Chiaki Akifuji1, Mio Iwasaki1, Yuka Kawahara1, Chiho Sakurai1, Yu-Shen Cheng1, Takahiko Imai1, Masato Nakagawa2. 1. Department of Life Science Frontiers, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. 2. Department of Life Science Frontiers, Center for iPS Cell Research and Application (CiRA), Kyoto University, Kyoto, 606-8507, Japan. nakagawa@cira.kyoto-u.ac.jp.
Abstract
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can differentiate into cells of the three germ layers and are promising cell sources for regenerative medicine therapies. However, current protocols generate hiPSCs with low efficiency, and the generated iPSCs have variable differentiation capacity among different clones. Our previous study reported that MYC proteins (c-MYC and MYCL) are essential for reprogramming and germline transmission but that MYCL can generate hiPSC colonies more efficiently than c-MYC. The molecular underpinnings for the different reprogramming efficiencies between c-MYC and MYCL, however, are unknown. In this study, we found that MYC Box 0 (MB0) and MB2, two functional domains conserved in the MYC protein family, contribute to the phenotypic differences and promote hiPSC generation in MYCL-induced reprogramming. Proteome analyses suggested that in MYCL-induced reprogramming, cell adhesion-related cytoskeletal proteins are regulated by the MB0 domain, while the MB2 domain regulates RNA processes. These findings provide a molecular explanation for why MYCL has higher reprogramming efficiency than c-MYC.
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) can differentiate into cells of the three germ layers and are promising cell sources for regenerative medicine therapies. However, current protocols generate hiPSCs with low efficiency, and the generated iPSCs have variable differentiation capacity among different clones. Our previous study reported that MYC proteins (c-MYC and MYCL) are essential for reprogramming and germline transmission but that MYCL can generate hiPSC colonies more efficiently than c-MYC. The molecular underpinnings for the different reprogramming efficiencies between c-MYC and MYCL, however, are unknown. In this study, we found that MYC Box 0 (MB0) and MB2, two functional domains conserved in the MYC protein family, contribute to the phenotypic differences and promote hiPSC generation in MYCL-induced reprogramming. Proteome analyses suggested that in MYCL-induced reprogramming, cell adhesion-related cytoskeletal proteins are regulated by the MB0 domain, while the MB2 domain regulates RNA processes. These findings provide a molecular explanation for why MYCL has higher reprogramming efficiency than c-MYC.
Human induced pluripotent stem cells (hiPSCs) are generated from somatic cells and can differentiate into cells of all three germ layers[1,2]. They are functionally identical to human embryonic stem cells (hESCs) but do not require the destruction of the embryo, which has made them attractive sources for regenerative medicine[3]. The original reprogramming was induced by four factors, OCT3/4, SOX2, KLF4, and c-MYC (OSKM). Since then, several new methods have been developed to improve the yield and quality of iPSCs, but the cost remains high and the production remains technically difficult[4,5]. Further complicating the application of hiPSCs is the wide variability in the differentiation capacity of different hiPSC clones[6].We have shown that excluding c-MYC from the reprogramming factors significantly lowers the reprogramming and differentiation efficiencies of the resulting iPSCs[7]. The MYC family consists of the oncogenes c-MYC, MYCN, and MYCL in humans[8]. c-MYC was the first MYC gene discovered in human and has been a topic of cancer research ever since[9]. Tumorigenesis depends on high transformation activity derived from the N-terminus region of c-MYC protein[10]. Consequently, OSKM-based reprogramming may not be appropriate for the clinical application of iPSCs. Many groups have reported reprogramming methods that exclude c-MYC overexpression but at the cost of lower reprogramming efficiency[5,7]. MYCL is about 30 amino acids shorter in the N-terminus region than c-MYC and has lower transformation activity[10]. We found that substituting c-MYC for MYCL in reprogramming can increase the number of iPSC colonies and maintain the ability to differentiate into the cells of three germ layers[7]. Furthermore, fewer chimeric mice died by tumorigenesis after the transplantation of MYCL-iPSCs, whereas the transplantation of c-MYC-iPSCs caused lethal tumorigenesis in more than 50% of mice during two years of observation. Despite these observations, little is known about the molecular function of MYCL and the different mechanisms between c-MYC and MYCL to promote reprogramming.MYC proteins have six MYC Box (MB) domains: MB0, 1, 2, 3a, 3b, and 4 in the N-terminus and a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLHLZ) in the C-terminus[11], but MYCL does not have MB3a. The C-terminus of c-MYC and MYCL is essential in reprogramming due to its binding with MAX protein, allowing MYC to access the DNA[7,12]. The N-terminus is mainly known as a transactivation domain (TAD), which regulates the target gene, but its function in reprogramming is less clear[13]. We found that a mutant of c-MYC lacking the N-terminal showed low transformation activity and promoted reprogramming[7]. However, which domain on the N-terminal side is essential for reprogramming and what function it performs were not resolved. In addition, MYC proteins act as transcription factors upon interacting with several binding proteins[14]. Although MYCL-binding proteins are important for MYCL function, there are no reports about MYCL-binding proteins during reprogramming.In this study, using domain deletion mutants of MYC proteins, we found that the MB0 and MB2 domains promote iPSC-like colonies and that the MB0 domain is functionally different between c-MYC and MYCL. In c-MYC, it induced non-iPSC-like colonies by increasing nucleic proteins related to transcription, but in MYCL, the MB0 domain induced iPSC-like colonies by increasing the expression of cell adhesion-related proteins. We also found that deletion of the MB2 domain in MYC proteins prevented colony formation and that MYCL could interact with RNA-binding proteins (RBPs) via this domain. These results suggested that MYCL promotes reprogramming by regulating RNA processing.
Results
MYCL promotes reprogramming more efficiently than c-MYC
To compare the reprogramming phenotypes of MYCL and c-MYC, we used Sendai virus (SeV)-based reprogramming (CytoTune-iPS) and StemFit AK03N medium without bFGF (Fig. 1A). The SeV method has high reprogramming efficiency without genome integration, and c-MYC and MYCL SeV kits are already available[15]. The bFGF exclusion is based on the data in Supplementary Fig. S1. DMEM supplemented with 10% FBS (DMEM + 10%FBS) is the standard medium to induce reprogramming. We used DMEM + 10%FBS when introducing the reprogramming factors, but after 7 days of reprogramming, we replated the cells and used StemFit AK03N without bFGF (03N (-)) from that point on. The MOI (multiplicity of infection) of each SeV was 20. To improve the reprogramming efficiency, we compared three media combinations (Supplementary Fig. S1A). The highest number of colonies was obtained using 03N (-) during reprogramming and 03N ( +) after replating (Supplementary Fig. S1B). These results indicated that the 03N (-) reprogramming condition in the first 7 days enhances the reprogramming efficiency compared to 03N ( +). We then examined the optimal MOI of SeV for the reprogramming (Supplementary Fig. S1C). A lower MOI induced more colonies (Supplementary Fig. S1D), indicating a higher reprogramming efficiency. Following these results, we applied SeV for the transduction at an MOI of 4.3 using 03N (-) during reprogramming.
Figure 1
MYCL promotes reprogramming more efficiently than c-MYC. (A) Schematic representation of HDF reprogramming with Sendai virus (SeV). HDFs were transduced with SeV carrying KLF4-OCT3/4-SOX2 (KOS), KLF4 (K), and c-MYC or MYCL on day 0. We used an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 4.3 for each virus. StemFit AK03N without bFGF was used during the transduction and subsequent induction of iPSC-like colonies. We performed immunostaining of the reprogramming HDFs 1 to 7 days after the transduction and analyzed the results using ArrayScan. (B) Representative immunostaining images of reprogramming HDFs stained by anti-TRA-1-60 antibody (green) and Hoechst (blue) 7 days after the transduction. Scale bar, 300 μm. Ph, phase contrast. (C) Proliferation and expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells during reprogramming. HDFs were transduced with SeV, including c-MYC or MYCL, and immunostaining was performed from days 1 to 7. The number of total cells was counted as Hoechst-positive cells. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 by paired t-test. (D) Schematic representation of HDF reprogramming with episomal plasmid vector (EpiP). HDFs were transduced with EpiP carrying SOX2, KLF4, OCT3/4-shp53, LIN28A, EBNA1, and c-MYC or MYCL. StemFit AK03N without bFGF was used during the transfection and subsequent induction of iPSC-like colonies. We performed flow cytometry of the reprogramming HDFs every three days from 1 to 19 days plus day 21 after the transduction. (E) Representative immunostaining images of reprogramming HDFs stained by anti-TRA-1-60 antibody (green) and Hoechst (blue) 21 days after the transduction. Scale bar, 300 μm. Ph, phase contrast. (F) Proliferation and expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells during reprogramming were analyzed by flow cytometry. HDFs were transduced with EpiP, including c-MYC or MYCL. Flow cytometry was performed every three days from days 1 to 19 days plus day 21. Mean ± SD for n = 3, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by paired t-test. (G) The number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies derived from 1 × 105 HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC or MYCL on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, **p < 0.01 by unpaired t-test. (H) Percentage of CD13 ( +) cells during EpiP reprogramming determined by flow cytometry. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by paired t-test.
MYCL promotes reprogramming more efficiently than c-MYC. (A) Schematic representation of HDF reprogramming with Sendai virus (SeV). HDFs were transduced with SeV carrying KLF4-OCT3/4-SOX2 (KOS), KLF4 (K), and c-MYC or MYCL on day 0. We used an MOI (multiplicity of infection) of 4.3 for each virus. StemFit AK03N without bFGF was used during the transduction and subsequent induction of iPSC-like colonies. We performed immunostaining of the reprogramming HDFs 1 to 7 days after the transduction and analyzed the results using ArrayScan. (B) Representative immunostaining images of reprogramming HDFs stained by anti-TRA-1-60 antibody (green) and Hoechst (blue) 7 days after the transduction. Scale bar, 300 μm. Ph, phase contrast. (C) Proliferation and expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells during reprogramming. HDFs were transduced with SeV, including c-MYC or MYCL, and immunostaining was performed from days 1 to 7. The number of total cells was counted as Hoechst-positive cells. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 by paired t-test. (D) Schematic representation of HDF reprogramming with episomal plasmid vector (EpiP). HDFs were transduced with EpiP carrying SOX2, KLF4, OCT3/4-shp53, LIN28A, EBNA1, and c-MYC or MYCL. StemFit AK03N without bFGF was used during the transfection and subsequent induction of iPSC-like colonies. We performed flow cytometry of the reprogramming HDFs every three days from 1 to 19 days plus day 21 after the transduction. (E) Representative immunostaining images of reprogramming HDFs stained by anti-TRA-1-60 antibody (green) and Hoechst (blue) 21 days after the transduction. Scale bar, 300 μm. Ph, phase contrast. (F) Proliferation and expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells during reprogramming were analyzed by flow cytometry. HDFs were transduced with EpiP, including c-MYC or MYCL. Flow cytometry was performed every three days from days 1 to 19 days plus day 21. Mean ± SD for n = 3, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by paired t-test. (G) The number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies derived from 1 × 105 HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC or MYCL on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, **p < 0.01 by unpaired t-test. (H) Percentage of CD13 ( +) cells during EpiP reprogramming determined by flow cytometry. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 by paired t-test.Next, we conducted immunostaining to analyze the expression of TRA-1-60 from days 1 to 7 after the transduction (Fig. 1A). TRA-1-60 is a glycoprotein and major cell surface marker of hiPSCs and hESCs[16]. We quantified the results using a high-content imaging system, ArrayScan, because the cell number was small during SeV reprogramming for the first seven days, making flow cytometry challenging. On day 7, we observed that c-MYC and MYCL induced a small cell mass to form colonies, but only the colonies induced by MYCL expressed TRA-1-60, while those induced by c-MYC looked like cell aggregations (Fig. 1B and Supplementary Fig. S2). Cell proliferation was highly increased in human dermal fibroblasts (HDFs) transduced with c-MYC compared to MYCL. On the other hand, the percentage of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells increased more in MYCL-transduced HDFs on day 3 after the transduction (Fig. 1C). This difference may be because c-MYC has higher transformation activity than MYCL, which causes different phenotypes, especially cell proliferation[10].We confirmed these reprogramming phenotypes using episomal plasmid vector (EpiP)[17] (Fig. 1D). SeV systems have a higher gene transfer efficiency, leading to more efficient reprogramming. However, we could modify the reprogramming vectors, which is useful for evaluating the molecular mechanism of c-MYC and MYCL, only when using the EpiP system.Similar to the results with the SeV method, few colonies expressed TRA-1-60 in c-MYC-transfected HDFs (Fig. 1E and Supplementary Fig. S3A). However, the transfection of MYCL resulted in a higher percentage of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells and lower cell proliferation than the transfection of c-MYC (Fig. 1F and Supplementary Fig. S3B). These differences between MYCL and c-MYC were more obvious with EpiP reprogramming than SeV reprogramming (Fig. 1C, F), probably because of differences in the gene transfer efficiency[15,17], the expression of the transfected factors, cell toxicity, and the time required for the iPSC-like colonies to appear: the SeV system requires about 7 days, but the EpiP system needs about 21 days based on our observations.We found two types of colonies: “iPSC-like” and “non-iPSC-like” colonies. The iPSC-like colonies produced by MYCL were more flattened and showed a monolayered colony morphology, with each cell tightly packed and expressing TRA-1-60. The non-iPSC-like colonies produced by c-MYC showed a cell aggregation-like morphology, in which individual cells were irregularly aggregated and did not express TRA-1-60. We counted the number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies on day 21 and found that c-MYC induced iPSC-like colonies as well as many non-iPSC-like colonies, but MYCL induced almost only iPSC-like colonies and more of them than c-MYC (Fig. 1G and Supplementary Fig. S3).It has been reported that before the increase in the expression of TRA-1-60, a decrease in the expression of CD13, a marker of fibroblasts[18], is observed in somatic cell reprogramming. Therefore, we confirmed the expression of CD13 during reprogramming. The percentage of CD13 ( +) cells decreased daily in HDFs transduced with c-MYC or MYCL, but the number of CD13 (-) cells rapidly increased in c-MYC compared to MYCL (Fig. 1H and Supplementary Fig. S4). In particular, the CD13 (-) TRA-1-60 (-) population was larger on day 10 with c-MYC reprogramming than MYCL reprogramming, but the CD13 (-) TRA-1-60 ( +) population from days 16 to 21 was larger with MYCL reprogramming (Supplementary Fig. S4). These results suggested that MYCL promotes TRA-1-60 ( +) cells more than c-MYC, but c-MYC suppresses CD13 expression more than MYCL.
