Literature DB >> 32814637

Clinical Restaging and Tumor Sequencing are Inaccurate Indicators of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer.

Russell E N Becker1, Alexa R Meyer2, Aaron Brant3, Adam C Reese4, Michael J Biles2, Kelly T Harris2, George Netto5, Andres Matoso2, Jean Hoffman-Censits2, Noah M Hahn2, Woonyoung Choi2, David McConkey2, Phillip M Pierorazio2, Michael H Johnson2, Mark P Schoenberg6, Max R Kates2, Alex Baras2, Trinity J Bivalacqua2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Standard of care for patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) includes neoadjuvant cisplatin-based chemotherapy (NAC) followed by consolidative therapy with either chemoradiation or radical cystectomy (RC). Some patients experience robust pathologic responses to NAC, and these have been reported to associate with somatic mutations in specific gene pathways including DNA damage response genes.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the ability of post-NAC clinical restaging, with or without tumor sequencing, to predict final RC pathologic staging. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: We reviewed our institutional review board-approved institutional database to identify patients with MIBC who underwent NAC followed by RC from 2003 to 2016. Following NAC prior to RC, cystoscopy was performed routinely, with resection of residual visible tumor and/or tumor base (transurethral resection [TUR]). For patients with pre-NAC tumor tissue available, tumor sequencing was performed. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Clinical restaging and tumor sequencing were evaluated for their ability to predict the final pathologic stage accurately at RC using chi-square or Fisher's exact test. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 114 patients underwent restaging TUR following NAC and prior to RC. The diagnostic accuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging including TUR was poor, with 32% of patients being downstaged falsely when compared with their final RC pathology. Forty-nine patients had sequencing of pre-NAC tumor tissue, of whom 32 showed at least one mutation of interest. However, NAC responses and rates of false downstaging did not differ significantly according to tumor mutation status.
CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the inaccuracy of post-NAC clinical restaging TUR with or without adjunctive tumor mutation analysis, to assess pathologic residual disease accurately. Caution must be taken when performing post-NAC restaging, especially when considering conservative management strategies such as active surveillance on this basis. Patient summary: Several groups are evaluating whether certain patients, whose bladder cancer responds well to upfront chemotherapy, may be able to forego cystectomy safely. We demonstrate that currently available staging tools and tumor DNA sequencing cannot identify such patients reliably and accurately.
Copyright © 2020 European Association of Urology. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bladder cancer; Neoadjuvant chemotherapy; Postchemotherapy restaging; Radical cystectomy; Transurethral resection of bladder tumor; Tumor mutation analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32814637     DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2020.07.016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  8 in total

Review 1.  Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging for bladder cancer: a comprehensive systematic review of the Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) performance and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Denis Séguier; Philippe Puech; Ronald Kool; Léa Dernis; Héléna Gabert; Wassim Kassouf; Arnauld Villers; Gautier Marcq
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2021-08-25

2.  Vesical Imaging-Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) for assessment of response to systemic therapy for bladder cancer: preliminary report.

Authors:  Martina Pecoraro; Francesco Del Giudice; Fabio Magliocca; Giuseppe Simone; Simone Flammia; Costantino Leonardo; Emanuele Messina; Ettore De Berardinis; Enrico Cortesi; Valeria Panebianco
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-12-17

Review 3.  Refining neoadjuvant therapy clinical trial design for muscle-invasive bladder cancer before cystectomy: a joint US Food and Drug Administration and Bladder Cancer Advocacy Network workshop.

Authors:  Chana Weinstock; Matthew D Galsky; Elaine Chang; Andrea B Apolo; Rick Bangs; Stephanie Chisolm; Vinay Duddalwar; Jason A Efstathiou; Kirsten B Goldberg; Donna E Hansel; Ashish M Kamat; Paul G Kluetz; Seth P Lerner; Elizabeth Plimack; Tatiana Prowell; Harpreet Singh; Daniel Suzman; Evan Y Yu; Hui Zhang; Julia A Beaver; Richard Pazdur
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2021-09-10       Impact factor: 14.432

4.  Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy plus Bevacizumab Combined with Total Mesorectal Excision in Treating Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer Patients with BRAF Mutation: Clinical Benefit and Safety.

Authors:  Jintian Song; Yi Wang; Hui Yu; Liang Zheng; Xiongchao Cai; Yigui Chen
Journal:  Comput Math Methods Med       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 2.238

5.  Urine tumor DNA detection of minimal residual disease in muscle-invasive bladder cancer treated with curative-intent radical cystectomy: A cohort study.

Authors:  Pradeep S Chauhan; Kevin Chen; Ramandeep K Babbra; Wenjia Feng; Nadja Pejovic; Armaan Nallicheri; Peter K Harris; Katherine Dienstbach; Andrew Atkocius; Lenon Maguire; Faridi Qaium; Jeffrey J Szymanski; Brian C Baumann; Li Ding; Dengfeng Cao; Melissa A Reimers; Eric H Kim; Zachary L Smith; Vivek K Arora; Aadel A Chaudhuri
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Prediction of pathological response following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the PRE-PREVENCYS trial.

Authors:  F J Hinsenveld; B J Noordman; J L Boormans; J Voortman; G J L H van Leenders; S L van der Pas; S C van Beek; D E Oprea-Lager; A N Vis
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-10-29       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  Genome-wide screening for the G-protein-coupled receptor (GPCR) pathway-related therapeutic gene RGS19 (regulator of G protein signaling 19) in bladder cancer.

Authors:  Yue Liu; Weiming Lou; Guang Chen; Bing Ding; Jin Kuang; Yize Zhang; Cong Wang; Sainan Duan; Ying Deng; Xiongbing Lu
Journal:  Bioengineered       Date:  2021-12       Impact factor: 3.269

Review 8.  Disease Management of Clinical Complete Responders to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy of Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer: A Review of Literature.

Authors:  Jie Wu; Rui-Yang Xie; Chuan-Zhen Cao; Bing-Qing Shang; Hong-Zhe Shi; Jian-Zhong Shou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 5.738

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.