Literature DB >> 34919037

Enterococcus innesii sp. nov., isolated from the wax moth Galleria mellonella.

Harriet C C Gooch1, Raymond Kiu2, Steven Rudder2, David J Baker2, Lindsay J Hall2,3,4, Anthony Maxwell1.   

Abstract

Four bacterial strains were isolated from two different colony sources of the wax moth Galleria mellonella. They were characterized by a polyphasic approach including 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis, core-genome analysis, average nucleotide identity (ANI) analysis, digital DNA-DNA hybridization (dDDH), determination of G+C content, screening of antibiotic resistance genes, and various phenotypic analyses. Initial analysis of 16S rRNA gene sequence identities indicated that strain GAL7T was potentially very closely related to Enterococcus casseliflavus and Enterococcus gallinarum, having 99.5-99.9 % sequence similarity. However, further analysis of whole genome sequences revealed a genome size of 3.69 Mb, DNA G+C content of 42.35 mol%, and low dDDH and ANI values between the genomes of strain GAL7T and closest phylogenetic relative E. casseliflavus NBRC 100478T of 59.0 and 94.5 %, respectively, indicating identification of a putative new Enterococcus species. In addition, all novel strains encoded the atypical vancomycin-resistance gene vanC-4. Results of phylogenomic, physiological and phenotypic characterization confirmed that strain GAL7T represented a novel species within the genus Enterococcus, for which the name Enterococcus innesii sp. nov. is proposed. The type strain is GAL7T (=DSM 112306T=NCTC 14608T).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Enterococcus; Galleria mellonella; antibiotic resistance; novel species; vancomycin resistant; wax moth

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34919037      PMCID: PMC8744253          DOI: 10.1099/ijsem.0.005168

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol        ISSN: 1466-5026            Impact factor:   2.747


Introduction

Enterococci are Gram-positive facultative anaerobes that are often diplococci, and which belong to the phylum , class , order and family [1, 2]. They comprise a large genus of lactic acid bacteria that are tolerant to many stress conditions and can be found in a wide range of habitats including water (fresh and marine), soils, and as members of animal, human and plant microbial communities (i.e. microbiomes) [3]. From a clinical perspective, some species, such as and , are associated with opportunistic infections, including bacteraemia, endocarditis and urinary tract and catheter infections [4-6]. Crucially, species have inherent resistance to many antimicrobial agents including cephaloporins and β-lactams [7, 8]. They are also of further concern due to acquisition of multi-drug resistance traits, particularly rising rates of vancomycin-resistant strains [9], which are an increasingly common cause of infection in hospitals [10]. As highlighted above, species are also common animal microbiota members, and previous work has indicated that the greater wax moth, Galleria mellonella, is dominated by Enterococci [11, 12], like many other species of Lepidoptera [13]. Although Galleria is a pest of honeybee (Apis mellifera) hives worldwide [14], in recent years it has gained popularity as a model host for a range of human pathogens. It has the advantages of being inexpensive, easy to use, and able to grow at 37 °C, while not being subject to the same regulations and ethical concerns as mammalian models such as mice [15-17]. It has also been of interest due to the ability of the larvae to metabolize polyethylene [18]. Previous research on endogenous Galleria and species indicates these bacteria may have a colonization-resistance function, either passively or actively, through the production of antimicrobial bacteriocins [11, 19]. In this study, we isolated four bacterial strains initially identified as based on 16S rRNA gene alignments. However, on further inspection and characterization (genomic and phenotypic) we propose a novel and putative species: herein named Enterococcus innesii sp. nov. These data expand our knowledge of an important model organism-associated species, which encodes atypical vancomycin resistance genes and is therefore also of clinical importance.

