Literature DB >> 34918223

Reality in a sphere: A direct comparison of social attention in the laboratory and the real world.

Jonas D Großekathöfer1, Christian Seis2, Matthias Gamer2.   

Abstract

Humans often show reduced social attention in real situations, a finding rarely replicated in controlled laboratory studies. Virtual reality is supposed to allow for ecologically valid and at the same time highly controlled experiments. This study aimed to provide initial insights into the reliability and validity of using spherical videos viewed via a head-mounted display (HMD) to assess social attention. We chose five public places in the city of Würzburg and measured eye movements of 44 participants for 30 s at each location twice: Once in a real environment with mobile eye-tracking glasses and once in a virtual environment playing a spherical video of the location in an HMD with an integrated eye tracker. As hypothesized, participants demonstrated reduced social attention with less exploration of passengers in the real environment as compared to the virtual one. This is in line with earlier studies showing social avoidance in interactive situations. Furthermore, we only observed consistent gaze proportions on passengers across locations in virtual environments. These findings highlight that the potential for social interactions and an adherence to social norms are essential modulators of viewing behavior in social situations and cannot be easily simulated in laboratory contexts. However, spherical videos might be helpful for supplementing the range of methods in social cognition research and other fields. Data and analysis scripts are available at https://osf.io/hktdu/ .
© 2021. The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ecological validity; Eye tracking; Social attention; Spherical videos; Virtual reality

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 34918223      PMCID: PMC9579106          DOI: 10.3758/s13428-021-01724-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Res Methods        ISSN: 1554-351X


  36 in total

Review 1.  From presence to consciousness through virtual reality.

Authors:  Maria V Sanchez-Vives; Mel Slater
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal.

Authors:  Dale J Barr; Roger Levy; Christoph Scheepers; Harry J Tily
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 3.059

3.  Potential social interactions are important to social attention.

Authors:  Kaitlin E W Laidlaw; Tom Foulsham; Gustav Kuhn; Alan Kingstone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-03-21       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Coordination of the eyes and head during visual orienting.

Authors:  Edward G Freedman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-08-13       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Stronger reactivity to social gaze in virtual reality compared to a classical laboratory environment.

Authors:  Marius Rubo; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2020-06-02

6.  Relations among Social Anxiety, Eye Contact Avoidance, State Anxiety, and Perception of Interaction Performance during a Live Conversation.

Authors:  Ashley N Howell; Devin A Zibulsky; Akanksha Srivastav; Justin W Weeks
Journal:  Cogn Behav Ther       Date:  2015-12-18

7.  Social content and emotional valence modulate gaze fixations in dynamic scenes.

Authors:  Marius Rubo; Matthias Gamer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-28       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  OSIEshort: A small stimulus set can reliably estimate individual differences in semantic salience.

Authors:  Marcel Linka; Benjamin de Haas
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-09-02       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  The Reality of "Real-Life" Neuroscience: A Commentary on Shamay-Tsoory and Mendelsohn (2019).

Authors:  Gijs A Holleman; Ignace T C Hooge; Chantal Kemner; Roy S Hessels
Journal:  Perspect Psychol Sci       Date:  2020-04-21

10.  Is the eye-movement field confused about fixations and saccades? A survey among 124 researchers.

Authors:  Roy S Hessels; Diederick C Niehorster; Marcus Nyström; Richard Andersson; Ignace T C Hooge
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2018-08-29       Impact factor: 2.963

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.