Mohsen Basiri1, Saghar Pahlavanneshan2. 1. Department of Stem Cells and Developmental Biology, Cell Science Research Center, Royan Institute for Stem Cell Biology and Technology, ACECR, Tehran, Iran. Email: basiri@royaninstitute.org. 2. Medical Nanotechnology and Tissue Engineering Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Placental alkaline phosphatase (PLAP) also known as alkaline phosphatase, placental type
(ALPP) is a membrane-bound glycosylated dimeric enzyme, which was first detected in the serum
during pregnancy and shown to be originated from the placenta (1). In human, PLAP is encoded
by ALPP gene located on chromosome 2 (2). There are three other distinct but
related alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes: Alkaline phosphatase, placental-like 2 (PLAPL2),
Alkaline phosphatase, intestinal (ALPI), and Alkaline phosphatase, tissue-nonspecific (ALPL).
PLAPL2 and ALPI genes are located together with
ALPP gene on chromosome 2, whereas ALPL gene is located on
chromosome 1. This redundancy in alkaline phosphatase isoenzymes is associated with different
expression patterns throughout healthy tissues (3), while PLAP is believed to be primarily
expressed in the placenta. Among human malignancies, PLAP is reportedly expressed in
testicular seminoma (4), ovarian cancer (OV) (5) and endometrial cancer (6, 7).A number of characteristics make PLAP an attractive
candidate of antigen-targeting immunotherapy: i. Being Pa
membrane-bound protein, PLAP is an accessible cell surface
target for specific binding molecules such as antibodies, ii.
The seemingly limited expression of PLAP in healthy tissues
and increased expression in malignant tumors suggests that
it might serve as a tumor specific antigen with low off-tumor
expression. iii. Alkaline phosphatase activity is reported to
induce tumor progression in different cancers such as prostate
cancer (8), head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (9), and
OV (10). Thus, targeting PLAP may also enhance tumor
control by reducing tumor-derived alkaline phosphatase
activity.To provide a comprehensive view of PLAP expression across different human cancers, we
analyzed RNA-Seq data from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression
(GTEx) using Gene Expression Profiling Interactive Analysis (GEPIA) gene expression analysis
application (11).Results showed that ALPP mRNA expression was statistically significantly
higher (P<0.05) in 12 different cancers (Fig .1A), namely: OV, testicular germ cell
tumors (TGCT), uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma (UCEC), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PAAD),
bladder urothelial carcinoma (BLCA), stomach adenocarcinoma (STAD), esophageal carcinoma
(ESCA), uterine carcinosarcoma (UCS), rectum adenocarcinoma (READ), head and neck squamous
cell carcinoma (HNSC), clone adenocarcinoma (COAD), and acute myeloid leukemia (LAML).
However, this increase in PLAP expression had different magnitudes for
different cancers, with OV, TGCT, and UCEC showing more than two-fold increase compared with
paired normal tissues. We also performed similar analysis on two well-known immunotherapy
targets, Mesothelin (codded by MSLN gene) (12) and HER-2 (codded by ERBB2
gene) (13) as a reference for comparison (Fig.S1, See Supplementary Online Information at
www.celljournal.org).
Fig.1
Differential expression of PLAP gene in different cancers based on data
deposited in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx)
databases. A. The expression of PLAP gene was statistically
significantly higher in cancerous tissues (red) than matched normal tissues (gray).
B. Expression PLAP gene across different stages of
cancers: (left) including OV, TGCT and UCEC, with >2-fold overexpression and (right)
including PAAD, BLCA, STAD, ESCA, UCS, READ, HNSC, COAD and LAML with <2-fold
overexpression. C. Survival rate analysis comparing PAAD tumors with high and
low levels of PLAP expression shows that highest expression was
associated with poor prognosis in patients with PAAD. *; P<0.05, BLCA; Bladder
urothelial carcinoma, COAD; Clone adenocarcinoma, ESCA; Esophageal carcinoma, HNSC; Head
and neck squamous cell carcinoma, LAML; Acute myeloid leukemia, OV; Ovarian cancer, PAAD;
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, READ; Rectum adenocarcinoma, STAD; Stomach adenocarcinoma,
TGCT; Testicular germ cell tumors, UCEC; Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, and UCS;
Uterine carcinosarcoma.
We then compared ALPP gene expression across
different stages of cancers. Interestingly, in cancers with
more than two-fold increase in ALPP expression (OV,
TGCT, and UCEC), slightly higher levels of expression
were observed in stage I compared with later stages.
