated a down-regulation of cyclin D1, cyclin-dependent kinase 4 (cdk4), and cyclin-dependent kinase 6 (cdk6), leading to the prevention of the G1-S transition and inducing the arrest phase. pGCs under the SMG condition showed an increase in nuclear area. This caused a reduction in nuclear shape value in pGCs under the SMG condition. SMG-induced pGCs exhibited different morphologies, including fibroblast-like shape, rhomboid shape, and pebble-like shape. These results revealed that SMG inhibited proliferation and induced morphological changes in pGCs.Entities:
Keywords: cell cycle proteins; cell morphology; porcine granulosa cells; proliferation; simulated microgravity
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34940129 PMCID: PMC8929043 DOI: 10.3390/cimb43030155
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Curr Issues Mol Biol ISSN: 1467-3037 Impact factor: 2.976
Figure 1The proliferation of pGCs from the control and SMG groups. (A) pGC proliferation assessed by a WST-1 assay; (B) pGC density assessed by the cell cycle app. of a Cytell microscope; (C) Gravite operation in a CO2 incubator.
Figure 2Cell cycle progression of pGCs. (A) Cell cycle analysis of pGCs evaluated by flow cytometry; (B) the viability of pGCs was assessed by flow cytometry; (C) the expression of major cell cycle-related proteins was estimated by Western blot.
Figure 3Nuclear morphology analysis of pGCs. (A) The distribution of the nuclear area in relation to nuclear intensity; (B) the distribution of the nuclear shape value in relation to nuclear intensity; (C) nuclei were counterstained with H33342. Scale bar = 25 µm.
Figure 4Morphology of pGCs. (A,B) pGCs from the control group showed the fibroblast-like shape; (C,D) pGCs from the SMG group exhibited various morphology, including fibroblast-like shape, rhomboid shape, and pebble-like shape. Original magnification ×100 (A,C).
Figure 5Microfilament distribution in pGCs. pGCs from the control group showed the parallel distribution of microfilament bundles (A); while the distribution of microfilament bundles varies with the morphology of pGCs under SMG (white arrows indicate microfilament distribution in pGCs with different shapes) (B). Scale bar = 223.64 µm.