Literature DB >> 34931058

Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery.

David A Ossin1, Emily C Carter2, Rufus Cartwright3, Philippe D Violette4, Shilpa Iyer5, Geraldine T Klein6, Sangeeta Senapati7,8, Zachary Klaassen9, Sylvia M Botros10.   

Abstract

Shared decision-making (SDM) is a hallmark of patient-centred care that uses informed consent to help guide patients with making complex health-care decisions. In SDM, patients and providers work together to determine the best course of action based on both the current available evidence and the patient's values and preferences. SDM not only provides a framework for the legal and ethical obligations providers need to fulfil for informed consent, but also leads to improved knowledge of treatment options and satisfaction of decision-making for patients. Tools such as decision aids have been developed to support SDM for complex decisions. Several decision aids are available for use in the field of urology and female pelvic medicine and reconstructive surgery, but these decision aids are also associated with barriers to SDM implementation including patient, provider and systematic challenges. However, solutions to such barriers to SDM include continued development of SDM tools to improve patient engagement, expand training of providers in SDM communication models and a process to encourage implementation of SDM.
© 2021. Springer Nature Limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34931058     DOI: 10.1038/s41585-021-00551-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Rev Urol        ISSN: 1759-4812            Impact factor:   14.432


  56 in total

1.  Diagnostic and treatment decisions in US healthcare.

Authors:  Robert M Kaplan; Theodore G Ganiats; Dominick L Frosch
Journal:  J Health Psychol       Date:  2004-01

Review 2.  Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions.

Authors:  Dawn Stacey; France Légaré; Krystina Lewis; Michael J Barry; Carol L Bennett; Karen B Eden; Margaret Holmes-Rovner; Hilary Llewellyn-Thomas; Anne Lyddiatt; Richard Thomson; Lyndal Trevena
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-04-12

3.  Montgomery and informed consent: where are we now?

Authors:  Sarah W Chan; Ed Tulloch; E Sarah Cooper; Andrew Smith; Wojtek Wojcik; Jane E Norman
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2017-05-12

Review 4.  Patient preferences for shared decisions: a systematic review.

Authors:  Betty Chewning; Carma L Bylund; Bupendra Shah; Neeraj K Arora; Jennifer A Gueguen; Gregory Makoul
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2011-04-06

5.  Using decision aids in community-based primary care: a theory-driven evaluation with ethnically diverse patients.

Authors:  Dominick L Frosch; France Légaré; Carol M Mangione
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-09-03

6.  Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent.

Authors:  Per Olav Vandvik; Linn Brandt; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Shaun Treweek; Elie A Akl; Annette Kristiansen; Anja Fog-Heen; Thomas Agoritsas; Victor M Montori; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 7.  Undetermined impact of patient decision support interventions on healthcare costs and savings: systematic review.

Authors:  Thom Walsh; Paul James Barr; Rachel Thompson; Elissa Ozanne; Ciaran O'Neill; Glyn Elwyn
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2014-01-23

8.  Decision aids that really promote shared decision making: the pace quickens.

Authors:  Thomas Agoritsas; Anja Fog Heen; Linn Brandt; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Annette Kristiansen; Elie A Akl; Ignacio Neumann; Kari Ao Tikkinen; Trudy van der Weijden; Glyn Elwyn; Victor M Montori; Gordon H Guyatt; Per Olav Vandvik
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2015-02-10

9.  Assessing the quality of decision support technologies using the International Patient Decision Aid Standards instrument (IPDASi).

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; Annette M O'Connor; Carol Bennett; Robert G Newcombe; Mary Politi; Marie-Anne Durand; Elizabeth Drake; Natalie Joseph-Williams; Sara Khangura; Anton Saarimaki; Stephanie Sivell; Mareike Stiel; Steven J Bernstein; Nananda Col; Angela Coulter; Karen Eden; Martin Härter; Margaret Holmes Rovner; Nora Moumjid; Dawn Stacey; Richard Thomson; Tim Whelan; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Arduous implementation: does the Normalisation Process Model explain why it's so difficult to embed decision support technologies for patients in routine clinical practice.

Authors:  Glyn Elwyn; France Légaré; Trudy van der Weijden; Adrian Edwards; Carl May
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 7.327

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.