Literature DB >> 23918106

Creating clinical practice guidelines we can trust, use, and share: a new era is imminent.

Per Olav Vandvik1, Linn Brandt2, Pablo Alonso-Coello3, Shaun Treweek4, Elie A Akl5, Annette Kristiansen2, Anja Fog-Heen2, Thomas Agoritsas6, Victor M Montori7, Gordon Guyatt6.   

Abstract

Standards and guidance for developing trustworthy clinical practice guidelines are now available, and a number of leading guidelines adhere to the key standards. Even current trustworthy guidelines, however, generally suffer from a cumbersome development process, suboptimal presentation formats, inefficient dissemination to clinicians at the point of care, high risk of becoming quickly outdated, and suboptimal facilitation of shared decision-making with patients. To address these limitations, we have--in our innovative research program and nonprofit organization, MAGIC (Making GRADE the Irresistible Choice)--constructed a conceptual framework and tools to facilitate the creation, dissemination, and dynamic updating of trustworthy guidelines. We have developed an online application that constitutes an authoring and publication platform that allows guideline content to be written and structured in a database, published directly on our web platform or exported in a computer-interpretable language (eg, XML) enabling dissemination through a wide range of outputs that include electronic medical record systems, web portals, and applications for smartphones/tablets. Modifications in guidelines, such as recommendation updates, will lead to automatic alterations in these outputs with minimal additional labor for guideline authors and publishers, greatly facilitating dynamic updating of guidelines. Semiautomated creation of a new generation of decision aids linked to guideline recommendations should facilitate face-to-face shared decision-making in the clinical encounter. We invite guideline organizations to partner with us (www.magicproject.org) to apply and further improve the tools for their purposes. This work will result in clinical practice guidelines that we cannot only trust, but also easily share and use.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23918106     DOI: 10.1378/chest.13-0746

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chest        ISSN: 0012-3692            Impact factor:   9.410


  36 in total

1.  The validity of recommendations from clinical guidelines: a survival analysis.

Authors:  Laura Martínez García; Andrea Juliana Sanabria; Elvira García Alvarez; Maria Mar Trujillo-Martín; Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta; Anna Kotzeva; David Rigau; Arturo Louro-González; Leticia Barajas-Nava; Petra Díaz Del Campo; Maria-Dolors Estrada; Ivan Solà; Javier Gracia; Flavia Salcedo-Fernandez; Jennifer Lawson; R Brian Haynes; Pablo Alonso-Coello
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2014-09-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 2.  Systematic Analysis and Critical Appraisal of the Quality of the Scientific Evidence and Conflicts of Interest in Practice Guidelines (2005-2013) for Barrett's Esophagus.

Authors:  Joseph D Feuerstein; Natalia E Castillo; Mona Akbari; Edward Belkin; Jeffrey J Lewandowski; Christine M Hurley; Samuel Lloyd; Daniel A Leffler; Adam S Cheifetz
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-06-15       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 3.  Structured decision-making drives guidelines panels' recommendations "for" but not "against" health interventions.

Authors:  Benjamin Djulbegovic; Tea Reljic; Shira Elqayam; Adam Cuker; Iztok Hozo; Qi Zhou; Shelly-Anne Li; Paul Alexander; Robby Nieuwlaat; Wojtek Wiercioch; Holger Schünemann; Gordon Guyatt
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2019-02-16       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Shared decision-making in urology and female pelvic floor medicine and reconstructive surgery.

Authors:  David A Ossin; Emily C Carter; Rufus Cartwright; Philippe D Violette; Shilpa Iyer; Geraldine T Klein; Sangeeta Senapati; Zachary Klaassen; Sylvia M Botros
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 14.432

5.  Mapping Chilean clinical research: a protocol for a scoping review and multiple evidence gap maps.

Authors:  Javier Bracchiglione; Nicolás Meza; Juan Victor Ariel Franco; Camila Micaela Escobar Liquitay; Sergio R Munoz; Gerard Urrutia; Eva Madrid
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-20       Impact factor: 3.006

6.  Recommendations for kidney disease guideline updating: a report by the KDIGO Methods Committee.

Authors:  Katrin Uhlig; Jeffrey S Berns; Serena Carville; Wiley Chan; Michael Cheung; Gordon H Guyatt; Allyson Hart; Sandra Zelman Lewis; Marcello Tonelli; Angela C Webster; Timothy J Wilt; Bertram L Kasiske
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 10.612

7.  Guideline for opioid therapy and chronic noncancer pain.

Authors:  Jason W Busse; Samantha Craigie; David N Juurlink; D Norman Buckley; Li Wang; Rachel J Couban; Thomas Agoritsas; Elie A Akl; Alonso Carrasco-Labra; Lynn Cooper; Chris Cull; Bruno R da Costa; Joseph W Frank; Gus Grant; Alfonso Iorio; Navindra Persaud; Sol Stern; Peter Tugwell; Per Olav Vandvik; Gordon H Guyatt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 8.  Industry sponsorship and research outcome.

Authors:  Andreas Lundh; Joel Lexchin; Barbara Mintzes; Jeppe B Schroll; Lisa Bero
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-16

9.  Compliance with clinical pathways for inpatient care in Chinese public hospitals.

Authors:  Xiao Yan He; M Kate Bundorf; Jian Jun Gu; Ping Zhou; Di Xue
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 2.655

10.  Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters.

Authors:  Anja Fog Heen; Per Olav Vandvik; Linn Brandt; Frankie Achille; Gordon Henry Guyatt; Elie A Akl; Shaun Treewek; Thomas Agoritsas
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 2.796

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.