MYC Box 0 and 2 domains are crucial for colony formation during reprogramming
Next, we prepared domain deletion mutants to identify which domains in the N-terminus of MYC proteins influence reprogramming (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S5). We previously showed that a c-MYC mutant lacking transformation activity enhances the formation of iPSC-like colonies. This mutant has a point mutation in the transactivation domain of the N-terminal region, W135E (Fig. 2A and Supplementary Fig. S5B), but can bind to genomic DNA[7]. On the other hand, the bHLHLZ domain in the C-terminus region is a well-known binding domain of MAX[19]. Mutants in the C-terminus region prevent MYC proteins from binding to DNA and thus reprogramming[7]. Finally, we tested the reprogramming activities of these mutants using the EpiP reprogramming system because, as explained above, this method provided a clearer phenotype and was easier to manipulate than the SeV method.
Figure 2
MYC Box 0 and 2 domains are crucial for colony formation during reprogramming. (A) Schematic representation of WT c-MYC and MYCL protein. Black boxes show important domains for MYC function, including MB0, 1, 2, 3a (c-MYC only), 3b, 4, and basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper motif (bHLHLZ). The percentage of common amino acids in each MYC box domain between MYCL and c-MYC is shown (Identity%). The numbers on the right indicate amino acid lengths. (B) Number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/mutants (left) or MYCL-WT/mutants (right) on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. WT. (C) Expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) HDFs and CD13 ( +) HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/mutants (left) or MYCL-WT/mutants (right) on day 16. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. WT. (D) Representative flow cytometry images for TRA-1-60 and CD13 for HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/ΔMB0 or MYCL-WT/ΔMB0 10 and 21 days after the transduction. Numbers indicate the expression percentage of each quadrant. (E) Proliferation of HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/ΔMB0 or MYCL-WT/ΔMB0 10 and 21 days later. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, ***p < 0.001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. c-MYC-WT. The number of cells was counted using a Cell Counter model R1 (OLYMPUS).
MYC Box 0 and 2 domains are crucial for colony formation during reprogramming. (A) Schematic representation of WT c-MYC and MYCL protein. Black boxes show important domains for MYC function, including MB0, 1, 2, 3a (c-MYC only), 3b, 4, and basic-helix-loop-helix leucine zipper motif (bHLHLZ). The percentage of common amino acids in each MYC box domain between MYCL and c-MYC is shown (Identity%). The numbers on the right indicate amino acid lengths. (B) Number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/mutants (left) or MYCL-WT/mutants (right) on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. WT. (C) Expression of TRA-1-60 ( +) HDFs and CD13 ( +) HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/mutants (left) or MYCL-WT/mutants (right) on day 16. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, ***p < 0.001 and ****p < 0.0001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. WT. (D) Representative flow cytometry images for TRA-1-60 and CD13 for HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/ΔMB0 or MYCL-WT/ΔMB0 10 and 21 days after the transduction. Numbers indicate the expression percentage of each quadrant. (E) Proliferation of HDFs transduced with EpiP including c-MYC-WT/ΔMB0 or MYCL-WT/ΔMB0 10 and 21 days later. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, ***p < 0.001 by ordinary one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test vs. c-MYC-WT. The number of cells was counted using a Cell Counter model R1 (OLYMPUS).The EpiP mutants were transfected into HDFs with other reprogramming factors, and the number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies was counted (Fig. 2B and Supplementary Fig. S6). c-MYC-ΔMB0 promoted the formation of iPSC-like colonies and inhibited the formation of non-iPSC-like colonies compared to c-MYC-WT. In contrast, MYCL-ΔMB0 showed almost no ability to form iPSC-like colonies (Fig. 2B). We confirmed that the protein expression of each domain deletion mutant by western blotting showed no difference compared with c-MYC- or MYCL-WT (Supplementary Fig. S7 and S8). These results demonstrate that the MB0 domain has different functions in c-MYC and MYCL for reprogramming and that c-MYC-ΔMB0 has a similar function as MYCL-WT.Figure 2B shows that c-MYC-ΔMB1 promoted iPSC-like colony formation like c-MYC-ΔMB0, but it also led to the formation of non-iPSC-like colonies. The formation of iPSC-like colonies by MYCL-ΔMB1 was about a quarter that by MYCL-WT. Unlike c-MYC-WT, c-MYC-ΔMB2 did not induce non-iPSC-like colonies, but it did induce a rate of iPSC-like colonies similar to c-MYC-WT. MYCL-ΔMB2 showed little ability to form iPSC-like colonies, resembling MYCL-ΔMB0. c-MYC-ΔMB3a, -ΔMB3b, and -ΔMB4 had similar colony-forming activities as c-MYC-WT. MYCL-ΔMB3b showed the same reprogramming efficiency as MYCL-WT, but MYCL-ΔMB4 formed about the same small number of iPSC-like colonies as MYCL-ΔMB1. The ΔbHLHLZ mutants of both c-MYC and MYCL failed to induce colonies and were therefore considered to have lost MYC function completely. Thus, the results indicate that in c-MYC, the MB0 and MB2 domains are repressive for iPSC-like colony formation, but in MYCL, they are promotive. Other domains also influenced the colony formation efficiency, but the effect was small.Next, we analyzed the effect of the MYC-deletion mutants on the expression of TRA-1-60 and CD13 by flow cytometry 16 days after the start of reprogramming (Fig. 2C). Mutants that increased the number of iPSC-like colonies also increased the expression of TRA-1-60, while those that reduced the number of iPSC-like colonies lowered the TRA-1-60 expression (Fig. 2C and Supplementary Fig. S9). c-MYC-WT showed little TRA-1-60 expression, whereas c-MYC-ΔMB0 upregulated the expression. MYCL-ΔMB0, unlike MYCL-WT, failed to upregulate the expression of TRA-1-60. The CD13 expression was also correlated with colony formation. In c-MYC, a significant decrease in CD13 expression was observed for mutants that promoted non-iPSC-like colony formation. As for MYCL, only a slight decrease in CD13 expression was observed for mutants that promoted iPSC-like colony formation. From these results, we concluded that the MB0 domain is essential for the function of MYC in reprogramming but functions differently between c-MYC and MYCL.To analyze the function of the MB0 domain in more detail, we analyzed the expression of TRA-1-60 and CD13 10 and 21 days after the start of reprogramming by flow cytometry (Fig. 2D). In the case of c-MYC-WT, there was a strong decrease in CD13 expression on day 10, and most cells were CD13 negative on day 21. In the cases of c-MYC-ΔMB0 and MYCL-WT, there was a slight decrease in CD13 expression on day 10, and more than half of cells were expressing TRA-1-60 on day 21. Finally, in the case of MYCL-ΔMB0, there was no change in CD13 or TRA-1-60 expression. More study is needed to determine how CD13 is regulated by c-MYC and MYCL.Additionally, c-MYC-WT showed higher cell proliferation on day 10, but c-MYC-ΔMB0 resulted in a lower cell proliferation comparable more with MYCL-WT than with c-MYC-WT on day 10 (Fig. 2E). We attributed this effect to the lost transformation activity of c-MYC-ΔMB0. From days 10 to 21, the cell proliferation increased significantly in c-MYC-ΔMB0 and MYCL-WT, and a concomitant increase in the CD13 (-) TRA-1-60 ( +) population was observed (Fig. 2D, E). These observations suggest that the number of cells that were reprogrammed increased rapidly with c-MYC-ΔMB0 and MYCL-WT. With c-MYC-WT, the cell proliferation continued until day 21. However, the CD13 (-) TRA-1-60 ( +) population hardly increased (Fig. 2D), indicating that these cells were not reprogramming but changing to other highly proliferative cell types. From these results, we concluded that the MB0 domain functions negatively in c-MYC and positively in MYCL for reprogramming.
MYCL regulates cytoskeleton- and cell adhesion-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB0 domain
To confirm which genes are regulated by the MYCL MB0 domain in reprogramming, we analyzed protein expressions during reprogramming because it was reported that gene expressions do not correlate well with protein expressions[20]. We performed a comprehensive analysis of expressed proteins during reprogramming induced by c-MYC and MYCL WT and ΔMB0 mutants. We used SeV-reprogramming HDFs on days 3, 5, and 7 days and EpiP-reprogramming HDFs on day 10 as samples for mass spectrometry (MS) (Fig. 3A) because the percentage of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells was much higher with SeV than with EpiP for observations up to day 7 (Fig. 1C, F). There was more than a two-fold increase in the expression of 520 (SeV) and 128 (EpiP) proteins with MYCL-WT reprogramming compared to c-MYC-WT reprogramming (Fig. 3B, groups (i) and (ii), respectively) and 183 (EpiP) proteins with c-MYC-ΔMB0 reprogramming compared to c-MYC-WT reprogramming (Fig. 3B, group (iii)). Overall, we identified 18 proteins common to the three groups (Fig. 3B, group (iv)). Then, we applied a Gene Ontology (GO) analysis using DAVID and detected enriched terms during reprogramming[21,22] (Fig. 3C, D, and Table 1), finding cytoskeleton- and cell adhesion-related proteins are involved in the promotion of reprogramming by MYCL-WT. The same analysis was performed to identify proteins whose expression was upregulated by c-MYC-WT compared with MYCL-WT and c-MYC-ΔMB0 (Supplementary Fig. S10A and Table 2). These proteins were associated with the proliferation of non-iPSC-like colonies. We found that c-MYC-WT regulates proteins involved in cell proliferation, such as the cell cycle and DNA replication. To understand the function of the MB0 domain in reprogramming, MS analysis was applied to HDF samples transfected with MYCL-WT, MYCL-ΔMB0, or c-MYC-ΔMB0 (Supplementary Fig. S10B and Table 3). GO analysis indicated that these proteins were associated with cell adhesion and RNA processing.
Figure 3
MYCL regulates cytoskeleton- and cell adhesion-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB0 domain. (A) Schematic of the mass spectrometry (MS) and GO analysis (DAVID). (B) Venn diagram of upregulated proteins during iPSC-like colony formation. (C) Molecular functions from the GO analysis of the four groups in (B). (D) KEGG pathways from the GO analysis of the four groups in (B).