Isolation and ecology

Galleria mellonella larvae were obtained from a colony grown from larvae originally sourced from Livefood UK Ltd and maintained at the John Innes Centre Entomology Facility (Norwich, UK). Galleria larvae (TruLarv) were also purchased from BioSystems Technology. Larvae were flash-frozen in liquid nitrogen, and whole guts dissected under sterile conditions (three guts were pooled into each single sample). Each sample was then homogenized in 200 µl PBS, diluted 100-fold in PBS and 50 µl spread-plated on brain heart infusion (BHI) agar plates and incubated at 37 °C for 48 h. Individual bacterial colonies were selected and grown in BHI media. Three pure isolates from distinct single colonies were taken from Galleria mellonella larvae from the John Innes Centre Entomology Facility, and one was isolated from TruLarv larvae.

Genomic characterization

The genomes of E. innesii GAL7T, E. innesii GAL9, E. innesii GAL10 and E. innesii TL2 were sequenced using the Nanopore MinION sequencing platform. Prior to this, FastDNA Spin Kit for Soil (MP Biomedicals) was used to extract genomic DNA from each isolate (grown up in BHI media for 48 h) following manufacturer’s instructions, with an extended 3 min bead-beating procedure as described previously [20]. The sequencing library was prepared via a modified Illumina Nextera Flex low input tagmentation approach using symmetrical 24 base barcoded primers [21]. Libraries were pooled and stringently size selected on a sageELF 0.75 % cassette and fractions from 4 kb and above were pooled and put into a standard Nanopore Ligation reaction using the SQK-LSK109 kit and protocol and loaded onto a MinION following the recommended loading guidelines and run for 48 h. Basecalling was performed using Guppy version 3.6.0 (Oxford Nanopore Technologies) in high accuracy mode (model dna_r9.4.1_450bps_hac). Subsequently, high-quality pure culture genomes (genome size range: 3.6–3.8 Mb) were assembled via Unicycler version 0.4.9 [22] and further polished using Racon version 1.3.1 in the Unicycler pipeline, with a range of 13–18 in contigs and G+C content of ~42 mol% (Table 1). Genomes were further annotated using Prokka version 1.13, with ~3800–4100 CDS predicted for these for E. innesii strains.
Table 1.

Genome statistics comparison between closely related species (n=10) to E. innesii strains identified by TYGS, including type strain GAL7T [45]

Previously published type strain genomes were retrieved from GenBank for analysis in this study [46]. Genome assembly statistics were extracted using sequence-stats version 0.1 [47] while genome annotation was performed using Prokka version 1.13 [48].

Strains

Genome size

(bp)

Contigs

G+C

(mol%)

