| Literature DB >> 34929674 |
Babak Dehestani1, Nicholas Rs Stratford1, Carel W le Roux1.
Abstract
Obesity is defined as abnormal or excessive fat accumulation that contributes to detrimental health impacts. One-third of the population suffers from obesity, and it is important to consider obesity as a chronic disease requiring chronic treatment. Amylin is co-secreted with insulin from β pancreatic cells upon nutrient delivery to the small intestine as a satiety signal, acts upon sub-cortical homeostatic and hedonic brain regions, slows gastric emptying, and suppresses post-prandial glucagon responses to meals. Therefore, new pharmacological amylin analogues can be used as potential anti-obesity medications in individuals who are overweight or obese. In this narrative review, we analyse the efficacy, potency, and safety of amylin analogues. The synthetic amylin analogue pramlintide is an approved treatment for diabetes mellitus which promotes better glycaemic control and small but significant weight loss. AM833 (cagrilintide), an investigational novel long-acting acylated amylin analogue, acts as a non-selective amylin receptor. This calcitonin G protein-coupled receptor agonist can serve as an attractive novel treatment for obesity, resulting in reduction of food intake and significant weight loss in a dose-dependent manner.Entities:
Keywords: Analogue; Obesity; Satiety; Treatment; Weight loss
Year: 2021 PMID: 34929674 PMCID: PMC8735818 DOI: 10.7570/jomes21071
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Obes Metab Syndr ISSN: 2508-6235
Figure 1Amylin functions as a satiety hormone. Released into the bloodstream by β pancreatic cells, amylin activates various homeostatic and reward centres in the brain to suppress appetite and reduce food intake. In addition, amylin acts as an inhibitory signal to delay gastric emptying and suppress the release of glucagon from α pancreatic cells. POMC, proopiomelanocortin; ARC, arcuate nucleus; BNST, bed nucleus of the stria terminalis; NTS, nucleus tractus solitarius; LPBN, lateral parabrachial nucleus; AP, area postrema.
Baseline characteristics of trials included in this review
| Study | Study duration, Hawken et al. (2019)[ | Blinding | Study arm | Number of patients randomized | BMI (kg/m2) | Body weight (kg) | Age (yr), Hawken et al. (2019)[ | Female (%) | Significant loss in body weight vs. placebo |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Smith et al. (2008)[ | 16 | Double-blind, placebo controlled | 120 μg pramlintide bid | 38 | 37.5± 5.0 | 105.1± 19.9 | 43.0± 11.0 | 73 | Yes |
| 240 μg pramlintide bid | 38 | 37.7± 5.1 | 105.6± 18.0 | 46.0± 12.0 | 71 | Yes | |||
| 360 μg pramlintide bid | 32 | 38.1± 5.4 | 107.7± 19.5 | 45.0± 14.0 | 72 | Yes | |||
| 120 μg pramlintide tid | 45 | 37.2± 4.9 | 104.7± 19.2 | 44.0± 14.0 | 75 | Yes | |||
| 240 μg pramlintide tid | 49 | 37.8± 5.5 | 106.9± 22.1 | 44.0± 12.0 | 71 | Yes | |||
| 360 μg pramlintide tid | 42 | 37.7± 4.6 | 108.1± 17.2 | 46.0± 13.0 | 73 | Yes | |||
| Placebo | 36 | 37.2± 4.4 | 104.0± 17.8 | 47.0± 12.0 | 73 | NA | |||
| Enebo et al. (2021)[ | 20 | Randomized, placebo controlled | 0.16 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 12 | 31.0± 32.0 | 93.0± 10.6 | 43.0± 9.2 | 33 | No |
| 0.30 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 12 | 30.8± 2.3 | 92.9± 11.7 | 38.4± 10.4 | 42 | No | |||
| 0.60 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 12 | 333± 3.7 | 9.3± 11.7 | 40.0± 8.3 | 50 | No | |||
| 1.20 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 12 | 32.6± 4.4 | 95.1± 14.4 | 41.3± 11.1 | 50 | Yes | |||
| 2.40 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 12 | 32.2± 2.5 | 92.1± 11.9 | 43.0± 8.1 | 58 | Yes | |||
| 4.50 mg cagrilintide+2.4 mg semaglutide | 11 | 33.0± 4.2 | 98.0± 17.3 | 37.0± 9.7 | 27 | Yes | |||
| Placebo+2.4 mg semaglutide | 24 | 32.2± 3.0 | 99.6± 15.6 | 41.0± 8.8 | 33 | NA | |||
| Riddle et al. (2007)[ | 16 | Double-blind, placebo controlled | 120 μg pramlintide bid or tid | 107 | 35.0± 6.0 | 103.0± 18.0 | 55.0± 10.0 | 48 | Yes |
| Placebo | 105 | 35.0± 5.0 | 103.0± 18.0 | 55.0± 9.0 | 54 | NA | |||
| Smith et al. (2007)[ | 6 | Double-blind, placebo controlled | 180 μg before meals | 60 | 35.3± 3.6 | 100.2± 14.3 | 49.9± 9.0 | 50 | Yes |
| Placebo | 28 | 36.3± 4.7 | 103.2± 17.8 | 51.0± 8.0 | 50 | NA | |||
| Aronne et al. (2007)[ | 16 | Double-blind, placebo controlled | 240 μg tid | 137 | 37.9± 5.7 | 105.5± 18.4 | 48.0± 10.0 | 80 | Yes |
| Placebo | 67 | 37.6± 5.5 | 104.9± 19.1 | 19.0± 10.0 | 81 | NA | |||
| Lau et al. (2021)[ | 26 | Double-blind, placebo controlled | 0.3 mg cagrilintide once weekly | 101 | 38.4± 7.5 | 109.8± 25.1 | 53.5± 10.3 | 55 | Yes |
| 0.6 mg cagrilintide once weekly | 100 | 37.2± 6.9 | 106.2± 23.8 | 53.2± 11.0 | 62 | Yes | |||
| 1.2 mg cagrilintide once weekly | 102 | 37.1± 6.2 | 104.4± 21.5 | 52.1± 8.7 | 63 | Yes | |||
| 2.4 mg cagrilintide once weekly | 102 | 37.9± 7.6 | 106.8± 24.1 | 52.7± 9.8 | 75 | Yes | |||
| 4.5 mg cagrilintide once weekly | 101 | 38.4± 7.7 | 111.0± 28.6 | 51.5± 12.7 | 56 | Yes | |||
| 3.0 mg liraglutide qd | 99 | 38.4± 7.4 | 107.8± 24.1 | 51.5± 59.3 | 65 | NA | |||
| Placebo | 101 | 37.1± 5.7 | 106.2± 21.6 | 51.4± 11.9 | 59 | NA |
Values are presented as mean± standard deviation.
*Significant weight loss was achieved versus placebo and liraglutide arms in the context of a comparable weight loss trial.
BMI, body mass index; bid, twice a day; tid, three times a day; qd, once a day.