Table 1
MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed by MYCL- or c-MYC-ΔMB0.
(i) Proteins enriched more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared with c-MYC-WT (SeV)
NRP1
PMEL
IQCH
ZNF507
C1QTNF3
GLIPR2
ING1
THOC7
RPAIN
DGCR8
KRAS
PIPOX
CCNL2
ACOT8
KCNMA1
TTC38
MRI1
DLGAP5
CHPF2
P4HA1
HMCN1
STRA13
SMG5
FAM83D
MTFR1L
TSPYL1
CROT
PLPP1
PRKACB
FSD1
REPIN1
MKLN1
CPS1
MDP1
ZWILCH
ST6GAL1
MCL1
SRR
FAM134A
USP34
CEP41
MATN2
AQP1
PPL
SON
ARL14EP
ACSS3
KLHL11
FAIM
MCMBP
COL1A1
MOCS3
SHC1
DPT
VCPIP1
TPM2
CLDN7
C18orf32
SAG
POSTN
AKAP11
AMDHD2
AHCYL2
MASTL
MAP3K2
COPZ2
ARFGEF3
HBA1,HBA2
S100P
CCNYL1
RALGAPB
ACTR1B
PIAS4
PFKFB3
FAM134C
SDSL
PPIC
NR3C1
FYN
SPAST
MAP4K2
COQ3
CENPV
HERC2
CDS2
TADA2B
XPC
MX1
PCSK9
SDPR
CEP131
FEM1A
ACTG1
TNC
ITPR3
GNPTG
SH3BGRL2
QSOX1
LSM4
FBXL18
SH3BP5L
FARP2
ZIC5
PASK
FLYWCH2
TMEM119
FAP
AGTPBP1
ANKIB1
EDEM3
PANX1
CCDC28A
DDX58
FOXK2
ERICH1
KIAA1211
ZMYM4
FN1
ARSA
CSNK1E
MTRR
NCOA3
PATZ1
UBE2S
DDB2
CCDC68
POLG2
C10orf76
ADIRF
CALD1
RALGAPA1
NUDT9
YAE1D1
C14orf142
TSPAN14
PTGIS
FAM208A
PANK1
TCN2
TAGLN
ALG8
THAP11
NFIC
TMEM165
BLOC1S6
FAM21A
NCOR2
COL12A1
TGFBI
CRELD1
MARH5
CNOT8
RANGRF
MED16
CDA
GULP1
WDR54
MET
NOA1
PRKG1
CHMP1A
SHARPIN
RRP8
TBC1D7
CPQ
IFIT1
THBS1
HSDL2
GORAB
TRAF6
AHDC1
DDX60
NDUFB6
ARHGEF6
CERCAM
NPEPL1
GPR107
MAP3K15
MRS2
ELP3
TPM1
COMMD8
MED4
HACL1
IGFBP3
HTRA1
CD99L2
PEX16
GINS4
DSCR3
UBE2G1
EIF4EBP1
DYNC1I2
ACTN1
YPEL5
SMG6
ITGB4
PTGES
TPK1
REEP6
PMF1
PTBP2
IFIT2
PUM1
DYNC2H1
KDELR3
VIPAS39
KIF1B
EMILIN2
CRIP2
HIGD2A
C7orf26
DNM2
MMP2
KANK2
DHX30
RAP1B
DNAJB5
MRPL33
SPANXA2-OT1
PIR
SDCBP
HMGXB4
POLG
FOXK1
PEX1
LGALS8
LAMC1
DNAH6
PDIA4
MTMR14
S100A14
CNTLN
SLC25A32
TMED4
SPARC
GBP1
CNN2
GCC1
CTHRC1
STAU2
SUPV3L1
DNAJC16
KIAA0430
CASP4
NID2
FAM69C
TIMP2
OGFOD3
EED
DCX
PRNP
KCTD15
GSPT2
PCNT
STARD4
OTUD7B
PPP3CC
WDR35
CTSZ
SLC15A4
BASP1
SLC44A1
AKR1C2
COA3
RAB2B
GNA12
OPA3
INPP5A
GAP43
CAAP1
VWA8
PALM
KRT17
MIEF2
IKBKB
C1orf198
BUB1
ZBTB7A
CD248
ACOX1
DNAJA4
CNN1
ANAPC4
LOX
LAMA5
COL2A1
KRT6A
LRRC41
COL6A3
CABIN1
ECM1
MED8
KIF21A
NOL8
SLC30A5
COL16A1
TWISTNB
GREM1
ICAM1
OSBPL11
TBC1D15
HORMAD2
EPHA2
MRPL51
B3GALT6
USP9Y
VKORC1
ETNK1
MACF1
STAG3
SH3KBP1
BCAR1
KHDRBS3
TLE3
IGF2
STARD3NL
CTDSPL2
FIBP
RANBP10
IFT74
SERPINB2
SAMD9
FZD7
LGALS1
CSRP1
FBLN1
SERPINF1
SHCBP1
TUBG1
CAPN5
PTK7
PLAUR
ZNF185
SGF29
RASA3
ACSF3
DNA2
PRSS23
PKP3
GDAP1
CAV2
FBXO2
CCND1
SLC34A3
KYNU
RBM23
ACBD7
MAP2
MIC13
IFI44
PIK3CA
KLC4
ODR4
GATC
TANGO6
MITD1
ATL1
ANAPC13
SP100
MYL9
COL6A2
PPIL2
MPDZ
CCBL1
TGM2
TGS1
CDYL
KRT10
SNX32
OGN
FMNL3
LAMB1
CSRP2
MON2
FAM127A
WDR4
KRT14
BEND3
TRIM21
RPS6KA4
LENG8
SPRR3
FRG1
KLK14
CDC34
ASAP2
TAP2
NEXN
INPP5B
TPM4
PPFIA1
KRT16
LIMK1
HOOK2
PPP2R2D
CPLX1
SUN1
WDR73
WWC3
SMG7
COL1A2
CCDC92
MYCL
DESI2
FYCO1
RAC2
SEMA7A
TIMP3
PKD1L3
COL5A1
PYURF
DPYSL4
SNX24
SERPINB8
FBXO3
RNF31
AKTIP
BAZ2A
UGGT2
HSPB1
CBX2
IFIT3
QPCTL
C1orf50
CAV1
CD58
COL11A2
ISG15
RPL26L1
TYW3
CD44
PARP2
GOLT1B
FOSL1
GRB7
CREG1
HOMER3
HSPB6
ABR
NID1
ECT2
RAP2A
NDRG1
COL5A2
AURKA
GSDMD
ENG
WDR55
WNT5A
MRGBP
EP300
MAU2
CHST14
GHDC
NPHP3
FABP3
ANPEP
ARHGDIB
BST1
NABP2
SIRT5
DTX3L
HAUS7
LTBP2
CLINT1
PXMP4
DPY19L1
ARL5A
RNF113A
CRBN
GGA1
UBE2F
GPNMB
NT5E
CILP
MROH2B
SEPT5
ILF3
TANC1
STX3
NOTCH3
PLCG2
ARFIP1
NCOA5
QSOX2
SLC2A1
S100A6
CDCA5
CALHM2
KDM4B
TIMELESS
F13A1
COMMD9
REN
MECP2
TNXB
ZYG11B
AHNAK2
RDH10
CLIC3
MME
SLC39A14
GGCX
S100A4
ZCCHC6
CD9
CD82
LTBP1
STK11
UAP1L1
MED12
PXN
GOSR2
B3GNT5
ABI3BP
ITGA2
OASL
CTSK
VAMP8
Four groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT/HDFs compared with c-MYC-WT/HDFs using SeV on day 3, 5, or 7; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared with c-MYC-WT using EpiP; (iii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared with c-MYC-WT using EpiP; and (iv) commonly identified proteins. Bold fonts in the group (ii) indicate identified proteins with p < 0.05 (two-sample paired t-test). n = 3 for EpiP reprogramming.
Table 2
MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed with c-MYC.
(i) Proteins enriched more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT compared with MYCL-WT (SeV)
ATXN7L3B
TIMM21
SLC2A3
CA14
CRLF3
SYT6
TMEM161A
MTM1
METTL15
NKAP
CDS2
MRS2
MARS2
ERCC2
TDP1
MFAP4
ANAPC16
CARS2
NOLC1
IGHMBP2
MRPL34
FECH
PARP2
ING1
ADNP2
STEAP3
AK6
PDZD8
EPB41L5
PEX16
ZER1
CKS1B
GGPS1
DBNDD1
MIEF1
FUCA1
ADSSL1
POTEJ
TMEM209
CCNL2
TOP3A
ULK1
MGA
FAM162A
AMMECR1
ISG20L2
CEP78
NOM1
PAPD4
PROCR
IFRD2
LRRC41
UBR3
PHF3
RIN1
SPPL2B
ARAF
DNM2
HPS5
PSEN1
PARD3
ARHGEF16
RHPN2
PRPF18
SEMA4C
RPUSD3
NYNRIN
ARHGEF7
VRTN
PHF10
DMD
RPL26L1
RANBP6
CNOT4
TSPYL5
CDC25C
REEP4
FADD
INPP5F
ZBTB7A
GPN3
RBPMS2
BRAF
ORC6
CACNA2D2
AP1B1
NCAPD3
RRP8
MASTL
POLR2M
CASC3
NCL
C1orf174
LRRC14
SLC27A3
ACSF3
DHRS11
RBM23
WDR55
CAMK4
NDRG3
ALS2
NOVA1
SOX3
CLCN7
EHMT1
C7orf26
NSUN5
NMRAL1
STK25
NFKB2
OSBPL1A
VPS37B
RAD23A
HS2ST1
LYAR
PHKA1
SDC4
MGST2
SNTB1
MEN1
WDR4
DDX28
C1orf198
AKAP9
COQ9
STYX
PHF5A
PCDH1
TMSB4X
AP1G2
MYO1G
UCKL1
APC
TBC1D15
FASTKD1
APCDD1L
MARH5
ULK3
LONP2
SETD1A
ETFDH
ANKS1A
LRP8
PALD1
ANAPC5
CARMIL1
GATM
PANX1
NME3
UBA52
ZNF806
NCOR2
DVL2
CTDP1
PHKB
GINS3
DNPH1
CDCA5
BCKDK
TTF1
TGFBRAP1
HAUS2
HMGCR
SNCA
KLHDC4
TBP
AP1M2
E2F4
AFAP1L1
ZMYM6NB
N4BP2
TRIT1
CCDC134
ATL1
INTS6
CHD8
SPINT2
RASA2
NCK2
MAL2
ATAD3A
SLC25A32
LSAMP
ACOT8
KIFAP3
JARID2
CLSTN1
USP36
PTGIS
PIAS4
TMEM41B
SEC14L1
TUBGCP4
GEMIN8
VWA9
RPP25L
NRBP2
DOLPP1
WARS2
PLEKHA6
MRGBP
ZCCHC6
ZFP36L1
SLC4A7
SCARB1
ARID1B
PMF1
XXYLT1
ANKRD50