rRNA

tRNA

CDS

GenBank accessions

Enterococcus alcedinis CCM8433T

2 686 367

29

37.59

2

50

2472

GCA_014635985

Enterococcus casseliflavus NBRC100478T

3 498 264

54

42.35

3

50

3339

GCA_001544095

Enterococcus devriesei DSM22802T

3 320 653

65

40.22

1

29

3119

GCA_001885905

Enterococcus gallinarum NBRC100675T

3 774 884

87

39.75

3

49

3600

GCA_001544275

Enterococcus gilvus BAA350T

4 179 913

5

41.41

21

70

4111

GCA_000407545

Enterococcus innesii GAL10

3 678 879

18

42.32

15

69

3868

GCA_018982735

Enterococcus innesii GAL7 T

3 692 254

14

42.35

22

67

3866

GCA_018982785

Enterococcus innesii GAL9

3 793 471

13

42.22

18

64

4070

GCA_018982775

Enterococcus innesii TL2

3 806 372

17

42.25

20

63

4075

GCA_018982725

Enterococcus malodoratus ATCC43197T

4 654 237

10

39.56

16

54

4480

GCA_000407185

Enterococcus massiliensis AM1T

2 712 841

7

39.64

9

61

2612

GCA_001050095

Enterococcus pseudoavium NBRC100491T

2 731 874

59

40.06

3

48

2587

GCA_001544295

Enterococcus saccharolyticus ATCC13076T

2 604 038

2

36.70

6

38

2586

GCA_000407285

Enterococcus viikkiensis LMG26075T

2 545 311

45

40.26

4

40

2416

GCA_005405345

Genome statistics comparison between closely related species (n=10) to E. innesii strains identified by TYGS, including type strain GAL7T [45] Previously published type strain genomes were retrieved from GenBank for analysis in this study [46]. Genome assembly statistics were extracted using sequence-stats version 0.1 [47] while genome annotation was performed using Prokka version 1.13 [48]. Strains Genome size (bp) Contigs G+C (mol%) rRNA tRNA CDS GenBank accessions CCM8433T 2 686 367 29 37.59 2 50 2472 GCA_014635985 NBRC100478T 3 498 264 54 42.35 3 50 3339 GCA_001544095 DSM22802T 3 320 653 65 40.22 1 29 3119 GCA_001885905 NBRC100675T 3 774 884 87 39.75 3 49 3600 GCA_001544275 BAA350T 4 179 913 5 41.41 21 70 4111 GCA_000407545 Enterococcus innesii GAL10 3 678 879 18 42.32 15 69 3868 GCA_018982735 3 692 254 14 42.35 22 67 3866 GCA_018982785 Enterococcus innesii GAL9 3 793 471 13 42.22 18 64 4070 GCA_018982775 Enterococcus innesii TL2 3 806 372 17 42.25 20 63 4075 GCA_018982725 ATCC43197T 4 654 237 10 39.56 16 54 4480 GCA_000407185 Enterococcus massiliensis AM1T 2 712 841 7 39.64 9 61 2612 GCA_001050095 NBRC100491T 2 731 874 59 40.06 3 48 2587 GCA_001544295 ATCC13076T 2 604 038 2 36.70 6 38 2586 GCA_000407285 LMG26075T 2 545 311 45 40.26 4 40 2416 GCA_005405345 Initially, the 16S rRNA sequences of 61 validated species (60 were type strains) were obtained from the web server of List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN; May 2021) [23, 24]. Using in silico approaches, near-full-length 16S rRNA sequences (~1.5 kb) of E. innesii were extracted via bactspeciesID version 1.2 [25], aligned with 16S rRNA sequences of other 61 public genomes using muscle version 3.8.31 [26], and a 16S rRNA-based maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree was reconstructed via iq-tree version 2.0.5 with the GTR model at 1000 bootstrap replications while visualized with iTOL version 6 (Fig. 1) [27, 28]. E. innesii GAL7T was phylogenetically positioned among , (re-classified as ) and cluster due to its 16S rRNA sequence similarity (99.53–99.93 %) [29]. However, when we compared the digital DNA–DNA hybridization (dDDH; via the Type Strain Genome Server, TYGS) and average nucleotide identity (ANI) for genome-based species delineation purposes (via fastANI v1.3), the proposed E. innesii sp. nov GAL7T represented a separate species from and type strains. The dDDH was 59.0 % (using TYGS formula d4) and ANI 94.5 %, when compared to its closest neighbour NBRC100478T, despite the high similarity of 16S rRNA sequences between the two species, both fell below the intra-species thresholds of 70 % dDDH and 95 % ANI (Fig. 2). In contrast, the ANI values among E. innesii strains (n=4) were 99.92–99.96 %.
Fig. 1.

A mid-point rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic position of Enterococcus innesii sp. nov. strain GAL7T based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of 61 type strains. Bootstrap values (>70 %) based on 1000 replications are listed as percentages at the branches. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide base.

Fig. 2.

A mid-point rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 154 826 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 564 core genes, aligned with dDDH (%), ANI (%) and antibiotic resistance gene profiles.

