| Literature DB >> 34930305 |
Jianguo Chen1,2, Chaoran Huang1,2, Tongtong Zhang3, Wuqing Gong2, Xiaofeng Deng4, Hua Liu5, Jinbo Liu1, Yuanbiao Guo6,7.
Abstract
Several clinical studies showed that statins were potential to treat polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). Through comprehensive search PubMed, EMBASE, the Web of Science, BIOSIS, the ClinialTrails.gov, and the Cochrane Library database up to 14 Feb 2020, we identified the randomized controlled trials about the treatment of statins on hyperandrogenism in PCOS women, and performed a systematic review and meta-analysis. The quality of the included studies was assessed by the Cochrane risk of bias tool and the Jadda score. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were conducted to analyze the pooled results. Nine trials included 682 PCOS patients were identified. Statins showed a significant potential to reduce testosterone (SMD = -0.47; 95% CI, - 0.76-- 0.18; P = 0.002) and dehydroepiandrosterone (SMD = -0.51; 95% CI, - 0.97-- 0.05; P = 0.03) levels, compared to the control treatments. The cutaneous symptoms hirsutism (SMD = -0.61; 95% CI, - 1.13-- 0.10; P = 0.02) and acne (SMD = -0.92; 95% CI, - 1.49-- 0.34; P = 0.002) were significantly improved by statins in PCOS women. Subgroup analysis showed that the two types of statins, and the different control treatments as well, presented no significantly different effect on testosterone and dehydroepiandrosterone. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the stability of the findings from the meta-analysis. In conclusion, statin treatment could significantly reduce androgen levels and improve cutaneous manifestations of hyperandrogenism of PCOS.Entities:
Keywords: Hydroxymethylglutaryl-CoA Reductase inhibitors; Hyperandrogenism; Meta-analysis; Polycystic ovary syndrome; Randomized controlled trials
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34930305 PMCID: PMC8686603 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00863-5
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Reprod Biol Endocrinol ISSN: 1477-7827 Impact factor: 4.982
Fig. 1Flowchart of the selection of studies
Characteristics of the studies included in the meta-analysis
| Publication author, year | Country | Jadad score | Treatment arm A | Treatment arm B | Time of therapy | Sample size | Outcomes | Assessment method/Unit of primary outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seyam 2018 [ | Egypt | 5 | Simvastatin(20 mg/d) +Metformin(1.5 g/d) | Metformin(1.5 g/d) | 12 months | 70/65 | T,DHEA, Hirsutism | ELISA assay/ ng/ml |
| Seyam 2017 [ | Egypt | 4 | Simvastatin(20 mg/d) | Placebo | 6 months | 100/100 | T,DHEA, Hirsutism,Acne | chemiluminescence assays/ ng/ml |
| Puurunen 2013 [ | Finland | 5 | Atorvastatin 20 mg/d | Placebo | 6 months | 15/13 | T,DHEA, And | Liquid mass spectrometry/ nmol/l |
| Sathyapalan 2009 [ | United Kingdom | 5 | Atorvastatin 20 mg/d | Placebo | 3 months | 19/18 | T | Immunoassay/ nmol/l |