MT-CO1
MET
RBM47
LIN28B
EXD2
GORAB
GCSH
PLTP
PRKAB1
CUTC
SDSL
FARS2
LRRC8E
ARHGAP12
FBXW9
PMS2
NAA30
STRA13
FASTKD5
ZCCHC10
TTK
BNC2
COX16
BCS1L
NDE1
STX3
LARP1B
PTCD1
TPD52
SMG1
ACBD7
TRIP12
PTPMT1
ASB3
MTG1
ANKRD12
STK33
HEXIM1
RBM45
ATG9A
ANKIB1
B3GALNT2
C12orf43
SLC25A15
NDUFAF5
BAG4
NOA1
SFRP2
VPRBP
FOXK1
GPM6B
POLE
TRADD
AMFR
RPS6KA1
PLA2G4A
SELO
PROM1
CHTF18
BOD1
SPC24
KAT7
RAB17
IGFBP6
PNPLA4
AGTRAP
UBE2Q1
HIGD2A
RAPH1
SDF2
ARHGAP4
ODR4
MRPS18C
QSOX1
COX17
CHUK
RAPGEF2
GINS1
DFFA
CENPV
PTPN9
FUT11
ERMP1
SOGA1
DHX32
GEMIN6
HDHD2
GLE1
PTPRZ1
CREG1
GATC
PDXP
MID1
WRAP53
POU2F1
CA2
APPL1
TMEM14C
TXNIP
SLC7A3
FABP6
ITGA2
CWC22
MPDZ
PIGG
ACTB
INCENP
CARNMT1
RHBDD2
MRPL38
PUM1
HPDL
NME4
CDKN2A
TRIM27
ARHGEF10L
BDH1
CDC26
CTU1
ATF7
HMGXB4
L3MBTL3
MAP1LC3A
ISLR
URB1
MRPL21
CAMK1
RILPL1
WDR37
IGF2BP1
NAPEPLD
DPH6
FCF1
ANKRD29
ANAPC13
CD3EAP
WDR89
SLC25A17
DNA2
CENPM
CEP170B
GCA
CSTF2T
NKRF
SLC35A2
PMS1
SLC5A6
COQ5
SPR
RBM15B
USP19
LAMA4
DNM1L
INTS2
BCAS3
KIF22
NHEJ1
RPP40
TNC
SPNS1
RPRD1A
DDB2
IFIT5
ARMCX1
FAT1
DAP
BMPR1A
NPHP3
ARID3A
MRPL13
ZBED1
GTF2H1
PATZ1
DPH2
C11orf98
RRP7A
AKAP1
ANAPC1
NUDT16
CD74
DCAKD
ASB6
DNMBP
UTP11L
TUBG1
HAUS7
GAA
PDK1
DOHH
ISYNA1
BRMS1
EXOC6
ARAP3
CHKB
NOL8
DDX52
ORC5
COA7
NAA40
IQSEC1
TRIM24
DNTTIP1
HEATR6
SH3BP4
ZMYM3
MED30
CLASP2
PRPF38B
TMEM256
GTF3C2
MRPL10
NDUFAF7
VCPIP1
HSPB11
CASP7
TOR1B
ITPR2
PRPF39
GCFC2
KIF21A
DPPA4
TIMM8B
GTF2H4
MRPL16
BAZ1A
EXOC6B
MRPL41
POLR3B
USP9Y
SYNE2
MID1IP1
MOCS2
METTL5
PRUNE
UBE2V2
CDH1
GJA1
CHMP6
RCC1
RAPGEF6
COMMD9
HMBS
SQLE
IGFBP2
DIAPH2
EPB41
HIST1H1E
MAP3K4
CDK18
ARL15
UQCC1
HTATIP2
PTDSS2
TATDN2
MTA1
SNX18
EIF1B
MAEA
SCAF1
UBE2J2
NUP37
BAG1
TSSC4
RCOR2
FAM213A
MFF
TTLL12
UBXN6
EFEMP2
ZZEF1
NFYB
PDS5B
FXN
AGPAT5
ARFGEF2
TCOF1
SCAF11
RAPGEF1
PARG
PRIM1
USF1
L1TD1
SEPHS1
BRD8
POP7
EXT2
TSEN34
CAMKV
SLC29A1
MBD3
PPIF
MTX3
COG1
FASTKD2
ARL14EP
MRPL40
CD320
MBD1
VARS2
BRD3
MRPS18B
ACY1
PPIE
RIF1
VPS8
POGZ
RSL1D1
PAK1
STRBP
TERF2
TOP2A
SLC39A10
QRICH1
CISD1
POLB
DHX37
TRMT5
TIMMDC1
TRABD
SON
SET
LYST
RNASEH2B
MVK
ZC3HC1
NDUFC1
HSPA4L
EXOSC1
TCEANC2
NASP
CYP2S1
NSMCE3
HPRT1
HUS1
PRRC2A
RDH13
KANK1
PHF14
RBM7
SIRT5
QPCTL
CROCC
LIMK2
CWF19L1
KIF1B
VPS39
CHD7
YPEL5
SLC7A5
VPS25
LRWD1
FPGS
NT5C3A
NCKIPSD
PSIP1
CELF2
MDC1
ANP32A
ACADSB
GPC4
TUBB4A
BOP1
NT5C
CTSC
ANKLE2
ORC4
UTP18
CHST14
NUS1
PLK1
GPKOW
SIKE1
ADAM15
NUDCD2
SSU72
NFYC
LIG1
MSH2
HNRNPR
MSI2
STK26
EBP
ITPK1
STAU2
URI1
SLC7A8
MANBAL
RNGTT
PRIM2
SEC24B
MRPS34
RMND5A
F11R
SCAF8
RPAP1
SPATA5L1
RCC2
POLRMT
SERF2
TMEM115
PARP1
C2CD5
BEND3
BRAT1
TERF2IP
MT-ND2
FAM136A
NOP2
ARL5B
GFM2
WDR3
AARSD1
PPID
HRSP12
CHD2
MRPL45
YTHDF1
THEMIS
INTS4
PLEKHA1
CBX3
SIRT7
CENPF
CAMSAP2
MCC
PTPN2
NANOG
SLBP
MCAT
MRPL24
MZT1
ANAPC4
HIST1H1A
KPNA2
MED14
NDUFB9
NEFL
DUS3L
HSP90AA4P
CMSS1
ZNF706
PTRHD1
PBRM1
ABI3BP
MED10
PFAS
BRIX1
QRSL1
THNSL1
ADRM1
CECR2
NCOA5
ABRACL
WIPF2
USP28
GEMIN4
CHD1
SBNO1
LSM12
COG2
TARS2
KIF11
CHD1L
MLH1
MNAT1
DDX47
SRPK1
NACAP1
XPC
NELFCD
MPP6
HAUS6
TANC1
PPAN
MRPL33
PUM2
MRPL15
FAM65A
ERI3
TOM1L2
TIMM13
SPRYD4
MICU1
HMGN5
XPO4
WDR43
DDX20
YTHDC2
SLC25A22
CACUL1
PCF11
PRC1
DNAAF2
ACAT1
RWDD4
DHPS
PFKM
NUDT16L1
MTMR2
GPN1
SMARCA4
EI24
SCFD2
PPP3CB
RNASEH2A
GTF2E2
SMARCD1
ADCK3
TRMT1
RABEP1
CD97
GLT8D1
UBR5
HLTF
TXNRD2
TDP2
CCNY
NCAPD2
USP48
LRCH2
UBQLN1
TRIP10
MCM3
HSPA14
ZBTB8OS
MAP2K7
APOBEC3C
TTC27
DYSF
MINA
BAK1
HERC2
POLG2
TRAP1
EXOSC7
RCL1
C17orf62
PUS7
CASP6
ISOC1
THYN1
MYL6
CBR4
RFC3
SRSF10
LCLAT1
HIBADH
UHRF1
DHX57
MCM6
UBL4A
MRPS17
TFRC
GALK2
MKI67
CEBPZ
CHRAC1
TTC4
METTL3
GSTZ1
UBE2O
LRSAM1
NSA2
AGPAT4
MRPS5
MAP3K7
ZNF330
MLLT11
HK2
BLMH
PCCA
LYPLAL1
CPSF2
PEX3
INPP4A
SORD
SLC35F2
MRPL23
GNL3
WBP11
SAP30
INPPL1
TBC1D9B
MRPS31
GMPS
IMPDH2
SSRP1
LBR
TRIM28
NELFB
LDAH
DDX21
TWSG1
RBMX
NDUFAF1
PHF6
TFB2M
EBNA1BP2
ZMYM2
MLYCD
UROD
PKP3
NUBP2
FANCI
ARIH2
ZNF22
USP11
ARFRP1
PKN1
FAR1
MYBBP1A
PDS5A
CHMP7
COASY
SAP18
GTF3C4
SMARCAD1
DNAAF5
CTAGE5
GART
UBE2I
MRPL27
ENY2
PDK3
RUVBL1
PEAK1
WDR6
MYEF2
PWP2
RPA2
EXOSC4
FRA10AC1
ADAD2
NARS2
FAM64A
XRCC4
GTF2E1
DDX51
BMS1
OGFR
MRPL3
CHAC2
PES1
IGF2BP3
LDHB
ORC3
MSH6
DPYSL5
HEATR1
KATNA1
PTMA
SLC52A2
NLE1
MCM7
POLD1
MCM2
CXorf56
SMAD5
GPATCH4
STOML2
FLVCR1
MYH14
DAXX
ZCCHC8
TAMM41
TOMM34
LGALS3BP
PARN
KIF1BP
C5orf22
TP53RK
NACC1
MRPS30
TKT
ELAC2
PRKCI
PDCD11
DNAJB4
MTMR12
SUPV3L1
DARS2
RAVER1
SIGMAR1
DHODH
SLC3A2
BTAF1
HSDL1
EIF3C
TBPL1
NOC2L
MRPS28
CADM1
MRPL37
SRI
BZW2
NDUFC2
PCCB
DNTTIP2
PCBD2
TRIM2
CPSF1
RABGGTB
RFC5
ECT2
AGTPBP1
TRIM22
ECM29
PANK4
C11orf73
MCAM
THUMPD1
WDR18
RNPS1
SCO1
TIMM17B
INTS8
TUSC3
DCAF16
GTF2A1
SIRT1
UTP6
MRPL11
XRN1
DCTPP1
HSPBP1
TUFM
WDR92
PIR
ACAA2
DNAJC2
NPM3
ADNP
CERS6
NUDT12
APTX
DSG2
NTHL1
BOLA3
DDX24
NUP35
ATL2
NOL11
DDX31
ATPAF1
GCDH
RCHY1
C12orf10
HIP1R
PRPS2
MCM5
WDR75
RHOT1
KIAA1211
DDX54
RSPRY1
CDC123
NOP16
TACO1
GLMN
HOOK1
WNK1
NUP155
POLR1A
TBL3
GNAI1
KIAA2013
C7orf50
GUSB
GUF1
TIMM17A
GRWD1
LBH
CCNK
ILKAP
SMYD5
AGL
POR
LIG3
CMTR1
LRBA
WDR5
TOMM5
ARL8A
PCK2
PDCD4
NAT10
ACO1
TSC2
GNL3L
MTFP1
ABT1
KEAP1
ANKRD28
UBTF
STK3
SCAP
PPAT
PSAT1
APOA1BP
WDR54
SYT1
SCRIB
PTBP3
RNASEH2C
APOO
ASF1A
GSPT2
SDHB
SUPT16H
DBR1
PSME3
PPWD1
UBQLN4
CHAF1A
TRMT10C
SACS
BYSL
CDH13
USP24
ARID1A
GJB2
TEX10
UBA2
CLUH
ARL2
AS3MT
ABCC1
MRPL57
DDX56
EIF2D
ATP1B3
DCAF8
AGK
AIF1L
RBM42
FEN1
CCDC12
ELOVL6
EFNB1
NCAPG2
SARS2
OSBPL2
CDCA8
GNA13
ATF7IP
CCDC50
ADI1
HAUS8
C1orf131
GOLM1
DEK
DTD1
MCL1
INTS1
AHCY
GYS1
PAICS
DTWD1
CCDC59
MAK16
RUVBL2
ISY1
ECT2L
GTPBP10
ZNF593
RBM26
FDXR
MRI1
HS1BP3
LSM6
DNAJC8
SALL4
