| Literature DB >> 34917471 |
Marvin Xavierselvan1, Jason Cook2, Jeanne Duong1, Nashielli Diaz1, Kimberly Homan2, Srivalleesha Mallidi1,3.
Abstract
Photodynamic therapy (PDT) is a well-known cancer therapy that utilizes light to excite a photosensitizer and generate cytotoxic reactive oxygen species (ROS). The efficacy of PDT primarily depends on the photosensitizer and oxygen concentration in the tumor. Hypoxia in solid tumors promotes treatment resistance, resulting in poor PDT outcomes. Hence, there is a need to combat hypoxia while delivering sufficient photosensitizer to the tumor for ROS generation. Here we showcase our unique theranostic perfluorocarbon nanodroplets as a triple agent carrier for oxygen, photosensitizer, and indocyanine green that enables light triggered spatiotemporal delivery of oxygen to the tumors. We evaluated the characteristics of the nanodroplets and validated their ability to deliver oxygen via photoacoustic monitoring of blood oxygen saturation and subsequent PDT efficacy in a murine subcutaneous tumor model. The imaging results were validated with an oxygen sensing probe, which showed a 9.1 fold increase in oxygen content inside the tumor, following systemic administration of the nanodroplets. These results were also confirmed with immunofluorescence. In vivo studies showed that nanodroplets held higher rates of treatment efficacy than a clinically available benzoporphyrin derivative formulation. Histological analysis showed higher necrotic area within the tumor with perfluoropentane nanodroplets. Overall, the photoacoustic nanodroplets can significantly enhance image-guided PDT and has demonstrated substantial potential as a valid theranostic option for patient-specific photodynamic therapy-based treatments.Entities:
Keywords: 1O2, singlet oxygen; BPD, benzoporphyrin derivative; DLS, dynamic light scattering; DPPC, 1,2-dipalmitoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphocholine; DSPE-mPEG, 1,2-distearoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-[methoxy(polyethylene glycol)-2000]; H&E, hematoxylin and eosin; HbT, total hemoglobin; Hypoxia; ICG, indocyanine green; IF, immunofluorescence; Image guided PDT; MTT, 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide; NIR, near infrared radiation; PA, photoacoustic; PBS, phosphate buffered saline; PDT, photodynamic therapy; PFC, perfluorocarbon; PFP, perfluoropentane; PS, photosensitizer; Perfluorocarbon nanodroplets; Photoacoustic imaging; Photodynamic therapy; ROS, reactive oxygen species; SOSG, singlet oxygen sensor green; StO2, oxygen saturation; TBAI, tertbutylammonium iodide; pO2, partial pressure of oxygen
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917471 PMCID: PMC8666552 DOI: 10.1016/j.pacs.2021.100306
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Photoacoustics ISSN: 2213-5979
Fig. 1a) Schematic depiction of the photoacoustic nanodroplets used for oxygen enhanced PDT. b) Size distribution of the nanodroplets obtained with a DLS system. c) Stability of PFP nanodroplets monitored over 6 weeks post synthesis. d-f) Normalized UV–Visible absorption spectra of nanodroplets compared to the free dyes (solid lines). The photoacoustic spectra of the various formulations of the nanodroplets in PBS shown in black dots. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 2a) PA images of the nanodroplets in a tube obtained at 800 nm wavelength irradiation. Scale bar = 1 mm. b) Time dependent change in PA signal of ICG-PFP or BPD+ICG-PFP nanodroplets in the tube over time. The data are normalized to the PA intensity at time t = 0 s. PA at 800 nm excite ICG to vaporize the droplets and release oxygen. c) Time dependent change in PA signal produced by BPD-PFP, ICG-PFP and BPD+ICG-PFP nanodroplets when irradiated at 690 nm.
Fig. 3a) Comparison of singlet oxygen production by free BPD and BPD-PFP in normal and hypoxic conditions at 0 and 20 J/cm2 690 nm light irradiation. Analysis was performed using two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test: ** = p < 0.01 b) Singlet oxygen production of BPD+ICG-PFP with different ratios of BPD:ICG in the nanodroplets when irradiated with 690 nm wavelength. Analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test: * = p < 0.05, ** = p < 0.01 is performed. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and each symbol denotes an experimental repeat.
Fig. 4Quantification of a) intracellular BPD and b) ICG concentrations with free PS and PFP nanodroplet formulations. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M and each symbol represents experimental replicate. Analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test: * = p < 0.05, **p = < 0.01.