A mid-point rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree showing the phylogenetic position of Enterococcus innesii sp. nov. strain GAL7T based on 16S rRNA gene sequences of 61 type strains. Bootstrap values (>70 %) based on 1000 replications are listed as percentages at the branches. Bar, 0.01 substitutions per nucleotide base. A mid-point rooted maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree based on 154 826 single nucleotide polymorphisms from 564 core genes, aligned with dDDH (%), ANI (%) and antibiotic resistance gene profiles. Next, 10 closest-related strains (vs E. innesii) identified by TYGS were further examined phylogenetically at a genomic level, with antibiotic resistance genes also screened (using the resfinder database), for the four novel E. innesii strains (Fig. 2) [30]. The pangenome of these 14 strains were investigated using Roary version 3.12.0 [31] at blastp threshold at 70 % identity for inference of core genes. A total of 15 629 genes were present in this pangenome with 564 core genes and 15 065 accessory genes. Next, a core-gene alignment was generated and used to build a core-genome maximum-likelihood phylogenetic tree where it showed that NBRC100478T was genomically distinct from E. innesii, further supported by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) analysis (using snp-dists version 0.7.0) that confirmed the SNP range (8–32 SNPs) among E. innesii strains (n=4) indicating strain distinction yet close genetic relatedness, while 11538–11540 SNPs were found when comparing E. innesii strains (n=4) and NBRC100478T (Fig. 2) [32]. The vancomycin-resistance gene vanC-4 (NCBI accession: EU151752) was uniquely detected (nucleotide sequence identity: 98.52–98.58 % at near 100 % coverage) in all E. innesii strains using ABRicate version 1.0.1 with the resfinder database, which was not found in any other closely related type strains (Fig. 2) [30, 33]. Notably, we did not detect any other virulence or antibiotic resistance genes in any of the four E. innesii strains. Vancomycin resistant determinant vanC subtypes had been reported in , (vanC-1), (vanC-2), and (vanC-3; E. flavescens has now been re-classified as ), while vanC-4 has only been reported once previously in . In this study, the authors described the vanC-4 encoding clinically associated isolates as having ‘at least two genetic lineages with the distinct vanC genes, that is, a single subtype including previously known vanC-2/C-3, and a novel subtype vanC-4′. We therefore propose that this distinct ‘genetic lineage’ of may hypothetically be E. innesii, a novel species that uniquely encode vanC-4 gene [34, 35]. However, as these isolates described in this previous clinical study were not whole genome sequenced, we are unable to determine this conclusively. Furthermore, the vanC resistance gene was phenotypically demonstrated in and as having intrinsic but low-level resistance to vancomycin at a minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) of 4–32 µg ml−1 [36]. Subsequently, we screened through a larger public dataset of species via a targeted approach and found that three isolates previously designated as and appeared to be E. innesii based on ANI (however, taxonomy check on NCBI were inconclusive for these isolates). These include NCTC4725 (ANI vs NBRC100478T: 94.88 %; ANI vs E. innesii GAL7T: 97.02 %), FDAARGOS163 (ANI vs NBRC100675T: 77.99 %; ANI vs NBRC100478T: 94.79 %; ANI vs E. innesii GAL7T: 95.40 %) and m 4928STDY7071463 (ANI vs NBRC100675T: 78.08 %; ANI vs NBRC100478T: 94.96 %; ANI vs E. innesii GAL7T: 95.43%). Importantly, these three isolates NCTC4725 (ATCC27284; GCA_901542395.1), FDAARGOS163 (GCA_001558875.2) and 4928STDY7071463 (GCA_902159265.1) are derived from human sources [37-39]. These isolates also demonstrated similar genome features as E. innesii sp. nov., with genome size range ~3.6–3.7 Mb and G+C ~42 mol%. These data suggest E. innesii sp. nov., may also be a clinically important species associated with novel antimicrobial resistance determinants, as vanC-4 is encoded in all these genomes, and is reported to cause opportunistic human infection.

