| Literature DB >> 34917201 |
Chengjian Zhang1, Shengnan Zhou2, Huijing Chang3, Feng Zhuang1, Yang Shi1, Le Chang1, Wanchao Ai1, Juan Du1, Wei Liu1, Humin Liu1, Xukun Zhou1, Zhong Wang1, Tao Hong2.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The screening and early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC) still remain a challenge due to the lack of reliable and effective serum biomarkers. Thus, this study is aimed at identifying serum biomarkers of CRC that could be used to distinguish CRC from healthy controls.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 34917201 PMCID: PMC8670981 DOI: 10.1155/2021/6858809
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Dis Markers ISSN: 0278-0240 Impact factor: 3.434
Demographic characteristics of the included subjects.
| CRC group | Control group |
| |
|---|---|---|---|
| Male/female | 64/34 | 32/18 | |
| Age (year, mean ± SD) | 61.61 ± 9.86 | 61.52 ± 6.81 | 0.955 |
| BMI (kg/m2, mean ± SD) | 24.56 ± 3.31 | 25.13 ± 3.01 | 0.309 |
| CEA (ng/mL, mean ± SD) | 8.91 ± 20.07 | 3.34 ± 1.85 | 0.085 |
| Cancer location | |||
| Colon (number) | 41 | — | |
| Rectum (number) | 57 | — |
Figure 1(a) The PCA performed on two groups: 98 CRC patients (purple dots) and 50 healthy controls (red dots). (b) The OPLS-DA model was constructed using data from 98 CRC patients (purple dots) and 50 healthy controls (red dots). (c) The permutation test plot of OPLS-DA (permutation test with 200 times, p value CV-ANOVA = 0.004); the green dots represent the value of R2Y, and the blue dots represent the value of Q2.
The identified differential metabolites between the CRC group and the healthy control.
| Name | KEGG | RT |
| VIP |
| Fold change | Log_fold change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-Hydroxybutyric acid | C01089 | 243.25 | 103.04 | 1.56 | 0.001 | 2.01 | 1.007 |
| Hexadecanedioic acid | C19615 | 206.06 | 285.21 | 1.53 | 0.018 | 1.73 | 0.7923 |
| Succinic acid semialdehyde | C00232 | 82.39 | 101.02 | 1.46 | 0.014 | 1.25 | 0.316 |
| 4-Dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid | N/A | 28.15 | 325.18 | 1.62 | 1.06301 | 1.64 | 0.711 |
| Prostaglandin B2 | C05954 | 178.14 | 333.21 | 1.08 | 0.034 | 1.26 | 0.335 |
| 2-Pyrocatechuic acid | C00196 | 61.20 | 153.02 | 1.86 | 0.0002 | 0.49 | -1.042 |
| Xanthoxylin | C10726 | 148.02 | 195.07 | 1.38 | 0.049 | 0.49 | -1.014 |
| 12-Hydroxydodecanoic acid | C08317 | 71.41 | 215.17 | 1.03 | 0.002 | 1.33 | 0.417 |
| Formylanthranilic acid | C05653 | 71.61 | 164.03 | 1.47 | 1.22427 | 2.084 | 1.059 |
Figure 2ROC curves and box plots of the identified 4 potential biomarkers: (a) hexadecanedioic acid; (b) 4-dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid; (c) 2-pyrocatechuic acid; (d) formylanthranilic acid.
Figure 3Bubble blot of pathway analysis.
Results of the topological analysis and enrichment analysis of differential metabolites.
| Pathway | Total | Hits | Raw | -ln( | Impact |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alanine, aspartate, and glutamate metabolism | 24 | 1 | 0.149 | 1.907 | 0.057 |
| Vitamin B6 metabolism | 32 | 1 | 0.193 | 1.644 | 0 |
| Butanoate metabolism | 40 | 1 | 0.236 | 1.445 | 0.033 |
| Arachidonic acid metabolism | 62 | 1 | 0.342 | 1.072 | 0 |
| Tyrosine metabolism | 76 | 1 | 0.402 | 0.910 | 0.005 |
| Tryptophan metabolism | 79 | 1 | 0.415 | 0.880 | 0.008 |