| Banaszewska 2011 [ | Poland | 3 | Simvastatin(20 mg/d) +Metformin(1.7 g/d) | Metformin(1.7 g/d) | 6 months | 36/33 | T,DHEA, Hirsutism,Acne | enzymatic colorimetric assays/ ng/ml |
| Raja 2011 [ | American | 4 | Atorvastatin(40 mg/d) | placebo | 1.5 months | 9/11 | T,DHEA,And Hirsutism,Acne | not report/ ng/dl |
| Rashidi 2011 [ | Iran | 5 | Simvastatin(20 mg/d) | placebo | 2 months | 32/29 | T,DHEAS | chemiluminescence assays/ pg/ml |
| Kazerooni 2010 [ | Iran | 5 | Simvastatin(20 mg/d) +Metformin(1.5 g/d) | Metformin(1.5 g/d) | 3 months | 42/42 | T,DHEA,Hirsutism | Radioimmunoassay/ ng/ml |
| Duleba 2005 [ | Poland | 2 | simvastatin, 20 mg +OCP | OCP | 3 month | 24/24 | T,DHEA | chemiluminescence assays/ ng/dl |
T testosterone, DHEA dehydroepiandrosterone, And androstenedione, OCP oral contraceptive pills; containing 20 μg ethinyl E2 and 150 μg desogestrel
Fig. 2Risk of bias
Fig. 3Summary of risk of bias
Fig. 4Forest plot of the effect of statins on the levels of testosterone
Fig. 5Forest plot of the effect of statins on the levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA)
Fig. 6Forest plot of the effect of statins on the levels of androstenedione
Fig. 7Forest plot of the effect of statins on the hirsutism
Fig. 8Forest plot of the effect of statins on acne
Subgroup analysis in testosterone and DHEA
| Subgrouped by | No. of trials | WMD (95% CI) | P for heterogeneity | I2 (%) | P for between Subgroup heterogeneity | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| total | 9 | -0.47[−0.76,-0.18] | 0.002 | 0.002 | 68 | |
| Statin type | 0.86 | |||||
| Simvastatin | 6 | -0.48 [−0.77, − 0.18] | 0.002 | 0.002 | 66 | |
| Atorvastatin | 3 | −0.39 [−1.38, 0.61] | 0.45 | 0.007 | 80 | |
| Contol type | 0.90 | |||||
| Placebo | 5 | -0.39 [−0.86, 0.09] | 0.11 | 0.008 | 71 | |
| Metformin | 3 | −0.43 [− 0.84, − 0.02] | 0.04 | 0.06 | 65 | |
| total | 7 | −0.51 [− 0.97, − 0.05] | 0.03 | < 0.001 | 84 | |
| Statin type | 0.79 | |||||
| Simvastatin | 5 | −0.46 [−1.02, 0.09] | 0.10 | < 0.001 | 89 | |
| Atorvastatin | 2 | −0.62 [−1.70, 0.45] | 0.25 | < 0.001 | 67 | |
| Contol type | 0.70 | |||||
| Placebo | 3 | −0.49 [−1.44, 0.46] | 0.31 | < 0.001 | 93 | |
| Metformin | 3 | −0.70 [−1.20, − 0.21] | 0.005 | 0.15 | 47 | |
Sensitivity analysis of Testosterone and DHEA
| Excluded study | Testosterone | DHEA | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMD | 95CI | SMD | 95CI | |
| None | −0.47 | [−0.76,-0.18] | − 0.51 | [− 0.97,-0.05] |
| Seyam 2018 | − 0.48 | [− 0.84,-0.13] | −0.33 | [− 0.73,0.06] |
| Seyam 2017 | −0.53 | [− 0.85, 0.21] | −0.46 | [−1.04, 0.13] |
| Puurunen 2013 | −0.53 | [−0.83, 0.22] | − 0.57 | [−1.07,-0.06] |
| Banaszewska 2011 | −0.53 | [− 0.85, 0.21] | −0.61 | [−1.10,-0.12] |
| Raja 2011 | −0.51 | [−0.81, 0.20] | − 0.43 | [− 0.92,0.06] |
| Rashidi 2011 | − 0.44 | [− 0.76, 0.12] | – | – |
| Kazerooni 2010 | − 0.41 | [− 0.72, 0.11] | −0.59 | [− 1.09,-0.09] |
| Sathyapalan 2009 | −0.39 | [− 0.66, 0.12] | – | – |
| Duleba 2005 | −0.40 | [− 0.70, 0.11] | − 0.60 | [− 1.05,-0.16] |
Fig. 9Funnel plot of the studies included in the meta-analysis