| Literature DB >> 34937578 |
Laurent Briollais1,2, Denis Rustand3,4, Catherine Allard5, Yanyan Wu6, Jingxiong Xu3, Samyukta Govinda Rajan7, Marie-France Hivert8,9,10, Myriam Doyon5, Luigi Bouchard11,12, Patrick O McGowan13, Steven Matthews3,14, Steven Lye3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The role of breastfeeding in modulating epigenetic factors has been suggested as a possible mechanism conferring its benefits on child development but it lacks evidence. Using extensive DNA methylation data from the ALSPAC child cohort, we characterized the genome-wide landscape of DNA methylation variations associated with the duration of exclusive breastfeeding and assessed whether these variations mediate the association between exclusive breastfeeding and BMI over different epochs of child growth.Entities:
Keywords: ALSPAC; BMI; Breastfeeding; Child cohort; DNA methylation; DOHaD; Mediation; Obesity; microRNA
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34937578 PMCID: PMC8697471 DOI: 10.1186/s13148-021-01209-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Clin Epigenetics ISSN: 1868-7075 Impact factor: 6.551
Distribution of the main epidemiological variables in ALSPAC
| Boys | Girls | Boys | Girls | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N = 358 | N = 374 | With DNA methylation available | |||
| 0 | 117 (32.7%) | 116 (31.0%) | 0 | 331 | 337 |
| 1 | 19 (5.3%) | 24 (6.4%) | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| 2 | 62 (17.3%) | 45 (12.0%) | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 3 | 108 (30.2%) | 125 (33.4%) | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| 4 | 50 (14.0%) | 47 (12.6%) | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| ≥ 5 | 2 (0.6%) | 17 (4.5%) | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| 6 | 0 | 2 | |||
| < £100 | 8 (2.2%) | 6 (1.6%) | 7 | 452 | 456 |
| £1–199 | 43 (12.0%) | 36 (9.6%) | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| £200–299 | 89 (24.9%) | 103 (27.5%) | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| £300–399 | 88 (24.6%) | 87 (23.3%) | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| > £400 | 116 (32.4%) | 118 (31.1%) | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Missing | 14 (3.9%) | 24 (6.4%) | |||
| 12 | 0 | 0 | |||
| CSE/none | 24 (6.7%) | 27 (7.2%) | 13 | 0 | 0 |
| Vocational | 28 (7.8%) | 17 (4.5%) | 14 | 3 | 1 |
| O level | 109 (30.4%) | 126 (33.7%) | 15 | 156 | 178 |
| A level | 112 (31.3%) | 115 (30.7%) | 16 | 196 | 186 |
| University degree | 85 (23.7%) | 89 (23.8%) | 17–18 | 83 | 104 |
| No | 319 (89.1%) | 331 (88.5%) | |||
| Yes | 39 (10.9%) | 43 (11.5%) | |||
| Mean (± SD) | 3.5 (± 0.5) | 3.4 (± 0.4) | |||
| Mean (± SD) | 22.9 (± 4.0) | 22.8 (± 3.6) | |||
| Mean (± SD) | 39.6 (± 1.5) | 39.7 (± 1.4) | |||
Fig. 1Distribution of DNAm variations induced by different durations (3,4 and 5 months vs. no breastfeeding) of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in ALSPAC girls (a) and boys (b) and at different ages from birth to 17 years. Each box represents the inter-quartile range (IQR) of DNAm variations over all CpG sites significant at P < 0.0001 (list given in Additional file 1: Table S1 for girls and Additional file 1: Table S2 for boys). The whiskers correspond to ± 1.5 IQR and the points outside this range are outliers
Top EWAS hits associated with child longitudinal BMI from ALSPAC data in boys and girls selected at the P = 5.10−7 level
| CpG site | Gene | Chr | Pos. (kb) | Group | EBF effect on DNAm (≥ 3 months vs. 0)a | EBF direct effect on BMI (≥ 3 months vs. 0)b | EBF effect on BMI mediated by DNAm (≥ 3 months vs. 0)c | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 year | 2 years | 7 years | 15 years | 1 year | 2 years | 7 years | 15 years | 1 year | 2 years | 7 years | 15 years | ||||||
| cg06471491 | miR-21 | 17 | 57,918 | TSS1500 | < E−16 | 0.02 | − 0.08 | − 0.07 | − 0.07 | − 1.13 | − 0.51 | − 0.17 | − 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.11 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| cg16645539 | SNAPC3 | 9 | 15,423 | TSS200 | < E−16 | − 0.05 | − 0.03 | 0.00 | − 0.01 | − 0.28 | − 0.73 | − 0.21 | − 0.29 | − 0.38 | 0.00 | 0.02 | 0.00 |
| cg07408552 | ATP6V0A1 | 17 | 40,612 | 5'UTR | 3.E−08 | − 0.19 | − 0.18 | 0.06 | 0.00 | − 1.84 | − 0.44 | − 0.16 | − 0.32 | − 0.34 | − 0.08 | 0.03 | − 0.01 |