AATF
LETM1
LAS1L
MRPS11
SMARCA5
TMPO
LTA4H
MYCBP
MRPL19
NEPRO
PCBP2
WBSCR22
CCNH
DLGAP5
NDUFS7
NOP58
HDAC2
WDR48
GLTSCR2
PELP1
HARS2
NT5DC1
HIST1H1B
TOX4
TPI1
LUC7L
ATP11C
NXF1
HNRNPC
VRK1
KDM2A
COMMD8
CACNA2D1
RAD21
HNRNPU
WIPI1
USP39
SSB
CDCA7L
SNF8
LARS
ASH2L
VPS36
ZNF346
CRNKL1
TELO2
LRRC57
AASDHPPT
CNPY3
GLUL
CWC27
TNPO3
CHORDC1
CKAP2
CXADR
ILF2
PEG10
TTI2
MANBA
DCAF13
PLS1
LVRN
C1QBP
UBE2A
MEMO1
EIF4A3
EXTL2
MED24
GLYR1
UBXN1
MRPS18A
EIF5B
NIFK
POLR2H
HMOX2
ABCB6
NDUFB4
FNBP1L
NOL10
KIF5C
EXOSC9
ATP2B1
TOMM40
RBM28
GSTP1
TATDN1
FTSJ3
DAGLB
PLCG1
IFI16
HSPA4
TMEM192
MPI
SMPD4
POLE4
KDM1A
NUP188
TSFM
DLAT
FAM210A
POLR2D
NOL6
PRPF40A
UBAP2
MSTO1
GTF2I
SHPK
NUP133
RBM12B
DAB2IP
SAFB
LARP1
SPCS1
PDHA1
STX18
PPFIA1
NUP50
METTL13
SAAL1
QTRTD1
SUPT6H
ADSL
QSER1
POLR3C
TRMT1L
ASUN
BMP1
AFG3L2
GEMIN5
NEU1
PEX6
HDAC3
NDC80
MRRF
HMGN1
TIMM44
REEP6
OTX2
LPCAT1
MTPAP
SNU13
UMPS
TRIAP1
TUT1
GRSF1
NAA20
ACSS3
NCK1
ERBB2
CCDC28B
XRN2
NDUFAF4
MIF
PPP2R5A
SGSH
CRADD
MT-ND4
GATAD2A
MRPL9
RAD50
OSGEPL1
ADGRL2
MTUS2
NRBF2
FAM192A
DNPEP
THAP11
HEATR5B
RABGEF1
POP1
HEATR3
SRRM2
CACTIN
PRKD1
MRPL50
PRMT1
NIPBL
STK4
SLC25A35
ECE2
RPL13A
SDCBP
NTMT1
TBRG4
ZFAND6
DSEL
SDAD1
RPL21
PDCD5
PPIG
RALGAPB
MYO5C
TRMT6
RBM39
GULP1
DCP1A
IGSF1
POLG
UBE3A
SLC30A1
RFC4
TUBAL3
MGRN1
TPK1
KCTD10
SMAP
ACIN1
UBXN7
TMEM41A
DNAL1
F8A1,F8A2,F8A3
TKFC
BSG
ARHGEF40
FBP1
FBXL6
DFFB
TRIM33
EHBP1
ATP5S
CDC20
PLEKHA7
WDR73
CD70
EMC3
SLC9A3R1
COBLL1
TRIM9
SP1
YARS2
RBM19
CKMT1A,CKMT1B
HSP90AB3P
MRPL35
CCNA2
HDDC2
KDM3B
PPA1
SMARCAL1
MALSU1
AURKB
PPM1G
EARS2
HSP90AA1
SH3GL3
MPHOSPH6
NACC2
HMGB2
GTPBP4
ABCB10
CYP2U1
BSDC1
TLK1
LEO1
MFAP1
GIT1
FLCN
TYRO3
SH3PXD2A
EMC4
CPS1
INTS9
IRS2
SIRT3
FUT8
CDK2
TNFAIP6
SDHAF4
KITLG
ALDH3A1
GPR180
CFAP36
ANK3
CBX2
RBBP9
EML2
POLR3GL
FN3K
VWA5A
RAVER2
ATXN7L3B
TIMM21
SLC2A3
CA14
CRLF3
SYT6
TMEM161A
MTM1
METTL15
NKAP
CDS2
MRS2
MARS2
ERCC2
TDP1
MFAP4
ANAPC16
CARS2
NOLC1
IGHMBP2
MRPL34
FECH
PARP2
ING1
ADNP2
STEAP3
AK6
PDZD8
EPB41L5
PEX16
ZER1
CKS1B
GGPS1
DBNDD1
MIEF1
FUCA1
ADSSL1
POTEJ
TMEM209
CCNL2
TOP3A
ULK1
MGA
FAM162A
AMMECR1
ISG20L2
CEP78
NOM1
PAPD4
PROCR
IFRD2
LRRC41
UBR3
PHF3
RIN1
SPPL2B
ARAF
DNM2
HPS5
PSEN1
PARD3
ARHGEF16
RHPN2
PRPF18
SEMA4C
RPUSD3
NYNRIN
ARHGEF7
VRTN
PHF10
DMD
RPL26L1
RANBP6
CNOT4
TSPYL5
CDC25C
REEP4
FADD
INPP5F
ZBTB7A
GPN3
RBPMS2
BRAF
ORC6
CACNA2D2
AP1B1
NCAPD3
RRP8
MASTL
POLR2M
CASC3
NCL
C1orf174
LRRC14
SLC27A3
ACSF3
DHRS11
RBM23
WDR55
CAMK4
NDRG3
ALS2
NOVA1
SOX3
CLCN7
EHMT1
C7orf26
NSUN5
NMRAL1
STK25
NFKB2
OSBPL1A
VPS37B
RAD23A
HS2ST1
LYAR
PHKA1
SDC4
MGST2
SNTB1
MEN1
WDR4
DDX28
C1orf198
AKAP9
COQ9
STYX
PHF5A
PCDH1
TMSB4X
AP1G2
MYO1G
UCKL1
APC
TBC1D15
FASTKD1
APCDD1L
MARH5
ULK3
LONP2
SETD1A
ETFDH
ANKS1A
LRP8
PALD1
ANAPC5
CARMIL1
GATM
PANX1
NME3
UBA52
ZNF806
NCOR2
DVL2
CTDP1
PHKB
GINS3
DNPH1
CDCA5
BCKDK
TTF1
TGFBRAP1
HAUS2
HMGCR
SNCA
KLHDC4
TBP
AP1M2
E2F4
AFAP1L1
ZMYM6NB
N4BP2
TRIT1
CCDC134
ATL1
INTS6
CHD8
SPINT2
RASA2
NCK2
MAL2
ATAD3A
SLC25A32
LSAMP
ACOT8
KIFAP3
JARID2
CLSTN1
USP36
PTGIS
PIAS4
TMEM41B
SEC14L1
TUBGCP4
GEMIN8
VWA9
RPP25L
NRBP2
DOLPP1
WARS2
PLEKHA6
MRGBP
ZCCHC6
ZFP36L1
SLC4A7
SCARB1
ARID1B
PMF1
XXYLT1
ANKRD50
MT-CO1
MET
RBM47
LIN28B
EXD2
GORAB
GCSH
PLTP
PRKAB1
CUTC
SDSL
FARS2
LRRC8E
ARHGAP12
FBXW9
PMS2
NAA30
STRA13
FASTKD5
ZCCHC10
TTK
BNC2
COX16
BCS1L
NDE1
STX3
LARP1B
PTCD1
TPD52
SMG1
ACBD7
TRIP12
PTPMT1
ASB3
MTG1
ANKRD12
STK33
HEXIM1
RBM45
ATG9A
ANKIB1
B3GALNT2
C12orf43
SLC25A15
NDUFAF5
BAG4
NOA1
SFRP2
VPRBP
FOXK1
GPM6B
POLE
TRADD
AMFR
RPS6KA1
PLA2G4A
SELO
PROM1
CHTF18
BOD1
SPC24
KAT7
RAB17
IGFBP6
PNPLA4
AGTRAP
UBE2Q1
HIGD2A
RAPH1
SDF2
ARHGAP4
ODR4
MRPS18C
QSOX1
COX17
CHUK
RAPGEF2
GINS1
DFFA
CENPV
PTPN9
FUT11
ERMP1
SOGA1
DHX32
GEMIN6
HDHD2
GLE1
PTPRZ1
CREG1
GATC
PDXP
MID1
WRAP53
POU2F1
CA2
APPL1
TMEM14C
TXNIP
SLC7A3
FABP6
ITGA2
CWC22
MPDZ
PIGG
ACTB
INCENP
CARNMT1
RHBDD2
MRPL38
PUM1
HPDL
NME4
CDKN2A
TRIM27
ARHGEF10L
BDH1
CDC26
CTU1
ATF7
HMGXB4
L3MBTL3
MAP1LC3A
ISLR
URB1
MRPL21
CAMK1
RILPL1
WDR37
IGF2BP1
NAPEPLD
DPH6
FCF1
ANKRD29
ANAPC13
CD3EAP
WDR89
SLC25A17
DNA2
CENPM
CEP170B
GCA
CSTF2T
NKRF
SLC35A2
PMS1
SLC5A6
COQ5
SPR
RBM15B
USP19
LAMA4
DNM1L
INTS2
BCAS3
KIF22
NHEJ1
RPP40
TNC
SPNS1
RPRD1A
DDB2
IFIT5
ARMCX1
FAT1
DAP
BMPR1A
NPHP3
ARID3A
MRPL13
ZBED1
GTF2H1
PATZ1
DPH2
C11orf98
RRP7A
AKAP1
ANAPC1
NUDT16
CD74
DCAKD
ASB6
DNMBP
UTP11L
TUBG1
HAUS7
GAA
PDK1
DOHH
ISYNA1
BRMS1
EXOC6
ARAP3
CHKB
NOL8
DDX52
ORC5
COA7
NAA40
IQSEC1
TRIM24
DNTTIP1
HEATR6
SH3BP4
ZMYM3
MED30
CLASP2
PRPF38B
TMEM256
GTF3C2
MRPL10
NDUFAF7
VCPIP1
HSPB11
CASP7
TOR1B
ITPR2
PRPF39
GCFC2
KIF21A
DPPA4
TIMM8B
GTF2H4
MRPL16
BAZ1A
EXOC6B
MRPL41
POLR3B
USP9Y
SYNE2
MID1IP1
MOCS2
METTL5
PRUNE
UBE2V2
CDH1
GJA1
CHMP6
RCC1
RAPGEF6
COMMD9
HMBS
SQLE
IGFBP2
DIAPH2
EPB41
HIST1H1E
MAP3K4
CDK18
ARL15
UQCC1
HTATIP2
PTDSS2
TATDN2
MTA1
SNX18
EIF1B
MAEA
SCAF1
UBE2J2
NUP37
BAG1
TSSC4
RCOR2
FAM213A
MFF
TTLL12
UBXN6
EFEMP2
ZZEF1
NFYB
PDS5B
FXN
AGPAT5
ARFGEF2
TCOF1
SCAF11
RAPGEF1
PARG
PRIM1
USF1
L1TD1
SEPHS1
BRD8
POP7
EXT2
TSEN34
CAMKV
SLC29A1
MBD3
PPIF
MTX3
COG1
FASTKD2
ARL14EP
MRPL40
CD320
MBD1
VARS2
BRD3
MRPS18B
ACY1
PPIE
RIF1
VPS8
POGZ
RSL1D1
PAK1
STRBP
TERF2
TOP2A
SLC39A10
QRICH1
CISD1
POLB
DHX37
TRMT5
TIMMDC1
TRABD
SON
SET
LYST
RNASEH2B
MVK
ZC3HC1
NDUFC1
HSPA4L
EXOSC1
TCEANC2
NASP
CYP2S1
NSMCE3
HPRT1
HUS1
PRRC2A
RDH13
KANK1
PHF14
RBM7
SIRT5
QPCTL
CROCC
LIMK2
CWF19L1
KIF1B
VPS39
CHD7
YPEL5
SLC7A5
VPS25
LRWD1
FPGS
NT5C3A
NCKIPSD
PSIP1
CELF2
MDC1
ANP32A
ACADSB
GPC4
TUBB4A
BOP1
NT5C
CTSC
ANKLE2
ORC4
UTP18
CHST14
NUS1
PLK1