Phenotypic characterization

Phenotypic characteristics were also investigated and included cell and colony morphology, motility, Gram-staining reaction, formation of endospores, oxygen relationship, growth at different temperatures, fermentation profiles of carbohydrates, catalase activity, oxidase activity, tolerance to NaCl, Voges–Proskauer reaction, urease production, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase production, hydrolysis of hippurate, deamination of arginine, pyruvate utilization, bile-aesculin tolerance test, haemolysis test, fatty acid analysis and vancomycin susceptibility testing [40]. Motility tests were carried out on E. innesii GAL7T using motility test medium (Merck). Media were prepared according to manufacturer’s instructions and outcomes were recorded after culturing for 48 h at 37 °C. The susceptibility of E. innesii GAL7T to antibiotic vancomycin was evaluated using MIC assays on BHI agar plates (carried out in three biological replicates) as described previously [41]. Aside from motility and vancomycin susceptibility tests, all phenotypic analyses were carried out by the Identification Service, Leibniz Institute DSMZ (Germany). E. innesii cells were coccoid-shaped, 1.0–1.5 µm long, motile and occurred in pairs or in chains under phase-contrast microscopy (Fig. 3). All E. innesii strains were Gram-positive, asporogenous, and facultatively anaerobic. Biochemical characteristics were determined using API 50CHE strips for carbohydrate utilization profiles, after incubation for up to 48 h at 37 °C (Table 2). They were capable of growth at 10–45 °C with optimum at 30–37 °C in BHI broth, with only weak growth at 45 °C, and no growth at 5 °C for up to 13 days. Growth was observed at NaCl concentrations from 0 to 8 % (w/v), with optimum growth <6.5 %. All strains were catalase- and oxidase-negative and showed no haemolytic activity. When compared to the closest related species (based on 16S rRNA analysis), E. innesii strains exhibited a distinctive metabolism in producing acid from glycerol, sorbitol, raffinose and 2-ketoglyconate, while not producing acid from turanose (Table 2). Further phenotypic features were determined using the API rapidID32 STREP system on single strain E. innesii GAL7T where cells were negative for urease production, hydrolysis of hippurate and pyruvate utilization (no detectable growth using sodium pyruvate as sole carbon source in mineral salt medium for 6 days at 37 °C), while positive for Voges–Proskauer reaction, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase production and arginine dihydrolase. GAL7T cells tested positive for aesculin hydrolysis in complex medium (Bacto-Peptone, 1 g l−1 aesculin). Moreover, similar to , GAL7T cells were positive for β-glucuronidase while closest relative , and related species and were all negative for this enzyme (Table 2).
Fig. 3.

Phase-contrast microscopy showing E. innesii GAL7T occurring in pairs and in chains.

Table 2.

Distinctive phenotypic features between E. innesii strains (data from this study) and phylogenetically closely related [49] and strains [49], also distantly related [49] and strains [49]

+, All strains positive; −, all strains negative; +(−), most strains positive; −(+), most strains negative; v, variable; +w, most strains weakly positive, none negative. All strains were positive for ribose, galactose, glucose, fructose, mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, lactose, trehalose and gentibiose. All strains were negative for erythritol, d-arabinose, l-xylose, adonitol, methyl β-xyloside, sorbose, dulcitol, inositol, xylitol, lyxose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol and 5-keto-gluconate.

Characteristics

E. innesii* (n=4)

E. casseliflavus

(n=6)

E. gallinarum

(n=4)

E. faecalis

(n=6)

E. faecium

(n=5)

Acid production from:

d-Xylose

+

+

+

Sucrose

+

+

+

+

v

Melibiose

+

+

+

v

Methyl α-glucoside

+

+

+

Melizitose

+(−)

Mannitol

+

+

+

+

+(−)

Inulin

+

+

+

Gluconate

+

+

+

+(−)

v

l-Arabinose

+

+

+

+

Glycerol

+w‡

+

+

+

Rhamnose

+

+(−)

v

Sorbitol

v

+

+(−)

Methyl α-d-mannoside

+

+(−)

−(+)

Raffinose

+

+

Glycogen

−(+)

Turanose

v

+

d-Tagatose

+

+

2-Keto-gluconate

+

v

Hydrolysis of:

Aesculin

+

+

+(−)

+

Hippurate

−§

+

+(−)

+

Presence of enzymes:

Arginine dihydrolase

+(−)

+

+

+

α-Galactosidase

+

+

β-Galactosidase

+

+

+

β-Glucuronidase

+

*Determined with the API 50CH system.

†Determined with the API 50CHE system.

‡Shaded area represents distinctive phenotypic features between E. innesii strain(s) and closely related E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum strains as determined by API systems.

§Determined with API rapid ID32 STREP system on a single strain GAL7T.

