| Literature DB >> 34925051 |
Yujin Zhao1,2, Yue Li1,2, Jiaxu Hong1,2,3, Qihua Le1,2, Jianjiang Xu1,2.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to evaluate the impact of keratoplasty on the in vivo anatomical structures in the Schlemm's canal (SC) of nonglaucomatous subjects using Fourier-domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT).Entities:
Keywords: Fourier domain optical coherence tomography (FD-OCT); Schlemm’s canal (SC); cornea; in vivo imaging; keratoplasty
Year: 2021 PMID: 34925051 PMCID: PMC8675085 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.716117
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Physiol ISSN: 1664-042X Impact factor: 4.566
FIGURE 1Measurements of Schlemm’s canal (SC) using anterior segment optical coherence tomography. (A) SC meridional diameter was the distance of the longest axis of SC measuring from the posterior to the anterior SC end point. (B) SC sagittal diameter was defined as the distance between the superior and inferior outline of SC lumen (average of three measurements). (C,D) SC cross-sectional area (CSA) and circumference of SC (CCF) were obtained by automatic calculation process after manually pointing out the boundary of SC lumen.
Distribution of preoperative indications and surgery types.
|
|
|
|
| PK | 31 | 8 corneal stromal dystrophies, 7 KCN, 7 corneal leucoma, 5 corneal graft failure, 4 endothelial decompensation |
| DALK | 30 | 24 KCN, 4 corneal leucoma, 2 corneal stromal dystrophies |
| Triple surgery | 5 | 2 corneal leucoma, 2 corneal stromal dystrophies, and 1 endothelial decompensation |
PK, penetrating keratoplasty; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; KCN, keratoconus.
Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative parameters.
|
|
|
|
| |
| logMAR BCVA | 1.54 (0.55) | 0.95 (0.49) | 1.04 (0.49) |
|
| IOP (mmHg) | 12.55 (4.03) | 16.79 (8.64) | 15.33 (4.37) |
|
| nCSA (μm2) | 4000.00 (1794.09) | 4030.77 (2404.22) | 4052.63 (1756.83) | 0.951 |
| nMSC (μm) | 145.52 (52.01) | 131.72 (59.61) | 157.39 (49.90) |
|
| nSSC (μm) | 23.33 (2.88) | 25.09 (7.25) | 25.73 (6.51) | 0.093 |
| nCCF (μm) | 314.22 (98.96) | 293.51 (130.19) | 317.21 (96.76) | 0.541 |
| tCSA (μm2) | 4363.63 (2167.14) | 3681.82 (2184.98) | 3965.52 (1600.06) | 0.148 |
| tMSC (μm) | 149.74 (52.37) | 129.89 (56.73) | 155.41 (46.94) |
|
| tSSC (μm) | 24.96 (6.21) | 24.50 (6.39) | 26.46 (4.80) | 0.139 |
| tCCF (μm) | 318.32 (102.19) | 278.71 (117.54) | 317.24 (100.37) | 0.06 |
| CSA (μm2) | 4174.24 (1646.66) | 3840.91 (2096.08) | 4035.09 (1274.26) | 0.378 |
| MSC (μm) | 147.42 (41.78) | 130.17 (48.96) | 156.11 (39.82) |
|
| SSC (μm) | 24.22 (4.92) | 24.74 (6.07) | 26.12 (4.71) | 0.129 |
| CCF (μm) | 315.61 (82.77) | 284.95 (108.82) | 318.52 (81.83) | 0.150 |
LogMAR BCVA, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best-corrected visual acuity; IOP, intraocular pressure; n, nasal; t, temporal; CSA, cross-sectional area; MSC, meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal; SSC, sagittal diameter of Schlemm’s canal; CCF, circumference. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) test and Kruskal–Wallis test were performed for these parameters. All quantitative values were given as mean (standard deviation),
FIGURE 2Plotting line showing the significantly opposite variation trends of intraocular pressure (IOP) against nasal meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal (nMSC), temporal meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal (tMSC) and MSC before surgery, on day 1 after surgery, and at 1 week after surgery. *Indicates statistical difference between date groups.
FIGURE 3Schlemm’s canal (SC) parameters including cross-sectional area (CSA) (A), sagittal diameter of SC (SSC) (C), and circumference (CCF) (D) did not show significant differences among preoperative and postoperative time points, except meridional diameter of SC (MSC) (B). The SC morphology varied at different time points before and after surgery (E). *Indicates statistical difference between date groups.
Comparisons between preoperative and postoperative (1 day) parameters of different surgeries.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||
| LogMAR BCVA | 1.73 (0.47) | 0.91 (0.54) |
|
| 0.96 (0.41) |
| 1.89 (0.65) | 1.18 (0.64) | 0.109 |
| IOP (mmHg) | 14.20 (3.95) | 17.74 (10.05) | 0.102 | 10.4 (3.22) | 15.90 (6.86) |
| 15.2 (2.59) | 16.2 (10.11) | 0.686 |
| nCSA (μm2) | 3903.23 (2071.31) | 3838.71 (2608.92) | 0.625 | 4103.45 (1496.30) | 4310.34 (2331.51) | 0.614 | 4000.00 (1870.83) | 3600.00 (1516.58) | 0.581 |
| nMSC (μm) | 131.13 (48.18) | 132.61 (62.91) | 0.799 | 160.72 (53.82) | 131.79 (59.01) |
| 146.60 (48.07) | 125.80 (52.38) | 0.480 |
| nSSC (μm) | 24.02 (6.09) | 23.76 (7.22) | 0.850 | 22.60 (4.64) | 26.23 (7.60) |
| 24.03 (3.49) | 26.80 (4.27) | 0.112 |
| nCCF (μm) | 292.77 (93.18) | 282.84 (140.32) | 0.388 | 340.21 (94.49) | 310.14 (124.10) | 0.151 | 296.40 (142.18) | 263.20 (108.07) | 0.618 |
| tCSA (μm2) | 4032.26 (2373.24) | 3129.03 (1892.83) |
| 4766.67 (1959.65) | 4166.67 (2450.66) | 0.135 | 4000.00 (2000.00) | 4200.00 (1643.17) | 0.778 |
| tMSC (μm) | 143.90 (48.41) | 116.19 (50.21) |
| 149.73 (51.19) | 138.57 (60.33) | 0.241 | 186.00 (78.04) | 162.80 (60.22) | 0.521 |
| tSSC (μm) | 23.40 (6.44) | 22.88 (4.70) | 0.991 | 26.58 (5.52) | 25.70 (7.70) | 0.584 | 24.87 (7.40) | 27.33 (5.08) | 0.389 |
| tCCF (μm) | 311.32 (107.01) | 251.94 (111.45) |
| 326.03 (103.50) | 302.10 (123.18) | 0.237 | 315.40 (72.85) | 304.40 (104.30) | 0.673 |
PK, penetrating keratoplasty; DALK, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty; LogMAR BCVA, logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution best corrected visual acuity; IOP, intraocular pressure; n, nasal; t, temporal; CSA, cross-sectional area; MSC, meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal, SSC, sagittal diameter of Schlemm’s canal; CCF, circumference. Wilcoxon signed-rank test and paired
FIGURE 4Scattergrams showing the correlations between the changes in preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and the changes in the nasal meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal (nMSC) (A) and the temporal meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal (tMSC) (B) in all subjects.
FIGURE 5Scattergrams showing the correlations between the changes in preoperative and postoperative intraocular pressure (IOP) and the changes in the meridional diameter of Schlemm’s canal (MSC) (A) and cross-sectional area (CSA) (B) and circumference (CCF) (C) in all subjects.