GPKOW
SIKE1
ADAM15
NUDCD2
SSU72
NFYC
LIG1
MSH2
HNRNPR
MSI2
STK26
EBP
ITPK1
STAU2
URI1
SLC7A8
MANBAL
RNGTT
PRIM2
SEC24B
MRPS34
RMND5A
F11R
SCAF8
RPAP1
SPATA5L1
RCC2
POLRMT
SERF2
TMEM115
PARP1
C2CD5
BEND3
BRAT1
TERF2IP
MT-ND2
FAM136A
NOP2
ARL5B
GFM2
WDR3
AARSD1
PPID
HRSP12
CHD2
MRPL45
YTHDF1
THEMIS
INTS4
PLEKHA1
CBX3
SIRT7
CENPF
CAMSAP2
MCC
PTPN2
NANOG
SLBP
MCAT
MRPL24
MZT1
ANAPC4
HIST1H1A
KPNA2
MED14
NDUFB9
NEFL
DUS3L
HSP90AA4P
CMSS1
ZNF706
PTRHD1
PBRM1
ABI3BP
MED10
PFAS
BRIX1
QRSL1
THNSL1
ADRM1
CECR2
NCOA5
ABRACL
WIPF2
USP28
GEMIN4
CHD1
SBNO1
LSM12
COG2
TARS2
KIF11
CHD1L
MLH1
MNAT1
DDX47
SRPK1
NACAP1
XPC
NELFCD
MPP6
HAUS6
TANC1
PPAN
MRPL33
PUM2
MRPL15
FAM65A
ERI3
TOM1L2
TIMM13
SPRYD4
MICU1
HMGN5
XPO4
WDR43
DDX20
YTHDC2
SLC25A22
CACUL1
PCF11
PRC1
DNAAF2
ACAT1
RWDD4
DHPS
PFKM
NUDT16L1
MTMR2
GPN1
SMARCA4
EI24
SCFD2
PPP3CB
RNASEH2A
GTF2E2
SMARCD1
ADCK3
TRMT1
RABEP1
CD97
GLT8D1
UBR5
HLTF
TXNRD2
TDP2
CCNY
NCAPD2
USP48
LRCH2
UBQLN1
TRIP10
MCM3
HSPA14
ZBTB8OS
MAP2K7
APOBEC3C
TTC27
DYSF
MINA
BAK1
HERC2
POLG2
TRAP1
EXOSC7
RCL1
C17orf62
PUS7
CASP6
ISOC1
THYN1
MYL6
CBR4
RFC3
SRSF10
LCLAT1
HIBADH
UHRF1
DHX57
MCM6
UBL4A
MRPS17
TFRC
GALK2
MKI67
CEBPZ
CHRAC1
TTC4
METTL3
GSTZ1
UBE2O
LRSAM1
NSA2
AGPAT4
MRPS5
MAP3K7
ZNF330
MLLT11
HK2
BLMH
PCCA
LYPLAL1
CPSF2
PEX3
INPP4A
SORD
SLC35F2
MRPL23
GNL3
WBP11
SAP30
INPPL1
TBC1D9B
MRPS31
GMPS
IMPDH2
SSRP1
LBR
TRIM28
NELFB
LDAH
DDX21
TWSG1
RBMX
NDUFAF1
PHF6
TFB2M
EBNA1BP2
ZMYM2
MLYCD
UROD
PKP3
NUBP2
FANCI
ARIH2
ZNF22
USP11
ARFRP1
PKN1
FAR1
MYBBP1A
PDS5A
CHMP7
COASY
SAP18
GTF3C4
SMARCAD1
DNAAF5
CTAGE5
GART
UBE2I
MRPL27
ENY2
PDK3
RUVBL1
PEAK1
WDR6
MYEF2
PWP2
RPA2
EXOSC4
FRA10AC1
ADAD2
NARS2
FAM64A
XRCC4
GTF2E1
DDX51
BMS1
OGFR
MRPL3
CHAC2
PES1
IGF2BP3
LDHB
ORC3
MSH6
DPYSL5
HEATR1
KATNA1
PTMA
SLC52A2
NLE1
MCM7
POLD1
MCM2
CXorf56
SMAD5
GPATCH4
STOML2
FLVCR1
MYH14
DAXX
ZCCHC8
TAMM41
TOMM34
LGALS3BP
PARN
KIF1BP
C5orf22
TP53RK
NACC1
MRPS30
TKT
ELAC2
PRKCI
PDCD11
DNAJB4
MTMR12
SUPV3L1
DARS2
RAVER1
SIGMAR1
DHODH
SLC3A2
BTAF1
HSDL1
EIF3C
TBPL1
NOC2L
MRPS28
CADM1
MRPL37
SRI
BZW2
NDUFC2
PCCB
DNTTIP2
PCBD2
TRIM2
CPSF1
RABGGTB
RFC5
ECT2
AGTPBP1
TRIM22
ECM29
PANK4
C11orf73
MCAM
THUMPD1
WDR18
RNPS1
SCO1
TIMM17B
INTS8
TUSC3
DCAF16
GTF2A1
SIRT1
UTP6
MRPL11
XRN1
DCTPP1
HSPBP1
TUFM
WDR92
PIR
ACAA2
DNAJC2
NPM3
ADNP
CERS6
NUDT12
APTX
DSG2
NTHL1
BOLA3
DDX24
NUP35
ATL2
NOL11
DDX31
ATPAF1
GCDH
RCHY1
C12orf10
HIP1R
PRPS2
MCM5
WDR75
RHOT1
KIAA1211
DDX54
RSPRY1
CDC123
NOP16
TACO1
GLMN
HOOK1
WNK1
NUP155
POLR1A
TBL3
GNAI1
KIAA2013
C7orf50
GUSB
GUF1
TIMM17A
GRWD1
LBH
CCNK
ILKAP
SMYD5
AGL
POR
LIG3
CMTR1
LRBA
WDR5
TOMM5
ARL8A
PCK2
PDCD4
NAT10
ACO1
TSC2
GNL3L
MTFP1
ABT1
KEAP1
ANKRD28
UBTF
STK3
SCAP
PPAT
PSAT1
APOA1BP
WDR54
SYT1
SCRIB
PTBP3
RNASEH2C
APOO
ASF1A
GSPT2
SDHB
SUPT16H
DBR1
PSME3
PPWD1
UBQLN4
CHAF1A
TRMT10C
SACS
BYSL
CDH13
USP24
ARID1A
GJB2
TEX10
UBA2
CLUH
ARL2
AS3MT
ABCC1
MRPL57
DDX56
EIF2D
ATP1B3
DCAF8
AGK
AIF1L
RBM42
FEN1
CCDC12
ELOVL6
EFNB1
NCAPG2
SARS2
OSBPL2
CDCA8
GNA13
ATF7IP
CCDC50
ADI1
HAUS8
C1orf131
GOLM1
DEK
DTD1
MCL1
INTS1
AHCY
GYS1
PAICS
DTWD1
CCDC59
MAK16
RUVBL2
ISY1
ECT2L
GTPBP10
ZNF593
RBM26
FDXR
MRI1
HS1BP3
LSM6
DNAJC8
SALL4
AATF
LETM1
LAS1L
MRPS11
SMARCA5
TMPO
LTA4H
MYCBP
MRPL19
NEPRO
PCBP2
WBSCR22
CCNH
DLGAP5
NDUFS7
NOP58
HDAC2
WDR48
GLTSCR2
PELP1
HARS2
NT5DC1
HIST1H1B
TOX4
TPI1
LUC7L
ATP11C
NXF1
HNRNPC
VRK1
KDM2A
COMMD8
CACNA2D1
RAD21
HNRNPU
WIPI1
USP39
SSB
CDCA7L
SNF8
LARS
ASH2L
VPS36
ZNF346
CRNKL1
TELO2
LRRC57
AASDHPPT
CNPY3
GLUL
CWC27
TNPO3
CHORDC1
CKAP2
CXADR
ILF2
PEG10
TTI2
MANBA
DCAF13
PLS1
LVRN
C1QBP
UBE2A
MEMO1
EIF4A3
EXTL2
MED24
GLYR1
UBXN1
MRPS18A
EIF5B
NIFK
POLR2H
HMOX2
ABCB6
NDUFB4
FNBP1L
NOL10
KIF5C
EXOSC9
ATP2B1
TOMM40
RBM28
GSTP1
TATDN1
FTSJ3
DAGLB
PLCG1
IFI16
HSPA4
TMEM192
MPI
SMPD4
POLE4
KDM1A
NUP188
TSFM
DLAT
FAM210A
POLR2D
NOL6
PRPF40A
UBAP2
MSTO1
GTF2I
SHPK
NUP133
RBM12B
DAB2IP
SAFB
LARP1
SPCS1
PDHA1
STX18
PPFIA1
NUP50
METTL13
SAAL1
QTRTD1
SUPT6H
ADSL
QSER1
POLR3C
TRMT1L
ASUN
BMP1
AFG3L2
GEMIN5
NEU1
PEX6
HDAC3
NDC80
MRRF
HMGN1
TIMM44
REEP6
OTX2
LPCAT1
MTPAP
SNU13
UMPS
TRIAP1
TUT1
GRSF1
NAA20
ACSS3
NCK1
ERBB2
CCDC28B
XRN2
NDUFAF4
MIF
PPP2R5A
SGSH
CRADD
MT-ND4
GATAD2A
MRPL9
RAD50
OSGEPL1
ADGRL2
MTUS2
NRBF2
FAM192A
DNPEP
THAP11
HEATR5B
RABGEF1
POP1
HEATR3
SRRM2
CACTIN
PRKD1
MRPL50
PRMT1
NIPBL
STK4
SLC25A35
ECE2
RPL13A
SDCBP
NTMT1
TBRG4
ZFAND6
DSEL
SDAD1
RPL21
PDCD5
PPIG
RALGAPB
MYO5C
TRMT6
RBM39
GULP1
DCP1A
IGSF1
POLG
UBE3A
SLC30A1
RFC4
TUBAL3
MGRN1
TPK1
KCTD10
SMAP
ACIN1
UBXN7
TMEM41A
DNAL1
F8A1,F8A2,F8A3
TKFC
BSG
ARHGEF40
FBP1
FBXL6
DFFB
TRIM33
EHBP1
ATP5S
CDC20
PLEKHA7
WDR73
CD70
EMC3
SLC9A3R1
COBLL1
TRIM9
SP1
YARS2
RBM19
CKMT1A,CKMT1B
HSP90AB3P
MRPL35
CCNA2
HDDC2
KDM3B
PPA1
SMARCAL1
MALSU1
AURKB
PPM1G
EARS2
HSP90AA1
SH3GL3
MPHOSPH6
NACC2
HMGB2
GTPBP4
ABCB10
CYP2U1
BSDC1
TLK1
LEO1
MFAP1
GIT1
FLCN
TYRO3
SH3PXD2A
EMC4
CPS1
INTS9
IRS2
SIRT3
FUT8
CDK2
TNFAIP6
SDHAF4
KITLG
ALDH3A1
GPR180
CFAP36
ANK3
CBX2
RBBP9
EML2
POLR3GL
FN3K
VWA5A
RAVER2
Four groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT/HDFs compared with MYCL-WT/HDFs using SeV on day 3, 5, or 7; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT compared with MYCL-WT using EpiP; (iii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT compared with c-MYC-ΔMB0 using EpiP; and (iv) commonly identified proteins. n=3 for EpiP reprogramming.
Table 3
MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed with MYCL-WT and c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared with MYCL-ΔMB0.