Phase-contrast microscopy showing E. innesii GAL7T occurring in pairs and in chains. Distinctive phenotypic features between E. innesii strains (data from this study) and phylogenetically closely related [49] and strains [49], also distantly related [49] and strains [49] +, All strains positive; −, all strains negative; +(−), most strains positive; −(+), most strains negative; v, variable; +w, most strains weakly positive, none negative. All strains were positive for ribose, galactose, glucose, fructose, mannose, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, lactose, trehalose and gentibiose. All strains were negative for erythritol, d-arabinose, l-xylose, adonitol, methyl β-xyloside, sorbose, dulcitol, inositol, xylitol, lyxose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol and 5-keto-gluconate. Characteristics E. innesii* (n=4) (n=6) (n=4) (n=6) (n=5) Acid production from: d-Xylose + + + Sucrose + + + + v Melibiose + + + v Methyl α-glucoside + + + Melizitose +(−) Mannitol + + + + +(−) Inulin + + + Gluconate + + + +(−) v l-Arabinose + + + + Glycerol +w‡ + + + Rhamnose + +(−) v Sorbitol v + +(−) Methyl α-d-mannoside + +(−) −(+) Raffinose + + Glycogen −(+) Turanose v + d-Tagatose + + 2-Keto-gluconate + v Hydrolysis of: Aesculin + + +(−) + Hippurate −§ + +(−) + Presence of enzymes: Arginine dihydrolase +(−) + + + α-Galactosidase + + β-Galactosidase + + + β-Glucuronidase + *Determined with the API 50CH system. †Determined with the API 50CHE system. ‡Shaded area represents distinctive phenotypic features between E. innesii strain(s) and closely related E. casseliflavus and E. gallinarum strains as determined by API systems. §Determined with API rapid ID32 STREP system on a single strain GAL7T. Cellular fatty acids were analysed after conversion into fatty acid methyl esters (FAMEs) using a modified protocol by Miller [42]. Mixtures of the FAMEs were then separated by gas chromatography and detected by a flame ionization detector using the Sherlock Microbial Identification System (midi) based on TSBA6 database. C14 : 0, C16 : 0 and C18 : 1  ω7c were the major fatty acids in E. innesii GAL7T. Compared to the closest phylogenetic neighbours and type strains (JCM8723T and JCM8728T, respectively), E. innesii GAL7T cells have a significantly higher C14 : 0 fatty acid content at 26.12%, apparently distinctive from (7.5 %) and (0.2 %) as described previously [43]. Importantly, we determined that E. innesii GAL7T, which harboured putative atypical vancomycin resistance gene vanC-4, reduced susceptibility to vancomycin at MIC 4 µg ml−1 (vancomycin clinical breakpoint for Enterococci is >4 µg ml−1). This is similar to the low-level vancomycin resistance reported previously in and , strains that encode the vanC resistance gene [36, 44]. Based on the results of phylogenomic, physiological and biochemical studies presented above, strain GAL7T is considered to represent a novel species of the genus , for which the name Enterococcus innesii sp. nov. is proposed.

Description of Enterococcus innesii sp. nov.