| cg08224066 | DHX15/PPARGC1A | 4 | 24,578 | Body | 4.E−08 | − 0.04 | 0.03 | 0.05 | 0.05 | − 0.30 | − 0.44 | − 0.20 | − 0.30 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.02 |
| cg14822546 | LINC00398/ALOX5AP | 13 | 31,381 | – | 7.E−08 | − 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.01 | − 0.01 | − 0.76 | − 0.53 | − 0.22 | − 0.40 | 0.09 | − 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| cg14776321 | FAM238C | 10 | 27,220 | Body | 7.E−08 | − 0.05 | − 0.01 | 0.04 | 0.04 | − 0.10 | − 0.43 | − 0.12 | − 0.30 | − 0.30 | 0.03 | 0.06 | 0.02 |
| ch.8.18261148F | NATP/NAT2 | 8 | 18,217 | – | 7.E−08 | − 0.11 | − 0.06 | − 0.03 | − 0.04 | − 0.66 | − 0.67 | − 0.19 | − 0.26 | 0.05 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 |
| cg00313685 | CUX1 | 7 | 101,469 | Body | 1.E−07 | 0.19 | 0.06 | − 0.01 | 0.05 | − 0.39 | − 0.14 | − 0.22 | − 0.30 | − 0.10 | 0.00 | − 0.02 | − 0.04 |
| cg17476951 | TRAPPC9 | 8 | 141,054 | Body | 2.E−07 | − 0.12 | − 0.06 | 0.02 | 0.01 | − 0.67 | − 0.53 | − 0.25 | − 0.30 | 0.13 | 0.20 | 0.01 | 0.00 |
| cg26398656 | OSBPL1A | 18 | 21,852 | Body TSS200 | 3.E−07 | − 0.11 | − 0.06 | 0.00 | 0.04 | − 0.36 | − 0.60 | − 0.23 | − 0.25 | − 0.27 | − 0.11 | 0.03 | − 0.01 |
| cg26872564 | ZNF185 | X | 152,087 | Body | 3.E−07 | − 0.06 | − 0.01 | 0.06 | 0.07 | − 0.27 | − 0.19 | − 0.23 | − 0.38 | 0.04 | 0.01 | 0.00 | − 0.01 |
| cg18176842 | FAM84A | 2 | 14,776 | 3'UTR | 3.E−07 | − 0.11 | − 0.09 | − 0.02 | − 0.06 | − 0.17 | − 0.03 | − 0.27 | − 0.41 | 0.10 | 0.08 | 0.00 | − 0.03 |
| cg04354689 | PDPK1 | 16 | 2,660 | Body | 5.E−07 | 0.19 | 0.06 | − 0.01 | 0.05 | − 0.39 | − 0.14 | − 0.22 | − 0.30 | 0.14 | 0.02 | − 0.02 | 0.00 |
| cg26657240 | IL16 | 15 | 81,475 | – | 3.E−07 | − 0.02 | − 0.02 | − 0.03 | − 0.03 | − 1.43 | − 0.39 | − 0.01 | − 0.06 | − 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.05 | 0.23 |
| cg08651538 | NREP | 5 | 111,070 | Body | 4.E−07 | − 0.06 | − 0.05 | − 0.03 | 0.02 | − 1.32 | − 0.42 | 0.02 | − 0.07 | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.00 | 0.09 |
aCorresponds to estimate of βM(t) in Fig. 1. We estimated the average effect of 3 to 5 months of EBF vs. 0 month
bCorresponds to estimate of βDIR(t) in Fig. 1. We estimated the average effect of 3 to 5 months of EBF vs. 0 month
cCorresponds to estimate of βIND(t) in Fig. 1. We estimated the average effect of 3 to 5 months of EBF vs. 0 month
Fig. 2Distribution of mediation effects of DNA methylation on the association between different durations (3,4 and 5 months vs. no breastfeeding) of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) and BMI in ALSPAC girls (a) and boys (b) and at different ages from birth to 17 years. Each box represents the inter-quartile range (IQR) of mediation effects over all CpG sites significant at P < 0.0001 (list given in Additional file 1: Table S1 for girls and Additional file 1: Table S2 for boys). The whiskers correspond to ± 1.5 IQR and the points outside this range are outliers
Fig. 3Change in BMI mediated by DNA methylation from the combined effect of multiple CpG sites where DNA methylation is induced by different durations (3,4 and 5 months vs. no breastfeeding) of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in ALSPAC girls and boys and at different ages from birth to 17 years. The CpG sites in the final multi-mediator model were selected by forward selection (see “Methods” section). Each curve represents a smooth estimate function (loess estimate) of BMI changes over time and the confidence bands are the 95% confidence intervals of the smoothed curve
Fig. 4a Change in DNA methylation induced by different durations (3 and 5 months vs. no breastfeeding) of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in ALSPAC girls at different ages from birth to 17 years at 5 CpG sites linked to genes in the AMPK pathway. Each curve represents a smooth estimate function (loess estimate) of DNAm variations over time and the confidence bands are the 95% confidence intervals of the smoothed curve. b Change in BMI mediated by DNA methylation at 5 CpG sites linked to genes in the AMPK pathway where DNA methylation is induced by different durations (3,4 and 5 months vs. no breastfeeding) of exclusive breastfeeding (EBF) in ALSPAC girls at different ages from birth to 17 years. Each curve represents a smooth estimate function (loess estimate) of BMI changes over time and the confidence bands are the 95% confidence intervals of the smoothed curve