Literature DB >> 34913904

Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1b Gastric Cancer: An International Comprehensive Analysis from the Global Gastric Group (G3) Alliance.

Elvira L Vos1, Masaya Nakauchi, Mithat Gönen, Jason A Castellanos, Alberto Biondi, Daniel G Coit, Johan L Dikken, Domenico D'Ugo, Henk Hartgrink, Ping Li, Makoto Nishimura, Mark Schattner, Kyo Young Song, Laura H Tang, Ichiro Uyama, Santosha Vardhana, Rob H A Verhoeven, Bas P L Wijnhoven, Vivian E Strong.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to define criteria associated with low lymph node metastasis risk in patients with submucosal (pT1b) gastric cancer from 3 Western and 3 Eastern countries. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Accurate prediction of lymph node metastasis risk is essential when determining the need for gastrectomy with lymph node dissection following endoscopic resection. Under current guidelines, endoscopic resection is considered definitive treatment if submucosal invasion is only superficial, but this is not routinely assessed.
METHODS: Lymph node metastasis rates were determined for patient groups defined according to tumor pathological characteristics. Clinicopathological predictors of lymph node metastasis were determined by multivariable logistic regression and used to develop a nomogram in a randomly selected subset that was validated in the remainder. Overall survival was compared between Eastern and Western countries.
RESULTS: Lymph node metastasis was found in 701 of 3,166 (22.1%) Eastern and 153 of 560 (27.3%) Western patients. Independent predictors of lymph node metastasis were female gender, tumor size, distal stomach location, lymphovascular invasion, and moderate or poor differentiation. Patients fulfilling the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guideline criteria, excluding the requirement that invasion not extend beyond the superficial submucosa, had a lymph node metastasis rate of 8.9% (53 of 594). Excluding moderately differentiated tumors lowered the rate to 3.4% (10 of 296). The nomogram's AUC was 0.690. Regardless of lymph node status, overall survival was better in Eastern patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The lymph node metastasis rate was lowest in patients with well differentiated tumors that were ≤ 3 cm and lacked lymphovascular invasion. These criteria may be useful in decisions regarding endoscopic resection as definitive treatment for pT1b gastric cancer.
Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Year:  2021        PMID: 34913904      PMCID: PMC9192823          DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000005332

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg        ISSN: 0003-4932            Impact factor:   13.787


  29 in total

1.  Lymph node staging in gastric cancer: is location more important than Number? An analysis of 1,038 patients.

Authors:  M S Karpeh; L Leon; D Klimstra; M F Brennan
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Endoscopic resection of early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Takuji Gotoda
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2007-02-23       Impact factor: 7.370

3.  Differences in gastric cancer survival between the U.S. and China.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Ai-Wen Wu; Luke V Selby; Mithat Gonen; Meier Hsu; Kyo Young Song; Cho Hyun Park; Daniel G Coit; Jia-Fu Ji; Murray F Brennan
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2015-07-14       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Incidence of lymph node metastasis from early gastric cancer: estimation with a large number of cases at two large centers.

Authors:  Takuji Gotoda; Akio Yanagisawa; Mitsuru Sasako; Hiroyuki Ono; Yukihiro Nakanishi; Tadakazu Shimoda; Yo Kato
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 7.370

5.  Extended lymph-node dissection for gastric cancer.

Authors:  J J Bonenkamp; J Hermans; M Sasako; C J van de Velde; K Welvaart; I Songun; S Meyer; J T Plukker; P Van Elk; H Obertop; D J Gouma; J J van Lanschot; C W Taat; P W de Graaf; M F von Meyenfeldt; H Tilanus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1999-03-25       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Lymphatic involvement in early gastric cancer: prevalence and prognosis in France.

Authors:  F Borie; B Millat; A Fingerhut; J M Hay; P L Fagniez; B De Saxce
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2000-10

7.  The survival difference between gastric cancer patients from the UK and Japan remains after weighted propensity score analysis considering all background factors.

Authors:  Takanobu Yamada; Takaki Yoshikawa; Masataka Taguri; Tsutomu Hayashi; Toru Aoyama; Henry M Sue-Ling; Kiran Bonam; Jeremy D Hayden; Heike I Grabsch
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-03-12       Impact factor: 7.370

Review 8.  Predicting lymph node status in early gastric cancer.

Authors:  Robert Michael Kwee; Thomas Christian Kwee
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2008-09-30       Impact factor: 7.370

9.  Comparison of Young Patients with Gastric Cancer in the United States and China.

Authors:  Vivian E Strong; Ashley Russo; Sam S Yoon; Murray F Brennan; Daniel G Coit; Chao-Hui Zheng; Ping Li; Chang-Ming Huang
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-10-19       Impact factor: 5.344

10.  Different survival outcomes after curative R0-resection for Eastern Asian and European gastric cancer: Results from a propensity score matched analysis comparing a Korean and a German specialized center.

Authors:  Young-Woo Kim; Jungnam Joo; Hong Man Yoon; Bang Wool Eom; Keun Won Ryu; Il Ju Choi; Myeong Cherl Kook; Christoph Schuhmacher; Joerg Ruediger Siewert; Daniel Reim
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 1.889

View more
  1 in total

1.  Less Severe Intra-Abdominal Infections in Robotic Surgery for Gastric Cancer Compared with Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery: A Propensity Score-matched Analysis.

Authors:  Naoshi Kubo; Katsunobu Sakurai; Yutaka Tamamori; Yasuyuki Fukui; Kenji Kuroda; Naoki Aomatsu; Takafumi Nishii; Akiko Tachimori; Kiyoshi Maeda
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 5.344

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.