Fig. 5a) Mitochondrial localization of free dye and nanodroplet formulations. BPD and ICG signals were pseudo-colored in red. MitoTracker (Green) was used to stain mitochondria. Scale bar = 20 µm. b) Lysosomal localization of free dye and nanodroplet formulations. LysoTracker (Green) was used to stain lysosomes. BPD and ICG signals were pseudo-colored in red. Nuclear staining was done with Hoechst (blue) on both the panels. Scale bar = 20 µm. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 6a) Experiment timeline for phototoxic studies with PFP nanodroplets. b) Dark toxicity of the nanodroplets were subtracted from the light treated groups. BPD efficacy is largely not influenced by the presence of ICG except in the case of BPD+ICG-PFP 1:2 formulation. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; Analysis was performed with two-way AVOVA with a Tukey’s multiple comparison test: ** = p < 0.01, **** = p < 0.0001.
Fig. 7The ultrasound and photoacoustic oxygen saturation images of the tumor a) before and b) after injection of PFP nanodroplets where blue and red represents the hypoxic and oxygenated regions, respectively. The tumor region is identified with a green ROI and had ~9.1 (± 1.8 S.E.) fold increase in oxygen pO2 (measured with oxygen sensor) and 25% increase in ultrasound contrast. Scale bar = 2 mm. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 8PFP nanodroplets enhance tumor oxygenation and reduce hypoxia in the tumors. Measurements performed before and after injection of nanodroplets ae shown in red and green color, respectively. a) Increase in StO2 histogram of a representative tumor shown in Fig. 7. b) Average StO2 increase in the tumor after oxygen filled PFP nanodroplet administration. c) Total hemoglobin levels quantified from StO2 imaging shows no significant change in the accumulation of endogenous absorbers. Regional analysis of StO2 shows that PFP nanodroplets significantly enhanced oxygen in d) low StO2 areas while e) high StO2 regions maintained similar levels as before nandroplet administration. f) Validation of StO2 imaging with oxygen sensor that was placed inside the tumor adjacent to the imaging plane. IF image of the tumor cross-section treated with g) control and treated with j) BPD+ICG-PFP 1:1 nanodroplets. The insets h, iand k show the tumor core at higher magnification with k) inset showing the core at higher magnification. l) Quantification of the hypoxic regions (ratio of pimonidazole positive area to total tumor area) from the IF image. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; b, c, f, l – n = 3 mice; d & e, multiple regions within the 3 tumors. Scale bar = 1 mm for g and j. Scale bar = 100 µm for h, i and k; b-f: paired two-tailed t-test: * = p < 0.05, **** = p < 0.0001, l: unpaired two-tailed t-test: *** = p < 0.001. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 9Measurements performed before and after injection of nanodroplets are shown in red and green color, respectively. a) PA contrast (800 nm wavelength) in the tumor increased post injection due to accumulation of the nanodroplets containing ICG. b) The tumor ultrasound contrast is also enhanced by the nanodroplets. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; n = 3 mice; paired two-tailed t-test: * = p < 0.05, **** = p < 0.0001. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
Fig. 10a) In vivo pharmacokinetics of nanodroplets. ICG fluorescence in the tumor following the administration of BPD+ICG-PFP nanodroplets was monitored at different time points. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M (n = 3). b) Representative fluorescence image of excised organs 24 h post administration of BPD+ICG-PFP nanodroplets. c) Average fluorescence intensity in various excised organs demonstrating the biodistribution of the nanodroplets in vivo. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; n = 3 mice in each group.
Fig. 11Change in tumor volume in response to PDT treatment with nanodroplet variants. a) Oxygen enhanced BPD-PFP (red line) is significantly efficacious than the clinically used formulation of BPD i.e., Visudyne (cyan line). The tumor volume in the no-treatment group are shown in black line. ICG-PFP nanodroplets had minimal therapeutic effect. b) The tumor volume of the mice in the PFP only group are shown in gray line. The ratio of BPD:ICG ratio within the nanodroplets is critical to achieve effective therapeutic outcome. BPD:ICG 1:1 formulation (blue line) had better efficacy than the BPD:ICG 1:2 formulation (orange line). The H&E image of the tumors in c) non-treated group and d) 24 h post PDT with BPD+ICG-PFP 1:1 nanodroplets group. The insets show the tumor core at higher magnification. Scale bar in the inset = 1 mm. e) Quantification of necrotic regions in the tumors show higher values in the PDT with BPD+ICG-PFP 1:1 nanodroplets group compared to the control group. The results are expressed as mean ± S.E.M; n = 3–4 mice per group; Two-way ANOVA with Tukey’s multiple comparison test: * = p < 0.05. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)