(i) Proteins enriched more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared with MYCL-ΔMB0 (EpiP)
UBQLN2
DYNLRB1
EXOC2
KRT17
NANS
ARL1
REEP5
RAB11B
ARPC2
TPM1
UTP15
TMPO
SGCD
WDR46
CD47
SLC44A2
RASA1
CETN2
TUBB2A
ALDH6A1
STRN3
FBXW10
BAP18
SNW1
HMGB1
POTEF
PDHA1
CAMK2D
TM9SF3
NFS1
PPIC
COMMD4
SCP2
MT-ATP6
YIPF5
MPI
HMGB3
TUSC3
COL3A1
ARF4
ATP5PB
MPDU1
PCNP
MYD88
GNB2
NUCKS1
LIMS1
USP15
SYAP1
RAC1
COG6
TMED2
LRBA
OVCA2
CHMP4B
MACF1
SOX2
PRKACA
MAPK14
CALD1
UTP3
SRSF11
SSR1
MID1
DUSP12
GBP1
BLOC1S1
EXOC5
CSTF3
PCID2
THOC3
ANP32B
ST6GALNAC1
DNAJC9
CACNA2D1
TRIP12
SRSF5
USP48
MAP3K20
MICAL1
NRDC
GADD45GIP1
VAC14
PDIA4
KNTC1
POLR2L
MSRB3
GTF2I
PDXDC1
SF3A3
BAG5
SFXN3
NOL11
ERLIN2
ZNF462
NUCB2
CD320
CRIP1
OSTC
DBNL
ITGB1
AGK
MRPL11
NAA10
RPL37A
STT3A
CTTN
PPIL3
TFG
ARF6
LZIC
PAFAH1B1
EEF1B2
IDI1
THYN1
CCDC43
BMP1
SLC25A24
UGP2
ELN
NDRG3
NEK7
PDCL3
HOOK3
LSM2
COL4A2
TMX4
TUBB4B
UGP2
LAS1L
ACTB
BUD31
SEPHS1
MYO1E
TNS3
HLA-H
RABL3
MAP2
RPL36A
FNTA
VPS26B
DCN
RWDD1
PAIP1
MYDGF
SRBD1
EHD1
PUM1
TOMM20
ITGA5
OPTN
DBI
ANKFY1
PUS7
CRABP2
GPX8
GNAQ
SUGP2
KBTBD3
KPNA4
VDAC3
TXLNG
ACSL4
MTA1
SCPEP1
METTL26
EDIL3
ATP5MG
ATP5ME
MAP7D1
FBLN2
B4GALT4
PLA2G4A
PIK3R4
ABI3BP
ACTG1
LDLR
MBD5
CTNNA1
PLBD2
ASAH1
HINT1
EXOSC7
CSRP1
RPL23A
ZYX
GNS
HMGN1
DIP2B
GNB1
TMEM165
COX7C
WDR61
PTGR1
PITRM1
SNRPB2
DNAH6
H3-3A,H3-3B
ARL8A
TMSB4X
METTL14
CNN2
DPP9
NCKAP1
MAP3K20
FAM114A1
TMSB10
PPIB
ENDOD1
AHNAK
NDRG1
FTH1
CNPY3
S100A10
NDUFB11
PGM2
PITPNA
SGTA
HABP2
C1orf198
NAA50
PODXL
NIF3L1
SGPL1
SRP9
MARCKSL1
DNAJC8
CFL2
NME2
CD59
NDUFB9
TOR1AIP1
NXN
STAT6
PFDN1
DHRS4
RBPJ
NDUFA4
MRPS17
TP53BP1
ATG3
GSPT1
DCTN5
ACSS2
REXO2
ATAD1
ACIN1
BLOC1S3
TMED1
GSTK1
PEBP1
EIF3K
RAB14
RFC3
AKR1B1
ISLR
S100A13
GPX7
SNAP23
CD55
TALDO1
NOP14
SLC25A6
TRIO
EMC2
RPS15A
DSTN
POLR2A
OSBPL3
TSPYL5
Three groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared to MYCL-ΔMB0; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared to MYCL-ΔMB0; and (iii) commonly identified proteins. n = 3.
MYCL regulates cytoskeleton- and cell adhesion-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB0 domain. (A) Schematic of the mass spectrometry (MS) and GO analysis (DAVID). (B) Venn diagram of upregulated proteins during iPSC-like colony formation. (C) Molecular functions from the GO analysis of the four groups in (B). (D) KEGG pathways from the GO analysis of the four groups in (B).MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed by MYCL- or c-MYC-ΔMB0.Four groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT/HDFs compared with c-MYC-WT/HDFs using SeV on day 3, 5, or 7; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared with c-MYC-WT using EpiP; (iii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared with c-MYC-WT using EpiP; and (iv) commonly identified proteins. Bold fonts in the group (ii) indicate identified proteins with p < 0.05 (two-sample paired t-test). n = 3 for EpiP reprogramming.MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed with c-MYC.Four groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT/HDFs compared with MYCL-WT/HDFs using SeV on day 3, 5, or 7; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT compared with MYCL-WT using EpiP; (iii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-WT compared with c-MYC-ΔMB0 using EpiP; and (iv) commonly identified proteins. n=3 for EpiP reprogramming.MS analysis of identified proteins in cells reprogrammed with MYCL-WT and c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared with MYCL-ΔMB0.Three groups are described: (i) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in MYCL-WT compared to MYCL-ΔMB0; (ii) proteins whose peptide counts increased more than two-fold in c-MYC-ΔMB0 compared to MYCL-ΔMB0; and (iii) commonly identified proteins. n = 3.We also compared phosphorylated proteins during SeV reprogramming with MYCL and c-MYC. In total, there was more than a two-fold relative increase of 17 phosphorylated proteins with MYCL-WT and 132 phosphorylated proteins with c-MYC-WT. The GO analysis indicated that the phosphorylated proteins increased by MYCL included cytoskeleton-related proteins and those increased by c-MYC included transcription-related proteins (Supplementary Fig. S11).
MYCL regulates RNA processing-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB2 domain
Our analysis also revealed that, along with the MYCL MB0 domain, the MYCL MB2 domain is important for reprogramming (Fig. 2B). It has been reported that the c-MYC MB2 domain is involved in transformation activity, and tryptophan 135 within the MB2 domain is necessary for this activity[10]. MYCL also has a tryptophan residue within its MB2 domain but little transformation activity[23]. We hypothesized that this domain in MYCL has reprogramming function. We therefore produced a mutant in which tryptophan 96 was substituted with glutamate (W96E). This tryptophan is equivalent to tryptophan 135 in c-MYC (Fig. 4A and Supplementary Fig. S5B). We confirmed the expression of MYCL-W96E by western blotting (Supplementary Fig. S12). Next, we examined the effect of MYCL-W96E for reprogramming. HDFs were transfected with reprogramming factors including MYCL-WT or -W96E. MYCL-W96E could not induce iPSC-like colonies, suggesting tryptophan 96 is crucial for reprogramming (Fig. 4B, C). We thus hypothesized that the residue might be important for MYCL to bind to other proteins. To identify the binding proteins, we produced GST-fusion recombinant proteins of the MYCL MB2 domain (Fig. 4A). GST-MYCL-MB2-WT or -W96E proteins were immobilized on glutathione Sepharose, and affinity columns were prepared. Cell lysates were applied to the column, and, after washing, the bound proteins were eluted. We used the cell lysates from reprogramming HDFs, but since it was difficult to collect a large amount, we also used cell lysates from hiPSCs. The reason for using the hiPSC lysates is that many of the proteins expressed in reprogramming HDFs are highly expressed in hiPSCs as well[16,24-27].
Figure 4
MYCL regulates RNA processing-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB2 domain. (A) W96 and W135 in the MB2 domain of MYCL and c-MYC, respectively. The structure with the recombinant protein of the MB2 domain of MYCL-WT/W96E is shown below. The numbers on the right indicate amino acid lengths. (B) The number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies derived from 1 × 105 HDFs transduced with EpiP including MYCL-WT or MYCL-W96E on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 by unpaired t-test. (C) Representative images of reprogramming HDFs 21 days after the transduction of EpiP, including MYCL-WT or MYCL-W96E. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) Venn diagram of enriched proteins between reprogramming HDFs and hiPSCs by AP-MS. A list of the 25 commonly enriched proteins is shown below. Blue indicates RBP (23 in total). (E) Molecular function from the GO analysis of the 25 commonly identified proteins in (D).
MYCL regulates RNA processing-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB2 domain. (A) W96 and W135 in the MB2 domain of MYCL and c-MYC, respectively. The structure with the recombinant protein of the MB2 domain of MYCL-WT/W96E is shown below. The numbers on the right indicate amino acid lengths. (B) The number of iPSC-like and non-iPSC-like colonies derived from 1 × 105 HDFs transduced with EpiP including MYCL-WT or MYCL-W96E on day 21. Mean ± SD values are shown. n = 3, *p < 0.05 by unpaired t-test. (C) Representative images of reprogramming HDFs 21 days after the transduction of EpiP, including MYCL-WT or MYCL-W96E. Scale bars, 100 μm. (D) Venn diagram of enriched proteins between reprogramming HDFs and hiPSCs by AP-MS. A list of the 25 commonly enriched proteins is shown below. Blue indicates RBP (23 in total). (E) Molecular function from the GO analysis of the 25 commonly identified proteins in (D).We identified 31 candidate proteins that bind to the MB2 domain of MYCL-WT but not of MYCL-W96E during reprogramming in the HDF lysates (Fig. 4D and Table 4). Of those 31 proteins, 25 proteins were also identified using hiPSC lysates, and 23 were RNA-binding proteins (RBPs; Fig. 4D, genes written in blue). Six proteins were identified only in the reprogramming HDFs lysates: HNRNPK, DDX17, C1QBP, KBTBD3, COPG2, and SIKE1, of which HNRNPK, DDX17, and C1QBP are RBPs. From these results, there were 26 RBPs identified in the HDF lysates in total. We confirmed the function of the 31 proteins using a public database (https://www.nextprot.org/)[28] and found 16 of them are involved in RNA processing. A GO analysis using DAVID also showed that the 31 proteins are related to controlling pre-mRNA splicing, capping, and polyadenylation, suggesting functions in mRNA export, turnover, localization, and translation (Fig. 4E). These results suggested that MYCL interacts with RBPs via its MB2 domain and promotes reprogramming by post-transcriptional regulation.
Table 4
AP-MS analysis of identified proteins in MYCL-MB2-WT using cell lysates from reprogrammed HDFs and hiPSCs.
(i) Proteins enriched more than two-fold in MYCL-MB2-WT compared with MYCL-MB2-W96E (reprogramming HDFs) (31)
HNRNPA1
HNRNPD
HNRNPDL
HNRNPA2B1
HNRNPA0
HNRNPA3
KHDRBS1
HNRNPAB
ALYREF
DDX5
HNRNPU
SYNCRIP
HNRNPR
HNRNPK
DDX17
C1QBP
FAU
RPL22
RPL37A
RPL23A
NCL
RPS24
RPL31
RPS4X
RPS7
CIRBP
MCFD2
KBTBD3
COPG2
PTGES3
SIKE1
Italic value
RNA binding proteins
Bold italic value
: RNA processing proteins
Three groups are described: (i) protein interactors whose peptide counts increased in reprogramming HDFs more than two-fold in MYCL-MB2-WT than MYCL-MB2-W96E; (ii) protein interactors whose peptide counts increased in hiPSCs more than two-fold in MYCL-MB2-WT compared to MYCL-MB2-W96E; and (iii) commonly identified proteins. n = 1.
AP-MS analysis of identified proteins in MYCL-MB2-WT using cell lysates from reprogrammed HDFs and hiPSCs.Three groups are described: (i) protein interactors whose peptide counts increased in reprogramming HDFs more than two-fold in MYCL-MB2-WT than MYCL-MB2-W96E; (ii) protein interactors whose peptide counts increased in hiPSCs more than two-fold in MYCL-MB2-WT compared to MYCL-MB2-W96E; and (iii) commonly identified proteins. n = 1.