Enterococcus innesii (in.ne´si.i. N.L. gen. n. innesii, pertaining to British philanthropist John Innes JP and the John Innes Centre, Norwich, UK, where this bacterium was isolated). Description is based on a single strain. Cells are Gram-positive, facultatively anaerobic, motile, non-haemolytic, asporogenous, coccoid-shaped, 1.0–1.5 µm long and usually occur in pairs or in chains. It grows at temperatures between 10–45 °C (optimum, 30–37 °C), at NaCl concentrations from 0 to 8.0 % (optimum, 0–6.5 %, at 37 °C) in BHI medium. Colonies formed on BHI after incubation for 48 h at 37 °C are non-pigmented, circular, smooth, shiny, diameter 1–2 mm, with entire margins. Negative for urease production, hydrolysis of hippurate, pyruvate utilization and catalase and oxidase production. Positive for Voges–Proskauer reaction, pyrrolidonyl arylamidase production, hydrolysis of aesculin and arginine dihydrolase. Acid is produced from l-arabinose, ribose, d-xylose, galactose, glucose, fructose, mannose, rhamnose, methyl α-d-mannoside, methyl α-glucoside, N-acetylglucosamine, amygdalin, arbutin, aesculin, salicin, cellobiose, maltose, lactose, melibiose, sucrose, trehalose, inulin, raffinose, gentibiose, gluconate, 2-ketogluconate, starch and glycerol. Acid is not produced from erythritol, d-arabinose, l-xylose, adonitol, methyl β-d-xyloside, sorbose, dulcitol, inositol, melizitose, glycogen, xylitol, turanose, d-tagatose, d-fucose, l-fucose, d-arabitol, l-arabitol and 5-ketogluconate. Resistant to 4 µg ml−1 vancomycin. The major fatty acids are C14 : 0, C16 : 0 and C18 : 1  ω7c. The type strain, GAL7T (=DSM 112306T=NCTC 14608T), was isolated from the gut of a wax moth Galleria mellonella at John Innes Centre (Norwich, UK). The genome of the type strain is characterized by a size of 3.79 Mb and a G+C content of 42.22 mol%.
  41 in total

Review 1.  The ecology, epidemiology and virulence of Enterococcus.

Authors:  Katie Fisher; Carol Phillips
Journal:  Microbiology       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 2.777

Review 2.  The rise of the Enterococcus: beyond vancomycin resistance.

Authors:  Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 60.633

3.  Recommended minimal standards for description of new taxa of the genera Bifidobacterium, Lactobacillus and related genera.

Authors:  Paola Mattarelli; Wilhelm Holzapfel; Charles M A P Franz; Akihito Endo; Giovanna E Felis; Walter Hammes; Bruno Pot; Leon Dicks; Franco Dellaglio
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.747

Review 4.  Urinary tract infections: epidemiology, mechanisms of infection and treatment options.

Authors:  Ana L Flores-Mireles; Jennifer N Walker; Michael Caparon; Scott J Hultgren
Journal:  Nat Rev Microbiol       Date:  2015-04-08       Impact factor: 60.633

5.  Genetic diversity of the low-level vancomycin resistance gene vanC-2/vanC-3 and identification of a novel vanC subtype (vanC-4) in Enterococcus casseliflavus.

Authors:  Shojiro Watanabe; Nobumichi Kobayashi; Dianelys Quiñones; Satoshi Hayakawa; Shigeo Nagashima; Nobuyuki Uehara; Naoki Watanabe
Journal:  Microb Drug Resist       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.431

6.  Galleria mellonella as an infection model: an in-depth look at why it works and practical considerations for successful application.

Authors:  Monalessa Fábia Pereira; Ciro César Rossi; Giarlã Cunha da Silva; Jéssica Nogueira Rosa; Denise Mara Soares Bazzolli
Journal:  Pathog Dis       Date:  2020-11-11       Impact factor: 3.166

7.  What's New in the Treatment of Enterococcal Endocarditis?

Authors:  Masayuki Nigo; Jose M Munita; Cesar A Arias; Barbara E Murray
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 3.725

8.  Interactive Tree Of Life (iTOL) v4: recent updates and new developments.

Authors:  Ivica Letunic; Peer Bork
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 16.971

9.  List of Prokaryotic names with Standing in Nomenclature (LPSN) moves to the DSMZ.

Authors:  Aidan C Parte; Joaquim Sardà Carbasse; Jan P Meier-Kolthoff; Lorenz C Reimer; Markus Göker
Journal:  Int J Syst Evol Microbiol       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.747

10.  Galleria mellonella: A Novel Invertebrate Model to Distinguish Intestinal Symbionts From Pathobionts.

Authors:  Anna Lange; Andrea Schäfer; Annika Bender; Alexander Steimle; Sina Beier; Raphael Parusel; Julia-Stefanie Frick
Journal:  Front Immunol       Date:  2018-09-19       Impact factor: 7.561

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.