Literature DB >> 18729582

Masked fearful faces modulate the orienting of covert spatial attention.

Joshua M Carlson1, Karen S Reinke.   

Abstract

Dot probe studies indicate that masked fearful faces modulate spatial attention. However, without a baseline to compare congruent and incongruent reaction times, it is unclear which aspect(s) of attention (orienting or disengagement) is affected. Additionally, backward masking studies commonly use a neutral face as the mask stimulus. This method results in greater perceptual inconsistencies for fearful as opposed to neutral faces. Therefore, it is currently unclear whether the effects of backward masked fearful faces are due to the fearful nature of the face or perceptual inconsistencies. Equally unclear, is whether this spatial attention effect is due to orienting or disengagement. Two modified dot probe experiments with neutral (closed mouth in Experiment 1) and smiling (open mouth in Experiment 2) masks were used to determine the role of perceptual inconsistencies in mediating the spatial attention effects elicited by masked fearful faces. The results indicate that masked fearful faces modulate the orienting of spatial attention, and it appears that this effect is due to the fearful nature of the face rather than perceptual inconsistencies between the initial faces and masks.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18729582     DOI: 10.1037/a0012653

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emotion        ISSN: 1528-3542


  18 in total

1.  Backward masked fearful faces enhance contralateral occipital cortical activity for visual targets within the spotlight of attention.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Karen S Reinke; Pamela J LaMontagne; Reza Habib
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-08-11       Impact factor: 3.436

2.  Mechanisms for attentional modulation by threatening emotions of fear, anger, and disgust.

Authors:  Dandan Zhang; Yunzhe Liu; Lili Wang; Hui Ai; Yuejia Luo
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Unconscious social relation threats: Invisible boss face biases attention.

Authors:  Yanliang Sun; Luzi Xu; Xinyu Luo; Yanju Ren; Xiaowei Ding
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2021-12-21       Impact factor: 2.199

4.  Attentional bias to threat and gray matter volume morphology in high anxious individuals.

Authors:  Joshua M Carlson; Lin Fang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2021-11-09       Impact factor: 3.526

Review 5.  Mechanisms of attentional biases towards threat in anxiety disorders: An integrative review.

Authors:  Josh M Cisler; Ernst H W Koster
Journal:  Clin Psychol Rev       Date:  2009-12-14

6.  Bonobos (Pan paniscus) show an attentional bias toward conspecifics' emotions.

Authors:  Mariska E Kret; Linda Jaasma; Thomas Bionda; Jasper G Wijnen
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Dynamic Measures of Anxiety-Related Threat Bias: Links to Stress Reactivity.

Authors:  Laura J Egan; Tracy A Dennis-Tiwary
Journal:  Motiv Emot       Date:  2018-03-02

8.  Early ERP Modulation for Task-Irrelevant Subliminal Faces.

Authors:  Alan J Pegna; Alexandra Darque; Claire Berrut; Asaid Khateb
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2011-05-06

9.  Effects on automatic attention due to exposure to pictures of emotional faces while performing Chinese word judgment tasks.

Authors:  Huang Junhong; Zhou Renlai; Hu Senqi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-10-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  The Body as a Tool for Anger Awareness--Differential Effects of Angry Facial and Bodily Expressions on Suppression from Awareness.

Authors:  Minye Zhan; Ruud Hortensius; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-10-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.