| Literature DB >> 34926383 |
Anup M Upadhyaya1,2,3, Mohammad Kamrul Hasan4, S Abdel-Khalek5, Rosilah Hassan4, Maneesh C Srivastava1,2, Preeta Sharan3, Shayla Islam6, Asma Mohammed Elbashir Saad7, Nguyen Vo8.
Abstract
This study presented an overview of current developments in optical micro-electromechanical systems in biomedical applications. Optical micro-electromechanical system (MEMS) is a particular class of MEMS technology. It combines micro-optics, mechanical elements, and electronics, called the micro-opto electromechanical system (MOEMS). Optical MEMS comprises sensing and influencing optical signals on micron-level by incorporating mechanical, electrical, and optical systems. Optical MEMS devices are widely used in inertial navigation, accelerometers, gyroscope application, and many industrial and biomedical applications. Due to its miniaturised size, insensitivity to electromagnetic interference, affordability, and lightweight characteristic, it can be easily integrated into the human body with a suitable design. This study presented a comprehensive review of 140 research articles published on photonic MEMS in biomedical applications that used the qualitative method to find the recent advancement, challenges, and issues. The paper also identified the critical success factors applied to design the optimum photonic MEMS devices in biomedical applications. With the systematic literature review approach, the results showed that the key design factors could significantly impact design, application, and future scope of work. The literature of this paper suggested that due to the flexibility, accuracy, design factors efficiency of the Fibre Bragg Grating (FBG) sensors, the demand has been increasing for various photonic devices. Except for FBG sensing devices, other sensing systems such as optical ring resonator, Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), and photonic crystals are used, which still show experimental stages in the application of biosensing. Due to the requirement of sophisticated fabrication facilities and integrated systems, it is a tough choice to consider the other photonic system. Miniaturisation of complete FBG device for biomedical applications is the future scope of work. Even though there is a lot of experimental work considered with an FBG sensing system, commercialisation of the final FBG device for a specific application has not been seen noticeable progress in the past.Entities:
Keywords: blood pressure; fibre bragg grating; intraocular pressure; microcantilever; optical MEMS (optical micro electro mechanical system); orthodontic; pressure sensor; urodynamic
Mesh:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34926383 PMCID: PMC8674308 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.759032
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Public Health ISSN: 2296-2565
Figure 1(A) MOEMS overview chart, (B) different types of Optical MEMS.
Figure 2(A) MOEMS as sensor, (B) MOEMS as actuator.
Figure 3(A) Mach-Zehnder Interferometer working process, (B) intensity of sensor with various length and refractive index of core (6).
Figure 4(A,B) Transmission spectra and sensitivity calculation of Machzehnder Interferometer (12).
Figure 5Presents the various Microcantilever: Photonic crystal integrated Microcantilever (A), ring resonator integrated Microcantilever (B), FBG integrated Microcantilever (C), MZI Integrated with Microcantilever (D), array of Microcantilever with the microfluidic channel (E).
Figure 6Peak resonant wavelength for sensing structure (A) fixed at one end. (B) Fixed at both the end (35). (C) Hexagonal photonic crystal ring resonator-based pressure-temperature sensor (36).
Figure 7(A) Fiber bragg grating working process during the application of pressure (27). (B) Strain evolution of bulk flow resin during polymerization (28). (C) Temperature evolution of bulk flow resin during polymerization (29).
Performance comparison of selected sensors.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Interferometer | MZI | Three core fibre for measurement of directional bending | TE | n.r. | Bending sensitivity −15.35 nm/m−1 and 3.11 nm/m−1
| ( |
| Diaphragm Integrated MZI | Analysing to light intensity with diaphragm deflection | TE | n.r. | −0.2 pm/Pa | ( | |
| MZI | Lab on chip biosensor with MZI Phase modulator | <0.05 L/min), a high resolution (0.005 L/min), and a fast response time (12 millis | n.r. | ( | ||
| MZI | Methylcellulose coated MZI for humidity sensing | TE | 45–85% RH | 0.094 dB/%RH | ( | |
| MZI | MZI Ultrasound Sensor | TE | 0.38 mPa/Hz1/2 | 0.62 mV/Pa | ( | |
| MZI | MZI temperature sensor | TE | n.r. | 21.2 nm/C | ( | |
| MZI | MZI Respiratory monitoring | TE | n.r. | Sensitivity upto 8.53 dB/m-1 | ( | |
| Photonic MEMS /Microcantilever | Photonic Microcantilever | Photonic Microcantilever for chemical analysis | TE | 0.6 mum and 0.0098% in water and 0.812 mum and 0.0144% in air, | n.r. | ( |
| Optical MEMS microcantilever | Various shape microcantilever integration with Optical MEMS | NA | 81.55 μg−28.39 mg (polyimide material –Triangular cantilever. 50.97 μg−23.996 mg (Parylene material | n.r. | ( | |
| MOEMS | MOEMS nanomechanical sensor | TE | 0–0.10 MPa;(One end fixed) | 68.296 nm/MPa (fixed one end) | ( | |
| Photonic crystal fibre | Hybrid dual-core photonic crystal fibre | TE | 0 to 1,000 Mpa | −11.6 pm/Mpa. | ( | |
| Photonic crystal | Pressure and Temperature sensor with hexagonal resonator | TE | 0.04 to 6 GPa | n.r. | ( | |
| Microcantilever Hexagonal ring resonator | hexagonal ring and micromachined cantilever tips on 2D silicon photonic crystal | TE | 1–10 MPa, 10–100 MPa, 1-MPa −20MPa, 20 MPa−10 GPa | n.r. | ( | |
| Fibre Bragg Grating | FBG sensor for biomedical | Polymer optical fibre Bragg grating analysis | TE | n.r. | 54.2 pm %RH−1 ± 0.14%RH | ( |
| FBG for biomedical | Integrated nano-optomechanical displacement sensor | Displacement imprecision of only 45 FM/Hz1/2 as well as a large dynamic range (>30 nm). | n.r. | ( | ||
| Fibre pressure sensor | Multi-Point Optical Fibre | TE | n.r. | −0.672 rad/MPa | ( | |
| CMOS based Nanomechanical sensor | CMOS MEMS-based nanomechanical sensor for molecule detection | NA | 4.06 ± 0.15 μg/mL | n.r. | ( | |
| FBG force sensor | FBG force sensor for tissue palpation | TE | 0–5 N | n.r. | ( |
Not reported.