Discussion
Here we described the molecular function of MYCL during reprogramming and compared it to the c-MYC function by focusing on MYC Box domains. We found that the MB0 and MB2 domains are important for reprogramming, and deleting either region compromised the reprogramming ability of MYCL. Proteomic analysis revealed that MYCL regulates the expression of cell adhesion-related proteins during reprogramming via the MB0 domain (Fig. 3C, D). We also found the possibility that the same domain is regulated by post-translational modifications (PTM), as discussed below. It is known that cell-substrate adhesion is closely related to the mesenchymal-epithelial transition (MET)[29] and that MET occurs during the reprogramming process[30-32]. We speculate that MYCL promotes iPSC-like colony formation via the MET process by upregulating cell adhesion-related genes. Furthermore, we identified that the MB2 domain is required for MYCL to promote reprogramming by binding to RBPs, especially RNA processing-related proteins (Fig. 4D, E). It has been reported that RBPs regulate MET through post-transcriptional regulation. For example, heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein (hnRNP) A1 regulates the alternative splicing of Rac1 to control MET[33]. These findings suggest that MYCL regulates the RNA processing of cell adhesion-related genes transcribed by MYCL itself or other genes. Therefore, we hypothesize that transcriptional and post-transcriptional regulation by MYCL promotes MET, which increases the efficiency of reprogramming and leads to higher quality iPSCs.Western blotting revealed that MYCL protein has a unique expression pattern (Supplementary Fig. S8 and S12). The calculated molecular weight of MYCL is about 40 kDa (364 aa), but we detected three strong bands at around 60 kDa, which we verified with second antibody (Supplementary Fig. S13). Since the expression of MYCL-ΔMB0 showed a strong single band, we speculate that the MYCL MB0 domain is the PTM site (Supplementary Fig. S8). Such a phenomenon was not observed in c-MYC (Supplementary Fig. S7). One possible type of relevant PTM is phosphorylation. Phosphorylation is crucial for protein function. For example, RNA polymerase II (Pol II) is required for transcription pauses in a promoter-proximal position during transcription initiation. In order to initiate transcription, the C-terminal domain of Pol II must be phosphorylated by P-TEFb[34]. In addition, the phosphorylation of c-MYC on threonine 58 in the MB1 domain promotes c-MYC binding to F-box and WD repeat domain containing 7 (FBXW7), causing the ubiquitination of c-MYC, which triggers c-MYC degradation[35]. Similarly, MYCL might undergo phosphorylation to change its activity and interaction with binding proteins. However, this hypothesis requires further study.Comprehensive proteomic analysis suggested that the MYCL MB0 domain influences the expression of cell adhesion-related proteins, and MYCL shows an up-regulation of phosphorylated cytoskeletal proteins (Fig. 3C, D, and Supplementary Fig. S11A). Cell adhesion is mediated by adhesion molecules, such as integrins and cadherins, which function in the extracellular matrix (ECM) and cell–cell adhesion and are important for cell communication and the regulation of fundamental physiological processes such as tissue development and maintenance[36,37]. Human iPSCs and hESCs have unique focal adhesion localization, and appropriate adhesion to the ECM is required to regulate reprogramming via MET and maintain pluripotency[38-40]. Accordingly, our study supports MYCL regulating cell-substrate adhesion through its MB0 domain to promote reprogramming. In other words, MYCL might regulate proteins involved in cell adhesion and the cytoskeleton directly or indirectly to cause MET and promote reprogramming. In c-MYC, loss of the MB0 domain positively affects iPSC-like colony formation, suggesting that this domain has a different function compared to MYCL. This functional difference is somewhat surprising since the domain is well conserved (Supplementary Fig. S5B). We would like to clarify this point in the future.We also found that the MB2 domain has an important function in MYCL-reprogramming (Fig. 2B,C). Deleting the MB2 domain completely compromised the reprogramming ability of MYCL. In c-MYC, the MB2 domain has an important function in transformation activity[14], and tryptophan 135 in the MB2 domain is essential for this activity. The equivalent tryptophan residue in MYCL is tryptophan 96. MYCL has little transformation activity, but we showed that the mutation of tryptophan 96 completely lost the reprogramming ability of MYCL. To further investigate the function, we sought interacting proteins by affinity column chromatography. We found 31 proteins, including 26 RBPs, that interact with the MYCL MB2 domain (Table 4, genes written in blue). A GO analysis suggested that some of the 31 proteins are involved in RNA processing (Table 4). It has been reported that altered RNA processing affects somatic cell reprogramming[41]. Therefore, we hypothesize that MYCL also promotes MET in reprogramming by regulating RNA processing via interactions with RBPs at its MB2 domain. An illustrative summary of how MYCL regulates cell reprogramming through these two domains is shown in Fig. 5.
Figure 5
Model of the reprogramming process by MYCL. MYCL promotes iPSC-like colonies via its MB0 and MB2 domains. The MB0 domain regulates the expression of cell-adhesion proteins, possibly via post-translational modifications (PTM). The MB2 domain regulates RNA processing by interacting with RNA-binding proteins (RBP). We speculate that MYCL promotes reprogramming through the synergistic effects of these two mechanisms.
Model of the reprogramming process by MYCL. MYCL promotes iPSC-like colonies via its MB0 and MB2 domains. The MB0 domain regulates the expression of cell-adhesion proteins, possibly via post-translational modifications (PTM). The MB2 domain regulates RNA processing by interacting with RNA-binding proteins (RBP). We speculate that MYCL promotes reprogramming through the synergistic effects of these two mechanisms.To conclude, we have demonstrated that MYCL promotes more efficient reprogramming than c-MYC, regulates the expression of cell adhesion and cytoskeletal proteins, and is involved in RNA processing via a single tryptophan residue in the MB2 domain. Following these findings, we propose that MYCL causes MET by regulating the expression of proteins involved in the promotion of reprogramming from the RNA-processing stage. Further elucidation of the function of MYCL in reprogramming will improve the quality and efficiency of iPSC generation.
Material and methods
Cell culture
HDFs (106-05f.) were purchased from Cell Applications, Inc. HDFs were cultured in DMEM (08459-64, Nacalai Tesque) supplemented with 10% FBS (10439-024, gibco) and 1% penicillin and streptomycin (15140-122, Pen/Strep, gibco). The hiPSC clone 201B7 was used in this study[2]. iPSCs were cultivated on iMatrix-511 (NP892-012, Nippi)-coated (0.5 μg/cm[2]) cell culture plates with StemFit (AK03N, Ajinomoto) supplemented with bFGF and passaged via dissociation into single cells using TrypLE Select (A12859-01, Life Technologies) on day 7 following a previously reported protocol[42].
Generation of iPSCs
A frozen stock of HDFs was thawed and cultured for four days, and then 1 × 105 cells were collected by trypsinization. With SeV, HDFs were transduced with the CytoTune-iPS 2.0 (c-MYC) or CytoTune-iPS 2.0L (MYCL) Sendai Reprogramming Kit (DV-0304, DV-0305, ID Pharma). With EpiP, HDFs were electroporated with 1.2 μg of plasmid mixtures with the Neon Transfection System (MPK1096 and MPK10096, Invitrogen). The plasmid mixtures included pCXLE-SOX2, -KLF4, -OCT3/4-shp53, -LIN28A, and pCXWB-EBNA1 with wild-type or mutant pCXLE-c-MYC or -MYCL[17]. The mixing ratio of SOX2, KLF4, OCT3/4-shp53, LIN28A, EBNA1, and c-MYC/MYCL was 1:1:2:1:0.5:2. After that, the cells were plated in a 6-well plate and cultured in StemFit AK03N without bFGF with iMatrix-511 at 0.25 μg/cm2 in SeV or 0.125 μg/cm2 in EpiP. The culture medium was changed the next day and every three days after that. The colonies were counted 21 days after plating.
Episomal plasmid vector construction for deletion mutants of c-MYC and MYCL
We previously generated pCXLE-c-MYC and -MYCL from human cDNAs encoding c-MYC and MYCL amplified by PCR and cloned into pENTR1A[17]. Primers for the deletion mutants were designed using the Primer Design tool for the In-Fusion HD Cloning Kit (639650, Takara) and inserted into pENTR1A. The switch from pENTR1A to pCXLE was done using the Gateway system (11791020, Invitrogen). The primers used are listed in Table S1.
Immunostaining
The cells were fixed with 4% formaldehyde (163-20145, Wako) for 20 min at room temperature. Then, the fixed cells were treated with PBS (14249-24, Nacalai Tesque) containing 0.5% Triton X-100 (35501-15, Nacalai Tesque) and 3% bovine serum albumin (01281-84, BSA, Nacalai Tesque) for 20 min at room temperature for permeabilization. The cells were incubated with primary antibodies diluted in PBS containing 3% BSA at 4℃ overnight. After washing with PBS, the cells were incubated with fluorescence-conjugated secondary antibodies for 1 h at room temperature. Nuclei were visualized with Hoechst 33342 (346-07951, DOJINDO). Anti-TRA-1-60 (1:500, 560071, BD Pharmingen, and 1:500, 09-0068, Stemgent) and Alexa 488-conjugated goat anti-mouse IgG, IgM (H + L) (1:250, A10680, Invitrogen) were used as the antibodies.
Imaging and quantification
Stained cells were imaged using a BZ-9000 imaging system (KEYENCE) or ArrayScan High-Content Systems (Thermo Fisher Scientific). HCS Studio 2.0 Cell Analysis Software (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was used to quantify cell counts and signal intensities. The Cellomics BioApplication system (Thermo Fisher Scientific) was programmed to capture and analyze 25 images per well. The total cell number was detected by Hoechst 33342 staining. The number of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells was calculated as the number of TRA-1-60 ( +) cells among Hoechst ( +) cells. TRA-1-60 ( +) cells were calculated by dividing this number by the total cell number.
Flow cytometry
Transduced cells were harvested with 0.25% trypsin/1 mM EDTA (25200-056, gibco) each day after the transduction for the analysis. At least 5 × 104 cells were stained with the following antibodies in FACS buffer (2% FBS, 0.36% glucose (16806-25, Nacalai Tesque), 50 μg/μL Pen/Strep in PBS) for 30 min at room temperature: BV510-conjugated anti-TRA-1-60 (1:40, 563188, BD Biosciences) and PE-Cy7-conjugated anti-CD13 (1:40, 561599, BD Biosciences) antibodies. The analysis was performed using MACSQuant Analyzers (Miltenyi Biotec). Negative controls used a mixture of HDFs without any EpiP transduction and reprogramming HDFs electroporated with EpiP including c-MYC or MYCL. “Isotype” means mixed HDFs stained with the isotype control of anti-TRA-1-60 (1:40, 563082, BD Biosciences) and -CD13 (1:40, 557646, BD Biosciences) antibodies.
SDS-PAGE
Cells were lysed with SDS sample buffer (0.125 M Tris-base (35434-21, Nacalai Tesque), 0.96 M glycine (17109-35, Nacalai Tesque), and 17.3 mM SDS (31606-75, Nacalai Tesque)) containing 3-mercaptoethanol (139-16452, Wako). Samples were applied and separated in an 8% polyacrylamide gel composed of 30% (w/v)-Acrylamide/Bis Mixed Solution (29:1) (06141-35, Nacalai Tesque), Separating Gel Buffer Solution (4x) (30651-05, Nacalai Tesque) and Stacking Gel Buffer Solution (4x) (32158-25, Nacalai Tesque) for SDS-PAGE.
Western blotting
Proteins on an SDS-PAGE gel were transferred to a PVDF membrane (IPVH00010, Immobilon-P, Millipore) and probed with the following antibodies using an iBind Flex system (SLF2000, SLF2010 and SLF2020, Invitrogen): anti-human MYCL (1:250, AF4050, R&D) (1:250, C-20, sc-790, Santa Cruz), anti-human c-MYC (1:500, 9E10, sc-40, Santa Cruz, and 1:500, D84C12, CST), anti-β-actin (1:1000, A5441, SIGMA), anti-Goat (1:3000, ab6741-1, abcam), anti-mouse (1:3000, 7076S, CST), and anti-rabbit (1:3000, 7074S, CST) antibodies.
Preparation of recombinant proteins and affinity purification (AP)
The MB2 region of MYCL-WT or -W96E was cloned into pGEX-6P-1. The plasmids were transformed into BL21 E. coli (DE3) (L1198, Promega) competent cells. The fusion proteins, GST-MYCL-WT-MB2 and GST-MYCL-W96E-MB2, were induced by treatment with 0.5 mM IPTG (19742-94, Nacalai Tesque) for 4 h at 37 °C. The proteins were purified using glutathione Sepharose beads (17-0756-01, GE Healthcare). Human iPSCs or reprogramming HDFs were lysed in RIPA buffer (20 mM Tris/HCl (pH 7.6) (35436-01, Nacalai Tesque), 1% NP-40 (25223-75, Nacalai Tesque), 0.1% SDS, 150 mM NaCl (31320-05, Nacalai Tesque), and protease inhibitor (25955-11, Nacalai Tesque)) and then centrifuged. Cell lysates (supernatant) were transferred into a column (29922, Thermo Fisher Scientific) packed with beads conjugated with GST- MYCL-WT or -W96E proteins. After washing, binding proteins were eluted in lysis buffer (12 mM sodium deoxycholate (190-08313, Wako), 12 mM sodium lauroyl sarcosinate (192-10382, Wako), and 100 mM Tris-HCl (pH9.0) (314-90381, NIPPON GENE)) for the MS analysis. The iPSC lysates were prepared 6 days after passaging in two 10-cm dishes (n = 1), and reprogramming HDF lysates were prepared 3 days after SeV transduction in five 10-cm dishes (n = 1).
GO analysis by DAVID
The Database for Annotation, Visualization, and Integrated Discovery (DAVID Bioinformatics Resources 6.8) was used to identify enriched biological GO terms and KEGG pathway[43-45]. For more information, please visit the DAVID website (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/home.jsp) and KEGG Database website (https://www.kegg.jp/kegg/kegg1.html).The methods for MS are described in the Supplementary methods.Supplementary Information 1.Supplementary Information 2.Supplementary Information 3.
Authors: Elisa Närvä; Aki Stubb; Camilo Guzmán; Matias Blomqvist; Diego Balboa; Martina Lerche; Markku Saari; Timo Otonkoski; Johanna Ivaska Journal: Stem Cell Reports Date: 2017-06-15 Impact factor: 7.765