Martina Pecoraro1, Francesco Del Giudice2, Fabio Magliocca1, Giuseppe Simone3, Simone Flammia2, Costantino Leonardo2, Emanuele Messina1, Ettore De Berardinis2, Enrico Cortesi1, Valeria Panebianco4. 1. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. 2. Department of Maternal-Infant and Urological Sciences, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Rome, Italy. 3. Department of Urology, Regina Elena National Cancer Institute, Rome, Italy. 4. Department of Radiological Sciences, Oncology and Pathology, Sapienza University/Policlinico Umberto I, Viale del Policlinico 155, 00161, Rome, Italy. valeria.panebianco@uniroma1.it.
Abstract
PURPOSE: The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) criteria are expanding, providing fine differentiation of bladder wall layers involvement. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a novel categorical scoring, the Neoadjuvant chemotherapy VI-RADS (nacVI-RADS) for radiologic assessment of response (RaR), to define the spectrum of treatment response among patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: Ten consecutive patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC were prospectively enrolled and addressed to NAC and underwent mpMRI before staging resection and after the chemotherapy cycles. The follow-up MRI assessment was performed using the nacVI-RADS algorithm for evaluation of response to therapy. NacVI-RADS categorically define complete RaR, based on prior VI-RADS score, presence of residual disease, tumor size, and infiltration of the muscularis propria. RESULTS: NacVI-RADS categories were able to match all the final radical cystectomy pathology both for complete pT0 responders and for the patients defined as partial or minimal responders, who only showed some RaR inter-scoring class downstaging. CONCLUSION: This report is the preliminary evidence of the feasibility of nacVI-RADS criteria. These findings might lead to possible paradigmatic shifts for cancer-specific survival risk assessment and to possibly drive the therapeutic decision through active surveillance programs, bladder-sparing modalities, or to the standard of care.
PURPOSE: The Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) criteria are expanding, providing fine differentiation of bladder wall layers involvement. We aimed to explore the feasibility of a novel categorical scoring, the Neoadjuvant chemotherapy VI-RADS (nacVI-RADS) for radiologic assessment of response (RaR), to define the spectrum of treatment response among patients with muscle invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). METHODS: Ten consecutive patients diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC were prospectively enrolled and addressed to NAC and underwent mpMRI before staging resection and after the chemotherapy cycles. The follow-up MRI assessment was performed using the nacVI-RADS algorithm for evaluation of response to therapy. NacVI-RADS categorically define complete RaR, based on prior VI-RADS score, presence of residual disease, tumor size, and infiltration of the muscularis propria. RESULTS: NacVI-RADS categories were able to match all the final radical cystectomy pathology both for complete pT0 responders and for the patients defined as partial or minimal responders, who only showed some RaR inter-scoring class downstaging. CONCLUSION: This report is the preliminary evidence of the feasibility of nacVI-RADS criteria. These findings might lead to possible paradigmatic shifts for cancer-specific survival risk assessment and to possibly drive the therapeutic decision through active surveillance programs, bladder-sparing modalities, or to the standard of care.
Authors: Giovanni Barchetti; Giuseppe Simone; Isabella Ceravolo; Vincenzo Salvo; Riccardo Campa; Francesco Del Giudice; Ettore De Berardinis; Dorelsa Buccilli; Carlo Catalano; Michele Gallucci; James W F Catto; Valeria Panebianco Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2019-03-18 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Francesco Del Giudice; Giovanni Barchetti; Ettore De Berardinis; Martina Pecoraro; Vincenzo Salvo; Giuseppe Simone; Alessandro Sciarra; Costantino Leonardo; Michele Gallucci; Carlo Catalano; James W F Catto; Valeria Panebianco Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-11-05 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Maha Ibrahim Metwally; Nesma Adel Zeed; Enas Mahmoud Hamed; Al Shaimaa Fathi Elshetry; Rabab Mahmoud Elfwakhry; Ahmed M Alaa Eldin; Ahmed Sakr; Sameh Abdelaziz Aly; Walid Mosallam; Yara Mohammed Ahmad Ziada; Rawda Balata; Ola A Harb; Mohammad Abd Alkhalik Basha Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2021-02-19 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Andrea Necchi; Marco Bandini; Giuseppina Calareso; Daniele Raggi; Filippo Pederzoli; Elena Farè; Maurizio Colecchia; Laura Marandino; Marco Bianchi; Andrea Gallina; Renzo Colombo; Nicola Fossati; Giorgio Gandaglia; Umberto Capitanio; Federico Dehò; Patrizia Giannatempo; Roberta Lucianò; Andrea Salonia; Russell Madison; Siraj M Ali; Jon H Chung; Jeffrey S Ross; Alberto Briganti; Francesco Montorsi; Francesco De Cobelli; Antonella Messina Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2019-12-25 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Valeria Panebianco; Yoshifumi Narumi; Ersan Altun; Bernard H Bochner; Jason A Efstathiou; Shaista Hafeez; Robert Huddart; Steve Kennish; Seth Lerner; Rodolfo Montironi; Valdair F Muglia; Georg Salomon; Stephen Thomas; Hebert Alberto Vargas; J Alfred Witjes; Mitsuru Takeuchi; Jelle Barentsz; James W F Catto Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2018-05-10 Impact factor: 20.096
Authors: Russell E N Becker; Alexa R Meyer; Aaron Brant; Adam C Reese; Michael J Biles; Kelly T Harris; George Netto; Andres Matoso; Jean Hoffman-Censits; Noah M Hahn; Woonyoung Choi; David McConkey; Phillip M Pierorazio; Michael H Johnson; Mark P Schoenberg; Max R Kates; Alex Baras; Trinity J Bivalacqua Journal: Eur Urol Date: 2020-08-17 Impact factor: 20.096