In contrast, in cancers with less than two-fold but still
statistically significant increase in ALPP expression
(PAAD, BLCA, STAD, ESCA, UCS, READ, HNSC,
COAD, and LAML), stage I showed lower expression
than the later stages (Fig .1B). This observation suggests
that in the latter group of cancers ALPP expression
correlates with cancer progression. To further examine
correlation of ALPP with the aforementioned cancers
prognosis, we compared the overall survival rate of
patients with a higher and lower expression of ALPP using
GEPIA survival analysis. Interestingly, ALPP expression
showed significant correlation with mortality in PAAD
(Fig .1C). To further investigate whether ALPP expresses
among cancer surface markers, we also used the QSurface
tool (14) which can analyze the expression profile of
cell surface markers in 14 cancer subtypes. Expression
profiles of surface markers for OV, TGCT, and UCEC
are not provided in the QSurface, however, we could find
statistically significant increase in the ALPP expression,
with more than 2-fold change, in BLCA, HNSC, and
STAD (Fig .2A, B).
Fig.2
Evaluation of PLAP expression among surface protein coding genes in datasets of
14 different cancers provided by QSurface tool. A. Volcano plots: expression
level of PLAP (red) among cell surface proteins (yellow) and total genes (gray) in the
BLCA, HNSC, and STAD. B. Box plots: significant increase of PLAP expression
in cancerous samples compared to matched normal tissues. BLCA; Bladder urothelial
carcinoma, HNSC; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and STAD; Stomach
adenocarcinoma.
To survey the PLAP protein expression in human cancers, we queried PLAP in the Pathology
Atlas of Human Protein Atlas (HPA) (15). Results showed that PLAP protein expression was
detected with at least one antibody in eight different types of cancer types, namely TGCT,
UCEC, OV, liver hepatocellular carcinoma (LIHC), STAD, cervical squamous cell carcinoma and
endocervical adenocarcinoma (CESC), PAAD, and BLCA (Fig .3). Among them, the most robust
detections were observed in TGCT, UCEC, and OV with all four antibodies. These results confirm
that PLAP expression is detectable at the protein level in human cancers.
Fig.3
Prevalence of PLAP protein expression in cancer samples based
on the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). The levels of PLAP expression are
represented by different shades of red based on staining with four different
antibodies: Ab1 (CAB026327), Ab2 (HPA051699), Ab3 (HPA038765), and
Ab4 (HPA038764). BLCA; Bladder urothelial carcinoma, CESC; Cervical
squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, LIHC;
Liver hepatocellular carcinoma, OV; Ovarian cancer, PAAD; Pancreatic
adenocarcinoma, STAD; Stomach adenocarcinoma, TGCT; Testicular germ
cell tumors, and UCEC; Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.
Differential expression of PLAP gene in different cancers based on data
deposited in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx)
databases. A. The expression of PLAP gene was statistically
significantly higher in cancerous tissues (red) than matched normal tissues (gray).
B. Expression PLAP gene across different stages of
cancers: (left) including OV, TGCT and UCEC, with >2-fold overexpression and (right)
including PAAD, BLCA, STAD, ESCA, UCS, READ, HNSC, COAD and LAML with <2-fold
overexpression. C. Survival rate analysis comparing PAAD tumors with high and
low levels of PLAP expression shows that highest expression was
associated with poor prognosis in patients with PAAD. *; P<0.05, BLCA; Bladder
urothelial carcinoma, COAD; Clone adenocarcinoma, ESCA; Esophageal carcinoma, HNSC; Head
and neck squamous cell carcinoma, LAML; Acute myeloid leukemia, OV; Ovarian cancer, PAAD;
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, READ; Rectum adenocarcinoma, STAD; Stomach adenocarcinoma,
TGCT; Testicular germ cell tumors, UCEC; Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma, and UCS;
Uterine carcinosarcoma.Evaluation of PLAP expression among surface protein coding genes in datasets of
14 different cancers provided by QSurface tool. A. Volcano plots: expression
level of PLAP (red) among cell surface proteins (yellow) and total genes (gray) in the
BLCA, HNSC, and STAD. B. Box plots: significant increase of PLAP expression
in cancerous samples compared to matched normal tissues. BLCA; Bladder urothelial
carcinoma, HNSC; Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and STAD; Stomach
adenocarcinoma.Another important aspect of targeting PLAP for
immunotherapy is possible off-tumor expression
of the protein. To address this safety concern, we
surveyed PLAP protein expression in the Tissue Atlas
of HPA (16) and its mRNA expression in HPA, GTEx,
and FANTOM5 data. Not surprisingly, among normal
tissues, the highest expression of PLAP protein and
mRNA was observed in the placenta (Fig .4A). The low
levels of PLAP protein and mRNA expression could be
detected in the cervix and uterine tissues, although this
expression is confined to glandular cells. Also, PLAP
mRNA expression in lung had been reported in GTEx
data, but HPA protein expression data did not show
any sign of PLAP expression in this tissue (Fig .4B).
These data further confirm limited expression of PLAP
in somatic female organs which can be considered a
favorable safety profile as a potential immunotherapy
target.
