Literature DB >> 29052085

Comparison of Young Patients with Gastric Cancer in the United States and China.

Vivian E Strong1, Ashley Russo1, Sam S Yoon1, Murray F Brennan1, Daniel G Coit1, Chao-Hui Zheng2, Ping Li3, Chang-Ming Huang4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to compare the clinicopathologic characteristics and stage-specific prognosis of young patients with gastric cancer (GC) after curative resection (R0) in the United States and China.
METHODS: Data were collected on young patients (age ≤40 years) undergoing R0 resection at one U.S. (n = 79) and one Chinese (n = 257) institution. Patient, surgical, and pathologic variables and stage-specific survival rates were compared. Factors associated with 5-year disease-specific survival (DSS) were determined via multivariate analysis.
RESULTS: Tumor location was most often proximal in U.S. patients and distal in Chinese patients. The Chinese patients had more advanced-stage tumors, with a greater number of positive lymph nodes identified. Preoperative chemotherapy was administered more often in the United States. The 5-year overall survival (p = 0.07) and DSS (p = 0.07) did not differ statistically between the U.S. and Chinese cohorts. Among the patients with early GC receiving surgery alone, DSS did not differ significantly between the two cohorts (p = 0.44). Among the patients with advanced GC, DSS was comparable between the U.S. patients receiving preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery and the Chinese patients receiving surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy (p = 0.85). Lauren classification, depth of invasion, number of metastatic lymph nodes, and type of gastrectomy, but not country, were independent predictors of DSS.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumor features and therapeutic strategies among young patients with GC differ between the United States and China. Survival is comparable between young patients with advanced GC receiving preoperative chemotherapy plus surgery in the United States and those receiving surgery plus postoperative chemotherapy in China, suggesting that the outcomes for young patients with GC are stage dependent but not country specific.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 29052085     DOI: 10.1245/s10434-017-6073-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol        ISSN: 1068-9265            Impact factor:   5.344


  9 in total

1.  Genetic alterations and expression characteristics of ARID1A impact tumor immune contexture and survival in early-onset gastric cancer.

Authors:  Jun Zou; Wan Qin; Lin Yang; Lulu Wang; Yu Wang; Jianfeng Shen; Wei Xiong; Shiying Yu; Shumei Song; Jaffer A Ajani; Shiaw-Yih Lin; Gordon B Mills; Xianglin Yuan; Jianying Chen; Guang Peng
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2020-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

2.  Risk of Lymph Node Metastasis in T1b Gastric Cancer: An International Comprehensive Analysis from the Global Gastric Group (G3) Alliance.

Authors:  Elvira L Vos; Masaya Nakauchi; Mithat Gönen; Jason A Castellanos; Alberto Biondi; Daniel G Coit; Johan L Dikken; Domenico D'Ugo; Henk Hartgrink; Ping Li; Makoto Nishimura; Mark Schattner; Kyo Young Song; Laura H Tang; Ichiro Uyama; Santosha Vardhana; Rob H A Verhoeven; Bas P L Wijnhoven; Vivian E Strong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 13.787

Review 3.  Open and minimally invasive gastrectomy in Eastern and Western patient populations: A review of the literature and reasons for differences in outcomes.

Authors:  Mason D Stillman; Sam S Yoon
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 2.885

4.  Development and validation of prognostic nomogram for young patients with gastric cancer.

Authors:  Chaoran Yu; Yujie Zhang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-11

5.  More attention should be paid to adult gastric cancer patients younger than 35 years old: extremely poor prognosis was found.

Authors:  Wen-Long Guan; Lu-Ping Yuan; Xiang-Lei Yan; Da-Jun Yang; Miao-Zhen Qiu
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2019-01-01       Impact factor: 4.207

6.  Clinicopathological features and prognosis of young gastric cancer patients following radical gastrectomy: a propensity score matching analysis.

Authors:  Wu Liu; Hu Quan; Xiaoyan Chen; Yongzhong Ouyang; Hua Xiao
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-04-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  A meta-analysis of Watson for Oncology in clinical application.

Authors:  Zhou Jie; Zeng Zhiying; Li Li
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-03-11       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 8.  Progress of Artificial Intelligence in Gynecological Malignant Tumors.

Authors:  Jie Zhou; Zhi Ying Zeng; Li Li
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2020-12-14       Impact factor: 3.989

9.  Exploring the differences between early-onset gastric cancer and traditional-onset gastric cancer.

Authors:  Anwar Giryes; Hani Oweira; Meinrad Mannhart; Michael Decker; Omar Abdel-Rahman
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2018-12
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.