| Literature DB >> 31903132 |
Lei Duan1, Li Yang2, Juan Jin2, Fang Yang2, Dong Liu3,4, Ke Hu1, Qinxin Wang1, Yuanbin Yue1, Ning Gu1,2.
Abstract
Drug delivery for tumor theranostics involves the extensive use of the enhanced permeability and retention (EPR) effect. Previously, various types of nanomedicines have been demonstrated to accumulate in solid tumors via the EPR effect. However, EPR is a highly variable phenomenon because of tumor heterogeneity, resulting in low drug delivery efficacy in clinical trials. Because ultrasonication using micro/nanobubbles as contrast agents can disrupt blood vessels and enhance the specific delivery of drugs, it is an effective approach to improve the EPR effect for the passive targeting of tumors. In this review, the basic thermal effect, acoustic streaming, and cavitation mechanisms of ultrasound, which are characteristics that can be utilized to enhance the EPR effect, are briefly introduced. Second, micro/nanobubble-enhanced ultrasound imaging is discussed to understand the validity and variability of the EPR effect. Third, because the tumor microenvironment is complicated owing to elevated interstitial fluid pressure and the deregulated extracellular matrix components, which may be unfavorable for the EPR effect, few new trends in smart bubble drug delivery systems, which may improve the accuracy of EPR-mediated passive drug targeting, are summarized. Finally, the challenging and major concerns that should be considered in the next generation of micro/nanobubble-contrast-enhanced ultrasound theranostics for EPR-mediated passive drug targeting are also discussed. © The author(s).Entities:
Keywords: EPR effect; controlled drug delivery; micro/nanobubbles; tumor theranostics; ultrasound
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2020 PMID: 31903132 PMCID: PMC6929974 DOI: 10.7150/thno.37593
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Theranostics ISSN: 1838-7640 Impact factor: 11.556
Figure 1Various diagnostic and therapeutic strategies that make the best use of the EPR effect.
Figure 2Transportation of micro/nanobubbles in the tumor tissue.
Figure 3Bulk streaming and microstreaming in the blood vessel.
Figure 4The “small to large” strategy. Schematic of the method used to phase-change porphyrin nanodroplets into microbubbles, and the imaging contrast provided by both agents. Porphyrin nanodroplets, which provide photoacoustic contrast because of the strong optical absorption of porphyrin, can absorb acoustic or photonic energy which causes the liquid perfluorobutane core to phase-change into a gas microbubble, thereby providing ultrasound contrast due to its hyper-echogenic and nonlinear acoustic properties 135.
Figure 5The "big to small" strategy. Schematics of porphyrin microbubbles (pMBs) and their micro-to-nano conversion. A. The pMBs consist of a BChl-lipid shell encapsulating perfluorocarbon gas. B. Conversion of pMBs to porphyrin nanoparticles (pNPs) via sonication with low-frequency, high-duty-cycle ultrasound (conversion ultrasound) 138.
Figure 6A US imaging and B the corresponding average gray values of VX2 tumors on rabbit livers before and after intravenous injection of SGC (SPIO@GCS/acryl/biotin-CAT/SOD-gel) at various times. C. Schematic mechanism of responsive bubble generation for US imaging. D. Yellow arrows indicate outlines of the VX2 tumors. The bars in A correspond to 0.5 cm. The standard deviation in B is derived from a group within the region of interest (ROI) (n = 3) 141.
Figure 7Schematic diagram showing multi-gradient targeting strategy of RGD-l-TRAIL@MMBs for tumor diagnostics and therapy 128.
Figure 8Schematic diagram of microvesicles encapsulated with magnetic nanoparticles and glucose oxidase for the dual-stimuli responsive programmable delivery model. The encapsulated glucose-specific enzyme catalyzes glucose into gluconic acid and H2O2. The subsequent alternating magnetic field increases the porosity of the polymer shell, leading to the reaction between L-arginine and H2O2 to produce nitric oxides 157.
Figure 9Concepts and schematics of AMLs and their nano to micro conversion for US/MR dual modal imaging and the spatiotemporal-bombed combination tumor accurate therapy 129.
Figure 10Ideal process for tumor diagnosis and treatment based on the EPR effect by ultrasound and its contrast agents.
Summary of ultrasound classification and acoustic vehicles for tumor theranostics.
| Payload classification | Ultrasound Classification | Therapeutic | Vehicle | Tumor Type | Author, Year, Publishing Periodicals, Ref. |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chemicals | Low-frequency Ultrasound | Paclitaxel (PTX) | poly(lactide-co-glycolic acid) nanobubbles | prostate cancer | Wu, 2017, Int J Nanomedicine, |
| Endostar | lipid microbubbles | colon cancer | Zhang, 2014, Cancer Lett, | ||
| High-frequency Ultrasound | Cilengitide nanoparticles (CGT-NP) | phospholipid-based microbubbles | gliomas | Zhao, 2016, J Controlled Release, | |
| Focused Ultrasound | boron drug | polymer microbubbles | brain glioma | Fan , 2019, ACS Appl Mater Interfaces, | |
| Doxorubicin (DOX) | phase-changeable nanodroplets | breast cancer | Cao, 2018, Theranostics, | ||
| Doxorubicin(DOX) | lipid microbubbles | brain tumor | Park, 2017, J Control Release, | ||
| Nanoparticles (NPs) | Low-frequency Ultrasound | Gold nanoparticles and Gemcitabine and miR-21 Inhibitor | Dendrimer-Entrapped Gold | pancreatic cancer | Lin, 2018, Theranostics, |
| High-frequency Ultrasound | superparamagnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) and Anethole dithiolethione (ADT) | magnetic nanoliposome (AML) | HepG2 | Liu ,2017, ACS nano, | |
| superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO) and RGD‐l‐TRAIL | magnetic microbubbles (Polymer microbubbles) | colon cancer | Duan, 2016, Adv Funct Mater, | ||
| Focused Ultrasound | superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles (SPIO)- Doxorubicin (DOX) | lipid microbubbles | rat cerebral glioma | Fan , 2016, Theranostics , | |
| Therapeutic gases | Low-frequency Ultrasound | O 2, Paclitaxel (PTX) | Lipid Microbubble | ovarian cancer | Liu, 2015 Cancer Lett, |
| NO/DOX | Ultrasound responsive | breast cancer/ | Wang, 2017, J Control Releae | ||
| CO2 | Hollow Mesoporous Silica | pancreatic cancer | Zhang, 2015, Theranostics, | ||
| Focused Ultrasound | NO | Hollow Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles | pancreatic cancer | Zhang, 2016, Acs Nano, |