Fig.4
Expression of PLAP in healthy tissues. A. Expression of ALLP protein based on the
Human Protein Atlas (HPA) scores and ALLP mRNA expression in HPA, GTEx and FANTOM5
databases is shown as a heatmap with the actual scores and values in each cell.
Non-available data are indicated with N/A. B. Representative data from HPA
showing immunohistology staining of PLAP in placenta, cervix/uterine, and lung with
respectively high, low and undetectable expression levels. Low PLAP expression in
cervix/uterine is limited to the glandular cells.
Altogether, our survey on PLAP expression data in malignant and normal human tissues shows
that this surface protein can be a suitable candidate target for immunotherapy. Available
specific monoclonal antibodies against PLAP (17) can be used in different immunotherapy
strategies such as conventional monoclonal antibody therapies, bispecific antibodies, and
chimeric antigen receptor T cells. Our survey showed that PLAP expression in
healthy somatic tissues is limited to a low-level expression in cervix and uterine. This
potentially makes PLAP a safe target with low off-tumor toxicity, especially in male cancers
such as TGCT. Our study confirmed the previous reports that have proposed PLAP as a tumor
antigen in OV (3, 17). In one of such studies, PLAP expression was examined in 82 women with
OV and it was suggested that PLAP expression can be considered as an early marker of OV (18).
In line with this report, our analyses also showed high PLAP expression in early stages of
cancers with more than two-fold elevation in PLAP expression (Fig .1B), such as OV. Moreover,
our findings suggest that PLAP can be a potent target for late stage PAAD and STAD.
Especially, our results showed that PLAP expression was associated with poor prognosis in PAAD
patients. To our knowledge, there are no publication pointing out the role of PLAP as a
prognostic marker, although, another alkaline phosphatase, PLAPL2, is suggested to be a PAAD
biomarker (19) and associate with poor survival in STAD (20). Additionally, the expression of
the tissue non-specific alkaline phosphatase, ALPL, is shown to be associated with prostate
cancer (8). Although further studies are required to confirm PLAP as a targetable cancer
antigen, this study provides significant evidences suggesting that PLAP can serve as a safe
and potent target for cancer immunotherapy.Prevalence of PLAP protein expression in cancer samples based
on the Human Protein Atlas (HPA). The levels of PLAP expression are
represented by different shades of red based on staining with four different
antibodies: Ab1 (CAB026327), Ab2 (HPA051699), Ab3 (HPA038765), and
Ab4 (HPA038764). BLCA; Bladder urothelial carcinoma, CESC; Cervical
squamous cell carcinoma and endocervical adenocarcinoma, LIHC;
Liver hepatocellular carcinoma, OV; Ovarian cancer, PAAD; Pancreatic
adenocarcinoma, STAD; Stomach adenocarcinoma, TGCT; Testicular germ
cell tumors, and UCEC; Uterine corpus endometrial carcinoma.Expression of PLAP in healthy tissues. A. Expression of ALLP protein based on the
Human Protein Atlas (HPA) scores and ALLP mRNA expression in HPA, GTEx and FANTOM5
databases is shown as a heatmap with the actual scores and values in each cell.
Non-available data are indicated with N/A. B. Representative data from HPA
showing immunohistology staining of PLAP in placenta, cervix/uterine, and lung with
respectively high, low and undetectable expression levels. Low PLAP expression in
cervix/uterine is limited to the glandular cells.
Authors: Mathias Uhlén; Linn Fagerberg; Björn M Hallström; Cecilia Lindskog; Per Oksvold; Adil Mardinoglu; Åsa Sivertsson; Caroline Kampf; Evelina Sjöstedt; Anna Asplund; IngMarie Olsson; Karolina Edlund; Emma Lundberg; Sanjay Navani; Cristina Al-Khalili Szigyarto; Jacob Odeberg; Dijana Djureinovic; Jenny Ottosson Takanen; Sophia Hober; Tove Alm; Per-Henrik Edqvist; Holger Berling; Hanna Tegel; Jan Mulder; Johan Rockberg; Peter Nilsson; Jochen M Schwenk; Marica Hamsten; Kalle von Feilitzen; Mattias Forsberg; Lukas Persson; Fredric Johansson; Martin Zwahlen; Gunnar von Heijne; Jens Nielsen; Fredrik Pontén Journal: Science Date: 2015-01-23 Impact factor: 47.728
Authors: Maria Orsaria; Ambrogio P Londero; Stefania Marzinotto; Carla Di Loreto; Diego Marchesoni; Laura Mariuzzi Journal: Cancer Biomark Date: 2016 Impact factor: 4.388
Authors: S R Rao; A E Snaith; D Marino; X Cheng; S T Lwin; I R Orriss; F C Hamdy; C M Edwards Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2016-12-22 Impact factor: 7.640