Figure 8(A) Optical MEMS sensors application in the human body (50). (B) Dental X-Ray imaging of cracks by green near infrared imaging (51). (C) Dental OCT imaging (53). (D) FBG integration with human mandibular (52).
Figure 9Spinal cord parts of human with integrated FBG sensor (A) (57). Intervertebral disk in the spinal cord (B) (52). FBG sensor integrated with intervertebral disk (C) (57).
Figure 10(A) Microfluidic channel with photonic crystal integration (81). (B) Intraocular pressure development in the eye (82). (C) Human cochlear system (83).
Key applications of Optical MEMS in biomedical.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dental | Optical Coherence Tomography |
| Carries, cracked tooth | B-mode PAT is good at providing microstructural properties. | ( |
| Fibre Bragg Grating |
| Force monitoring in maxilla model | Force range detected 0–20 N | ( | |
| Intervertebral disc | Fibre Bragg Grating |
| Pressure monitoring in intervertebral disc | Pressure range between 0 and 500 N | ( |
| Lumbar motion | Fibre Bragg grating |
| Lumbar stretch monitoring | Rotation angle upto 0–35°C | ( |
| Low back motion | Optical fibre |
| Low back movements monitoring | Sensitivity 0.20 nm·mε−1 | ( |
| Join angle | Fibre Bragg grating |
| Goniometer | Joint angles in the range of 0–200° with a resolution of 0.06° | ( |
| Insole pressure | Optical fibre |
| Insole force monitoring | Sensitivity 11.06 pm/N | ( |
| Communication assistance | Optical fibre |
| Using breath pattern analyser | Average accuracy of the device obtained 90% | ( |
| Pulse wave and respiratory | MEMS + Optical |
| Pulse pressure monitoring | Minimum detectable pressure 0.01 Pa | ( |
| Microfluidic | Photonic crystal |
| Fluid flow sensing | Sensitivity 836 nm/RIU | ( |
| Intraocular | Optical MEMS |
| Glaucoma Monitoring | accuracy of 0.29 mm | ( |
| Oximetry | Optical Fibre |
| Oxygen monitoring by the contact force | Detection limit of 5-15KPa | ( |
| Pulse wave monitoring | Optical fibre and FBG |
| Pulse wave signals | POF-FBG APG correlation is distributed from 0.54 to 0.72 | ( |
| Urodynamic measurement | Optical fibre pressure sensor |
| Urodynamic Pressure | 0.1 cm H2O (~10 Pa), a stability better than 1 cm H2O/h | ( |
Figure 11(A) Back view showing the posterior part of the wearable devices with embedded sensor and and front view showing the anterior part of the embedded sensor (118). (B) Signal collected by flow meter and FBG during quite breathing and tachypnea (119).
Summary of application.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Dental | ❖ Prediction of dental carries using optical sensor |
| 2 | Intervertebral disc | ❖ Load distribution over intertribal disc during tensile and compressive stress has been monitored. |
| 3 | Lumbar motion | ❖ Load distribution over lumbar disc during tensile and compressive stress has been monitored. |
| 4 | Joint angle, gait analysis, insole pressure | ❖ Integration of FBG sensor in insole for foot pressure monitoring in diabetic and arthritis patients. |
| 5 | Communication assistance | ❖ Development of communication assistance based on eye blinking integrated with FBG sensor signals |
| 6 | Pulse wave and respiratory, body pressure | ❖ Different pressure points of the body are monitored with FBG sensor |
| 7 | Intraocular | ❖ Optical fibre based sensor has been used to detect the glaucoma in patients |
| 8 | Urodynamic measurement | ❖ Optical fibre has been incorporated with catheter to |
| 9 | Microfluidic system | ❖ FBG sensor has been integrated with different microfluidic channel for biosensing applications |
| 10 | Handgrip | ❖ FBG sensor for integrated with gloves, designed handgrip models, |
Figure 12Major applications of optical MEMS in biomedical.
Critical factors of optical MEMS.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Key factor 1 | ( | 49 papers |
| Key factor 2 | ( | 60 papers |
| Key factor 3 | ( | 28 papers |
Figure 13Major applications and TRL (technology readiness level) of optical MEMS sensing system in biomedical.
Figure 14(A) Presents trend of Optical MEMS market (127). (B) Optical MEMS market growth until 2023 (127–133).